Professional Documents
Culture Documents
How should we control avian influenza ? Are we substantially prepared for pandemic influenza ?
Why have the H5N1 HPAIVs persisted in poultry for 15 years ? Why Wh are antigenic ti i variants i t selected l t di in bi birds d ? Will the HPAIVs returned to migratory birds persist in nature ? How should avian influenza be controlled in poultry ? What are the advantage and disadvantage of the use of vaccines ? Is it OK to forget g about H5N1 avian influenza virus strain after the swine-origin H1N1 pandemic strain emerged ? Are the measures for the control of seasonal flu satisfactory ?
Viropexis
. Replication Transcription T i ti Translation Post translational modification 12. Release 11. Budding
Pig g
Cell
Genetic reassortment A/duck/S China/x/67
(H3NX)
A/S China/x/67
(H2N2)
A/Hong Kong/1/68
(H3N2)
H mans Humans
H1N1
(1947)
H2N2
(1957)
H3N2
(1968)
PB2 PB1
H2N3, H3N1, H3N3, H3N8 H4N6, H3N8, H4N6 H5N1, H5N1 H5N2, H9N2
H3N8 H7N7
H1-H12 N1 9 N1-9
H3N8,H5N1 H5N1
H1-10 N1-9
H1-16 N1-9 N1 9
H1-7, H9-16 N1-9 H3N3 H4N5 H7N7 H3N2 H5N1 H10N4 H1N3, H13N2, H13N9
8
FA
-
2.8 1.8
-
Cecum
+++ +
-
Feces
7.7
Kida et al (1980) Infect Immun
D k influenza Duck i fl
Each of the known subtypes (H1-16, (H1 16 N1 N1-9) 9) of influenza A virus has been isolated from ducks. In d I ducks, k viruses i replicate li t i in th the colon, l b being i shed h d with feces in a week, and non-pathogenic. W t b Water-borne f fecal-oral l l transmission t i i Ducks carry and provide viruses during migration and over-wintering. i t i Migratory duck is the NATURAL HOST of influenza A viruses.
Kida et al (1980) Infect Immun
+ +
Reactivity of duck and human virus strains with the McAbs Virus strains
Duck Strains Dk/Ukraine/63 Dk/Hok/5/77 / / / Dk/Hok/8/80 Dk/Hok/33/80 Dk/Hok/7/82 Dk/Hok/21/82 Dk/Hok/9/85 / / / Dk/Hok/10/85 Human Strains Aichi/2/68 / / Ud orn/307/72 Tokyo/6/73 P Chalmers/1/73 P.Chalmers/1/73 Victoria/3/75 Kumamoto/22/76 Bangkok/1/79 Philipines/2/82
Monoclonal antibodies
13/1 110/2 48/2 22/1 32/2 D11/3 D13/1 D17/4 D58/2 D22/3
Nucleotide and amino acid sequence identity of theHAs of duck strains with that of A/Hong Kong/68
Virus strains
D k/Ho k/5/77 D k/Ho k/8/80 D k/Ho k/33/80 D k/H o k/7/82 D k/Ho k/9/85 D k/Ho k/10/85 / k/21/82 /2 /82 D k/Ho D k/Ukr/63 Aich i/2/68 N u cleo tid e seq u en ce id en tity ( %) D k/5/ D k/8/ D k/33 D k/7/ D k/9/ D k/10 D k/21 D k/Ukr Aich i/ 77 80 /80 82 85 /85 /82 /63 2/68 94 6 94.6 97.5 98.2 97 6 97.6 97.8 98.0 9 3 95.3 95.8 97.1 98.5 98 9 98.9 97.8 98.0 96 0 96.0 96.7 97.3 97.1 97 1 95.8 94.2 94 2 98.2 95.3 96.4 96 4 94.6 98.5 94 4 94.4 96.7 96 7 94.9 98.5 94 7 94.7 99.4 84.8 84 8 85.0 85.6 85 2 85.2 85.0 85.5 90.5 90 5 91.0 91.4 91 4 91.4 91.0 90.8 8 6 85.6 95.8 96.9 96 9 95.9 97.5 95 4 95.4 96.7 97.1 8 0 85.0 91.2
98.7 98 7 99.3 98.0 99.1 98.2 96 96.4 96 2 96.2 96.9 96.7 97.8 97.6 Amin o a cid
99.8 9 6 95.6 9 8 95.8 96.2 96.4 95.1 97.6 97.8 95.3 seq u en ce id en tity ( %)
H3 HAs
Amino acid substitutions on the HAs of viruses isolated from humans are confined to the antigenic sites, indicating that viruses are circulating in the presence of antibody selection pressure. Amino acid substitutions on the HAs of viruses isolated from ducks are scattered throughout the HA molecule and not confined to the antigenic i sites, i indicating that viruses are circulating in the absence of antibody selection pressure.
