We cannot possibly know God but history and reality attest as to whom the Satanic are Eccentric 13 Equality

Conscious Conscience Elementary Natural Terrestrial Ritualistic Intuitive Confucius Spirit Truths Holistic Interactive Retrospect Transcendental Electromagnetism Enslavers Nemesis Aka Home growns Humanity one mother earth golden rule well-being natural spirit aka EUCHRESTRIONS Eccentrics United Coherency Human Rites Eradicate Substantive Thick Royal Insidious Ordinance Natures Sabotage The odds are with us in SIN Sane Insanity Normalcy Alien
Unfamiliar, unknown, strange, foreign, extraterrestrial, creature from out of space, space invader, Martian

Indigenous Native, original, aboriginal, home-grown, local (Antonym) foreign Creator Maker, inventor, originator, architect, designer, author, initiator (Antonym) destroyer Ignorance Lack of knowledge, awareness (Antonym) knowledge Coherent Logical, rational, sound, consistent, articulate, lucid, reasoned (Antonym) illogical God deity, spirit, divinity, supernatural being, idol Spirit Strength, courage, character, guts, will, strength of mind, fortitude, Force Supernatural Paranormal, mystic, mystical, ghostly, ghostlike, uncanny, weird, bizarre Confucius ordinance natural Jesus united Rite elementary CONJURE Conjure up, summon, call up, invoke, juggle, perform tricks, do magic tricks UP Ultimate Potential Humanity humankind, civilization, people, human race, kindness, charity, compassion, sympathy
Coherency Inherently Vital Implicit Logistics Intended Zenith Asserts Truth Imperative Obstruction Nullification

CIVILIZATION People, society, nation, culture, empire, development, evolution, progress

HA Hot Air FARTS Fiduciary Accountable Responsibility Truths Sabotage Implicit Complicit Explicit ICE Imperialist Capitalist Emperors Like other financial empires in history, Smith claims the contemporary model forms alliances necessary to develop and control wealth, as peripheral nations remain impoverished providers of cheap resources for the imperial-centers-ofcapital.[1] Belloc estimated that, during the British Enclosures, "perhaps half of the whole population was proletarian", while roughly the other "half" owned and controlled the means of production. Now, under modern Capitalism, J.W. Smith claims fewer than 500 people possess more wealth than half of the earths population, as the wealth of 1/2 of 1-percent of the United States population roughly equal that of the lower 90percent. PS Pyramid Schematics

Imperialism
1. Belief in Empire Building The policy of extending the rule or influence of a country over other countries or colonies 2. Domination by Empire The political, military, or economic domination of one country over another 3. Takeover and Domination The extension of power or authority over others in the interests of domination

Jesuit
1. Member of Roman Catholic religious order A member of the Society of Jesus, a Roman Catholic religious order engaged in missionary and educational work worldwide. The order was founded by Saint Ignatius Loyola in 1534 with the objective of defending Catholicism against the Reformation. 2. Offensive Term An offensive term for somebody regarded as crafty or scheming, especially somebody who uses deliberately ambiguous or confusing words to deceive others

"Thy kingdom come"

The request for God's kingdom to come is usually interpreted as a reference to the belief, common at the time, that a Messiah figure would bring about a Kingdom of God. Traditionally the coming of God's Kingdom is seen as a divine gift to be prayed for,

not a human achievement.

This idea is frequently challenged by groups who believe that the Kingdom will come by the hands of those faithful to work for a better world. It is believed by these individuals that Jesus' commands to feed the hungry and clothe the needy are the Kingdom to which he was referring.

Domination Opulent Masticating Elite Substantive Thick Imperialist Capitalists Assert Truths Inherently Obstruct Nefarious

DOMESTICATION
to accustom an animal to living with or near people, usually as a farm animal or pet to accustom somebody to home life or housework biology to cultivate plants or raise animals, selectively breeding them to increase their suitability for human requirements All's fair in

Love of War Business

From Orwell's novel Animal Farm comes the sentence, "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others", describing theoretical equality in a grossly unequal society. Elite animals make animals of us all Alienate Estrange, make unfriendly, disaffect, set against, distance, push away, separate from, isolate MUSIC Mystic Universe Segregated Ignorant Coherence

In his essay Politics and the English Language (1946), Orwell wrote about the importance of honest and clear language and said that

vague writing can be used as a powerful tool of political manipulation.

