HOW CRIMINALISED CHRISTIAN

MISSIONARIES ARE ABUSING TAMIL PRIDE

AND CULTURE

A Bastard christian Deivanayagam, wrote a book titled, `Vivliyam

(Bible), Thirukkural, Saiva Siddantham - Oppu Ayvu (Comparative
Research)', which was published in 1985-86 by the `International
Institute of Tamil Studies', Adayar, Madras as a deliberate act of
connivance. Deivanayagam was also awarded a Doctorate by the
University of Madras run by the Tamil Bastards who call themselves
Dravidians. Deivanayagam says that Thiruvalluvar was a Christian and
a disciple of the so-called fake St.Thomas. Of course Pope says that
Thomas never came to India. Christianity was a fake religion and
Jesus Christ was created by a committee in AD325
 Baptising' Thiruvalluvar to `besiege' the
Hindus!

By: B R HARAN \\
http://newstodaynet.com/col.php?section=20&catid=29&id=
8961

`History is always written by the victors and whoever

controls the writing of history books control the past.
Without doubt, the most consistently powerful force
in the western world over the last two thousand years
has been the Roman Catholic Church and
consequently history has often been what it wanted
to be'.

George Orwell in his novel `1984'.

(Thamizhaga Anthanar Varalaaru _ History of

Brahmins of Tamil Nadu - Vol-II-Page599).

As rightly expressed in those immortal words by George

Orwell, the Indians have been fed with distorted history by
the Western Christian elite before independence and the
same has been continued even after independence, thanks
to the takeover of the nation's history by the Marxists and
Christian stooges, who continued the dark and sinister
legacy of Max Mueller and McCauley. As an important part of
the perverted history, which was planted by the western
scholars, the so-called St.Thomas's arrival, life and death
were thrust on South India. This thrust gave a solid
foundation to the Church to claim as if Christianity was also
an indigenous religion.

As brilliantly shown in these columns by Mr.Sundaram for the

last four days, many attempts have been made at regular
intervals to impose the concocted history of Thomas on the
people, thereby removing the facts from their minds, about
the persecution of Hindus and destroying of Hindu Temples
by the Christian invaders (Portuguese, French and British)
from the fifteenth century onwards.

One such attempt, in the line of Arulappa and Acharya

Paul, was made by a writer by name Deivanayagam, who
wrote a book titled, `Vivliyam (Bible), Thirukkural, Saiva
Siddantham - Oppu Ayvu (Comparative Research)',
which was published in 1985-86 by none other than
the `International Institute of Tamil Studies', Adayar,
Madras, either without any application of mind, or, as a
deliberate act of connivance. Shockingly Deivanayagam was
also awarded a Doctorate by the University of
Madras. Deivanayagam had predetermined to conclude
his book with a finding that Thiruvalluvar was a
Christian and a disciple of the so-called St.Thomas
and most of the Saiva Sidhantha and the vivid
knowledge found in Thiruklural were nothing but the
sayings of The Bible. In order to achieve this devious
motive, he distorted and misinterpreted the verses of Kural
and Shivite Philosophical Works and completed the book.
Later on, Tamil and Shivite scholars protested against this
and the `Dharmapuram Adheenam', a famous Shivite
Mutt, came out with a book of refutation written by Tamil
Shivite Scholar Arunai Vadivel Mudaliar and released it
amongst a congregation of eminent Scholars, who strongly
criticized Deivanayagam for his perversion of history. This
was done mainly to prevent the usage of such deceitful
materials by the future generations for research activities.
(Ref: www.hamsa.org _ Ishvar Sharan)

The planting of the so-called St.Thomas's story was

not only to have a foundation for Christianity in India,
but also to spread it through out the country. This
fabrication succeeded slightly, over the years, in the areas of
Madras, Nagappatinam and Pondicherry, mainly because of
the fact that the `Kapaleeshwarar Temple', Mylapore,`Vel
Ilankanni Amman Temple' near Nagappattinam
and `Vedapureeshwarar Temple', Pondicherry were
destroyed and Santhome Basilica, Velankanni
Church (Our Lady of Health Basilica) and
the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Immaculate
Conception, Pondicherry were built on their remains
respectively. Well known scholars of Archeology have
established that, the details of the destruction of
originalKapaleeshwarar Temple could be found
in Tamil inscriptions on the walls of
theMarundeeswarar Temple in Thiruvanmiyur,
Chennai, even today!