Evolutionally stasis
Viruses replicating Vi li ti i in the th i intestine t ti are not t under d the serum antibody selection pressure. 40 to 50 % of population of migratory ducks are juvenile birds that hatched in the summer. Preserved in frozen water of the lakes, , where they y nest in summer, in winter.
Kida H et al (1987) Virology; Ito et al (1995) Arch Virol
Amino acid sequences at the receptor-binding site of the HA of swine viruses compared to those of human and avian strains Virus us st strain a sequence 6 226 Human Viruses Avian Viruses Sw/Taiwan/82 Sw/China/78 227 Amino Acid 228 8
Virus HA
NeuAc
Receptor
Gal
CHOH AcHN OH OH CH2OH HO O COOH O HO a O O OH CH2OH AcHN OH O COOH HO OH CH2OH O HO O O OH
GlcNAc
CH2OH
O O
OH NHAc
2, 6
CH2OH O O OH NHAc
2, 3
Amino A i acid id residues id 226 and d 228 of f th the HA1 subunit b it of f H3 HA determine the receptor specificity.
Closely related with those of A/Hong Kong/68 (H3N2) and H3 viruses isolated from migratory ducks. Amino A i acid id sequences at t th the receptor-binding t bi di site it on the HA indicate either specificity to human or avian type receptors. receptors Both types yp of receptor p were found on the surface of the epithelial cells lining the upper respiratory tract of pigs.
KIDA et al (1988) Virology; Ito et al (1998) J Virol
Nucleotide N l tid and d amino i acid id sequence identity id tit of f H3 viruses i of f ducks, goose, and pig from China, duck from Japan, and A/Hong Kong/68 and its variant
Nucleotide sequence identity % Dk/HK Gs/HK Dk/HK Dk/HK/ Sw/HK/ Dk/Hok Aichi /7/75 /10/76 /64/76 231/77 126/82 /8/80 /2/68 96.6 97.1 92.5 99.0 98.0 95.6 97 5 97.5 99 0 99.0 93 5 93.5 96 7 96.7 96 2 96.2 95 2 95.2 97.8 98.9 93.2 97.3 96.7 95.4 96.6 97.3 96.9 93.2 92.7 94.0 99.5 97.6 98.0 96.9 98.3 96.5 97.8 97.5 97.8 96.7 98.7 95.9 96.9 96.9 96.9 96.9 97.1 97.3 94.0 93.6 93.6 93.1 94.6 94.4 95.6 Amono acid sequence identity (%) Vic/ 3/75 93.0 92 9 92.9 93.2 91.5 93.3 93.2 96.5
HAs of influenza viruses isolated from domestic ducks in southern China closely y related with those of viruses isolated from migratory ducks, pigs, and A/Hong Kong /68 antigenically and genetically. Each of the viruses was isolated on the Pacific Flyway of migratory ducks. ducks Migratory duck domestic duck pig humans
Pig g
Cell
Genetic reassortment A/duck/S China/x/67
(H3NX)
A/S China/x/67
(H2N2)
A/Hong Kong/1/68
(H3N2)
H mans Humans
Migratory duck
A/duck/ xx (H3N?)
Domestic duck
3 4 10 17 6 7 Dk/8/80 Sw/2/81 () (H3N8) (H3N8) (H3N8) (H3N8) (H3N1) (H3N1) (H3N8) (H1N1) PB2 D D D D D D D S PB1 D D D D D D D S PA D D D D D D D S HA D D D D D D D S NP D D D D S S D S NA D D D D S S D S M D D D D S D D S NS D D D D D S D S
Pigs are susceptible to avian influenza viruses of each of the HA subtypes. Genetic reassortants were generated in the cells lining g upper pp respiratory p y tract of pig p g upon p concurrent infection with mammalian and avian strains.
H1 to H16 and N1 to N9 subtypes of influenza A viruses perpetuate p p in lakes where ducks nest in nature. 1957 H2N2 and 1968 H3N2 viruses are reassortants between AIV and the preceding human strains. Pigs are susceptible to each of avian and mammalian influenza viruses, generating reassortants.
