Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A question of taste
Ethics
Strength in
compromise
Priorities
Desperately
seeking
consensus!
Service
development
An audit result
Collaboration
A multi-agency team
In my
experience
Clinical
liaison
groups
How I
manage
dementia
My top
resources
The London Connect Centre
A W A Y F O R W A R D
ISSN 1368-2105
AUTUNN oo+
http://www.speechmag.com
Now with a
search facility!
Key in any word(s) and
very quickly you will be
guided to relevant areas of
the site.
Reprinted articles to complement the
Autumn 2001 issue of Speech &
Language Therapy in Practice
Video - a reflective tool.
(Autumn 1997)***
Continual self-analysis ensures we all
practise what we preach. Keena
Cummins and Sarah Hulme focus on the
strengths of video playback as a reflective
tool in the therapy process and for
ongoing professional development.
Whose right? - Whos right?
(Winter 1999)***
Jack is a 10 year old boy with cerebral
palsy. His parents and his speech and
language therapist have very different
opinions on how his therapy should be
delivered, as does Jack himself. Can an
ethical perspective help them come to
an agreement? Jois Stansfield and
Christine Hobden find out.
Activating Potential for
Communication.
(Winter 1997)***
Confused, disorientated and socially
deprived elderly people are often
neglected as client groups. Sonas aPc is
a packaged programme designed to
meet their needs. Speech and language
and occupational therapy staff of the
Victoria Infirmary NHS Trust outline its
implementation and benefits.
Also on the site - contents of back
issues and news about the next one,
links to other sites of practical value
and information about writing for the
magazine. Pay us a visit soon and try
out our new search facility.
Remember - you can also
subscribe or renew online
via a secure server!
From Speech Therapy in Practice*/Human
Communication**, courtesy of Hexagon
Publishing, or from Speech & Language Therapy
in Practice***
w
w
w
.
s
p
e
e
c
h
m
a
g
.
c
o
m
READER OllERS
Two great reader oers
rom Back Sheep Press
lrst up, we have two copes o the D
Tme to Sng!
Twenty five childrens songs are newly arranged at a
slower tempo so children with speech and language dif-
ficulties can join in. Im a Little Teapot, If Youre Happy
and You Know It and Wheels on the Bus are just a few
of the popular songs featured. The normal retail price is 12 - but you could get it FREE!
To enter, send your name and address marked Speech & Language Therapy in
Practice - CD offer to Alan Henson, Black Sheep Press, Coast Cottage, Donna Nook,
Louth, Lincs. LN11 7PA by 25th October. The winners will be notified by 31st October.
Next, we have Back Sheep Presss new oncepts n Pctures matera.
They normally retail at 84, but we have three sets to give away FREE. The eight
packs relate to time: before/after; parts of the day; days; first/next/last;
now/soon/early/late; rate; age.
To enter, send your name and address marked Speech & Language Therapy in
Practice - CiP offer to Alan Henson, Black Sheep Press, Coast Cottage, Donna Nook,
Louth, Lincs. LN11 7PA by 25th October. The winners will be notified by 31st October.
Time to Sing! and Concepts in Pictures material is available, along with a free catalogue,
from Black Sheep Press, Tel. 01756 791 627, email alan@blacksheeppress.co.uk. You can also
purchase materials online at www.blacksheep-epress.com.
vn The Seectve Nutsm
Resource Nanua
Why does a child speak to its parents but not to its
teacher; and to its brothers and sisters at home but not
in any other environment?
Selective Mutism is a rare condition but it is important
because selectively mute children are at a significant dis-
advantage personally, socially and educationally. Written
by experienced speech and language therapists Maggie
Johnson and Alison Wintgens, with the emphasis on
practical assessment and treatment, and advice and
information, The Selective Mutism Resource Manual fills
a gap in the availability of suitable resources.
Speechmark Publishing Ltd (formerly Winslow Press) is making copies available FREE to
FIVE readers of Speech & Language Therapy in Practice in yet another great reader offer.
To enter, simply send your name and address marked Speech & Language Therapy
in Practice - SMRM offer to Su Underhill, Speechmark, Telford Road, Bicester, OX26
4LQ. The closing date for receipt of entries is 25th October, and the winners will be
notified by 31st October.
The Selective Mutism Resource Manual is available, along with a free catalogue,
from Speechmark, tel. 01869 244644, priced 37.50.
The next issue of Speech & Language Therapy in Practice features How I use music
in therapy. We kick-start the theme with a great reader offer.
ve have Nusc lactory sotware to gve
away lREE to THREE ucky readers,
courtesy o vdgt.
This program lets students listen to sounds and build their own music from pre-defined
sound clips. A variety of styles provides something for every age group, and simple to
complex combinations cater for all abilities. Music Factory is available in eight lan-
guages and can be accessed using a variety of methods such as a touch screen or switch.
To enter, simply send your name and address marked Speech & Language Therapy in
Practice - MF offer to Ian Wedgewood, Widgit Software Ltd, 26 Queen St, Cubbington,
Leamington Spa, Warwickshire CV32 7NA. The closing date for receipt of entries is 25th
October 2001, and the first three out of the hat will be notified by 31st October.
The recommended running specification is a multimedia PC with CD ROM running
under Windows 95 or higher or Windows NT4 plus. A single user copy is 34 plus VAT
+ p&p from Widgit Software Ltd, tel. 01926 885303.
R
E
A
D
E
R
O
l
l
E
R
S
R
E
A
D
E
R
O
l
l
E
R
S
R
E
A
D
E
R
O
l
l
E
R
S
R
E
A
D
E
R
O
l
l
E
R
S
Congratulations to the winners of Speechmarks Working with Adults with a
Learning Disability, the reader offer in the Summer 01 issue. They are Alison
Lemmey, Anna Watson, Kevin Borrett, Nicola Sydney and Sarah Harris.
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 1
14 Priorities
Motivation should be a significant factor for any
system of prioritisation, providing all aspects are
taken into account. For those who have learning
difficulties, motivation to communicate is as important
as motivation to change.
Joanna Manzs pilot prioritisation system for mainstream
school children who have learning difficulties is based
on the opinions of experts in the field.
18Service development
Although patients are encouraged to contact the
speech and language therapy department when a
valve change is indicated, some attend without an
appointment. When patient numbers were smaller
these requests could usually be accommodated but,
with increased numbers, this is not always possible.
Janice Deys decision to audit a tracheo-oesophageal
valve changing service has led directly to the
establishment of a specific Valve Clinic.
20 Collaboration
The team works very closely together and all work is
developed jointly. When referrals or requests for
training or parent support are received the team
decides together on which members will respond. As
well as simplifying the process for the providers of
nursery education, this approach also enables the team
to develop their own skills and learn from each other.
A multi-agency team tackles the needs of children
with behavioural and language difficulties in nursery
settings. Sarah Hulme and Barbara Sampson report.
24How I
manage
My main strategy
is training. The
underlying principle
is that my input will
make little difference
to the patients care
unless I can influence
the behaviour of the
staff and relatives.
Julie Baker and
Mary Heritage
work with elderly
people with dementia, while Scilla Reeds clients also have
learning disabilities.
AUTUMN 2001
(publication date 27th August)
ISSN 1368-2105
Published by:
Avril Nicoll
33 Kinnear Square
Laurencekirk
AB30 1UL
Tel/fax 01561 377415
e-mail: avrilnicoll@speechmag.com
Production:
Fiona Reid
Fiona Reid Design
Straitbraes Farm
St. Cyrus
Montrose
Website design and maintenance:
Nick Bowles
Webcraft UK Ltd
www.webcraft.co.uk
Printing:
Manor Creative
7 & 8, Edison Road
Eastbourne
East Sussex
BN23 6PT
Editor:
Avril Nicoll RegMRCSLT
Subscriptions and advertising:
Tel / fax 01561 377415
Avril Nicoll 2001
Contents of Speech & Language
Therapy in Practice reflect the views
of the individual authors and not
necessarily the views of the publish-
er. Publication of advertisements is
not an endorsement of the adver-
tiser or product or service offered.
Any contributions may also appear
on the magazines internet site.
Inside cover
Spring 01 speechmag
Reader offers
Two great reader offers from Black Sheep Press, plus a
chance to win Winslows The Selective Mutism Resource
Manual and Music Factory software courtesy of Widgit.
2 News / Comment
4 Education
One student who was 21 years old was thought to
have little or no discrimination of tastes and was
known for eating chillies and onion with no reaction;
however, on closer inspection and recording, he was
found to have distinctly different responses to tastes.
For example, he would have an increase in saliva for
lemons and his eyes would water on onions.
Kim Talbot and Julie Stinchcombe address
communication and eating, drinking and swallowing
difficulties in their students through a taste
programme.
7 Further reading
Psychiatry, stroke, stammering, interaction, hypernasality.
8 Ethics
The most positive outcome of the situation was seen
as one which would reconcile the mismatch between
Marks expectations and speech and language
therapy management.
Mark has severe dysarthria following a head injury
and is keen to use technology he has seen
promoted in the media. What happens if
therapists dont feel this would help? Helen
McGrane and Jois Stansfield use an ethics
approach.
12In my experience:
clinical liaison
groups
On our agenda each speech and language
therapist is given time to discuss challenging or
complex patients... We have all shared in and
learned from these discussions even when the
patient is not directly known to all present.
What are the benefits of a clinical liaison
group? Carol Harris and colleagues focus on
head and neck cancer, but the concept is as relevant
to other areas of practice.
Contents
Autumn 2001
Cover picture by Paul Reid.
Thanks to models and Stracathro
Hospital.
See back cover My Top Resources
www.speechmag.com
IN FUTURE ISSUES
ADULT LEARNING DISABILITY USING MUSIC PARENTS VIEWS AUTISM
REFLECTIVE DIARIES EARLY FEEDING
Back cover
My Top
Resources
In partnership with families and
health and social care workers, we
help people living with aphasia to
develop new skills for communicating
with confidence, so that they can
reconnect with their lives.
Find out from Tom Penman and
colleagues how Blobby Men, pebbles
and Hello magazine feature in the
work of the London Connect Centre.
COVER STORY
dementia
Making a difference
Guidance in promoting speech and language development through
Sure Start programmes is now available.
The framework, by James Law and Frances Harris of City
University, includes many examples of current Sure Start practice.
Although it has been written specifically for the cross-governmen-
tal programme to improve the life chances of young children in dis-
advantaged areas, the information is also relevant to all speech and
language therapists and those involved in planning services.
Adult-child interactions, home languages, the home and commu-
nity environment, carers, specialists and outcomes are covered.
Research notes summarise evidence-based practice and resource
notes illustrate good practice. Submissions are being sought for a
revised edition planned for 2003/4.
Sure Start will now, in its fifth year, have 437 sites in England. Extra
support is to be announced for programmes in rural areas and places
with small pockets of deprivation. A major six year evaluation is
underway. An initial snapshot survey suggests the programme is
making a difference for children and families in low income areas.
www.surestart.gov.uk
Promoting Speech and Language Development - Guidance for Sure
Start Programmes from DfES Publications, tel. 0845 602 2260, e-mail
dfes@prolog.uk.com, ref. SS/SPEECH.
news
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 2
The burden of caring for a person with autism at home
places huge stress on carers and their families, often leav-
ing them socially excluded or suffering mental ill health.
