Professional Documents
Culture Documents
An Unwanted Guest
You sit straight up in bed. You heard a noise downstairs, at least you think you did. It sounded like someone bumped something in the kitchen. You ease the nightstand drawer open slowly, trying to be as quiet as possible, and withdraw your pistol. Your heart is beating a little faster now. You creep down the stairs, stopping whenever one of the treads squeaks a bit. You knew you should have fixed that. Finally at the bottom you slowly sweep around each corner, making your way circuitously toward the kitchen. Theres no one in sight, but its dark, and your eyes are still adjusting. You check the whole downstairs, just to be sure, but every window and door is secure. Finally you see it. The plastic lid to a brownie tin has popped off and landed on the floor. You pick it up and replace it, this time securely. Smiling and shaking a bit, you start to relax and breathe a sigh of relief. You head back upstairs to tell your wife that everything is OK, no need to worry about your children still asleep down the hall.
Me and Stephen
Everyone knows who Stephen King is, and lots of people read his works. Im a big fan myself, The Stand being my favorite of his writing so far (I admit to not having read everything hes written).
In the wake of Sandy Hook and the subsequent gun-control push, King published Guns, an essay in the form of a Kindle Single, proposing a path forward in the fight for tighter gun legislation. He has a lot of opinion, some fact, and a lot of bluster. And hes Stephen King. So its vitally important, imperative even, that someone respond to him. My goal is to address his opinion, supposed facts, and bluster. To level the playing field, let me share a bit about myself. Im 32 years old. I have a wife and three children. Im a Christian and a deacon. Im a libertarian, closer to an anarchist really. I love guns. I shoot them for fun. I have them to protect myself and my family. And I carry one in public, sometimes concealed, sometimes openly. Those of us who own and carry firearms have no desire to have to use them. The story above is an ideal outcome for us. But if that plastic lid had been an intruder, Id rather be standing there with my 1911 than a cell phone, waiting for help to arrive.
32,000 people were killed by motor vehicles1 in 2011 with 14,600 murders2 committed that same year, yet we dont hear anyone clamoring to ban assault vehicles. Nearly 80,000 people die from alcohol or alcohol-related disease3 each year, but we have not seen a push to ban alcohol. (Im not suggesting we should do either of these.) Buried in his essay are arguments against the two main reasons for Americans to own guns: tyranny and self-defense. These are both important reasons, and they are linked. Recently, gun-rights advocates held the first annual National Gun Appreciation Day. The problem with this is that we dont just appreciate guns. We need them, to defend ourselves and our families from criminals, both street and political. More than needing them, we have a right to them, and that right does not come from an old piece of paper saying we can keep and bear arms. for everybody has a natural right, not only to defend his own person and property against aggressors, but also to go to the assistance and defence of everybody else, whose person or property is invaded. The natural right of each individual to defend his own person and property against an aggressor, and to go to the assistance and defence of every one else whose person or property is invaded, is a right without which men could not exist on the earth. And government has no rightful existence, except in so far as it embodies, and is limited by, this natural right of individuals. Lysander Spooner, Vices Are Not Crimes
Kings Guilt?
Kings explanation of how he made the decision to remove his book Rage from circulation is quite puzzling to me. After four separate school shooting incidents were each in some way linked to the book, he told his publisher to pull it from circulation. The puzzling part is that King says he has no regret about writing the story, which depicts a boy, Charlie, who takes a gun to school, kills his algebra teacher, and holds his class hostage.
http://www.nhtsa.gov/About+NHTSA/Press+Releases/2012/New+NHTSA+Analysis+Shows+2011+Traffic+Fataliti es+Declined+by+Nearly+Two+Percent
2
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-1 http://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/fact-sheets/alcohol-use.htm
The violent actions and emotions portrayed in Rage were drawn directly from the high school life I was living five days a week, nine months a year. The book told unpleasant truths, and anyone who doesnt feel a qualm of regret at throwing a blanket over the truth is an asshole with no conscience. But why only Rage? Virtually all of Kings works are violent. The main antagonist in The Stand, Randall Flagg, uses guns to execute people. The lead character in The Dark Tower series is a gunslinger who uses his revolver to kill people on nearly every page. Kings miserable high school experience is by no means unusual. But he doesnt delve any further into it. High school sucks, kids (especially boys) feel anger, frustration, and any number of other emotions, but thats just the way it is. Now give up your guns. Two things are conspicuously absent from Kings description. First, what happens to kids who are feeling these things? The answer, most often, is that they are medicated, usually with mindaltering psychoactive pharmaceuticals which damage their brains and in many cases, cause them to be psychotically suicidal and homicidal. Per a 12-year National Institutes of Health study4, boys are prescribed psychostimulants (like Ritalin and Adderall) more than three times as often as girls. The second question he fails to ask is whether there is any link between the introduction of these types of medicines, beginning with Prozac in 1987, and an increase in violence from school children. Since about 1850 there have been approximately 239 school shootings5. Only 35% were committed in the period up until 1987, the other 65%, 155 shootings have occurred in the last 25 years. One might argue that this is because of the abundance and availability of guns today, compared to previous generations, but this argument rings hollow as you could mail order a gun from Sears up until the Gun Control Act of 1968 was passed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_related_to_primary_schools http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_related_to_secondary_schools