In Nineteen Eighty-Four he described how

the state controlled thought

by controlling language, making certain ideas literally unthinkable. The adjective Orwellian refers to the frightening world of Nineteen Eighty-Four, in which the state controls thought and

misinformation is widespread.
Several words and phrases from Nineteen Eighty-Four have entered popular language. Newspeak is a simplified and obfuscatory language

designed to make independent thought impossible.

Doublethink means holding two contradictory beliefs simultaneously. Thought Police are those who suppress all dissenting opinion. Prolefeed is homogenised, manufactured superficial literature,

film and music,

used to control and indoctrinate the populace through docility. Big Brother is a supreme dictator who watches everyone. PRICK I FIBIB Political Religious Intellectual Charlatan Kleptocracy inciting Fickle Inherent Ignorant Bliss
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy

Popular sovereignty or the sovereignty of the people is

the belief
that the legitimacy of the state is created by the will or consent of its people, who are the source of all political power. It is closely associated to the social contract philosophers, among whom are Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Popular sovereignty expresses a concept and does not necessarily reflect or describe a political reality.[1] It is often with the concept of parliamentary sovereignty, and with individual sovereignty.

contrasted

Truth their Alamo Ignorance our Albatross http://www.scribd.com/doc/113583404/BONZAI-British-Oriented-Nazi-Zionist-Anatomy-Incinerator Rule of Law The rule of law is a legal maxim which provides that

no person is above the law,

that no one can be punished by the state except for a breach of the law, and that no one can be convicted of breaching the law except in the manner set forth by the law itself. The rule of law stands

in contrast to the idea that the leader is above the law a feature of

Roman Law, Nazi law,

and certain other legal systems. The phrase has been used since the 17th century, but the concept is older. For example, the Greek philosopher Aristotle said, "Law should govern".[2] One way to be free from the rule of law is

by denying
that an enactment has the necessary attributes of law. The rule of law has therefore been described as

"an exceedingly elusive notion"[3]

giving rise to a

"rampant divergence of understandings".[4]

At least two principal conceptions of the rule of law can be identified: a formalist or "thin" and a

substantive or "thick"
definition of the rule of law. Formalist definitions of the rule of law

do not make a judgment about the "justness" of law itself,

but define specific procedural attributes that a legal framework must have in order to be in compliance with the rule of law. Substantive conceptions of the rule of law

go beyond this
and include certain substantive rights that are

said
to be based on, or derived from, the rule of law.[5]

Rule of Law http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law The Rule of law in its most basic form is no one is above the law. Perhaps the most important application of the rule of law is the principle that governmental authority is legitimately exercised only in accordance with, publicly disclosed laws, adopted and enforced in accordance with established procedural steps that are referred to as due process. The rule of law is hostile to dictatorship and to anarchy. According to modern Anglo-American thinking, hallmarks of adherence to the rule of law commonly include

a clear separation of powers,

legal certainty,
the principle of legitimate expectation and equality of all before the law. The concept is not without controversy, and it has been said that "the phrase the rule of law has become meaningless thanks to ideological abuse and general over- use" GO POE General Over-use Proclamations Only Elusivity publicly disclosed laws 52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency,

of no force or effect.
As chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of

that most elusive concept

- the rule of law.The rule of law is a well established legal principle,

but hard to easily define.

It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary measures and safeguards personal liberties.

Legal Certainty?
Since the English Civil War, the bedrock of the British constitution has traditionally been the doctrine of

parliamentary sovereignty,
according to which the statutes passed by Parliament are the UK's supreme and final source of law.[3] It follows that Parliament can change the constitution simply by passing new Acts of Parliament.