Avian viruses of any subtype can contribute genes for reassortants : None of the 16 HA and 9 NA subtypes can be ruled out as potential candidates for future pandemics. Global surveillance of swine flu as well as avian flu is i important. t t
Isolation of influenza viruses from water samples of lakes in Alaska in 1992-1994 No. of samples with virus/ total no. of samples tested 1992 1993 1994 1994 summer summer summer autumn 1/4 0/2 0/3 0/3 0/4 0/1 0/4 0/5 7/13 3/21 0/10 1/2 0/5 0/17 0/5 0/3 0/1 2/23 0/28 7/30 3/21
Location
Lake Ho od /Spenard Lake Cheney P tt Potter M Marsh h Westchester Lagoon Lake Hanger Fairb anks
Kobyaysky(820) 40 Ilands(1321) Kenkeme(32) H4N6 H4N9 H11N1 H11N6 H11N9 White Lake(1136) H3N8 Ptropavlovsk PtropavlovskKamchatsky(58)
Buotama(51)
Magadan(295)
Irkutsk(290)
Elavga(66)
L k K Lake Kanicheva(95) i h (95) Wakkanai (958) H1N1 H3N8 H5N3 H5N4 H6N2 H6N7 H8N1 H8N3 H9N2 H11N9
Malyshevo(90)
69 Months
LPAIV
A A sequences
IQSR IESR KQTR KASR RKKR RETR IETR KKRKKR KKTR VEPR RSSR VQGR IASR VQDR ISNR KQAK IRTR
b Kovacova
GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF GLF
Senne et al (1996),
et al (2002)
Ugii Lake
A/whooper swan/Mongolia/2/09 (H5N1) A/whooper swan/Mongolia/9/09 (H5N1) A/bar-headed goose/Mongolia/X53/09 (H5N1) A/ bb sholduck/Mongolia/X42/2009 A/rubby h ld k/M li /X42/2009 (H5N1) A/common goldeneye/Mongolia/X60/09 (H5N1) A/whooper swan/Mongolia/1/10 (H5N1) A/whooper swan/Mongolia/7/10 (H5N1)
62 Countries where H5N1 HPAIV infections were reported in wild birds, poultry, and both
Japan, Republic of Korea, China, Mongolia, Myanmar, Lao PDR, Thailand, Cambodia, Viet Nam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Bangladesh, India, Pakistan; Afghanistan, Afghanistan Iran, Iran Azerbaijan, Azerbaijan Georgia, Georgia Iraq, Iraq Kuwait, Kuwait Saudi Arabia, Arabia Turkey, Turkey Israel; Russian Federation, Federation Kazakhstan, Kazakhstan Ukraine Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Serbia, Hungary, Slovakia, Czech Republic, Croatia, Poland, Slovenia, Bosnia & Herzegovina; Greece, Switzerland, Austria, France, Italy, Germany, Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Spain, England, Ireland; Djibouti, Gaza Strip, Egypt, Sudan, Nigeria, Niger, Cameroon, Burkina Faso, Cote dIvoire
China Viet Nam Indonesia Egypt Cambodia Lao PDR Thailand Iraq Azerbaijan Turkey Djibouti Nigeria Myanmar Pakistan Bangladesh Total
Viet Nam
Thailand
Indonesia
Cambodia
As of 19 August 2011
WHO, Kuribayashi
Birdfluvaccines
Vietnam:
H5N2andH5N1 (Adjuvantinactivatedvaccines)
As a stockpile, Singapore:
H5N2 (Inactivated,adjuvanted vaccine)
China:
H5N1andrecombinantNDV (Reversegeneticsinactivatedvaccines)
Japan:
H5N1andH7N7 (Oiladjuvanted inactivated i ) vaccines)
Indonesia:
H5N1,H5N2,H5N9andrecombinant H5N1 (inactivatedvaccines)
Pakistan:
H5N1,H5N2,H5N9,andH5N3 (Waterbasedwithalumhydroxide andoilbasedwithmineraloil)
Egypt: since2006
Thailand: Prohibitedvaccine2006
Q.WhydoyouthinkthattheH5N1HPAIVstrainshavepersistedinpoultryfor12years? The virus strains are circulated among poultry populations in some Asian countries b because of f vaccination i ti . If the th vaccine i is i used, d infected i f t d poultry lt may not t be b recognized i d because they may not show any clinical signs. Eventually the poultry can be resources of the infection. Continuing spread of virus within and between large populations of susceptible birds, influenced by breeding and movement of birds, virus exposure and vaccination history, antigenic drift etc. etc.