According to a report from the National Autistic
Society, having a child with autism spectrum disorder can
leave the whole family excluded from normal life. Major
disruption suffered can include loss of a career, neglected
siblings and broken marriages.
Half of all adults with autism are still living at home,
often with elderly parents caring for them. Many parents
report their fears as to what will happen to them when
they become too old or frail to continue caring for their son
or daughter.
Meanwhile, a book published by the society is a new guide
to living in an intimate relationship with a person who has
Asperger syndrome.
Author Maxine Aston has explored the relationships of
adults with Asperger syndrome as part of her academic
research, as a qualified couples counsellor specialising in this
area and from her own personal experience.
The books emphasis is on positive attitudes and strategies
for successful relationships.
A new law has made it easier for people with aphasia to get the
support of an intermediary when appearing as a witness in court.
Reporting on the implications of the Youth Justice and
Criminal Evidence Act 1999, Speakability explains intermedi-
aries are one of the special measures to help vulnerable wit-
nesses give best evidence in court. The intermediarys function
is to communicate to the witness the question they have to
answer and to communicate to the person asking the ques-
tions what reply the witness has given.
Speakability is working with the Home Office on guidance
which will define how the intermediary role differs from wit-
ness supporters, interpreters or appropriate adults. The
organisation is planning some workshops later in the year for
speech and language therapists who would like to know
more. It suggests they should be comfortable with having a
rather detached, non-partisan relationship with the client, as
it is very important that the intermediary is neutral.
Speakability, tel. 020 7261 9572 (contact Anne Keatley-Clarke).
Speech
comprehension
targeted
A major grant has secured
research aimed at improv-
ing the speech recognition
of people using cochlear
implants.
The research teams want
to quantify the amount of
information coded by the
cochlear nerve in response
to electrical stimulation
from the implant, and to
find ways to increase the
information transfer to
improve speech comprehen-
sion. Methods will include
computational studies and
perceptual experiments
with cochlear implant users.
It is possible the research
could lead to more people
being implanted, including
some who have residual
hearing and get slight ben-
efit from conventional
hearing aids. Cochlear
implantation increases the
probability that a child with
profound deafness will be
placed in a mainstream
school and reduces the
amount of special support
required. Even modest
improvements in speech
recognition would greatly
improve the quality of life
of the more than 900 adults
and 800 children in the UK
with a cochlear implant.
The three year project has
been funded by the
Engineering and Physical
Sciences Research Council.
Dr Nigel Stocks, University
of Warwick,
tel. 0247 652 2857, e-mail
ngs@eng.warwick.ac.uk.
Joined up agenda
A working party of people with aphasia have drawn up an Agenda for Change to deliver
the right services based on their own experience of living with the condition.
The twenty five requirements for the government to act on reflect the need for all profes-
sionals to take a more holistic approach to clients with aphasia. A section on best treatment
and therapy calls for more research, support for people with aphasia to contribute to service
development, adoption of good practice from abroad and resources for self-help groups and
information services. It recommends that equal weight should be attributed to the qualitative
experiences of people with aphasia as academic findings when evaluating the benefits of
treatments and services, and that research should include efforts to understand what non-
medical services and support mechanisms are of most benefit to people with aphasia.
Joined Up Talking, Joined Up Working from Speakability, tel. 020 7261 9572.
Whole family excluded
Fit to teach?
The increased likelihood of
teachers presenting with
voice problems, and the
value of preventative work,
is acknowledged in the gov-
ernments Healthy Schools
Programme.
The Voice Care Network
UK, which has long cam-
paigned for this recognition,
reports on the development
of two Department for
Education and Employment
publications, Fitness to
Teach. Both give guidance
on occupational health, at
length for medical
professionals and through a
shorter version for teachers
employers, managers and
tutors. The employers legal
responsibility for health risk
management is emphasised,
including the risk of voice
trauma. Referral to speech
and language therapy and /
or an ENT consultant is
recommended should
problems arise, and the
important role of prevention
briefly discussed.
www.dfee.gov.uk/hsht/
Voice Care Network UK, tel.
01926 864000,
www.voicecare.org.uk
Best evidence
Ignored or Ineligible? The reality for adults with autism spectrum disorders and The Other Half of Asperger Syndrome
are available from the NAS tel. 020 7833 2299, www.nas.org.uk. Autism Helpline, 10am-4pm, Mon-Fri, 0870 600 85 85.
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 3
news & comment
A way orward
Like Julie Baker (p.25), readers of this magazine frequently need the tenacity
of a terrier to find a way forward when our efforts are beset by problems.
The inroads being made by the profession in the dementia field compared
with 10 years ago is hugely encouraging (p.24-28) but has taken great effort
and perseverance. We are also seeing progress in understanding of how
services need to move forward to meet the needs of people living with
aphasia, with the pioneering work of the team at Connect (back page)
playing a significant part.
Over the past few years, a programme of increasing centralisation has
ensured clients get access to the most experienced and expert staff for the
most specialist procedures. This does, however, throw up other challenges for
professionals like Carol Harris and colleagues (p.12) who have to
communicate effectively to provide clients with the best service from start to
finish. The way forward they identified was a clinical liaison group, which
provides them with peer support for the development of professional skills to
take back to the multidisciplinary setting.
Different levels of response are needed for different situations. Although most
children with speech and language difficulties are managed very effectively
through a clinic-based service, Sarah Hulme and Barbara Sampson (p.20)
recognised that a multi-agency approach was required to meet the needs of a
small number of children with additional behavioural problems. Recognition
that such service developments are necessary is often the first step forward. A
simple audit enabled Janice Dey (p.18) to put a convincing case for the
establishment of a Valve Clinic, and a simple question - how do you know? -
led Kim Talbot (p.4) into developing a multidisciplinary taste programme
which addressed communication and eating / drinking issues in one go.
Contributors to this magazine put good ideas into practice then tell others. A
clear message from Joanna Manz (p.14) is that, although there is a lot of
good practice going on with children with special needs in mainstream
schools, the way forward is to get better at sharing it. Then, even in the
absence of hard evidence on which to base our practice, we at least have
useable guidelines by consensus.
Moving forward by consensus is not necessarily an easy concept for speech and
language therapists to take on board when much of our work has a significant
subjective, personal element. Using an ethics approach, as exemplified by
Helen McGrane and Jois Stansfield (p.8), can take some of the heat out of a
situation - even one which seems to present intractable challenges.
Speech & Language Therapy in Practice is popular with its readers because it
is practical and because the contributors, like you, are always looking for a
way forward.
...comment...
Avr Nco,
Edtor
Knnear Square
laurencekrk
ABo +Ul
te/ansa/ax o++
;;(+
e-ma
avrncoQspeechmag.com
Scope for Conductive
Education
The charity for people with cerebral palsy is con-
tinuing its work to highlight the role of conduc-
tive education in promoting independence.
Scope is hosting the 4th World Congress on
Conductive Education in London where they will
be joined by a number of international experts to
explore how disabled people can gain greater
equality in society through Conductive Education,
a learning system which enables people with neu-
rologically based movement problems to function
more independently. In addition to school and
training developments in relation to the
approach, Scope has developed a national net-
work of centres where preschool children are able
to prepare for mainstream or special primary
school through learning programmes based on
the philosophy of Conductive Education.
Scope, tel.020 7619 7200, www.scope.org.uk
Cerebral Palsy Helpline, tel. 0808 800 333.
Afasic move
Afasic, the UK charity representing children and
young adults with communication impairments, is
now at 2nd Floor, 50-52 Great Sutton Street, London
EC1V 0DJ, tel. 020 7490 9410, www.afasic.org.uk
The Afasic Helpline offers help and advice on a
range of issues concerning speech and language
impairments, including therapy, assessment,
Statements and Records of Special Educational
Needs and choosing a school. It is open from
11am-2pm Monday to Friday: 0845 3 55 55 77.
Aids on loan
Some of the newer communication aids are now
available for loan in Scotland from the CALL Centre.
The expensive and complex systems which need
to be trialled before purchase can be recom-
mended include DynaVox 3100 and MultiLevel
Message Mate 40. These personal communication
aids can be loaned following a CALL assessment
or to school teams providing joint teacher/speech
and language therapy assessment and ongoing
collaborative working.
The Centre has placed a database of access
equipment which can be loaned on the internet.
CALL Centre, tel. 0131 651 6235,
http://callcentre.education.ed.ac.uk.
Rebuilding work
The Alzheimers Society is planning to award
grants to former carers in an effort to help them
rebuild their lives.
While the Society is committed to supporting
carers throughout the whole process of caring,
from diagnosis through to bereavement and
beyond, it has not previously been able to go past
helping people who are caring on a day to day
basis. A grant from the Millennium Commission
means that people who have had their lives
altered by caring for someone with dementia will
have the opportunity to develop new or forgot-
ten skills and interests as they make the difficult
transition to a different kind of life.
Alzheimers Society, tel. 020 7306 0606, www.
alzheimers.org.uk.
education
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 4
you want to mprove
assessment through
observaton
cent-ocused work
ntegraton wth other
servces
Food for
thought
A school theme of cultural foods gave Kim
Talbot and Julie Stinchcombe the opportunity
to address communication and eating, drinking
and swallowing difficulties in their students
through a taste programme.
Setting the table...
I work in a special school in New Zealand that
caters for students from 5-21 years with a range
of disabilities. Many, particularly those with more
significant needs, have eating and drinking diffi-
culties and dysphagia. Frequently, I would hear
the phrases he likes it or he doesnt like it
when I was asking about a students food prefer-
ences. How do you know? was often met with
a reason that did not make sense. I began to ques-
tion what it was that led staff to make decisions
and assumptions around mealtimes, and to what
extent communication from the child was getting
through to them, as I suspected a mismatch.
In 1999, as part of the social studies curriculum,
some classes chose a theme around cultural foods.
The occupational therapist and I saw this as an
ideal opportunity to develop a better under-
standing of the students in our care by comparing
what was believed about them with their actual
responses through providing a range of foods and
observing and recording their reactions.
Ugh! Whats that?!
Our first aim was to provide a range of taste and
smell experiences. We began with cultural tastes
that fitted the theme work and followed that
with salty, sour, bitter and sweet. Morris & Klein
(1987) assert that strong tastes alert the nervous
system and sour and bitter facilitate more move-
ment. I looked at providing distinct flavours so
that, for example, responses to lemons could be
compared to responses to chocolate spread. It was
not an easy task to find foods that neatly fitted
the categories. The occupational therapist was
keen for the students to actively explore and play
with the foods, as a tactile stimulus, before eating.
A sheet was devised (figure 1) that enabled us to
record all the observations including taste, touch
and associated behaviours. We were already
aware that liked / did not like was not enough.
