Professional Documents
Culture Documents
20080605
NPV
Abstract
Energy-conservation, as another important energy following after the coal, natural gas,
petroleum, hydropower, and nuclear energy, plays an irreplaceable role in the country's
increasingly tense situation in the energy. On the other hand, as a kind of clean energy,
energy-conservation makes more indelible contributions to relieving the problem of
environmental pollution that the industrial development brings. Energy- conservation work
penetrates all aspects of life and production, of which the use of industrial waste heat
energy is very important in a part of. The industrial waste heat resources of our country are
abundant, but inefficient use and recovery of it, especially in low-temperature flue gas
utilization of waste heat energy has great potential. In this paper, recovery and utilization of
waste heat in the industrial flue gas as the main research subjects, the optimization research
of the heat exchanger in the waste heat recovery as the focus, the optimization research for
the recovery and utilization of waste heat in the industrial flue gas has been launched.
In this paper, the use of waste heat of the flue gas general principles has been summed
up from the thermodynamic point of view. The ways of utilizing flue gas waste heat of
different temperature levels has been analyzed applying thermodynamics. And that, the heat
exchanger in the waste heat recovery plays a critical role in the use of the flue gas waste
heat of middle and low- temperature.
The optimization research for the heat exchanger of waste heat recovery is the core
content of this article. In this paper, the introduction of optimization (also known as the
mathematical programming), a new model has been to bring up, which the value type
dynamic evaluation indicators of technical and economic-net present value (NPV) as the
optimized goal, the heat transfer area of heat exchanger in waste heat recovery as the design
variables. With the second law of thermodynamics and technical economics theories,
detailed building process of the mathematical model was derived. Than the effect of
optimization model was validated through specific examples. The result reveals:
Optimization of net present value than conventional design can achieve better economy
efficiency and environmental benefits.
The design and calculation of recovery and utilization of waste heat at tail flue gas was
carry out, which is the part of the project of pulverized coal and lime rotary kiln togas
burning in Tongshan County of Hubei Tongli Magnesium Indstry limited liability company ,
II
by optimization of net present value. The economy efficiency and environmental benefits
after the recovery and utilization of waste heat was calculation. And it will offer the reference
to the determination of project of recovery and utilization in the tail flue gas.
In the optimal design model of the heat exchanger in waste heat recovery of his paper,
not only the optimization problem of energy was considered, combined with technical
economics theory, the time efficiency of capital has also been considered. Through analysis
