Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Civil Society Coordination Newsletter - supporting independent engagement with the OGP
Dear colleagues, The London OGP meeting 2 weeks ago had a packed agenda; let me give you three pieces to chew on. The first piece is linked to the discussion of timelines. One of the things agreed in principle was the idea to begin moving toward a biannual calendar for action plans and IRM reports. This links to the discussion on how to encourage ambition and stretch in the action plans - something that was envisioned in the design of OGP, but has not everywhere come out as such. Many commitments are actually defined to be deliverable within a year. From that perspective longer timelines can drive ambition if balanced by efforts to keep the local dynamic going and maintain pressure on the national process. One of the challenges in the coming months will be to work out how to improve the OGP guidance and mechanics in a way that brings additional quality and ambition to the national dialogue and to the action plans: what can be done to facilitate and strengthen CSO advocacy and monitoring efforts, how can we move from consultation to ongoing dialogue and partnership? Getting this right can bring more depth and quality to the national processes At the heart of the SC meeting was the presentation of the action plans of the newest OGP members, the future plans of the founding members and a dialogue between the both of them. This worked best where countries had both government and civil society at the table like in the case of Costa Rica and Hungary. Costa Rica - with the hands-on support of the Networking Mechanism and our team - managed to turn around their process and deliver a promising action plan and lay the basis for a good permanent dialogue. The case of Hungary brought about a spirited dialogue on balancing political space versus creating space for CSO priorities and on how difficult it is to consult and provide feedback in a way that works for both sides. Our discussion took place before Hungary drastically curtailed the FOI space. This last point brings me to the second piece: what to do about countries that clearly backslide against the principles or eligibility criteria of OGP? How to deal with this clear restriction of the FOI in Hungary or the very obvious restrictions of CSO space in Russia and Azerbaijan? The OGP Steering Committee generally does not collectively comment on progress or lack thereof in an individual country as the local dynamic is leading - except in the exceptional circumstances. OGP reiterated this in February. But cases will continue to pop up and each case will ask for a tailor-made reaction. The toolbox might need to be filled with more options I think from diplomacy via publicity to ultimately suspension. More guidance is needed on making processes and plans better at the start of each round, keeping a focus on strong (independent) monitoring and being prepared to act if countries lose ground on openness. All these elements are needed to improve the performance of the current 58 members. Although there was general agreement that the next phase of OGP should be about deepening the commitments and actual change in these countries, there was also consensus on the need to broaden participation in certain regions (Africa, Asia) where more countries are getting ready to join. The latest update of the eligibility criteria made 6 additional countries eligible, including Malawi and Venezuela. Much more can be found in the minutes the Support Unit will release, by the end of the week, via the regular channels. This includes new thinking on peer learning and support as well as agreement on the next rotation (October 2014 with an additional seat being created). A final point to chew on is the OGP Summit (31 October and 1 November). There is no strategic outline or agenda yet from the side of the UK government. But the buzzwords point in the right direction: energetic, fresh format, smart use of technology, co-creation programming, plenty of space for civil society meetings before and during the Summit. A planning committee is about to be created hopefully we will have an outline (soon) and a draft agenda before summer. Thats was my quick take on what happened in London. The official minutes and final documents will be online by the end of the week, and the next Steering Committee meeting is in July. Kind regards, Paul
Highlights London SC Meeting highlights from the Civil Society Coordinator Self-Assessment Reports available for OGP founding members News from Italy on FOI implementation FOI setbacks in Hungary
Inside this issue: FOI Setbacks in Hungary Self-Assessment Reports Available CS Comments on South African Assessment 2
In Case You Missed 2 It... Italy: The Silent State Upcoming Events and Webinars African Model Access to Information Law 3 3
NGOs Excluded 4 from UNCAC Evaluation Mechanism OKCON Call for Proposals Achieving Results Through OGP 4
Page 2
If you have any information or materials that you would want for us to include in our next newsletter please send them to Nout van der Vaart (n.van.der.vaart@hivos.nl) or Emilene Martnez (emilene17@gmail.com).
Page 3
Page 4
During the regional consultation meeting on the draft (jointly organized by the Special Rapporteur, Human Rights Centre and Africa Freedom of Information Centre in Nairobi, Kenya, on Aug. 29-31, 2011) government and civil society leaders from Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania, Rwanda, Burundi, The Model Law on Access to Information for Africa, recently Ethiopia and South Sudan commented on the initiative and launched by the African Commission on Human and Peomade significant inputs into the draft. ples Rights (ACHPR), is a milestone for the development of FOI laws in Africa. This multi-stakeholder co-creation approach process offers valuable lessons for OGP community. Read the full article here.
NGOs Excluded from UNCAC Evaluation The Open Knowledge Foundation is calling for proposals for Mechanism OKCON 2013 Call for Proposals
its annual Conference scheduled for September 17 -18 in Geneva. The deadline to submit them is May 24th. Six topics will be discussed and explored on this years conference Open Data Broad, Deep, Connected: Open Data, Government and Governance; Open Development and Sustainability; Open Science and Research; Open Culture; Technology, Tools and Business; and Evidence and Stories. Anticipating the meeting of the United Nations Convention Against Corruptions Implementation Review Group (IRG) in Vienna May of 27th, the civil society network UNCAC Coalition submitted a written statement to UNCAC to express their concerns about the exclusion of NGOs from the Implementation Review Group and from the Working Groups on Asset Recovery and Prevention meetings.
According to Vincent Lazatin and Gillian Dell (who respectively represent the Transparency and Accountability NetDFIDs Mark Robinsons published an article on OGPs blog work in the Philippines and Transparency International in where he discusses how to achieve concrete results through OGP. Robinson argues that generating convincing evidence the UNCAC Coalition) civil society participation in internaon the impact of transparency reforms is critical to the long- tional review mechanism bodies contributes to genuine dialogue and helps to improve law, policies, programmes er term success of OGP. and institutions at national level. Concrete results achieved through OGP would have involve: the successful realization of action plan commitments on Both argue that the application of the relevant UNCAC the part of OGP members; progress on all four main eligibilRules of Procedure would better serve the IRG and the UNity criteria for OGP members against agreed indicators; and actual impact of openness and transparency on the lives of CAC. Transparency enhances public understanding, builds trust and deters malfeasance. Participation of civil society ordinary citizens. assists and strengthens the hand of government officials The last point would be the trickiest one to measure, but working to address corruption. Cooperation among all could take the form of for example the creation of jobs and stakeholders therefore is essential to advance UNCAC improsperity, through the utilization of government data in the plementation and counter corruption. For further reference public domain by the private sector to inform business incheck out TIs statement on the matter. vestment decisions.