Is Modern Pi Accurate?

http://www.hydrosonics.org/HYDROSONICS/IS_MODERN_PI_ACC...

VOL. 1, NO. 1. JANUARY, 2009

IS MODERN PI ACCURATE?

Is Modern Pi Accurate?

Introduction Modern math science wants to keep us confined and boxed in with specific constants, with no consideration of ancient values or other "hyper dimensional" possibilities. Yet these modern math value constants have undergone changes in exactness over the past few decades. For example, Planck's Constant's base value is now [6 .626068], whereas in the recent past it was otherwise. [e] is now [2 .71828]. It is not that modern Pi is wrong. It has to be correct, especially in the framework of pentagonal geometry, but it has distinct validity when accompanying Phi values. Phi values work with different number systems to include four dimensional (4D) polytopes. These polytopes derive their importance by virtue of the ancient Phi values found in Egyptian pyramid numerologies. That is, our square root Phi value of 1 .27272727272~ is a slope tangent of Egyptian pyramids. Pi, on the other hand, is inconsistent, but in calculative efforts in applied technologies it is certainly close enough. My view is this: Pi is fluid, it has convergent flux, and can be a variety of values as evidenced by Pyramid

1 of 4

4/9/2013 11:53 AM

Is Modern Pi Accurate?

http://www.hydrosonics.org/HYDROSONICS/IS_MODERN_PI_ACC...

Pi = [22 / 7], or in many calculations where a result is so excruciatingly close to what modern Pi is supposed to be, that it is essentially within a statistical "nodal convergence" of numeric validity of what Pi represents. There are various forms of Phi and Pi. Ancient Phi Values Phi as 1.618033989 is absolutely correct in our 3D reality and universe, and modern mathematic applications as designed in our tangible universe. The Phi value derived from the ancient pyramids as 1 .62 is a calculative count system Phi by aligning the 9 into the ancient cultural count systems. (That is, 1 .62 or its non decimal form 162 = 3 x 6 x 9 = 9 x 18.) The square root Phi value of 1.27272727272727~ is an Egyptian Slope tangent for pyramids, and thus squared = 1 .619834711 and that VALUE, with the square root 1 .2727272727~, appears to have distinct evidence of flowing through most of the hypercube and evolved polytope numbers. Also, 1 .2727272727~ works in Pascal's triangle on specific numbers therein.'

Inter-dimensional Pi Values The modern value is off exact, in my opinion, but it is close enough for practical applications. Obviously ancient Pi is a valid and applicable value, but it is pyramid Pi that has nothing to do with circles or spheres. This ancient Pi value also is a distinct aspect of the hypercube and evolved polytopes. Math science has explored many values for Pi. It is safe to say that modern Pi is accompanied by several forms of Pi which are valid. I do believe, as indicated from my publication in HYDROSONICS, and postings on Love528.com, that modern Pi is askew from what it should be. That is, from the simple equation of Pi / Phi sq. = 1 . 199981614 = 1 .2 = 6 /5; the obvious realignment of modern Pi to flow perfectly within our current number system would be simply to make sure it aligns in the above formula with 1 .2 or 6 /5. In other words the Pi value would be unified into our number system if it were aligned properly in the equation:

2 of 4

4/9/2013 11:53 AM

Is Modern Pi Accurate?

http://www.hydrosonics.org/HYDROSONICS/IS_MODERN_PI_ACC...

Pi / Phi sq. = 1 .2 = 6 /5 . . . where in Phi sq = 2 .6180339 8 9. Such being the case, 1 .2 times Phi squared = Pi = 3 .141640787 [and not the 3.14159... imaged above]. Furthermore, if Phi sq = 2 .618033 99, then Pi would be 3 .141640788.

Modern Phi Values Modern Phi has Phi value company that facilitates different valid vectors of application. However, Modern Phi is the peak value of Phi as we use our modern [non-Pythagorean] mathematics system. Make no mistake, it works consistently in our 3D universe, but imperfectly in 4D analyses. The Phi values I often use are from the ancient math and count systems. With multi-versal possibilities in reality, as increasingly proven in math science and physics, with the infinitely interwoven fabrics of interdimensional connectivities, we see that modern Pi and Phi values become, lets say, fluid. Thus, they are closely related values which are proven to work with different applications, and are equally valid and both important. In conclusion, I do believe that modern Pi is off a tad.

* Vic Showell is a mathematician specializing in sacred geometrics and hyper-dimensional physics.

3 of 4

4/9/2013 11:53 AM

Is Modern Pi Accurate?

http://www.hydrosonics.org/HYDROSONICS/IS_MODERN_PI_ACC...

4 of 4

4/9/2013 11:53 AM