but that LaPierre couldnt care less about it. His only job is to maintain the illusion that the NRA cares about your right to own a gun. And its just that, an illusion. The NRA is no more than a political organization. And like all such organizations it is susceptible to corruption. The NRA, including LaPierre, in conjunction with the Brady Campaign, supported Project Exile6, which moved the prosecution of technical gun possession offenses from state to federal court and imposed mandatory minimum sentencing. The NRA is also a big proponent of prosecuting people for unconstitutional gun laws and for making concealed carry a privilege while droning on about supporting your right to keep and bear arms. Need I mention that they have also contributed to the election campaigns of politicians who voted for gun control? I guess not. As for the culture of violence, yes, we do live in one. King tries to disprove this by regaling us with statistics on superhero movies, TV shows, and videogames, feeding us the conclusion that The message is clear: Americans have very little interest in entertainment featuring gunplay. Perhaps King doesnt have a TV, so well forgive him on this point. The majority of popular television shows may not feature non-stop gunplay, but what they do feature is the deification of all things law enforcement and military. And what do these agencies specialize in: Violence, in the form of the murder of half a million Iraqi children through economic sanctions, the seemingly endless preemptive foreign wars, drone strikes, and the murder of innocent people by trigger-happy cops. The US Army has even developed its own first person shooter video game, Americas Army. The US government, including Obama, is the number one purveyor of violence today. Its a bit hard to take being preached at by someone about ending violence when they turn around and sign orders to murder innocent men, women, and children because they were born in the wrong country. Why is it that those who continually wring their hands about gun violence are rarely, if ever, seen challenging their dear leaders on the gun and drone violence being committed in their name against innocents all over the world?
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/virginia-attorney-general-wants-project-exile-expanded-nationwide
Before giving us his solution to gun violence, King tries to offer evidence that gun control works. He details the shooting incident that led to Australias gun ban in 1997. Since then, were told, homicides by firearm have declined almost 60 percent in Australia. This is a common trick of gun control advocates. They like to compare gun crime rates, rather than actual overall crime rates. Its a bit disingenuous to focus specifically on gun crime statistics if your stated goal is an overall decrease in crime. That is unless you werent really serious. I have yet to have anyone tell me that theyd rather be stabbed, beaten, or drowned to death rather than being shot. While the graph of Australian gun crime does show the decline King mentions, the knife/sharp instrument graph is a near mirror image7, trending upward at exactly the same rate. Total murders are virtually unchanged since the ban8. Assaults and rapes have also continued to increase steadily9. Instead of being shot to death, the Australians are now being stabbed to death. Its hard to understand how this is a win in any sense of the word. The UK suffered the same fate after their gun ban, with violent crime increasing by 2.5 times since then10. These statistics are freely available from the respective governments websites for those who would care to look at the arithmetic. The statistics from the United States are just as telling, but completely ignored by those seeking to strip law-abiding people of their firearms.
10
The UK doesnt provide a year-over-year table of crime. 1998/1999 Report: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http:/rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs/hosb1899.pdf 2011/2012 Report: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/science-research-statistics/research-statistics/crimeresearch/hosb0812/hosb0812
Per FBI crime statistics11, over the 20 year period from 1992-2011 the violent crime rate and murder rate have dropped 50% in the US. Note that the assault weapons ban ended a little more than halfway through that period. Incidentally, this is the same time period where many states passed shall issue concealed carry laws.
11
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/tables/table-1
maxim is this: We need guns so government cant take them away and then kill us as they see fit. To believe that it could only happen in Europe and Asia during the 20th century is the height of arrogance.
Conclusion
So, dear reader, you ask, what is my solution for the problem of gun violence? To the extent that I care to differentiate gun murder from any other type of murder, here are some radical suggestions. Repeal the Gun Free School Zone Act 1990 These Safe for Criminals Shooting Galleries seem to be a magnet for the Adam Lanzas of the world. Note that Im not suggesting the government designate or post armed guards. Just remove the restrictions on having guns within 1,000 feet of school property and let anyone carry a firearm.
I would add shutting down all government schools, but that may be a bit too radical for most readers, and deserves its own essay. Repeal all concealed carry laws and allow anyone to carry a concealed firearm Most will not be able to stomach this, but it goes hand in hand with the above. Stop subsidizing big pharma by drugging children with mind-altering drugs Its amazing I even have to write that. Who can object to it? Will these measures stop violence? Of course not. Will a good guy with a gun always stop a bad guy with a gun? No again. But even the government admits that having a gun improves your odds over not having one. Otherwise the police would give up their guns in favor of that burglar alarm.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 444 Castro Street, Suite 900, Mountain View, California, 94041, USA.