of the economic effect of the entire operation period after investment, a more
comprehensive evaluation on the reasonableness of the recovery scheme can be made.
Methods and conclusions of this paper can also be offered certain reference for the
application of project.
Keywords: waste heat recovery; industrial flue gas; optimization; the heat exchanger;
net present value (NPV)
III
______
1.1
1.1.1
2004
23 1.4% 2.23
1.2% 1145 12.6%
2030
1-1[1]
1-1
65%
1-1 60
1990~2004 [2]
1-1
/ %
1990
98 703
76.2
16.6
2.1
5.1
1995
131 176
74.6
17.5
1.8
6.1
2000
130 297
66.1
24.6
2.5
6.8
2001
134 914
65.3
24.3
2.7
7.7
2002
148 222
65.6
24.0
2.6
7.8
2003
170 943
67.6
22.7
2.7
7.0
2004
197 000
67.7
22.7
2.6
7.0
1-2
25
20
15
10
5
0
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
1-2
[3]
1.1.2
1)
()
2003 893
2.3 2.7 9.4
45[4] 1-2
1-2
2003 GDP
GDP
GDP
GDP
13200
1178.3
8.93
1.00
5590
345.3
6.18
1.45
7330
212
2.89
3.09
58800
504.8
0.86
10.40
5060
670.8
13.26
0.67
27100
332.2
1.23
7.28
18300
260.6
1.42
6.27
13900
223.2
1.61
5.56
12400
181.9
1.47
6.09
7540
291.4
3.86
2.31
94600
2297.8
2.43
3.68
36300
9747.1
2.68
3.33
1600 [6]
70
60
58.2
50.6
50
40
30
20
15.4
12.1
11.5
10
8.1
5.5
5.3
4.5
3.9
1-3
CO2
1.1.3
1.2
1.2.1
1-3
830
10.4
180
21.7
650
62
4.9
20
30.8
45
620
8.8
260
41.9
360
680
24.5
380
55.9
300
CHEN
305
3.2
85
27.9
220
280
6.1
70
21.9
210
70
6.1
30
42.9
40
70
2.2
30
42.9
40
120
3.1
20
16.7
100
3040
7.3
1075
34.9
1965
7.3%
34.9%
70%
[9, 10]
1.2.2
1-4
1-4
[11]
1)
2)
15
3)
4)
5)
400
6)
1.2.3
25%
1) 1975
30.4% 28% 54%
76.8%
2)
3)
4)
50%
1)
65%
2)
3)
4)
1.3
[12, 13]
[14, 15]
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
1-5
1-5
2.1
[16]
()
()
10
[17]
2.2
[18, 19]
1)
[20]
11
2) [21]
30%
1000
3)
[22] 2-1
12
2-1
2-1
2-1
1650~1900
100~300
1100~1300
400~500
1400~1600
300~600
1000~1100
250~400
900~1200
400~600
600~800
250~600
650~900
300~450
600~650
13
2.3.1
600
5000 Nm3 /h
Ty1 T0
1 2
2
2
T
T
E y = dQ 1 0 = 1 0 C p dT
1
1
T
T
2-1
Wmax
2
T
T
Wmax = E y = 1 0 C p dT = C p (Ty1 Ty 2 ) T0 ln y1
1
Ty 2
T
2-2
Q = C p (Ty1 T0 )
2-3
1
W
=
Q Ty1 T0
Ty1
(Ty1 Ty 2 ) T0 ln
Ty 2
2-4
2.3.2
14
1)
Qin = Qyx + Qr
2-5
Qyx
Qin
100%
2-6
Qin = Qyx + Qr
2-7
hs =
Qyx
Qin
100%
2-8
kJ/h
= 1
Qhs
=
hs Qin
2-9
2-2A
15
2-2
2)
2-10
Qyx
100%
2-11
Qin
Qhs
Qgi = Qgi + Qhs Qyx = Qyx Qhs
Qin Qin
[8]
16
Qyx
Qin
Qyx
2-12
Qin
2-13
hs =
Qyx
Qin
Qyx Qhs
Qin
Qyx
Qyx Qhs
1
Q
1 hs
Qyx
2-14
= 1
Qhs
=
hs Qyx
2-15
2-2BC
3)
2-16
hs =
Qyx + Qhs
Qin
= +
Q
Qhs
= 1 + hs
Qyx
Qin
2-17
= 1
Qhs
=
hs Qyx + Qhs
2-18
2-2D
2-9
2-15
2-18
17
Qhs
Qhs
Q
>
> hs
Qyx Qyx + Qhs Qin
2.4
1.
2.
3.
4.
18
3.1
3.1.1
(Optimization)
()
(Mathematical Programming)[24]
50 70
3.1.2
[25, 26]
19
3.1.3
[27]
()
()
[28]
20
[29]
n
min f ( X )
X = ( x1 , x2 , ^, xn )
S .T .gi ( X ) 0
( i = 1, 2, ^, m )
hj ( X ) = 0
( j = 1, 2, ^, l )
f ( X ) X n m
l gi ( X ) h j ( X )
3.1.4
3.2
21
3.2.1
[30-38]
NPQ
NPQ = CQ Q B I
CQ /J
Q W s
B / I /
NCQ = CQ Qg + B + I
Qg
Ce Ec + n ( Ecr + E yr ) I
Q
Ce /J Ec kJ/h Ecr E yr
kJ/h
T=
I
B C
I B / C
/
22
NPV
NPV = ( CI CO )t (1 + i0 )
3-1
t =0
( CI CO )t t CI CO
T i0
3.2.2
3.2.3
[39]
1)
1000
23
200 1400
140~150
2)
3)
0.8 1.75
[23]
4)
24
3.3
3.3.1
[40, 41]
1.