We carefully observed the students to ensure that
Read this
Figure 1 - Record sheet
FOOD/ EXPOSURE/ TEXTURE RESPONSE
TASTE AMOUNT
e.g. bread One slice moist To include: acceptance, rejection, turned head away,
vocalisations, crying, smiling, toleration, etc etc.
Possible conclusions
Well/unwell
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 5
education
their responses were recorded as accurately as
possible and we wrote as much detail as we could
(example in figure la). We began the recording
process and modelled for the staff the level of
detail needed. This was a time consuming process
but the staff were interested in the results and
quickly became skilled at making quality observa-
tions. The observing and recording not only gave
us a detailed overview of the students taste
responses, but also empowered the staff to look
more closely at the students.
Whats for dinner?
Our second aim was to develop the students
taste memory, including food preferences. The
literature suggests (Morris & Klein, 1987) that, by
a childs first birthday, many food preferences
have developed and that these change over time.
For the majority of the students, little was known
about their taste memory or preferences, and I
therefore decided part of my investigation need-
ed to focus on recognition and memory of food.
Information was also needed from families to
continue to build a picture of the student. A let-
ter was sent home for each student participating
(figure 2) to ascertain current food preferences
and any allergies. Where necessary, it enabled us
to discuss eating and meals with parents and allay
any fears.
Following the letter, the term (10 weeks in New
Zealand) was broken down as follows:
Week 1: Samoan foods eg. green banana, Taro,
fish.
Week 2: Tongan food eg. coconut, pineapple.
Week 3: Maori food, eg. kumara, hangi.
Week 4: European food, eg. potato, mince meat.
Week 5: Indian food, eg. spices, naan, curry.
Week 6: Asian food, eg. sweet and sour, rice, stir fry.
Week 7: salty food, eg. hot chips, crisps, feta cheese.
Week 8: sour foods, eg. lemon, lime, sherbet.
Week 9: bitter foods, eg. peppermint, soya sauce.
Week 10: sweet foods, eg. chocolate spread,
honey, jams, syrup.
The food chosen may have varied within the
classes but followed the culture / taste of this
programme which, in turn, fitted in well with the
class curriculum. There was a great deal of flexi-
bility within the food categories depending on
availability and ease of preparation. The foods
were negotiated between the occupational
therapist, class teacher and myself week to week,
and we also rotated the task of purchasing the
food.
The sessions were generally done once weekly
with the therapists. The session plan was straight-
forward, and manageable time-wise. There was
usually one food presented per session and occa-
sionally two. The sessions lasted approximately 15
minutes and were always before either lunch or
mid-morning snack. The students were given a
face massage that was familiar to them as a pre-
cursor to food. (This was designed from the
anatomy of the face and eating and from obser-
vations of other speech and language therapists
rather than following any specific technique.) The
students were allowed to touch the food and
experiment within its texture and shape, the
occupational therapist providing some students
with specially adapted trays or bowls to facilitate
this.
The students then either took the food to their
mouths spontaneously, were verbally encouraged
to do so, or had it placed on or near their lips.
Students were never forced or cajoled into eating
and would often initiate licking their fingers. Staff
also actively tasted the food and experimented
with it themselves, although this often took some
persuading! Once the tasting was over, the stu-
dents ate their own meal. Tube fed students were
also tube fed to prevent distress from the false
promise of lunch.
Figure 1a - Case example
FOOD/ EXPOSURE/ TEXTURE RESPONSE
TASTE AMOUNT
Pineapple 3-4 pieces - Chewed. Appeared to smell. Opened mouth for more. No vocalisations.
Kiwi fruit one whole fruit - Tipped head back. Smiled. Opened mouth for more. Chewed. Vocalised.
Figure 2 - Letter to parents
Date:
Name:
Dear Parent,
We are carrying out a tasting programme in
[name of child]s class. [Name of child] will
swallow the food if she wants to, however the
main aim is to taste it. The programme aims to
provide a range of taste experiences, which can
develop a better understanding of [name of
child]s tastes. The responses to the tastes will
be recorded and will contribute to a feeding
profile for her. The programme is aimed to be
for information gathering and assessment only
at this stage.
I would be grateful if you could complete the
following questionnaire and return it to school.
This will give us the background knowledge for
the programme.
1) Does [name of child] have any allergies to
foods or ingredients?
2) What is [name of child]s favourite meal?
3) Any suggestions for foods or flavours?
4) Any concerns, queries or advice?
Would you like information from school to carry
out the programme at home?
Thank you for your time. If you have any
questions please do not hesitate to contact me
at Base School. I will keep you updated and
informed over the term and will be happy to
discuss any findings with you.
Kim Talbot
Speech and Language Therapist
The students
were allowed to
touch the food
and experiment
within its
texture and
shape
education
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 6
Say ahhhhh
Our next aim, of oral hygiene, was built into the
programme for two main reasons. The first was to
indicate to the student that the tasting session
was beginning and ending. At the beginning of
each session the student was given a face massage
and lukewarm water was used to swab the mouth
to alert the students that tasting was to happen.
At the end of the session, students had the same
process with cold water; this alerted them that
the session was over and stimulated their oral cav-
ity before lunch.
The second reason was to encourage and main-
tain good oral hygiene practice within the class.
Many students needed to have their teeth
brushed for them and to have support with clean-
ing the mouth. Students who were tube fed and
only tasted the food also needed to have the oral
cavity cleaned to prevent aspiration of food from
the mouth. This helped to reduce any risk from
our intervention.
Having oral hygiene as part of the programme
was useful as the students needed individual oral
hygiene plans, which were then supported and
established in class.
Mmm, that was good...Any afters?
The project had some interesting results. It was
important that we were able to review each stu-
dent individually and analyse
and summarise the findings for
class staff and parents. For some
students the findings confirmed
previous beliefs about them
and their diets; for others it
showed the student to be more
or less capable of discriminating
tastes. One student who was 21
years old was thought to have
little or no discrimination of
tastes and was known for eat-
ing chillies and onion with no
reaction; however, on closer
inspection and recording, he
was found to have distinctly dif-
ferent responses to tastes. For
example, he would have an
increase in saliva for lemons
and his eyes would water on
onions. This gave us a more
comprehensive picture of each
student and their sensory
process for taste.
Work has begun on taste
memories and food preferences, although consid-
erably more data is still needed to have a compre-
hensive picture. More work is needed on examin-
ing changes over time and consistency of respons-
es and I hope that continued focus will promote
this. Overall, though, we have a better under-
standing of our students and what they like or
dont like for lunch.
The programme has been taken on not only by
the staff but also by other speech and language
therapists in the area. They adapted the pro-
gramme and had variations on the results. Since
the initial programme it has been repeated with
new students and revisited with others. This has
enabled us to find comparisons and changes from
last year. The teachers have also taken more of an
active role now they are familiar with the format
and the recording sheets.
A team approach is encouraged at the school,
and my piece in the team puzzle here was to facil-
itate structured and precise observations of the
student as well as being an observer myself.
Asking relevant questions and offering support to
the team members in observing the students
more closely avoided actions and behaviours sim-
ply being accepted without question as part of
the students repertoire. A successful outcome
was the teams ability to further generalise obser-
vations to other situations, so that students were
now seen as communicating all day.
In addition to improved awareness of communi-
cation, I was able to assess the textures of food for
safety, and empower the staff to try foods that
they were unsure of without supervision. A bal-
ance was achieved, with class staff trying new
things without being overly adventurous; this
largely came with education around risky foods
and the students own individual needs.
This programme was tried mainly on teenage
and adult students ini-
tially and then expand-
ed to include primary
age students. It can be
used with students of
any age for fact find-
ing, or for developing
and refining your
knowledge of them. It
needs to be run regu-
larly so development
and change can be
monitored, and may be
particularly useful for
gathering information
on a new client, or
when someone has a
growth spurt or is in
the process of a transi-
tion. For the students
we worked with, the
profile proved invalu-
able when they left
school and went to day
centres.
Kim Talbot is a speech and language therapist
now back in the UK at St. Elizabeths school for
children with epilepsy. She was supported in writ-
ing this article by Julie Stinchcombe, occupational
therapist at Arohanui school, New Zealand.
Reference
Evans Morris, S. & Dunn Klein, M. (1987) Pre-feed-
ing skills. Therapy Skill Builders, Texas.
Do I enable others to
observe, record and
respond to a clients
communication in
everyday situations?
Do I recognise that
people need to be
familiar and confident
with procedures
before they can use
and generalise them?
Do I spot opportunities
to integrate my goals
with those of other
professionals?
Reflections
Kim Talbot
A successful
outcome was the
teams ability to
further generalise
observations to
other situations, so
that students were
now seen as
communicating
all day.
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 7
further reading
HYPERNASAllTY
Habermann, W., Kiesler, K., Dornbusch, H.J., Friedrich, G. (2000)
Hypernasalitya rare initial symptom of a cerebellar astrocytoma. Int J
Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 55 (3) 207-10.
Nasality is a disorder due to nasal resonance, which may be induced by a variety
of etiologies. Transitional hypernasality is frequently seen in children after ade-
noidectomy. The alleged post-surgical hypernasality in the case presented was
shown to be related to the late detection of an astrocytoma of the cerebellum
and the brain stem in a 6-year-old boy. This case was characterized by increased
hypernasality which failed speech therapy. A developing one-sided vocal fold
palsy in combination with an ipsilateral soft-palate palsy indicated further
investigation. Computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) revealed a brain stem-tumor with a maximum size of 6 cm involving parts
of the cerebellum. These findings demonstrated the need for a strict follow-up,
even after adenoidectomy, in the presence of hypernasality for identifying con-
current etiologies as well as cases suitable for speech therapy.
lURTHER
READlNG
Ths reguar eature
ams to provde
normaton about
artces n other
journas whch may
be o nterest to
readers. The Edtor
has seected these
summares rom a
Speech 8 language
Database comped
by Bomedca
Research lndexng.
Every artce n
over thrty journas
s abstracted or
ths database,
suppemented by a
monthy scan o
Nedne to pck out
reevant artces
rom others.
To subscrbe to the
lndex to Recent
lterature on
Speech 8
language contact
hrstopher Norrs,
Downe, Badersby,
Thrsk, North
Yorkshre YO; (PP,
te. o+; (o8,
ax o+; (o.
Annua rates are
Ds (or vndows
,):
lnsttuton L,o
lndvdua Lo
Prnted verson:
lnsttuton Lo
lndvdua L(.
heques are
payabe to
Bomedca
Research lndexng.
u
r
t
h
e
r
r
e
a
d
n
g
u
r
t
h
e
r
r
e
a
d
n
g
u
r
t
h
e
r
r
e
a
d
n
g
u
r
t
h
e
r
r
e
a
d
n
g
PSYHlATRY
Beitchman, J.H., Wilson, B., Johnson, C.J.,
Atkinson, L., Young, A., Adlaf, E., Escobar,
M., Douglas, L. (2001) Fourteen-year fol-
low-up of speech/language-impaired and
control children: psychiatric outcome. J Am
Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40 (1) 75-82.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association
between early childhood speech and language
disorders and young adult psychiatric disorders.