But, the glorious religious tradition and cultural heritage of

Sanatana Dharma had been so hugely established that,
despite the cooperation from the Dravidian racists, Marxists
and the English language media, the Catholic Diocese
couldn't expand beyond a certain limit. As a result, it started
indulging in `inculturation' methods (saffron dressing,
paadayaatra, calling`Santhome Mary' as `Thirumayilai
Annai', giving sugar-rice as prashaad, etc) to confuse and
win over the gullible masses.

At this juncture, fell on its head like a `bolt from the

blue', the categorical statement from Pope Benedict
that the so-called St.Thomas never ever visited India!
This resounding statement from the Papacy, which
shocked the Catholic community, had shaken the very
foundation of Christianity in South India! As the Papacy
didn't bother to listen to the Indian Catholic community and
their protests, the Madras and Cochin Bishops met in Cochin,
Kerala during the second week of June 2008, to find out ways
and means of reestablishing the history of the so-called St.
Thomas.

As a step in that direction, the Archdiocese of Santhome,

Madras, decided to produce a feature film on the so-called
St.Thomas the Apostle of India, at a cost of Rs.50 Crore in
the banner of `St.Thomas Apostle of India Trust', which
has Archbishop A.M.Chinappa, Deputy Archbishop Lawrence
Pius, Treasurer of the Diocese Mr.Ernest Paul and Script
Writer Dr.Paulraj Lourdusamy as office bearers. The movie
will be presenting the life and times of the so-called
St.Thomas in South India in general and Madras in
particular. The film will have certain supposedly
important events like the alleged meeting

between Thomas and Tamil Sage Thiruvalluvar, the

establishment of Santhome Cathedral and the alleged
killing of Thomas by a Hindu Brahmin Priest.

The story of Thirukkural containing Biblical verses

was first concocted by G.U.Pope, a Christian
Missionary, who learnt Tamil and translated the Tamil
Literary works such as Thiruvachagam, Naaladiyaar
and Thirukkural in English. The missionaries like
G.U.Pope, Joseph Besky (who took a Tamil name
`Veeramaa Munivar') and Caldwell have a modus
operandi of learning the native language with a
motive of distorting history to suit their missionary
agendas. The Dravidian racist political party, which always
thrived on the bogus Aryan Invasion theory, took immense
satisfaction in glorifying these missionaries by erecting
statues for them along the Marina Beach when it ruled Tamil
Nadu in the late sixties and early seventies, thereby
exhibiting its unholy connection with Christian missionaries.
No wonder, the Honourable Chief Minister Karunanithi
inaugurated this 50 crore movie-magnum on the so-called
St.Thomas!
G.U.Pope lived up to the true tradition of Christian
missionaries, by telling that Thiruvalluvar lived in
Madras between 800 and 1000 years after the birth of
Christ! The Tamils never bought this story and
laughed at it. As per the available records it is
believed that Thiruvalluvar could have lived during
the second century based on the evidence that
`Thirukkural' was included in the group called
Pathinen Keezh Kanakku (Eighteen literary works)
during the `Kadai Sangam' (Last Sangam) days. Those
days, there was a literary-grammatical procedure by which
the author would always make it a point to convey to the
readers the identification of his Teacher (Guru) and Patron
apart from his own personal details such as name, native
place, worshipping deity, etc. But Thirukkural sans such
details, and hence, the connection between Thiruvalluvar
and Thomas is a mere figment of imagination.

Whereas, a look at many other literary works written after

the second century, say for example Kamba Ramayanam, or
Periya Puraanam, could lead to the mentioning of Thirukkural
or its philosophy in them and none of them would have any
information about a religion called Christianity. The glorious
rule of Raja Raja Chola was during the 10 century and there
was no trace of Christianity then! Also the Santhome
Cathedral had the inscriptions of Rajendra Chola of the
eleventh century on its corridor walls! Then what meeting is
this Archdiocese talking about between Thiruvalluvar and the
so-called St.Thomas?