Q = Gc C pc (tc 2 tc1 )
3-2
Q
K tm
tm
F=
tm =
(t
y1
3-3
tc 2 ) ( t y 2 tc1 )
t t
ln( y1 c 2 )
t y 2 tc1
t t t t
( y1 c 2 ) ( y 2 c1 )
Q
= Gc C pc (tc 2 tc1 ) / K
F=
t t
K tm
ln( y1 c 2 )
t y 2 tc1
3-4
Q = Gc C pc (tc 2 tc1 ) = G y C py (t y1 t y 2 )
t y 2 = t y1
Gc C pc
G y C py
(tc 2 tc1 )
3-5
3-53-4
25
F=
GcC pc G y C py
t y1 t c 2
3-6
Gc C pc
Gc C pc
t y1 +
1 t
t
G y C py c1 G y C py c 2
2
F / m Gc C pc G y C py / W K -1 K
K ( Gc C pc G y C py )
ln
/ W/ ( m 2 K ) tc1 t y1 tc 2 t y 2 /
R=
GcC pc
G y C py
NTU ,
1
NTU =
KF
NTU 3-6
Gc C pc
3-7
NTU
3-8
T0 / K ,
2.
[34]
p
kc 1
3-9
GcC pcT0 ln 1 c
kc
pc1
kc pc / pa pc1
Ecr =
26
/ pa
p1 = f
c uc2 L
2 di
c kg/m3 U c m/s
L / di p2 =
c uc2
2
1
3-10
pc = f c L + c cU c2
di
2
p
K
Eu = 12 St =
u
uC p
NTU =
KF
3-10
Gc C pc
NTU
d
3-11
f c + i L c pc1
8 Euc Stc
1
Fc =
( f c + i c ) Fc
8 Euc Stc
L
pc =
p
3-11 c = Fc NTU
pc1
Ecr =
kc 1
Gc C pcT0 ln (1 Fc NTU )
kc
3-12
3.
p k 1
G y C pyT0 ln 1 y = y G y C pyT0 ln (1 Fy NTU )
ky
p y1
ky
k y Fy
E yr =
ky 1
3-13
3.3.2
27
NPV
[42]
NPV < 0 ,
1.
I c = CeEc
3-14
1
Ce /J[43] Ce =
C
1 ln Q
CQ /J =
Ty1
T0
Ec kJ/h
2.
I r = nCe ( Ecr + E yr )
3-15
3.
28
I 0 I F
I = I 0 + I F F = I 0 + I F NTU GcC pc / K
3-16
4.
I N = I c I r = Ce Ec + n ( Ecr + E yr )
3-17
NPV = I N (1 + ic ) I = I N (1 + ic ) I 0 I F NTU Gc C pc / k
t =1
3-18
t =1
NPV T ic
3.4
NTU
3-7
3-1
3-83-14
3-12
3-13 3-2
29
3-17
NTU
NPV
3-3
300
250
R=0.2
R=0.4
R=0.6
R=0.8
200
150
100
0
3-1
0.08
(kJ/h)
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
0
3-2
30
3.5
80.00
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
0
3-3
1.
2.
NPV
3.
31
32
NPV
4.1
35t/h
4-1 4-2
4-1
kg/h
20
12893.00
4-2
250
160
13614.33
h/
Q235-A/
/
(/)
KJ/ kg
/
7000
15
1.4
1.2
0.45
25
21054
700
0.15
= 0.7
4-3
33
4-3
NTU
kJ/h
104.92
104591.4788
77828.78
138.71
194329.8736
144605.05
154.78
244764.2469
182134.36
163.31
273407.1743
203448.18
168.11
290048.5018
215831.35
170.89
299875.3960
223143.75
172.53
305738.7119
227506.77
kJ/h
kJ/h
-10841.20
-4373.42
33964.59
-21826.72
-8757.82
68275.86
-32932.27
-13153.25
102879.69
-44153.92
-17559.76
137767.45
-55492.24
-21977.42
172940.53
-66949.26
-26406.27
208403.58
-78527.55
-30846.38
244162.50
I 0
I F
I 0 = 5000 Q235-A Y1 = 1.4 /
Y2 = 1.0
/ Q235-A = 7.85 103 kg/m3
50 2mm 0.45
34
M1 = F
M 1 kg mm
M 2 = 0.45M 1
K = 13W / ( m 2 K )
4-5
4-5
NTU
65265.18
85140.43
296,489.21
114641.60
165532.84
504,819.04
126801.41
245979.05
495,475.75
118403.92
326432.66
365,918.89
98601.21
406880.21
169,677.54
72207.93
487318.46
-65,091.99
41858.31
567747.72
-322,986.71
4.2
4.2.1
4-6 4-1
35
4-6
kw
(/)
100
286.89
240368.58
72777.53