METHOD: In a longitudinal community study
conducted in the Ottawa-Carleton region of
Ontario, Canada, interviewers administered
structured psychiatric interviews to age 19 par-
ticipants who were originally identified as
speech-impaired only, language-impaired, or
nonimpaired at age 5. The first stage of the
study took place in 1982 when participants
were 5 years old, and the latest stage of the
study took place between 1995 and 1997 when
participants had a mean age of 19 years. This
report examines the association between early
childhood speech/language status and young
adult psychiatric outcome. RESULTS: Children
with early language impairment had significantly
higher rates of anxiety disorder in young adult-
hood compared with nonimpaired children. The
majority of participants with anxiety disorders
had a diagnosis of social phobia. Trends were
found toward associations between language
impairment and overall and antisocial personality
disorder rates. Males from the language-
impaired group had significantly higher rates of
antisocial personality disorder compared with
males from the control group. Age of onset and
comorbidity did not differ by speech/language
status. The majority of participants with a disorder had
more than one. CONCLUSIONS: Results support
the association between early childhood speech
and language functioning and young adult psy-
chiatric disorder over a 14-year period. This
association underscores the importance of
effective and early interventions.
STROKE
von Koch, L., Holmqvist, L.W., Wottrich, A.W., Tham, K., de Pedro-Cuesta,
J. (2000) Rehabilitation at home after stroke: a descriptive study of an
individualized intervention. Clin Rehabil 14 (6) 574-83.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the content of a programme involving early hospital dis-
charge and continued rehabilitation at home after stroke. DESIGN: Quantitative
and qualitative descriptive study of an intervention within the context of a ran-
domised controlled trial. SETTING: Huddinge University Hospital, Stockholm,
Sweden. SUBJECTS: Forty-one patients, moderately impaired after stroke, rehabil-
itated by a team of six occupational, physical, and speech and language therapists.
RESULTS: The average duration of the programme was 14 weeks, the mean
number of home visits 12, and the median total time consumption 23 hours and
20 minutes, of which face-to-face contact with the patient constituted 54%. The
rehabilitation process was pursued by the patient and the therapist in partnership.
Supported by the team the therapists incorporated a wider domain of activities
than usual and left a considerable amount of the training to self-directed activities.
The most common foci of the visits were speech and communication, ADL activities
and ambulation. When planning the intervention the therapists paid attention
to discrepancies between the desires and abilities of the patient on the one
hand and environmental demands on the other - discrepancies detected
through observation of the patient in the home environment. CONCLUSIONS:
The home environment offers therapists working in a team opportunities to
adopt a behaviour that enables patients with moderate neurological impairments
after stroke to resume responsibility and influence over their rehabilitation
process, resulting in an individualized rehabilitation programme that varies in
duration, content and frequency of home visits.
STANNERlNG
Ginsberg, A.P. (2000) Shame, self-con-
sciousness, and locus of control in people
who stutter. J Genet Psychol 161 (4) 389-99.
Stuttering is a multidimensional disorder,
including psychological as well as physiological
elements. This investigation of the value of 3
psychological constructs (shame, self-conscious-
ness, and locus of control) in the prediction of 3
self-reported behavioral dimensions of stutter-
ing (struggle, avoidance, and expectancy)
revealed shame and self-consciousness to be
significant psychological predictors of the
selected dimensions of stuttering, whereas
locus of control was found not to be. Certain
demographic elements, including affiliations
with others who stutter, were also determined
to be predictive of the stuttering dimensions.
The present findings and their implications for
theory, research, and practice are discussed.
lNTERATlON
Pennington, L., McConachie, H. (2001) Predicting patterns of interaction
between children with cerebral palsy and their mothers. Dev Med Child
Neurol 43 (2) 83-90.
Children with cerebral palsy (CP) have often been described as passive communi-
cators. Their familiar conversation partners tend to direct and control interaction.
Such conversation patterns may have various precursors: childrens motor impair-
ment, their intelligibility difficulties, and/or their level of cognitive development.
To test the comparative influence of these factors, measures of motor function,
speech, communication, cognitive and language skills were applied in 40 chil-
dren (18 males, 22 females) with CP who were aged from 2 years 8 months to
10 years. These variables were correlated with measures relating to interaction
patterns to investigate whether individual features predicted communication
style. In this group, poor speech intelligibility was the main predictor of restric-
tive communication patterns, such as fewer child-initiated conversation
exchanges, more simple child communicative acts such as yes/no answers and
acknowledgements of the other partners messages. Results support the provision
of therapy to increase childrens intelligibility, whether spoken or augmented, such
as the introduction of communication aids and training programmes for parents.
ethics
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 8
Strength in
compromise
Mark (26) has severe dysarthria following a head injury. He accepts AAC as a short-term measure,
but is keen to use technology he has seen promoted in the media to improve his oral skills.
What happens if speech and language therapists dont feel this would help? Helen McGrane and
Jois Stansfield seek a way forward using an ethics approach.
thics in practice is rarely easy. Speech
and language therapists make decisions
daily regarding who is to be offered
therapy (prioritisation), and the most
suitable intervention for clients. The
Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists
provides a code of ethics to guide decision-making
(RCSLT, 1996), acknowledging that ethical principles
must be applied in considering the various cir-
cumstances of each individual case. This code of
ethics encompasses the generally acknowledged
principles of ethics which are considered to be the
foundational points in health care (Beauchamp,
1994). These principles are
1. beneficence (do good)
2. non-maleficence (do no harm)
3. respect for autonomy
4. justice.
Seedhouses ethical grid (figure 1) was devel-
oped to facilitate decision making with explicit
reference to aspects of moral reasoning in health
care (Seedhouse & Lovett, 1992). This framework
enables one to justify decisions and actions in
moral terms. The grid consists of detachable
boxes in a framework of four different coloured
layers representing:
the principles behind health work (Blue)
the duties one believes one has (Red)
the general nature of the outcome to be
achieved (Green)
the pertinent practical features (Black).
Acknowledging that each circumstance is differ-
ent, consideration of every box is not essential;
however, it is important that the situation in ques-
tion is considered in the light of each coloured
layer (Seedhouse & Lovett, 1992).
E
Here, we consider the issues involved in the case
of Mark, a 26 year old man with a head injury as
a result of a road traffic accident. The Seedhouse
ethical grid (references italicised in the following
text) was the model used in the decision-making
process on the best intervention for him.
On referral, Mark was three and a half years
post-trauma. It may therefore be assumed that
Mark is near the end of any spontaneous recovery
period and must use his present abilities and
adapt to his impairments to facilitate his commu-
nication skills. Mark is wheelchair bound although
he reports some slow recovery of his lower limbs.
He was observed to have a stable sitting balance
and reasonable head control with slow neck
movement. He doesnt report any auditory or
visual difficulties. He has a high level of compre-
hension and uses complex linguistic structures
with his Lightwriter, with no apparent dysphasia.
Marks full medical notes were not available;
however, certain tentative hypotheses may be
offered concerning his oral abilities. An oro-facial
examination report on his first visit to the clinic
diagnosed severe dysarthria. Mark displayed flac-
cid muscle tone in his neck, head and facial
region. He also displayed right brachiofacial
weakness and apraxia of tongue, lip and left limb
movement, suggesting some higher cortical dys-
function (Lindsay & Bone, 1997).
Mark requires excessive effort to phonate, which
- along with slow, low, monopitched vocalisations
and the lack of volume variation - suggests bilat-
eral pseudobulbar (spastic) dysphonia (Greene &
Mathieson, 1989). His inability to co-ordinate
appropriate closures in the larynx, oral cavity
........... and the out-of-phase quality of breathing
and phonation (Greene & Mathieson, 1989; 252)
also fits with this tentative diagnosis.
These observations are clearly subjective and
ideally would have been supported by objective
assessment and confirmation of Marks exact med-
ical status. They do, however, serve to illustrate
the severity of Marks condition which was a fac-
tor considered in the decision-making process
(degree of certainty of evidence on which action
is taken - Black).
Issues which arose before Mark was accepted as
a client in the clinic described below have a bear-
ing on the contract offered to him.
Mark lives with his two parents and four sisters
(two older and two younger). He was a mature
student prior to the accident and now continues
his education with the assistance of a sister who
accompanies him to college to help the recording
of relevant lecture notes.
Mark and his family had some disputes with
their local speech and language therapy service.
The family did not accept the prognosis for Mark
as a total communicator, that is, with some single
vocalisations but mainly an alternative and aug-
mentative communication (AAC) user (wishes of
others - Black). Mark and his family were adamant
that he could speak (single words) at home but he
was unable to demonstrate this in the clinical
environment (disputed facts - Black). His family
refused to accept concurring speech and language
therapists diagnoses and sought numerous subse-
you
nd evdence-based
practce s not accepted
want partnershp wth
cents
ace demands oowng
meda stores
Read this
s
e
e
w
w
w
.
s
p
e
e
c
h
m
a
g
.
c
o
m
in
s
id
e
fr
o
n
t
c
o
v
e
r
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 9
ethics
quent opinions to find some therapy which would
meet Marks needs as they saw them.
Immediately prior to referral, the only support
Mark was receiving for communication was from
a voluntary organisation and his family. His moth-
er and sister implemented a daily programme of
muscular exercises and Proprioceptive
Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) techniques
taught at this organisation. During this time
Marks father saw an article in the
local newspaper claiming new tech-
nology had been developed which
would help cure speech difficulties
(Hendry, 1998) (disputed facts -
Black). As a result, he sought out a
clinic which was able to provide this
facility - the electropalatograph (EPG).
This instrument is designed to
record the location and timing of
tongue contacts with the hard
palate during continuous speech.
EPG may be useful in the treatment
of dysarthria (Main et al, 1997); how-
ever, when considering EPG as a pos-
sible therapeutic intervention, it is necessary to
ensure that the clients speech problem is essen-
tially one of lingual placement or dynamics. Other
factors such as velopharyngeal incompetence will
affect the overall prognosis for treatment out-
come (Hardcastle et al, 1991). Although Mark had
lingual placement difficulties, he also has difficul-
ty initiating and maintaining volitional phona-
tion, along with velopharyngeal incompetence.
This was noted in the decision-making process
(degree of certainty of evidence on which action
is taken - Black).
Marks suitability for EPG was assessed by the
speech and language therapist at the specialist
clinic. The resulting report stated that, as Mark
had very severe dysarthria, he did not demon-
strate adequate range of movement or tongue
control for EPG to benefit him. The report sug-
gested the most appropriate computer pro-
gramme to assist in achieving longer and more
systematic use of voice was SpeechViewer (do
most positive good - Red). Mark
refused the offer of
SpeechViewer on two occasions,
asserting that he should be
offered EPG (respect autonomy -
Blue). After much discussion he
agreed to try SpeechViewer with
a view to improving his oral
functioning. It was agreed to
reconsider this after five weeks
of individual intervention, which
would also allow for any under-
performance in the initial assess-
ment (disputed facts - Black).