There is some debate

about whether this principle

remains entirely valid today,

[4]

in part due to the UK's European Union membership.[5]

Sanity will prevail when the populace are coherent enough to debate the validity of

SISTERS
Satanic Investigating Self Tax Evading Righteous Saboteurs

Renewed interests? Since ancient times responsible to eradicate the abrogated Satanic bastards, but Satanic bastards enjoying luxurious lifestyle rather reluctant to eradicate self That's left for them they leave in hopelessness and despair The General Assembly has considered rule of law as an agenda item since 1992, with renewed interest since 2006 and has adopted resolutions at its last three sessions.[41] The Security Council has held a number of thematic debates on the rule of law,[42] and adopted resolutions emphasizing the importance of these issues in the context of women, peace and security,[43] children in armed conflict,[44] and the protection of civilians in armed conflict.[45] The Peacebuilding Commission has also regularly addressed rule of law issues with respect to countries on its agenda.[46] [edit] International Bar Association The Council of the International Bar Association passed a resolution in

2009
endorsing a

substantive or "thick"
definition of the rule of law:[47] An independent, impartial judiciary; the presumption of innocence; the right to a fair and public trial without undue delay; a rational and proportionate approach to punishment; a strong and independent legal profession;

strict protection of confidential communications between lawyer and client; equality of all before the law;
these are all fundamental principles of the Rule of Law. Accordingly, arbitrary arrests; secret trials; indefinite detention without trial; cruel or degrading treatment or punishment; intimidation or corruption in the electoral process, are all unacceptable. The Rule of Law is the foundation of a

civilized
society.

It establishes a transparent process accessible and

equal to all.
It ensures adherence to principles that both liberate and protect. The IBA calls upon all countries to respect these fundamental principles. It also calls upon its members to speak out in support of the Rule of Law within their respective communities.
Constitution Faade Fake Democracy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution

A constitution is a set of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is governed.[1] These rules together make up, i.e. constitute, what the entity is. When these principles are written down into a single collection or set of legal documents, those documents may be said to comprise

a written constitution.
Constitutions concern different levels of organizations, from sovereign states to companies and unincorporated associations. A treaty which establishes an international organization is also its constitution in that it would define how that organization is constituted. Within states, whether sovereign or federated, a constitution defines the principles upon which the state is based, the procedure in which laws are made and by whom. Some constitutions, especially written constitutions, also act as limiters of state power by establishing lines which a state's rulers cannot cross such as

fundamental rights.
Generally, every modern written constitution confers specific powers to an organization or institutional entity, established upon the primary condition that it

abides by the said constitution's limitations.

According to Scott Gordon, a political organization is constitutional to the extent that it "contain[s] mechanisms of power control for
institutionalized

the protection of the interests and liberties of the citizenry,

including
those that may be in the

minority."

[7]

MC D Mind control Diminutives DIMINUTIVES Democracy Ignorant Majority Intuitive Neanderthals Ultimately Tyrannize Ignorant Vulnerable Egotistical Self

Majority rule is often listed as a characteristic of democracy. However, it is also possible for a minority to be oppressed by a "tyranny of the majority" in the absence of governmental or constitutional protections of individual and/or group rights. An essential part of an "ideal" representative democracy is competitive elections that are fair both substantively [15] and procedurally.[16] Furthermore, freedom of political expression, freedom of speech, and

freedom of the press

are considered to be essential, so that citizens are adequately informed and able to vote according to their own best interests as they see them.[17][18] It has also been suggested that a basic feature of democracy is the capacity of individuals to participate freely and fully in the life of their society.[19] Implicit Complicit Explicit ICE Imperialist Capitalist Emperors Like other financial empires in history, Smith claims the contemporary model forms alliances necessary to develop and control wealth, as peripheral nations remain impoverished providers of cheap resources for the imperial-centers-ofcapital.[1] Belloc estimated that, during the British Enclosures, "perhaps half of the whole population was proletarian", while roughly the other "half" owned and controlled the means of production. Now, under modern Capitalism, J.W. Smith claims fewer than 500 people possess more wealth than half of the earths population, as the wealth of 1/2 of 1-percent of the United States population roughly equal that of the lower 90percent.