Q.Why Q ydothesestrainsshowantigenic g variation? In some Asian countries, poultry are vaccinated. The antigenic variants should have been selected by the pressure of antibodies induced by vaccination. Theuseofvaccine, mixed poultry in a pen, poor managementofsanitation.
may prevent manifestation of disease signs and decrease the amount of virus shed, but does not confer protective immunity from infection. Stamping-out p g influenza.
Vaccination is not primarily y recommended but approved as one of the options applied only under DIVA (differentiating infected from vaccinated animals) based strategy. Country where vaccine is used is not designated as HPAI-free.
26TH CONFERENCE OF THE OIE REGIONAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA, THE FAR EAST AND OCEANIA Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China, 16 16-20 November 2009
It is recommended that;
Since stamping out is the best and ultimate measure for the control of HPAI HPAI, vaccine should be used in addition to, not instead of stamping out. The OIE should continue and develop standards on animal influenza surveillance, prevention and control. Surveillance of swine flu is crucial in the countries where avian flu has not been controlled.
USA (111) H2N3 (1) H4N6 (57) H7N7 (1) H10N7 (11) ( )
Hokkaido (296) H1N1 (12) H2N2 (2) H2N5 (1) H3N2 (2) H3N8 (37) H4N2 (8) H4N6 (33) H4N9 (3) H5N3 (11) ( ) H6N1 (17) ( ) H6N5 (2) H6N8 (7) H7N1 (18) H7N7 (14) H9N2 (7) H9N4 (1) H9N9 (1) H10N2 (1) H10N5 (7) H10N6 (1) H10N8 (1) H10N9 (2) H11N9 (21) H12N2 (2) H13N6 (2) H5N1(1)
H2N3 (4) H3N6 (6) H4N5 (1) H5N2 (1) H6N2 (32) ( ) H6N9 (1) H8N4 (8) H9N5 (1) H10N4 (12) H10N7 (12) H11N6 (1) H12N5 (4)
H5N1(2)
HongKong(3isolates) H3N2(1) H5N1(2)
Vietnam(1isolate) H9N6(1)
Laos(none)
H5N1 HPAIVs isolated from wild birds and poultry in Japan, 2010-2011
October, 2010 Fecal samples of ducks Wakkanai, Hokkaido
, February, 2011 Chickens (layer) (2 farm farm, 327 327,000) 000) Mie February, 2011 Chickens (broiler)(1 farm, 100,000) G j Nara Gojo, N November, 2010 Chickens (layer) (1 farm, 23,000) Y Yasugi, i Shimane Shi
February, 2011 Chickens (layer) (1 farm farm, 8 8,100) 100) Oita, Oita ,, January, 2011 February, 2011 ,, March, 2011 Chickens (13 farm, 1,012,000) Miyazaki
H5N1 HPAIV infections in Korea since the end of December 2010 as of 18 May 2011
12017 21318 127 1 1 27 29135 18153 123134 573 1231117 1251100 226111 17123 9171 19113 7 1248 518116 2131465 12218 381200 115 52172 11216 225130 110118 4103 324118 48113 417 1 1241201 2261250 11319 114120 124114 33131
113120
201126 20101123 7 17
A/chicken/Guiyang/3055/2005 2.3.3 A/goose/Guiyang/3422/2005 2.3.3 A/duck/Guiyang/3242/2005 2.3.3 A/duck/Hunan/139/2005 2.3.1 A/d k/H A/duck/Hunan/149/2005 /149/2005 2 2.3.1 31 A/duck/Hunan/127/2005 2.3.1 A/chicken/Shantou/810/05 A/duck/Guangxi/89/2006 A/duck/Yunnan/1126/2006 A/goose/Guangxi/345/2005 A/d k/H A/duck/Hunan/1265/2005 /1265/2005 A/duck/Vietnam/568/2005 A/goose/Guangxi/3316/2005 A/feral pigeon/Hong Kong/3409/2009 A/oriental magpie robin/Hong Kong/9298/2009 A/grey heron/Hong Kong/779/2009 A/ A/grey h heron/Hong /H K Kong/1046/2008 /1046/2008 A/crested myna/Hong Kong/1178/2009 large billed crow/Hong Kong/885/2009 A/great egret/Hong Kong/807/2008
2.3.3
231 2.3.1
234 2.3.4
A/whooper swan/Hokkaido/2/2008
A/chicken/Laos/LPQ001/2008 A/ hi k /L /LPQ001/2008 A/chicken/Hunan/8/2008 A/black-crowned night heron/Hong Kong/659/2008 A/Hong Kong/6841/2010 A/great crested grebe/Tyva/120/2009 A/great crested-grebe/Qinghai/1/2009 A/ h A/whooper swan/Mongolia/1/2010 /M li /1/2010 A/ grebe/Tyva/2/10 A/bar-headed goose/Mongolia/X25/2009 A/common goldeneye/Mongolia/X60/2009 A/whooper swan/Mongolia/2/2009 A/whooper swan/Mongolia/4/2009 0 01 0.01
