You are on page 1of 2

U.S.

Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review

Board ofImmigration Appeals Office ofthe Clerk


5107 leesb11rg Pike, S11ite 2000 Falls Church, Virginia 22041

DIZO-KAMARA, ABU BAKARR A200-515-968 3400 CONCORD ROAD YORK, PA 17402

OHS LIT./York Co. Prison/YOR


3400 Concord Road York, PA 17402

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

Name: DIZO-KAMARA, ABU BAKARR

A200-515-968

Date of this notice: 6/8/2012

Enclosed is a copy of the Board's decision and order in the above-referenced case. Sincerely,

Donna Carr Chief Clerk

Enclosure

Panel Members: Holmes, David B.

Cite as: Abu Bakarr Dizo-Kamara, A200 515 968 (BIA Jun. 8, 2012)

U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review


Falls Church, Virginia

Decision of the Board oflmmigration Appeals

22041 Date:

File: In re:

A200 515 968 - York, PA ABU BAKARR DIZO-KAMARA

JUN 08 2012

Immigrant & Refugee Appellate Center | www.irac.net

IN REMOVAL PROCEEDINGS APPEAL ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT: Pro se

ORDER: The respondent appeals from an Immigration Judge's oral ruling rendered on April 24, 2012.

Matter ofA-P-, 22 l&N Dec. 468 (BIA 1999). Further, while the summary order of the Immigration
Judge indicates that the respondent waived appeal, the transcript of the final hearing does not reflect the respondent's appeal rights were clearly addressed. Finally, the hearing of that date includes "testimony" of a unswom witness, who was not clearly identified for the record. Given the entirety of circumstances presented, we vacate the Immigration Judge's April 24, 2012, order and remand the record for further proceedings. The parties should be provided the opportunity to present further evidence and argument before the Immigration Judge. We note that bond proceedings are conducted separate and apart from these removal proceedings, and the respondent would have to separately raise any issue regarding his bond before the Immigration Judge. FURTHER ORDER: The record is remanded to the Immigration Judge for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order and for entry of a new decision.

The record does not reflect that the Immigration Judge entered a separate decision on the merits. See

FOR THE BOARD

Cite as: Abu Bakarr Dizo-Kamara, A200 515 968 (BIA Jun. 8, 2012)