Doublethink means holding two contradictory beliefs simultaneously.

Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.

2. Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: (a) freedom of conscience and religion; (b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication; (c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and (d) freedom of association.

Satanism is a broad term referring to a group of Western religions comprising diverse ideological and philosophical

beliefs.
Their shared features include symbolic association with, or admiration for the character of, Satan, or similar rebellious, promethean, and, in their view, liberating figures.

"Thy kingdom come"

The request for God's kingdom to come is usually interpreted as a reference to the belief, common at the time, that a Messiah figure would bring about a Kingdom of God. Traditionally the coming of God's Kingdom is seen as a divine gift to be prayed for,

not a human achievement.

This idea is frequently challenged by groups who believe that the Kingdom will come by the hands of those faithful to work for a better world. It is believed by these individuals that Jesus' commands to feed the hungry and clothe the needy are the Kingdom to which he was referring.

NEWS Never Ending War Story SELVES Satanic Elite Lawyerism Voyeurism Exposing Self Mal de Tete Mesmerizing artificial logistics demon-strably elusive Tyrannical Exponential Tax Evasion

Excedrin Investors To be humanly efficient is to excel self to redundancy The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada - Lawyers Rules of Conduct 103) Interpretation (f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit as well as in the letter. Constitution Act, 1982 Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Whereas Canada is founded on principles that recognize the Supremacy of God and the Rule of Law One Obligatory Natural Enforcement Humanity (Spirit Force Law) Rule of Law IT Invincible Triad God deity, spirit, divinity, supernatural being, idol Spirit Strength, courage, character, guts, will, strength of mind, fortitude, Force Spirit S ESS Epitome Simplistic Sanity
Giving credence to that which is least apt to be mistaken by humankind needing only to be a sane human to know what is and what is not receptive to a fellow human

"Do not do to others what you would not want done to self" "Recompense injury with justice and recompense kindness with kindness"

Humanity and Golden Rule common element Ignorance, satanic beliefs and insanity one and the same

DURESS Due Undeniable Rights Epitome Simplistic Sanity Ignorance of the law initially is a plea for mental help with recompense connotations Human rights are commonly understood as "inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being."[1] Human rights are thus conceived as universal (applicable everywhere) and egalitarian (the same for everyone). These rights may exist as natural rights or as legal rights, in both national and international law.[2] The doctrine of human rights in international practice, within international law, global and regional institutions, in the policies of states and in the activities of non-governmental organizations, has been a cornerstone of public policy around the world. The idea of human rights[3] states, "if the public discourse of peacetime global society can be said to have a common moral language, it is that of human rights." Many of the basic ideas that animated the movement developed in the aftermath of the Second World War and the atrocities of The Holocaust, culminating in the adoption of theUniversal Declaration of Human Rights in Paris by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. The ancient world did not possess the concept of universal human rights.[5]Ancient societies had "elaborate systems of duties... conceptions of justice, political legitimacy, and human flourishing that sought to realize human dignity, flourishing, or well-being entirely independent of human rights".[6] The modern concept of human rights developed during the early Modern period, alongside the European secularization of Judeo-Christian ethics.[7] The true forerunner of human rights discourse was the concept of natural rights which appeared as part of the medieval Natural law tradition that became prominent during the Enlightenment with such philosophers as John Locke, Francis Hutcheson, and Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui, and featured prominently in the political discourse of the American Revolution and the French Revolution. From this foundation, the modern human rights arguments emerged over the latter half of the twentieth century. Gelling as social activism and political rhetoric in many nations put it high on the world agenda.[8] All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. Article 1 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)[9] TIED Tacit: Unspoken, implicit, inferred, implied, understood, unstated Inalienable: unchallengeable, absolute, immutable, not able to be forfeited, unassailable, incontrovertible, indisputable, undeniable Essential: Necessary, vital, indispensable, important, crucial, critical Demonstrably: Obviously, palpably, patently, evidently, noticeably, perceptibly, discernibly, apparently Sane: Rational, sensible, reasonable, sound, normal, wise, commonsensical (Antonymn) Mad Despite this, the strong claims made by the doctrine of human rights continue

to provoke considerable skepticism and debates about the content, nature and justifications of human rights to this day.

