Professional Documents
Culture Documents
*
*
*Steve Tsang
**
256
32
92 7
(J. Harsanyi)
(J. Rawls)
(Ronald Coase)
(single-owner)
257
1988
258
32
92 7
(facts)
2002 2 3 3080
12.4 56.5
10800 3.5
267
1912
1949 90
53 5
(political
configurations)
2000
www.stats.gov.cn
259
260
32
92 7
20% 16%
261
(internal pricing)
(sister product)
(economic rationality)
262
32
92 7
1987 2% 2002
23.5%
2%
20% 12%
www.mac.gov.tw/statistic/
ass_em/9010c.gif www.trade.gov.tw/prc&hk/
bi_ch/mo_index.htm
(2002, p. 47)
263
(value-added)
91.12.13
92.04.04
92.04.30
264
32
92 7
(2000)
(2000)Vol. 2
(1992)
Baxter, William F. and Altree, Lillian R. ( 1972), "Legal Aspects of
Airport Noise," Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 15, pp. 1-113.
Buchanan, James M. and Tullock, Gordon.(1962), The Calculus of Consent,
Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Campbell, Kurt M. and Mitchell, Derek J. (2001), "Crisis in the Taiwan
Strait?" Foreign Affairs, July/August.
Cheung, Steven. (1989), San-di-chin-huei (Thoughts on China, Taiwan,
and Hong Kong), Taipei: Yuan-Lieo. (in Chinese)
Coase, Ronald H. (1988), "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of
Law and Economics, 1960, 3, pp. 1-44. Collected in The Firm, the
Market, and the Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
--------. (1988), The Firm, the Market, and the Law, Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
Cooter, Richard N. (1995), "The Coase Theorem and International Economic
Relations," Japan and the World Economy, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 29-44.
Cross-Straits (2002), Taipei: Cross-Strait Common Market Foundation,
March. (in Chinese)
Dworkin, Ronald. (1977), Taking Rights Seriously, Cambridge, MA: Harvard
University Press.
Epstein, Richard A. (1993), "Holdouts, Externalities, and the Single
Owner: One More Salute to Ronald Coase," Journal of Law and Economics,
Vol. 36, No. 1, pp. 553-94.
265
266
32
92 7
Abstract
The idea of a single-owner who owns the opposing interests of a dispute has
been suggested in the literature to make the Coase Theorem operational in
resolving the dispute. This paper points out that the idea implicitly assumes the
existence of an overriding authority, e.g., the Courts, to implement the solution.
When such an overriding authority does not exist, other reasonings must be
employed to make the single-owner apparatus work.
This insight is explored and then applied to help resolve the Taiwan Strait
conflict.
Keywords: Coase Theorem, Single-owner, Taiwan Strait Conflict
Content
.Introduction
.Coase Theorem
.Taiwan Strait Conflict
.Implications
.Conclusions
267
268
32
92 7