Marks motivation to succeed
was extremely high. He worked hard to improve
the strength and prolongation of his phonation
using SpeechViewer. Tongue and lip exercises were
attempted to improve strength and endurance
(Hibberd & Jinks, 1998) but to no avail. Therapy
also aimed to promote volitional vocalisation and
tongue movement. At home Marks family contin-
ued PNF and oral exercises. Mark also continued to
receive support from the voluntary organisation.
Although there was some improvement in
Marks length of phonation after the therapy
block, he continued to display inconsistency in his
ability to initiate and prolong phonation. The
decision regarding EPG suitability was based on
research evidence and clinical knowledge on real-
istic outcomes for using this technique, otherwise
the ethics of do most positive good and most ben-
eficial outcome (Green) for Mark would have
been disregarded. It was explained to Mark that
EPG was still not considered to be beneficial for
him at this time. Counselling skills were used
offering empathy and advice while acknowledg-
ing Marks feelings of disappointment. The clinic
offered him continuation of speech and language
therapy using SpeechViewer for a mutually
agreed pre-determined period (most beneficial
good - Green). Mark was understandably disap-
pointed but agreed to continue with
SpeechViewer, being the only speech and lan-
guage therapy input he could have.
During the intervention period two further
issues arose:-
1.Should Mark be referred for further therapy at
the end of the current contracted therapy block
and, if so, to whom? The clinic he was attending
is a service which only takes clients on a short-
term block basis. Marks previous community clin-
ic was reluctant to maintain him on its books,
partly due to previous disputes, but mainly
because he was considered to be on a plateau and
did not fit their criteria for further intervention.
However, Mark needed to be recorded some-
where in the event of the emergence of suitable
new technology (resources available - Black).
2. A meeting between Mark, his speech and lan-
guage therapist and an AAC specialist strongly
advocated the desirability of Mark joining an
AAC group with members of his own age (tell the
when considering
EPG as a possible
therapeutic
intervention, it is
necessary to ensure
that the clients
speech problem is
essentially one of
lingual placement
or dynamics.
Figure 1 Ethical Grid
ethics
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 10
truth - Red and create autonomy - Blue).
This was available for a five week block in
the same clinic and intended focusing on
areas deemed useful for Mark, for exam-
ple, telephone usage as Marks mother
currently takes his calls. At this stage
Mark declined to attend as he had done
on previous occasions (respect for auton-
omy - Blue) (resources available - Black).
Reconciliation
The most positive outcome of the situa-
tion was seen as one which would recon-
cile the mismatch between Marks expec-
tations and speech and language therapy
management. To achieve this reconcilia-
tion, Mark had to be open to advice and
trust, and speech and language therapy
management had to incorporate ethical
considerations explicitly. Figure 2 high-
lights the grid boxes which were used in the deci-
sion-making process and which were thought to
create the highest degree of rectitude given
Marks circumstances.
These influenced the outcome in the following
ways:
1. The levels of practicality (Black Boxes)
The clinic in question had the technological
resources which Mark wished to access. However,
Mark was not deemed a suitable candidate
because his severe neurological impairment didnt
allow him meet the requirements of the EPG.
Mistrust had developed between family members
and speech and language therapy management
based on disagreement with previous
speech and language therapy diagnoses.
Also as a result of newspaper and journal
articles the family felt that the speech and
language therapy service was holding out
on them. The situation was discussed in
depth with the family and Mark was given
the opportunity to display his oral func-
tioning. This also reflected the level of
duties (Red) speech and language therapy
management felt towards Mark and his
family. As a result, the levels of trust
between the family with the speech and
language therapy clinic grew, encouraging
a more discursive open relationship,
although this never became fully comfort-
able.
2. The general nature of the outcome to be
achieved (Green Boxes)
The main focus at this level of consequences was
the most beneficial outcome for Mark. Initially
there was a mismatch between Marks and his
parents perceptions of what this should be (EPG
and speech) and the view of the speech and lan-
guage therapy clinicians (AAC). The dilemma
arose as to whether to offer a management pack-
age which the speech and language therapists
believed could not benefit Mark or to risk Mark
abandoning the clinic situation again. The use of
counselling skills in acknowledging Marks and his
familys emotional responses to speech and lan-
guage therapy recommendations and offering
discursive explanations enabled some resolution.
While the most beneficial outcome for the
patient is acknowledged, the most beneficial out-
come for oneself, that is, the individual speech
and language therapist, must also be noted. At
times, personal outcomes which were going to be
satisfactory for the speech and language therapist
were in direct opposition to those which were
going to be satisfactory for Mark and his family.
This was particularly the case when Mark was dif-
ficult to place because of differing perceptions of
need, levels of practicality and pre-
vious confrontations between the
family and the speech and lan-
guage therapy service. It is impera-
tive that speech and language ther-
apists analyse their personal contri-
bution in the light of the justice
principle (Beauchamp, 1994) when
prioritising caseloads, and be aware
of the potential for subjective views
to be a factor - however subtle - in
influencing decision-making.
3. The level of duties (Red
Boxes)
It was felt that the importance of
telling the truth could not be over-
emphasised and was felt to complement do most
positive good for Mark. While Mark needed to
understand facts about his impairments and prog-
nosis, hope could not be taken away from him. It
was reiterated that regaining any speech would
be at best a very long-term process for him. Mark
was advised that AAC would enable him to com-
municate his needs while he worked on his voice,
and the benefits of attending an AAC group were
discussed. This level of duties also involved
onward referral, ensuring Mark didnt just disap-
pear from the system. The speech and language
therapy service manager addressed and
resolved this issue to the satisfaction of
both Mark and the service.
4. The principles behind health work
(Blue Boxes)
This is said to be the most important level
in the grid as it indicates the basic inspira-
tion of health care (Seedhouse & Lovett,
1992). One aim of speech and language
therapy management was to enable Mark
to have a heightened control over his
own life (create autonomy). This was felt
to best be promoted within the realm of
an AAC age-appropriate group. Group
activities aimed to encourage active par-
ticipation in the communication process
and also focused on telephone skills,
therefore fostering more independence
in Marks life. Balanced against this was
the principle of respecting autonomy especially
when Mark refused the use of SpeechViewer on
two occasions and had declined a place within an
AAC group on previous occasions.
Two issues which impacted on Marks expecta-
tions of the speech and language therapy service
remain unresolved:
1. There is a gap within NHS provision for the
chronic needs of young head injured individuals
as their circumstances change over their lifetime.
This gap is somewhat filled by voluntary organisa-
tions; however, this appears to be insufficient for
many clients such as Mark.
2. There is a tendency by the media to overstate
the benefits of new approaches to disability. The
balance between promoting new technology and
avoiding the suggestion of miracle cures is a diffi-
cult one to achieve.
It was felt that the successful outcome of the
intervention would be demonstrated if Mark
agreed to attend an AAC group and further block
intervention could be agreed, thus reconciling the
mismatch between the clients expectations and
speech and language therapy management.
Happily, this was the final outcome. Further thera-
py was eventually agreed with Mark, encompassing
work with SpeechViewer and AAC techniques. Gillis
(1996) advises that the process of family adjustment
to a family member with Traumatic Brain Injury
resulting in acceptance is an ongoing process. She
states that denial is a coping mechanism which fam-
ilies use to get them through a situation. Clinicians
must work with families to find a balance between
hope and reality (Gillis,1996;297). Using the guid-
ance of Seedhouse & Lovetts (1992) ethical grid the
positive outcome of this case suggests that this
intervention has gone some way in achieving this.
Helen McGrane is a PhD student and Jois
Stansfield is Head of the Department of Speech
and Language Sciences, Queen Margaret
University College, Edinburgh. Both are speech
and language therapists. Readers are also
referred to a previous ethics article Whose right?
Mark
needed to
be recorded
somewhere
in the event
of the
emergence
of suitable
new
technology
Figure 2 Grid boxes used in decision-making process
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 11
ethics
- Whos right? by Jois Stansfield and Christine
Hobden which appeared in the Winter 99 issue of
Speech & Language Therapy in Practice.
References
Beauchamp, T. (1994) Four principles approach. In
Gillon, R. (Ed) Principles of health care ethics. John
Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Gillis, R. (1996) Traumatic brain injury rehabilita-
tion for speech-language pathologists.
Butterworth-Heinemann. USA.
Greene, M. & Mathieson, L. (1989) The voice and its
disorders. 5th edition. Whurr Publishers Ltd. London.
Hardcastle, W., Gibbon, F. & Jones, W. (1991)
Visual display of tongue-palate contact: elec-
tropalatography in the assessment and remedia-
tion of speech disorders. British Journal of
Disorders of Communication 26; 41-74.
Hendry, S. (1998) Hi-tech palate makes it good to
talk. In Evening News paper.
Hibberd, J. & Jinks, C. (1998) Muscle specificity:
strength, endurance and functional improvement.
Speech & Language Therapy in Practice Autumn.
Lindsay, K. & Bone, I. (1997) Neurology and neu-
rosurgery illustrated. Churchill Livingstone. UK.
Main, A., Kelly, S. & Manley, G. (1997) Teaching
the tongue and looking at listening. Bulletin of
the Royal College of Speech & Language
Therapists November, 8-9.
RCSLT (1996) Communicating Quality 2. Royal
College of Speech & Language Therapists, London.
Seedhouse, D. & Lovett, L. (1992) Practical medical
ethics. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Resources
Lightwriter - available from Toby Churchill, tel.
01223 576117, www.toby-churchill.com.
SpeechViewer - UK suppliers include Don
Johnston Special Needs, tel. 01925 241642.
Electropalatography - the Reading EPG 3 system is
supplied by Millgrant Wells Ltd, tel. 01788 561185.
A new windows version of EPG is available from
Laryngograph Ltd., tel: 0207 387 7793 or from EPG
Enterprises, Research and Innovation Office,
Queen Margaret University College, Edinburgh.
Communication aid
funding
A new charity, Speakeasier, is providing commu-
nication aids for people with multiple sclerosis
who cannot access other funding.
Steve Brisk, who has had MS for 20 years, was
shocked to discover that while people who are
unable to walk can have a wheelchair on the NHS,
those who lose the ability to talk cannot necessarily
get a communication aid. He persuaded Huw
Evans of financial sector software specialists
Marlborough Stirling to chair the charity, and
fund its first 2500 speech synthesiser.
It is estimated there are around 85,000 people in
the UK with MS. Around five per cent of them
experience acute communication difficulties.
Speakeasier, PO Box 410, Cheltenham GL52 9GH, tel.
01242 674006. (Donations by cheque are welcome.)
Do I work with clients and
families to establish trust and
resolve mismatches of
expectation?
Am I able to continue with a
client where there is a history
of disagreement?
Does our service keep a record
of clients who may benefit
from future developments in
technology?
Reflections
news extra. . . news extra. . . news extra. .
The Danish instigator of Johansen Sound Therapy is
coming to the UK to train others in the approach.
The four day training with Dr Kjeld Johansen
includes background theory on the effect of sen-
sory deprivation on learning (including dyslexia),
and topics such as auditory sensation and per-
ception, auditory acuity, and auditory laterality.