167591.05
110
322.75
270414.65
88804.77
181609.88
120
358.61
300460.72
108363.88
192096.84
130
394.47
330506.79
132976.82
197529.97
140
430.33
360552.86
165343.63
195209.24
150
466.19
390598.94
210967.11
179631.82
160
502.06
420645.01
284124.66
136520.35
170
537.92
450691.08
451153.92
-462.84
//
()
50.00
45.00
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
-5.00
80
100
120
140
160
180
4-1
4-6 4-1
4.2.2
4-6
4-2
36
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
0
NTU
4-2
4-2
4.2.3
3-83-123-133-143-153-17
4-3
//
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0
NTU
4-3
37
4-3
4.2.4
NPV
4-4
4-4
4-5 4-4 6
60.00
40.00
20.00
0.00
-20.00
-40.00
0
NTU
4-4
38
4.2.5
4-5
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
-10
-20
0
10
15
20
25
30
4-5
4-5
4.3
4.3.1
NTU
39
NTU =
KF
Gc C pc
4-7
4-7
663.48
568.82
146
130
kw
451.86
394.01
37.8588
33.0122
(/)
20.4927
18.6557
8.2083
7.0344
12.2843
11.6213
19.7708
17.0358
1.6
1.46
52.0604
50.9187
m2
4-7
14.7% 5.7%
2.2%
4.3.2
[46]
40
B =
Bqc
Q + qc q y
4-1
y
dw
B t/h
y
Qdw
kJ/kg
qc kJ/kg
q y kJ/kg
qc = Ln tc 2C pc Ln m3 /kg
100 q4
100
4-2
CO 1. 7878 kg/m3
2
t h
q4 %
Ln = 2.59m3 /kg Vn = 3.48m3 /kg
B =
Bqc
= 140.43kg/h
Q + qc q y
y
dw
100 q4
= 66.9Mt/y
100
100 q4
= 65.35Mt/y
100
5837 kg/h
5696.57 kg/h 2.4%
41
66.9Mt/y 65.35Mt/y 1.55Mt
4.4
1.
2.
3.
42
5.1
5-1
5-1
600 400~450
1200
43
400~450
5.2
[47]
5-1
5-1
400
20
kg/h
3813.14
kg/h
3822.9
h/
7000
10
Q235-A/
1.4
1.2
0.45
(/)
25
380
0.15
KJ/ kg
20929.26
= 0.7
5-2
44
5-2
NTU
kJ/h
168.84
93904.77
45799.08
226.89
166488.49
81199.49
253.18
204002.50
99495.76
266.10
223370.67
108941.97
272.70
233492.02
113878.34
276.14
238825.57
116479.61
277.95
241649.78
117857.03
32m
Fc Fy
Fc = 0.017 Fy = 0.004
: kc = 1.4 , k y = 1.3 n = 4
5-3
5-3
NTU
kJ/h
kJ/h
-4732.06
-2376.76
13868.41
-9572.38
-4763.09
27966.69
-14503.29
-7159.06
42260.51
-19523.13
-9564.75
56746.78
-24634.07
-11980.24
71429.89
-29839.54
-14405.61
86316.69
-35143.45
-16840.94
101414.97
I 0
I F
45
I 0 = 50000 I F = 290.45 / m 2
5-4
5-4
NTU
31930.66
70503.98
89748.64
53232.80
91118.38
176044.74
57235.25
111752.60
175497.87
52195.19
132385.95
129569.66
42448.45
153013.82
60025.12
30162.92
173636.22
-22255.50
16442.06
194254.31
-111735.43
5.3
NPV
//
5-2 5-3
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
5-2
46
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
-5.00
-10.00
-15.00
0
5-3
B =
Bqc
= 70.61kg/h
Q + qc q y
y
dw
100 q4
= 11.36Mt/y
100
100 q4
= 10.42Mt/y
100
5-5
47
5-5
173.65
241.13
kw
203.31
17.1363
()
9.0945
3.4375
5.6570
10.0403
1.77
18.3512
70.61
kg/h
%
8.3
Mt/y
0.94
5.4
8.3%
0.94Mt
48
6.1
1.