Indeed,
the question of what is meant by a "right" is itself controversial and the subject of continued philosophical debate.[4]

What's it all about Alfie?

Insane considered legally incompetent or irresponsible because of a psychiatric disorder showing a complete lack of reason or foresight people legally considered as psychiatrically disordered people who are considered legally incompetent or irresponsible because of a psychiatric disorder or Complicit: It was clear that some of the staff were complicit in the attempt to cover up the scandal. OBIT Or both Inherently Transcendental
Transcendental 1. Not experienced but knowable Philosophy independent of human experience of phenomena but within the range of knowledge 2. Mystical Relating to mystical or supernatural experience and therefore beyond the material world

the study of the physical and natural world and phenomena, especially by using systematic observation and experiment

BLOT Bright Light of Truth

Trans is a Latin noun or prefix, meaning "across", "beyond" or "on the opposite side".

ORBIT ROP Outside Routine Box Intellectual Trigger Reverse Osmosis Psychosis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitution_Act,_1982 The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is a bill of rights. The Charter is intended to protect certain political and civil rights of people in Canada

****from****
the policies and actions of all levels of government. It is also supposed to unify Canadians around a set of principles that embody those rights.[3][4] The Charter was preceded by the Canadian Bill of Rights, which was introduced by the government of John Diefenbaker in 1960. However, the Bill of Rights was only a federal statute, rather than a constitutional document. Therefore, it was limited in scope and was easily amendable. This motivated some within government to improve rights protections in Canada. The movement for human rights and freedoms that emerged after World War II also wanted to entrench the principles enunciated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.[5] Hence, the government of Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau enacted the Charter in 1982. Universal Declaration of Human Rights The pursuit of human rights was a central reason for creating the UN. World War II atrocities and genocide led to a ready consensus that the new organization must work to prevent any similar tragedies in the future. An early objective was creating a legal framework for considering and acting on complaints about human rights violations. The UN Charter obliges all member nations to promote "universal respect for, and observance of, human rights" and to take "joint and separate action" to that end. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights,

though not legally binding,

was adopted by the General Assembly in 1948 as a common standard of achievement for all. The Assembly regularly takes up human rights issues. A large share of UN expenditures addresses the core UN mission of peace and security. The peacekeeping budget for the 20052006 fiscal year was approximately US$5 billion, 2.5 billion (compared to approximately US$1.5 billion, 995 million for the UN core budget over the same period), with some 70,000 troops deployed in 17 missions around the world.[60] UN peace operations are funded by assessments, using a formula derived from the regular funding scale, but including a weighted surcharge for the five permanent Security Council members, who must approve all peacekeeping operations. This surcharge serves to offset discounted peacekeeping assessment rates for less developed countries. As of 1 January 2011, the top 10 providers of assessed financial contributions to United Nations peacekeeping operations were: the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Italy, China, Canada, Spain and the Republic of Korea.[61] Special UN programmes not included in the regular budget (such as UNICEF, the WFP and UNDP) are financed by voluntary contributions from other member governments. Most of this is financial contributions, but some is in the form of agricultural commodities donated for afflicted populations. Since their funding is voluntary, many of these agencies suffer severe shortages during economic

recessions. In July 2009, the World Food Programme reported that it has been forced to cut services because of insufficient funding.[62] It has received barely a quarter of the total it needed for the 09/10 financial year. Many of the basic ideas that animated the movement developed in the aftermath of the Second World War and the atrocities of the Holocaust, culminating in the adoption of the