Participants learn to use audiometry and dichotic
listening as diagnostic tools.
Speech and language therapist Camilla Leslie will
cover the particular application of the technique
to speech and language therapy. She believes
that children with receptive, expressive and written
language disorders can benefit, as can adoles-
cents and adults with language and/or literacy
difficulties. The approach aims to enhance auditory
processing skills so that the client becomes able
to benefit more from the support they are
already receiving and requires less input overall.
Johansen Sound Therapy involves a child in lis-
tening to specially-recorded, customised tapes
for 10 minutes per day, for up to 9 months.
9-12 October, 2001, Edinburgh - details from
Camilla Leslie, tel. 0131 337 5427.
Children in Scotland with severe, low-incidence
disorders of speech and language no longer
have to travel to England for residential care.
Donaldsons College in Edinburgh, traditionally
a provider of residential and day placements for
children who are profoundly deaf, has opened
The Speech and Language Resource, funded by
the Scottish Executive. In the past, many of the
children who are attending would have been
sent to specialist schools in England as there was
no national provision in Scotland specifically tai-
lored to their needs.
Training is high on the agenda, and Donaldsons
has set up a training partnership with Afasic and
I CAN, the two national charities working for
children with speech and language impairments.
The training - typically one day courses - is open
to professionals and parents. Future events
include an Afasic training week from Mon 5 - Fri
9 November 2001 (functional language; selective
mutism; dyspraxia; secondary aged pupils; bilin-
gual issues.) The I CAN courses are: 30 October,
2001 - Intensive interaction; 1 February, 2002 -
multidisciplinary approach with nursery children;
15 March, 2002 - Communication in the classroom;
12 September, 2002 - pragmatic impairment.
Details from Marion Fletcher, Head of Speech
and Language Unit, Donaldsons College, tel.
0131 337 9911,
e-mail: marionfletcher@donaldsons-coll.edin.sch.uk.
New independent centres for rehabilitation of
people with brain injury plan to work alongside
local and regional NHS services.
Priory Rehabilitation Services now have a five
bedded unit at their Unstead Park neuro-rehabil-
itation complex in Surrey for people with chal-
lenging behaviour following brain injury who
would not be suitably placed on an acute ward.
The newly built Priory Rehabilitation Centre
Peterlee in County Durham specialises in intensive
cognitive rehabilitation after brain injury, and
provides the only dedicated Persistent Vegetative
State service in the North of England.
www.prioryhealthcare.co.uk
In a separate development, The Royal Star and
Garter Home for disabled ex-service men and
women is to diversify into mental health care
and expand provision in England beyond London
and the south east. Plans include building a new
40 bed dementia care home in partnership with
another specialist care provider and funding res-
idential and nursing placements.
www.starandgarter.org.
Independent provider
developments
National centre for Scotland
Sound therapy
Training places
needed
A college which provides disabled adults with
residential training for work is concerned that
demand for places is outstripping supply.
Fifty four per cent of the students at Queen
Elizabeths Foundation Training College last year
gained employment immediately after their
course which the college compares favourably
with the able bodied rate of 40 per cent. With a
two year waiting list for places, a spokesman
said, The Training College is particularly con-
cerned about the lack of facilities and therefore
the lengthy waiting times as they are aware that
many people lose the impetus to remain inde-
pendent after such a long period of time and
may never embark upon a training course and
consequently never re-enter employment.
in my experience
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 12
he delivery of head and neck cancer ser-
vices over recent years has been restruc-
tured as recommended by Calman & Hine
(1994) and the NHS Cancer Plan (2000),
with surgery, radiotherapy and joint clinics
centralised, and follow-up rehabilitation including
speech and language therapy and nursing care
organised locally. Similar patterns of service deliv-
ery are offered to other patient groups; for exam-
ple, those with cleft palate. Prior to this, acute
work was spread more widely geographically,
being carried out at local district hospitals, and
more therapists, sometimes with less experience,
saw fewer patients all the way through from the
time of diagnosis on a local service basis. The
change has benefited patients, as staff providing
the specialist services have a wealth of experience
and expertise. However, patients are now often
travelling significant distances and across differ-
ent Trusts for their care. Speech and language
therapy services have been challenged to produce
a cohesive and effective service with clear, well
coordinated delivery across these different sites.
In response to this we have found that a Clinical
Liaison Group has been pivotal in us being able to
develop a better speech and language therapy ser-
vice. This concept could have applications to other
groups of therapists who share patients, or for
groups of therapists within the same clinical field.
Cohesive service
The need to have good communication between
professionals when patients are travelling across
different Trusts and Counties for their care is para-
mount (Edwards, 1997). We were aware that com-
munication was not always as effective as it should
have been because the people involved werent
aware of the different circumstances in different
places, so expectations were sometimes unrealistic.
In establishing the group three years ago, our first
and foremost aim was to ensure a more cohesive
service and to address the communication issues
central to this (figure 1). Clearer care pathways
needed to be developed, such as for equity of
access to surgical voice restoration management.
The clinical liaison group has achieved far more
than these original aims, and now encompasses a
wider remit that includes protocol development
across Trusts, training in a specialised area, peer
group supervision, and offers clinical perspectives
to management strategy development. It has led
to a strong head and neck speech and language
therapy team that is not fragmented by distance.
The core difference between a special interest
group and our clinical liaison group is that our
you want
to coordnate servces
across derent stes
peer support or case
management
to bud a strong team
Read this
meetings are primarily based on discussion of patients
on our mutual caseload. In contrast, a special interest
group usually has presentations about a clinical topic
to a larger group and might include discussion of
patients not known to anyone else attending.
The clinical liaison group consists of eight speech and
language therapist specialists in head and neck cancer
from five Trusts who meet termly. In the interimthere
are reports and telephone conversations about the
patients, but the gains of meeting in person have
been significant. We have also invited the Head and
Neck Liaison Nurse to join the group as she is often
able to contribute a valuable overview of the
patients. As the number of health professionals
involved in the team caring for head and neck cancer
patients is large, we could potentially evolve to be a
large multidisciplinary group. However, we aim to
keep it small and with a predominantly speech and
language therapy membership so we can remain
focused on our own profession and our case man-
agement. Were we to increase the numbers or dis-
ciplines of the clinical liaison group, or move the
focus from discussion of individuals, we would lose
the essence of what makes the group work. We
are able to further and develop our own profes-
sional skills to take back to our own multidiscipli-
nary setting with confidence, as we have peer sup-
port for what we as individuals are doing.
Reflective practice
We meet for two and a half hours once a term. On
our agenda each speech and language therapist is
given time to discuss challenging or complex
patients. Problem sharing and reflective practice
approaches are used. Discussions might include
therapy techniques, communication issues that
arose, or problems encountered by the patient
from treatments, disease recurrence or
family/work situations. We have all shared in and
learned from these discussions, even when the
patient is not directly known to all present.
The latter part of the meeting allows time for
related clinical issues and has included:
development of shared protocols such as
Surgical Voice Restoration procedures
compiling a useful contacts directory (numbers
for radiotherapists, dietitians and so on)
feedback from courses and special interest
groups attended
literature reviews
management issues such as staffing changes
within the multidisciplinary team, and implications
for us as speech and language therapists
funding surgical voice restoration equipment
and communication aids
T
Centralisation of the
most specialised acute
health services benefits
clients but presents
communication
challenges for all staff.
Carol Harris and
colleagues addressed this
through a clinical liaison
group - and found some
unexpected further
benefits. Although they
focus on head and neck
cancer, the concept is as
relevant to other areas
of speech and language
therapy practice.
Ahead-and-ne
of the
f
Rapid Access
and
Combined Cllinics
Radiotherapy Surgery
Speech and
language therapy
Oxford
Local speech and
language therapy teams
Clinical
Liaison Group
Oxfordshire Wiltshire
Buckinghamshire Berkshire
Figure 1 Service structure and interfaces around the clinical liaison group
discussion of other service developments within
the head and neck service.
The interface with service managers is developing
all the time. As specialist clinicans, we contribute
to management issues, and can focus on logistical
management from a clinical, grass roots perspective.
It is useful to have one response from across several
locations which we can then feed back to higher
levels of management such as the Four Counties
Cancer Network.
Communication is now much more effective
because
we all have a better understanding of each
speech and language therapy setting and their
constraints and possibilities, so can quickly
troubleshoot and take opportunities as they arise
there has been an opportunity to develop
protocols and pathways that work, which are
firmly based on patient and clinical needs
as a team we know each other beyond a name
at the end of the phone, and have developed a
supportive forum for peer supervision in a
specialist area of work.
Allocating specific time to discuss particular cases
with a peer group is something many therapists
comment would be helpful. This includes those
with a lot of experience as well as those newer to
an area of work. From our experience, we advo-
cate that formally establishing a clinical liaison
group is time well spent.
References
Calman, K. & Hine, D. (1994) A Policy Framework
for Commissioning Cancer Services. London:
Department of Health.
Department of Health (2000) The NHS Cancer Plan.
Edwards, D. (1997) Face to Face. The Kings Fund.
You can contact The Head and Neck Clinical
Liaison Group c/o Carol Harris, Speech and
Language Therapy, Radcliffe Infirmary,
Woodstock Road, Oxford 0X2 6HE.
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 13
in my experience
Do I communicate as effectively as
I should with speech and language
therapists in neighbouring areas?
Do I have sufficient peer support to
bolster my contribution to the
multidisciplinary team?
Are our care pathways clear and
firmly based on clients needs?
Reflections
neck
e
field
A mind odyssey
There is a need for open discussion by both relatives
and hospital staff about policy for resuscitating
patients with severe dementia; more than half of
mothers with postnatal depression have difficulties
interacting with their babies; and drawings of
school-aged children give clues to their mental state.
These issues were among the papers at a confer-
ence to mark the beginning of 2001 - a mind
odyssey, a year-long celebration of the arts, psychi-
atry and the mind organised by the Royal College of
Psychiatrists. Other events included the launch of
four comic books for 4-7 year olds which address
what it is like to be different. They have been
designed to provide a framework for people who
wish to support children to develop their strengths
and confidence, and to help other young people
understand what it is like to be different.
Reading Lights (set of 4 books and activity
poster) costs 12.
The Royal College of Psychiatrists, tel. 020 7235
2351, www.rcpsych.ac.uk
Strategy to
raise profile
Occupational therapists have been
successful in their aim to raise the
profile of the profession over the
past year.
The annual report of the British
Association of Occupational
Therapists describes how they
have targeted politicians, health
professionals, key decision-makers,
users, carers and the general
public to widen understanding
of how occupational therapists
can improve quality of life and
to ensure the concerns of staff
are heard and acted upon.
Methods include a parliamentary
lobbying strategy, a national
petition drive, developing
contacts with journalists, pro-
moting occupational therapy as
a career, expanding the website,
and producing a Publicity
Activity Book as a resource for
members organising events for
Occupational Therapy Day.
The College has also begun a
series of seminars aimed at
senior practitioners, occupational
therapy leaders and decision
makers with a focus on interme-
diate care.