2.
3.
4.
NPV
1)
49
2)
3)
5.
6.2
1.
2.
3.
50
109
2008 5
51
[1]
http://www.chinaelections.org/NewsInfo.asp?NewsID=125380.
[2]
. 2005 http://www.allchinadata.com.
[3]
. . : , 2006.
[4]
. 2003.
[5]
. CO2 .
http://www.chinaelections.org/NewsInfo.asp?NewsID=125380.
[6]
. . : , 2005.
[7]
. . , 2006
[8]
. . : , 1993.
[9]
, . . : ,
1993.
[10] Bebar L, Martinak P, Hajek J. Waste to energy in the field of thermal processing of
waste. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2002(22): 897906.
[11] Stehlik P. Heat transfer as an important subject in waste-to-energy systems. Applied
Thermal Engineering, 2007, 27(10): 1658-1670.
[12] . : []. :
, 2005.
York: John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1995.
[18] R G, A T. Principles of waste heat recovery. Atlanta, G.A.,USA: The Fairmont Press,
1986.
[19] . . http://www.cnki.net:
[20] . : [ ]. : ,
2007.
[21] . .
, 200087~92.
[22] WC T. Energy management handbook, 4th ed. New York, NY, USA: Marcel Dekker
Incorporated, 2002.
[23] . . : , 2002.
[24] . . : , 2000.
[25] , . . : , 1985.
[26] , . . : , 1987.
[27] . CAD : []. :
, 2003.
[28] . . : , 1989.
[29] . . : , 1996.
[30] Zhang Y, Liu S. The optimization model of the heat conduction structure. Progress in
Natural Science, 2008, 18(6): 665-670.
[31] , . . , 1994(3): 17~19.
[32] . . , 1994(4): 36~39.
[33] , . . , 1993, 28(9): 76~78.
[34] , . . , 1996,
15(6): 4446.
[35] , . . : , 1992.
[36] Sylemez M S. On the optimum heat exchanger sizing for waste heat recovery.
Energy Convers Manage, 2000(41): 1419-27.
[37] Reppich M, Kohoutek J. Optimal design of shell-and-tube heat exchanger.
Computers and Chemical Engineering 1994(18): 295~299.
[38] C.H. Hewitt, Pugh S J. Approximate Design and Costing Methods for Heat
Exchangers. Proc. International Conference Heat Exchangers for Sustainable
53
Development, Lisbon, Portugal, 1998pp. 801820.
[39] Bejan A, Tsatsaronis G, Moran M. Thermal design and optimization. New York: J.
Wiley, 1996.
[40] Ahern J E. The exergy method of energy system analysis. N.Y Wiley, 1980.
[41] . . ,
1996, 11(1): 45~50.
[42] . . : , 2004.
[43] Taal M, Bulatov I. Cost estimation and energy price forecast for economic evaluation
of retrofit projects. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2003(23): 1819~1835.
[44] . . , 1985, 6(4):
311314.
[45] . . , 1998, 17(2):
4649.
[46] . CAD . : , 1998.
[47] . : []. :
, 2007.
54
t/h
CQ
/J
Ce
di
/J
Ec
Ecr
E yr
kJ/h
kJ/h
F
f
m 2
Gc C pc
W K -1
G y C py
W K
I0
IF
i0
K
qy
kJ/kg
y
Qdw
kJ/kg
Qgi
kJ/h
kJ/h
Qgo
kJ/h
Qhs
Qin
kJ/h
kJ/h
Qin
kJ/h
kc
ky
Qr
kJ/h
Qr
kJ/h
p1
pa
Qyx
p2
pa
kJ/h
pc
pa
pc1
pa
q4
qc
tc1
tc 2
t y1
kJ/kg
ty2
T0
-1
W/ ( m 2 K )
55
Uc
m/s
CO
VCO2
CO2 m3 /kg
Eu
St
NPV
NTU
kg/m3
2
56
1.7878 kg/m3
(1)
1.. []- 2010(17)
http://d.g.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis_D064606.aspx