Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sociometry
Moreno (asking students to nominate peers to evaluate status)
Social preference being selected as popular/ positive Social impact being selected often, even if negative
Sociometric Categories
Popular High preference, high impact Good perspective-taking abilities High levels of self-regulation and selfcontrol Physically attractive Scholastic competence
Sociometric Categories
Rejected Low preference, high impact Rejected-aggressive
high levels of instrumental aggression; low levels of perspective-taking, self-control, poor social skills; hostile attribution bias (approx. 50%) Poor academic outcomes
Rejected-withdrawn
socially anxious, poor perspective-taking, general social ineptness (10-20%) Limited evidence for later internalizing problems
Sociometric Categories
Neglected Low preference, low impact Less aggressive than average Less sociability Not associated with developmental problems Average Moderate preference, moderate impact Not associated with developmental problems
Social Competence
Affective responses
empathy & valuing relationships
Cognitive processes
perspective taking & moral decision making
Social skills
Competence level of perspective taking ability Performance childs actual use of skills for getting along with others Can have competence without performance
Adolescent-onset
Difficult or exaggerated reaction to adolescence
Self-concept
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Proximal influences
Patterson: coercive family interaction
Parent command Child noncompliance + aggressive bx Parent backs down Child rewarded for negative bx
Interpretation
hostile attributional bias
Clarification
use aggressive schemas to understand situation
Action
limited repertoire of available responses
Interventions
Some define therapy as the process of building an awareness of how our actions affect other people Therapies that presume high levels of metacognitive development may strain the capabilities of young clients