Even the Chief Minister during his speech at the

inauguration function, has not mentioned anything
about the alleged meeting between Thomas and
Thiruvalluvar. It is a well-known fact that,
Karunanidhi, himself being a Tamil Scholar and well
versed with Tamil literary works, had written his
masterpiece `Kuraloviyam' on Thirukkural. As he had
not talked anything about the connection between
the Bible and Thirukkural or Thomas and
Thiruvalluvar at the inaugural function of the movie,
it becomes obvious that the `Thomas story' is an
absolute falsehood! But, he has waxed eloquent on
the supposed killing of the so-called St.Thomas at the
hands of a Hindu Brahmin Priest and went on to say
that the particular scene alone is enough for the
success of the movie! But For this (Thomas's killing)
also, the Church doesn't have even an iota of
evidence.

At this juncture, it can be recalled that the Honourable Chief

Minister had recently questioned the truth of Bhagwan
Rama, historicity of Ramayana and existence of Rama Sethu,
despite the availability of so much of archeological, literary,
cultural, numismatic, geographical and historical
evidences. But, he has not exhibited the courage to
question the historicity of the so-called St.Thomas,
despite being aware of the fact that there is
absolutely no iota of evidence. The Honourable Chief
Minister, who is a well-known expert in Thirukkural,
has unfortunately not felt it important to ascertain
the truth of the so-called metering between Thomas
and Thiruvalluvar, but conveniently left it untouched
at the inauguration function. Though the people are
aware of the Chief Minister's hostile stand against the
majority community, it doesn't augur well for him to
openly pander the minority community accepting
their devious machinations.

The Archdiocese talks of three vital places in Madras namely

Santhome (Mylapore), Little Mount (Saidapet) and Thoms
Mount (Brungi Malai). While Santhome Cathedral stands on
the ruins of Kapali Temple, Little Mount was also built after
demolishing a Temple and the Church on the Big Mount was
also built on the ruins of a Temple. The Big Mount was
called as `Brungi Malai' named after `Brungi
Maharishi', who sat in penance there invoking
Bhagwan Shiva seeking his Darshan and Blessing.
Ultimately Bhagwan Shiva appeared before Brungi
Munivar as `Nandeeshwara' and as clear evidence the
`Avudai Nayagi Sametha Nandeeshwara Temple'
stands near the St.Thomas Railway Station, from
where one could see the Brungi Malai clearly. This
`Stal puraanaa' can be found in the form of
inscriptions on the walls of the Nandeeshwara Temple
even today! Even while the Archdiocese has been
attempting to establish the fallacy of St.Thomas over
the years, it has not exhibited the courage so far to
face a public debate despite invitations from learned
Tamil Hindu scholars.

The Archdiocese has the freedom of expression and the

freedom of religion to propagate its faith, but it cannot be
done at the cost of other religious faith. Freedom of
expression and freedom of religion cannot be used to distort
history, or Christianise the icons of other religions, with a
motive of belittling the other faith, which is native in all
respects and which has well-established glorious religious
tradition and cultural heritage spanning thousands of years
even before the birth of Christianity. Thrusting of falsehood
on the gullible masses cannot be allowed. It is not too
difficult to understand the aims and objectives of the Madras
Archdiocese behind this movie project. So, it would be better
for them to understand the sensitivity attached

with this project, as they have a social responsibility. The

government must also ensure that history is not distorted
and the people are not repeatedly fed with fabrications and
fallacies.

It would be appropriate to conclude with the sensible and

courageous words of Dr. Subramaniam Swamy, `The
Church will have to go, and the Kapaleeshwara
Temple re-built on that site. Hindus will do it with the
help of sane and civilised Christians if possible,
without them if necessary, and despite them if forced.
When 83 percent Hindus unite, let those who
are seeking to debase Hindu icons by bogus history
realise that a religiousTsunami will wash them away'.
Politics has always been interwoven with religion and history
in our nation of diversity and in such a scenario, it would be
better to leave this project untouched, for the sake of Unity!