The seminars involve participants
in addressing key national policy
issues and the opportunities and
challenges they present to the
profession.
BAOT, tel. 020 7357 6480,
www.cot.co.uk
Story time
Readers interested in using storytelling /
narrative in their work can contact the
Society for Storytelling for information and
to share ideas.
Started in 1993, the Society has specific
aims to promote, provide information
about and educate the public in the art of
oral storytelling, and produces a magazine,
Storylines. Facts and Fiction is another sto-
rytelling publication. Speech and language
therapist Sue Doncaster, a director of the
Society, is keen to set up a Special Interest
Group.
Society for Storytelling, PO Box 2344,
Reading RG6 6FG, tel. 0118 935 1381,
www.sfs.org.uk
Facts and Fiction, 190 Burton Road, Derby
DE1 1TQ, e-mail steelcarpet@lineone.net
Sue Doncaster, No. 1 Hibberd Road,
Malin Bridge, Sheffield, tel. 0114 233 1018,
e-mail suzie@smdoncaster.freeserve.co.uk.
Stammering changes
A change in its Constitution has enabled the British Stammering
Association to clarify its role in education and training.
Now a charitable company, the Association has widened its
objectives. In addition to the relief of people whose lives are
affected by stammering, it has a second charitable object, to
advance the education and training of the public in all matters
relating to stammering.
The Association is hoping it can attract more people as trustees, as
they will no longer be personally financially liable for its activities.
Although the distinction between members who stammer or have a
stammering child and those who do not has now been abolished, the
board will continue to have in the majority members who stammer.
BSA, tel. 020 8983 1003, Helpline 0845 603 2001, www.stammering.org
Brain injury developments
The support group for people affected by encephalitis has wel-
comed various government initiatives on brain injury.
A National Service Framework for Long Term Conditions is
planned, with a particular focus on the needs of people with neu-
rological conditions and brain and spinal injury. The Encephalitis
Support Group has been lobbying for this, and hopes it will look
at providing a clear patient pathway for treatment and ongoing
management. Although it is an initiative for England, the group
believes it will help campaigning work for similar frameworks
elsewhere in the UK.
Findings of a Health Select Committee short inquiry at the House
of Commons into brain injury services focused mainly on head
injury but will also have implications for encephalitis sufferers. They
include recommendations on improving the understanding of
brain injury among disability living allowance assessors and GPs.
The value of working collaboratively with other charities has
been demonstrated by the positive government reaction to a third
initiative involving the Encephalitis Support Group. The Childrens
Acquired Brain Injury Group has been given a grant to produce
information for teachers and others in education, along with a
commitment to consider the inclusion of information on acquired
brain injury in new guidance on the education of sick children.
Encephalitis Support Group, tel. 01653 692 583; helpline 01653
699 599, www.esg.org.uk.
news extra. . . news extra. . . news extra. .
priorities
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 14
Desperately
seeking
consensus!
he speech and language therapy profes-
sion finds itself attempting to provide val-
idation of therapy interventions, both to
adhere to the political agenda and to
deliver therapy when resources are limit-
ed. Within this context, I was asked to devise a set
of guidelines upon which to base decision making
with one particular client group: school aged chil-
dren who have learning difficulties and who are
educated within mainstream schools. We are
piloting the resulting prioritisation system (see
figure 1), but the survey and background research
described here highlight some important areas of
agreement among experts and the need for fur-
ther investigation into good practice.
The UK governments clinical governance initia-
tives have resulted in speech and language thera-
pists attempting to relate grass roots practice to
the few studies of efficacy into therapy interven-
tions with paediatric caseloads. For example, Law
et al (1998) carried out a systematic review of
therapy interventions, and were able to make
some conclusions for a limited number of client
groups, in certain contexts. They found interven-
tion for primary speech and language delay
(phonology, expressive language, receptive lan-
guage and phoneme awareness) was effective as
measured on standardised tests.
However, there is concern about the application
of certain methodologies to speech and language
therapy. The above review was unable to demon-
strate the effects of parental compliance and
cooperation, vital considerations for the practising
therapist. Van der Gaag (2000) says managers and
clinicians feel under increasing pressure to deliver
evidence which they do not have. Mobley (2000)
asserts that, Therapists intuition is based on tacit
knowledge acquired through experience and this is
difficult to quantify. Investigations into practice
must be appropriate if they are to be useful.
For a profession which delivers therapy to children
in many different contexts - even within specialties
- and with as many potential variables as there are
clients, the process of investigating efficacy can be
problematic. Although considerations of clinical
effectiveness should not automatically be linked to
resources, many practising therapists are under
pressure to demonstrate efficiency as well as effica-
cy, and constraints have prompted many depart-
ments to attempt prioritisation. McCartney (2000)
argues, prioritisation measures are being used to
restrict service delivery to schools before effective-
ness studies have been carried out.
Some therapists have attempted to reorganise ser-
vice delivery to take account of the fact that need
often outstrips supply (for example Portch, 1999;
Stainton-Ellis, 1998). The restriction of services may
be another barrier to collaborative practice as ther-
apists attempt to juggle caseload responsibilities
with team commitments. For example, McCartney
(1999) describes one system to prioritise therapy ser-
vices for children in education settings (Luscombe
and Shaw, 1996) as exemplary practice in health
service terms, but goes on to outline how it com-
The pilot prioritisation system devised by
Joanna Manz for mainstream school chil-
dren who have learning difficulties is based
on the opinions of experts in the field.
While the development process had its
imperfections, there are lessons for
everyone in a profession which must
deliver therapy that works.
you want to
deveop gudenes
show ecacy and
ecency
take an ethca approach
Read this
T
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 15
priorities
promised good collaborative practice between
speech and language therapists and education staff.
The Malcolmess Care Aims Model (1999) directly
addresses clinical governance and utilises aspects
such as enabling and anticipatory care.
Outcome depends very much upon the rationale
behind the intervention, although it could be
argued that multi-outcome is discounted.
Consensual rationing
Encouragingly, there is an acknowledgment that, if
there is not the empirical data on which to base
practice, opinion from experienced clinicians,
along with the views of associated professionals,
inform guideline statements to assist and define
the delivery of care in the most appropriate way,
(RCSLT, 1998). Acceptance of this as a means of
facilitating consensual rationing is in line with cur-
rent trends towards local priority setting. During a
conference (1998) which looked at prioritisation in
wider healthcare terms, Mullen justified the
process of local citizens juries as a way of estab-
lishing healthcare priorities, and Dickenson argued
that, even where there was research evidence upon
which to base resource allocation, practitioners were
still faced with making hard choices.
There are ethical issues around such decision
making. Therapists are part of society, and our
attitudes to disability are important when making
decisions about type and quantity of therapeutic
intervention. These decisions, based upon assess-
ment, raise fundamental ethical issues for chil-
dren who have, sub-average intellectual func-
tioning (I.Q. around 70) existing concurrently with
deficits in adaptive behaviour, (Dockrell & Henry,
1993). It is clearly not appropriate to speak in
terms of curative therapy. Therapy is expected to
take account of the clients strengths as well as
needs and building an environment that is con-
ducive to good communication is particularly sig-
nificant for this client group (RCSLT, 1996).
Tetzchner & Jensen (1999) assert that society has
a moral duty to reconsider its views of people
who have disabilities. Only through experience,
and seeing people with a disability as individuals
who are as different as all others, is it possible to
obtain an authentic impression of their situa-
tion. In their paper on peer-relationships,
Roberts & Smith (1999) describe how non-dis-
abled pupils attitudes affect the quantity and
quality of interaction which takes place in schools,
between themselves and their disabled peers. The
disability rights movement has attempted to
change attitudes, and there is a move towards see-
ing disability as the way society views its disabled
population rather than the original disabling
condition. Cunningham & Sloper (1985)
describe this as primary and secondary handicap,
the former being the individuals sensory or cog-
nitive disability, and the latter the environmental
aspects for the child. Much of the literature on
inclusion in schools focuses upon staff attitudes as
positive or negative influences on the inclusion
process. Carrington (1999) in particular describes
Figure 1 - Prioritisation system
RSEN prioritisation: guidance notes
Zero scores: It is important that each parameter has a zero score, as a particular one may have
no relevance to a pupil (eg. AAC) but could still influence the total by scoring a single point.
Ceiling scores: Following discussion with experienced therapists, the following seemed
appropriate:
24 or over = high priority
20-24 = bordeline
below 20 = low priority
However, each case is prioritised on its own merit therefore, even if a pupil scores low, the
therapist may feel they warrant some type of intervention (eg. indirect input). There is little
evidence to say definitively that intervention for pupils with learning difficulties is not effective,
even if it only maintains skills levels. Therefore the therapist has discretion to keep a case open.
Pupils with autism spectrum disorder / emotional difficulties: It could be argued by experts in
these areas that the form is not suitable for these pupils. The original research did not
specifically address this diagnostic category, although learning difficulties may be part of the
condition for some children. The parameters of motivation and readiness to change may
be difficult for therapists to consider for these pupils, whose interaction may fluctuate as an
integral part of their disorder.
Language in line with developmental age: If therapists feel this is the case, then the
score is zero. If there is a significant discrepancy, then they may place the score between 1
and 4. If a pupil has a severe learning difficulty, it is likely that they will have a severe
language disorder. However, if it is in line with developmental age, they may not be a candidate
for input. Therefore severity does not automatically prioritise the pupil. In the original
research, severity as a parameter did not rate highly. However, this is a local system,
responding to local demographics. It is acknowledged that some speech and language therapy
departments may have therapists who specialise in the clinical area of severe learning difficulties,
and they would find this position unacceptable.
AAC: A child may use only a small number of signs / symbols, but have a high frequency use.
Such a pupil should score highly, as the therapists should maintain involvement to assist
functional use. A low score would indicate a low level of need for the system.
RSEN PRIORITISATION
PARAMETERS LOW HIGH
Motivation 0 1 2 3 4
Readiness to change 0 1 2 3 4
Carer motivation 0 1 2 3 4
Carer motivation 0 1 2 3 4
Team support 0 1 2 3 4
Use of AAC system 0 1 2 3 4
Environmental change 0 1 2 3 4
Severity 0 1 2 3 4
Language 0 1 2 3 4
YES NO
AUTOMATIC PRIORITIES?
Assess and advise
Dysphagia
Consistent change as recorded on standardised tests
Dysfluency (access to generic therapists)
SCORE:..................
COMMENTS:
(To assist with therapy)
(To retain therapy contact)
(teaching/SLA/SFL)
(1 = low need, 4 = high need)
(of language delay / disorder)
(In line with developmental
age)
collaboration
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 22
difficulties participating in nursery
activities as a result of family /
environmental change.
The team may work with any child
who is on the Code of Practice at
any stage from 1-3, or with any child
who is not on the Code of Practice
but who is raising concerns.
The team offers a range of pack-
ages of care which view either the
child or the nursery as the client:
1. Assessment
Assessment may include observation
of the child in the nursery setting,
discussion with parents, and assess-
ment of the key workers interaction
skills and childs response.