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

in Paris by the United Nations General Assembly in 1948. The ancient world did not possess the concept of universal human rights.[5] Ancient societies had "elaborate systems of duties... conceptions of justice, political legitimacy, and human flourishing that sought to realize human dignity, flourishing, or well-being entirely independent of human rights".[6] The modern concept of human rights developed during the early Modern period, alongside the European secularization of Judeo-Christian ethics.[7] The true forerunner of human rights discourse was the concept of natural rights which appeared as part of the medieval Natural law tradition, became prominent during the Enlightenment with such philosophers as John Locke, Francis Hutcheson, and Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui, and featured prominently in the political discourse of the American Revolution and the French Revolution. Multinational companies play an increasingly large role in the world, and have been responsible for numerous human rights abuses.[52] Although the legal and moral environment surrounding the actions of governments is reasonably well developed, that surrounding multinational companies is both controversial and ill-defined.[citation needed] Multinational companies' primary responsibility is to their shareholders, not to those affected by their actions. Such companies may be larger than the economies of some of the states within which they operate, and can wield significant economic and political power. No international treaties exist to specifically cover the behavior of companies with regard to human rights, and national legislation is very variable. Jean Ziegler, Special Rapporteur of the UN Commission on Human Rights on the right to food stated in a report in 2003: In August 2003 the Human Rights Commission's Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights produced draft Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights.[54] These were considered by the Human Rights Commission in 2004,

but have no binding status on corporations and are not monitored.[55] A lie told Often enough becomes the Reality
Hawii http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9nqDkCzwXeY&feature Korea http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_war Vietnam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5LctoUV-tag&feature=relmfu Iraq War http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Khut8xbXK8&feature=related Bush broke every law in the books of the US Constitution and UN Charter Now I lay me down to sleep before I ... Say again the purpose of financing the United Nations Globalization http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_3K1PCZHE0&feature Banked into submission Truth kills truth saves Save yourself and the world http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3117338213439292490#
In this lecture by Michel Chossudovsky, he blows away the smokescreen put up by the mainstream media, that 9/11 was an attack on America by "Islamic terrorists". Through meticulous research, he has uncovered a military-intelligence ploy behind the September 11 attacks, and the cover-up and complicity of key members of the Bush Administration. According to Chossudovsky, the "war on terrorism" is a complete fabrication based on the illusion that one man, Osama bin Laden, outwitted the $40 billion-a-year American intelligence apparatus. The "war on terrorism" is a war of conquest. Globalisation is the final march to the "New World Order", dominated by Wall Street and the U.S. military-industrial complex. September 11, 2001 provides a justification for waging a war without borders. Washington's agenda consists in extending the frontiers of the American Empire to facilitate complete U.S. corporate control, while installing within America the institutions of the Homeland Security State.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU Truth Kills

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K9dgqKmJ50&feature Fema Detention Camps Marshall Law http://www.infowars.com/obama-implementing-martial-law-coup/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/53187051/To-United-Nations http://www.scribd.com/doc/57985401/To-United-Nations-Again

Fine words and an insinuating appearance are seldom associated with true virtue There were no dates in this history, but scrawled this way and that across every page were the words Benevolence Righteousness and Morality finally I began to make out what was written between the lines. The whole volume was but a single phrase, Eat People

www.Eccentrics13.com Bottle Neck

Benefits of transforming to logistical eccentric Natural eradication charlatan kleptocracy The odds are with Us http://www.scribd.com/doc/71070946/Economic-Democracy-the-Satanic-Way http://www.scribd.com/doc/71333371/Who-Would-Be-Foolish-Enough-to-Leave-a-Paper-Trail http://www.scribd.com/doc/106684083/Satanic-Al-Capone-Genocidal-Crime-Boss-Case-SetPrecedence-Organized-Crime-Corporation-Persons-Can-Be-Taken-Down-for-Life-Under-theAuspices-of-Tax-Evasion http://www.scribd.com/doc/62297204/On-Realizing-the-Debts-Incurred-by-the-Satanic-Theirs-ShouldBe-Enough-to-Make-Even-the-Anti-Christ-Convert-to-Believing-in-God PS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FHGaH-7wq6M