Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
1 2 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Test Tools ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Data collect Method......................................................................................................... 2 Summary............................................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Cluster Information and Test Route.................................................................................3 2.2 Site Information and SSV................................................................................................4 2.3 Site distribution map:....................................................................................................... 5 RF Analysis and Comparison.............................................................................................. 7 3.1.1 RSCP Coverage....................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Quality........................................................................................................................... 11 3.2.1 Ec/Io Coverage....................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Cell Best SC Distribution............................................................................................... 13 3.4 Pilot Pollution................................................................................................................. 13 3.4.1. Pilot pollution.......................................................................................................... 14 Call Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 16 4.1 Short call access statistics (Sony Ericsson W995)........................................................16 4.2 Retainability Analysis (Short call)..................................................................................19 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)...................................................................................20 5.1 KPIs based on Drive Test.............................................................................................. 20 Drive Test conclusion ...................................................................................................... 20
4 5 6
Page 1 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
1 Introduction
The statistical data shows present performance KPIs of cluster two before and after RF optimization. In this report, the WCDMA RAN performance is described according to separate measures of RF coverage, Accessibility and Retainability, using Huaweis quality metrics and classifications. This analysis was performed for Pre Optimization. Data is collected from WCDMA test UE.
Page 2 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
Summary
2.1 Cluster Information and Test Route
To have more facts about the network information and according to BTS distribution of the sites and landform, we confirm test route around the sites. The area of this cluster and the test route is shown in the figure below:
Page 3 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
Status
ON AIR
ON AIR
Page 4 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
Page 5 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
2.4
Site Parameters
Cell ID PSC Antenna Height Azimuth Mech. Tilt Elect. Tilt
Site Name
28 28 28 30 30 30
0 0 0 0 0 0
2 2 2 2 2 2
Total number of planned sites for the cluster is: 2 Percentage Sites Radiating: 100% Comments: All the sites were up and running.
Page 6 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
CPICH RSCP distribution shows the downlink coverage. Greater Pilot RSCP reflects better downlink coverage.
C D
Figure1: RSCP Distribution map Figure 1 above shows the RSCP Coverage for the network before optimization. Bad areas marked B, C & D was due distance from the serving sector. The Areas A need 2 degree electrical down tilt at site UKAD023B to improve the coverage in the area.
Page 7 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
Fig. 2 UE-CPICH Pilot RSCP Distribution The CPICH pilot points greater than -95dBm is analyzed as 70% as shown in Fig.2, above.
Page 8 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
3.1.3
UE Tx Power Coverage
Fig.3 below also shows the UE-Tx power statistics recorded for Cluster 1 before Optimization which was -100 to 0 dBm, indicating very strong Uplink coverage. The indexes of UE-TX power 10dBm was measured as 84.1%.
Page 9 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
Page 10 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
3.2 Quality
3.2.1 Ec/Io Coverage CPICH pilot Ec/Io greater than -12dB before Optimization is represented as 95.6%, this is directly related to the downlink coverage.
Page 11 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
Page 12 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
Page 13 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
3.4.1.Pilot pollution At each measurement point, the number of detected CPICHs that fulfill the condition Ec/Nonth cell SC >= Ec/NoBest serving cell SC 5 dB AND RSCPnth cell SC >=-90 dB has been computed.
Figure 8 shows pilot pollution map. Pollution is recorded only in situations where the number of polluters is greater than 3.
From the figure 8 above, it can be seen that the pilot pollution overhead is 0.1%, which is good.
Page 14 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
Downlink App. Throughput Distribution before Optimization. As the figure shown below, the downlink RLC Throughput samples are low, which was as a result of poor coverage and transmission link failure.
Page 15 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
Call Analysis
4.1 Short call access statistics (Sony Ericsson W995)
RRC Setup Count RRC Setup Suc count RRC Setup Suc Ratio Average setup time delay(s) RAB Setup Summary RAB Setup Count RAB Setup Suc count RAB Setup Suc Ratio Average RB setup time delay (s) Call Setup Success Rate; 100%
90 75 82.9%
63 63 100%
The RRC setup success ratio was 82.9%, and the RAB setup success ratio reached to 100%.
Page 16 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
ANALYSIS & SOLUTION/RECOMMENDATION Call setup failure 1: The call block was as a result of limited service, improve coverage around UKAD023B
Page 17 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
Page 18 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
Result 68 0
Rate 100% 0%
Page 19 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
All KPIs are from short calls otherwise mentioned. Drive test Based
3G Call Performance Call Attempt (CS) Attempt Failure (CS) Attempt Failure Rate (CS) Good Initialization (CS) Call Setup Success Rate (CS) Call Attempt (PS) Attempt Failure (PS) Attempt Failure Rate (PS) Good Initialization (PS) Call Setup Success Rate (PS) Call Drop (CS) Call Drop Rate (CS) Normal Termination (CS) Call Retainability (CS) Call Drop (PS) Call Drop Rate (PS) Normal Termination (PS) Retainability (PS) 3G Handover Soft / Softer Handover Factor overhead Soft Handover Success Rate CS Inter-RAT Handover Success Rate( from UTRAN to GSM) PS Inter-RAT Handover Success Rate( from UTRAN to GSM) INTEGRITY UL BLER (Speech) UL BLER (PS) THROUGHPUT PS 64 RAB PS 128 RAB PS 384 RAB
17.6% 100%
2.21%
Drive Test Data collected was analyzed so that problems can be located. After analyzing coverage problems, Pilot pollution and handover problems, corresponding adjustment solutions were made to
Page 20 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011
improve the coverage and quality of the network. From the above analysis and statistics, it can be summarized that the coverage of Kaduna Cluster 1 dont meets Acceptance Criteria. .
Page 21 of 23
Date: 12/8/2011