2. Intervention
The team can work indirectly, offering support
and advice to staff in developing programmes and
strategies which enable children with emotion-
al/behavioural/language difficulties to access the
curriculum more easily.
The team can also work directly with individuals,
pairs and groups of children for negotiated
amounts of time once the referral process has
been completed.
3. Training
Training can be offered centrally or in response to
the needs of individual providers and can focus on
general support for special educational needs or
on specific areas of concern.
4. Work with parents/carers
The development of work with parents/carers is
an important focus for the team. The work
includes parent drop-ins and surgeries, specific
training/support sessions and general advice. The
drop-ins were requested by parents and focus on
behaviour management and sleep difficulties.
They have had good take-up, and a lot of involve-
ment from the parents, including a group for whom
English is an additional language. Further work-
shops/surgeries have been requested on different
topics and repeated sessions for other settings.
5. Adult-child interaction
To develop the abilities of a particular child - and
to develop the key-workers skills in interacting
with that child - parent/child interaction therapy
has been adapted for use with adults in the nurs-
ery setting. The principles remain the same but,
instead of the parent, the child and his key work-
er participate in four adult/child interaction ses-
sions. Video playback is used to assist the key
worker to identify the strengths and weaknesses
of their interaction with that particular child, and
over the course of the sessions their interaction
style is adapted to meet the needs of the child.
This is done with reference to a list of the para-
meters, the self rating scale, which research has
shown to be important to consid-
er when interacting with a child
with language impairment.
(Cummins & Hulme, 1997). These
include following the childs lead
in play, and reducing the number
of questions asked.
Since this is a language based
intervention package and
requires a high degree of training
and experience to be used effec-
tively, this package is always man-
aged primarily by the speech and
language therapist on the team.
However, it is co-run by the
speech and language therapist
and specialist teacher, who pro-
vides strategies for managing
behaviour alongside the language development
strategies.
6. Nursery screening
This consists of a session at an individual nursery
where all members of the team are present. The
head of the nursery and/or the special edu-
cational needs co-ordinator, with key work-
ers, can bring to the session the names of
children who are causing concern. The chil-
drens needs can then be discussed and
action recommended.
Before any child can be discussed by the
team, permission must be given by the par-
ent/carer and the importance of working in
partnership with parents/carers as well as
staff is a central principle for the team.
Numbered referrals forms are sent out to
nursery staff for completion and signature
from parent/carer as soon as a request
about an individual child is received.
Completed forms are then discussed at a
referral meeting and team members allocated to
each child initially. Each child is reviewed regu-
larly, and whether support is ongoing or addi-
tional action needs to be taken is noted. Children
may be exited from the service for a variety of
reasons including:
current needs having been met and support
no longer needed
entry to school
referral to another agency because of more
complex or ongoing needs
parental request.
To date 51 referrals have been made to the
team and, of these, 24 have been exited; 20 to
schools, 1 referred to the educational psychology
service, 1 to a language unit within an early years
centre, 1 because of parental request and 1
because support was no longer needed within the
nursery.
Complementary
The Early Years Intervention Team is not a substi-
tute for clinic based parent focused intervention,
and it is not an alternative for children who fail to
attend the clinic. However, for children with lan-
guage impairment, the Early Years Intervention
Team has complemented and added to the speech
and language therapy services already offered.
Children have been able to transfer between the
Early Years Intervention Team and the clinic based
speech and language therapy service in order to
access packages of care as appropriate. The case
example (page 21) shows how a multi-agency and
flexible approach has been able to benefit chil-
dren.
The packages offered have served to develop
staff knowledge of language impairments and
appropriate management. This has impacted on
the efficacy of the speech and language therapy
service as a whole, both by increasing the number
and appropriateness of referrals to the clinic
based speech and language therapy service from
nursery centres, and by improving the existing
links between the agencies.
Having a member of the speech and language
therapy service working in direct collaboration
with education agencies has improved links as a
whole, and both health and education have ben-
efited from mutual
exchange of training,
which in turn impacts on
client care. There has been
some generalisation of
skills by nursery staff. One
of the main aims of the
team is to support staff in
working with all the chil-
dren, and training has been
given to some staff around
behaviour management
and communication as well
as direct work with individ-
ual children. The team
spends time discussing
strategies with staff as well as modelling strate-
gies in their direct work with the children. An
evaluation by London Universitys Institute of
Education (Siraj-Blatchford & McCallum, 2000)
commented on the skills gained by staff and
detailed how staff were using suggestions not
only with referred children but also generally
and/or with other children causing concern. The
very positive feedback from staff and parents
about the teams input is detailed in these
excerpts from the evaluation (Siraj-Blatchford &
McCallum, 2000):
The team observe a child in the setting and then
suggest strategies to the staff as well as modelling
the strategies with the child. In the evaluation,
staff commented on some of the strategies that
they had learned in this way -
describing unacceptable behaviour clearly to
the child responsible and the consequences of
that behaviour on others
remaining calm (in the face of bad behaviour)
giving children time to talk about their feelings
(after an incident ) and listening.
Parents have appreciated the importance given
parent/child
interaction
therapy has
been adapted
for use with
adults in the
nursery setting.
s
e
e
w
w
w
.
s
p
e
e
c
h
m
a
g
.
c
o
m
in
sid
e
fro
n
t
co
v
e
r
SPEECH & LANGUAGE THERAPY IN PRACTICE AUTUMN 2001 26
how I
References
Allan, K. (2001) Exploring ways for staff to consult people
with dementia about services. Executive summary. Joseph
Rowntree Foundation.
Baker, J. (2001) Life Story Books for the Elderly Mentally Ill.
International Journal of Language & Communication
Disorders, 36, Supplement, 185-187.
Murphy, J.C. (1994) It started with a sea-shell - Life Story Work
and People with Dementia. Dementia Services Development
Centre. University of Stirling.
Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists (1996)
Communicating Quality 2.
Threadgold, M. (1999) Sonas aPc activating potential for com-
munication. Manual.
Resource
Information and training in Dementia Care Mapping from
Bradford Dementia Group, tel. 01274 233996,
www.brad.ac.uk/acad/health/bdg/dementia.htm.
work with older adults in a mental health trust. Speech
and language therapy provides a service to inpatient
wards (assessment and continuing care), day care facili-
ties and a community dementia outreach service. As our
wards close over the next year, the work we have done
in the hospital setting needs to be rolled out into community
teams, nursing homes and family homes.
My main strategy is training. The underlying principle is that
my input will make little difference to the patients care unless
I can influence the behaviour of the staff and relatives. People
with dementia have impaired memory and often significant
comprehension difficulties. Direct intervention with the person
with dementia is unlikely to be carried over. By taking time to
explain, demonstrate, coach and give feedback, I can enhance
the carers competence and confidence in communicating or in
assisting with eating and drinking. Time spent with paid carers
is valuable because they can carry over the skills they have
learned from one person to another. Speech and language
therapists train people in a number of ways:
formal lectures to large groups
more informal workshops
skills training with assessment of competencies
coaching
case discussion
reports
and I use all of these in my work.
Nutrition in this Trust is managed by a multidisciplinary
team including dietitian, catering staff and pharmacist as
well as nurses and speech and language therapists. Screening
tools, dysphagia menus (including finger foods and snacks)
and picture menus have been developed by the team which
also audits the standards that have been set.
Allies
My main allies in managing dysphagia in this setting are the
nurses we have trained to use our locally developed tool
Screening for Dysphagia. This allows them to identify dys-
phagia, to write a care plan for food and drink provision for
people with dysphagia, and to update the care plan as the
persons condition progresses. I am currently preparing a
research study to validate this screening tool.
Many of the people who do have dysphagia have oral stage
dysfunction - for example, Feinberg et al (1992) found 71 per
cent - and the nurses are able to help them through modify-
ing the consistency of food and drinks. Those with complex or
severe difficulties are identified using the tool and referred
on to speech and language therapy.
The scheme is an extension of a larger project which origi-
nated in the Acute Hospitals Trust. The speech and language
therapy service in the Mental Health Trust was introduced in
1998, following a period of heightened awareness about
nutrition in the organisation. A set of screening tools was
launched to manage the clinical risks around eating and
drinking. The referral rate to speech and language therapy
dropped by 75 per cent within three months of the first
cohort of nurses being trained.
New
opportuntes
Tranng nurses to
use a dysphaga
screenng too
reduced reerras
to speech and
anguage therapy
by ; per cent n
three months,
aowng Nary
Hertage to ocus
on true dysphaga
and specc com-
muncaton needs
o oder aduts n
her menta heath
trust.
Eating and drinking difficulties in dementia are common; for
example, Steele et al (1997) found 87 per cent. However, many
of these difficulties are behavioural, such as cramming or need-
ing cues to initiate eating behaviour. Nurses in this specialist set-
ting are competent to deal with these behavioural difficulties
but use the tool to identify true dysphagia. A small number of
patients are referred to us for eating or drinking difficulties.
This may be because they have a severe or complex dysphagia.
While in the USA there is widespread use of PEG (percutaneous
endoscopic gastrostomy) feeding for any condition in the older
person, in the UK PEGs are often not available to people with
dementia. A few people here have had a PEG and, in these spe-
cific cases, I feel that it is appropriate management (Barratt,
2000). I usually use a mealtime for assessment, observing the
assistance provided by staff as well as the persons ability to eat
and drink. I am then able to provide feedback and guidance as
to what appeared to help or hinder them. The recommenda-
tions are usually made jointly by me and the nurse, following
discussion on what we saw. This then enables us to:
identify and manage risks
maintain independent self-feeding for as long as possible
empower the nursing staff, and
increase nurse ownership of the recommendations made. It
is rare here for compliance to be a problem.
Assisting
Other ward staff need to access an ongoing programme of
workshops aimed at raising awareness of eating and drinking
difficulties and improving the skills of all grades of ward staff
in relation to patients mealtimes. The onset of oral stage
dysphagia correlates with the onset of eating dependency
(Siebens, 1986), so it is vital that staff and carers are skilled in
maximising self feeding and concentrate on assisting rather
than on feeding. Training for them includes consideration
to the environment as well as their own behaviour.
Because the number of direct referrals to speech and language
therapy has fallen so drastically, I have been able to accept referrals
for people with communication disabilities associated with demen-
tia. Referrals usually come from the day hospitals and are for people
whose communication is a specific area for concern for the person or
their relatives, over and above their level of cognitive functioning. I
use formal assessments but prefer to engage in or observe natural
conversational behaviour. This is often only possible to do in the
persons home environment where they feel more relaxed, and
where cues for communication are at hand. I can observe the
communicative strategies used by family members and feed back
to them which are more successful and others that may also help.
It is vital to be positive and concentrate on the strengths of the
carer and the person with dementia. I hope to start to use video
as a tool for this purpose. I write reports and recommendations that
are aimed at the carers and copied to the other professionals. These
give concrete examples of strengths and strategies; for example,
ways of cueing that seem to help; aids for initiating or anchoring
conversation. Life story work can help those who are trying to find
something to talk about and a shared focus for conversation
(Murphy, 1994). I am able to feed back the information gained
l