2.3.2
A/duck/Hokkaido/WZ83/2010 / / / / A/chicken/Shimane/1/2010
A/whooper swan/Mongolia/21/2010
Ck/Mexico/232/94 Ck/Taiwan/1209/03 Dk/NY/185502/02 Emu/Texas/39442/93 Ty/MN/3689-1551/81 Mallard/Ohio/345/88 Mallard/Wisconsin/169/75 Ty/Wisconsin/68 Ck/Florida/22780-2/88 Ck/Pennsylvania/10210/86 Ck/Pennsylvania/1/83 Tern/SouthAfrica/61 Ck/Scotland/59 Ty/England/N28/73 Mallard/Miyagi/53/76 Dk/HongKong/205/77 Dk/Primorie/2633/01 Ck/France/03426a/03 Mallard/Sweden/2/02 Mallard/Netherlands/3/99 Ck/Italy/312/97 HongKong/156/97 Ck/HongKong/728/97 HongKong/483/97 Gs/Guangdong/1/96 Ck/Hebei/326/05 Ck/Fujian/1042/05 VietNam/1203/04 Ck/Thailand/73/04 Thailand/2-SP-33/04 Hanoi/03/04 Ck/Vietnam/NCVD09/05 Gs/Cambodia/022b/2005 Ck/Cambodia/022LC3b/05 HongKong/213/03 Ck/Yamaguchi/7/04 Ck/K t /3/04 Ck/Kyoto/3/04 Ck/Korea/ES/03 Mallard/Italy/332/06 Bh goose/Mongolia/1/05 Bh Goose/Qinghai/5/05
Ck/Ibaraki/1/05 Ck/Guatemala/45511-1/00
2005
2004
H5HA
0.02
Ck/Miyazaki/S749/07 Mountain hawk-eagle/Kumamoto/1/07 Ck/Okayama/T6/07 Ck/Miyazaki/H358/07 Ck/Miyazaki/K11/07 Dk/Indonesia/MS/04 Ck/Yunnan/447/05 Dk/Fujian/1734/05 Ck/Hunan/999/05 Ck/Guangxi/604/05 Dk/Vietnam/568/2005 Whooper swan/Hokkaido/2/08 Whooper swan/Hokkaido/1/08 Whooper swan/Akita/1/08
2007
2008
PB2 - North American avian PB1 - Human H3N2 PA - North American avian H1 - Classical swine NP - Classical swine N1 - Eurasian avian avian-like swine M - Eurasian avian avian-like swine NS - Classical swine At least 18,366 deaths in 214 countries as of 18 July 2010
Each of the pandemic strains have been generated in pigs. Genetic reassortment often occurs in birds and pigs. The H1N1 strain is a genuine swine influenza virus.
Modified from Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus investigation Team, N Eng J Med, 2009
goose
HPAIV
X
Genetic Reassortant virus
Pandemic virus
Thus, 246 avian influenza viruses of 144 combinations of HA and NA subtypes have been stocked as vaccine strain candidates. candidates Their pathogenicity pathogenicity, antigenicity, antigenicity genetic information and yield in chicken embryo have been analyzed, databased, and opened for Web site (http://virusdb.czc.hokudai.ac.jp/vdbportal/view/index.jsp).
How should we control avian influenza ? Are we prepared for pandemic influenza ?
1. Why have the H5N1 HPAIVs persisted in poultry for 14 years and been antigenic variants selected ? Misuse of Vaccine. 2. Will the HPAIVs returned to migratory birds persist in nature ? Started perpetuation of HPAIVs in the nesting lakes of ducks. ducks 3. How should avian influenza be controlled in poultry ? Stamping-out Stamping out without misuse of vaccine is only way, so far. 4. What are the advantage and disadvantage of the use of vaccines ? 5 Is it OK to forget about H5N1 avian influenza virus strain after the 5. swine-origin H1N1 strain emerged ? 6. Are the measures for the control of seasonal flu satisfactory y? The measures how to control pandemic influenza should be based on the measures for the control of seasonal influenza.
Y Year 1977 1982 1983 1986 1989 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Di Disease Ebola hemorrhagic fever Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome
Emerging Zoonoses
C Causative ti agent t Ebola virus of Filoviridae Hantavirus of Bunyaviridae C t Country Zaire (DRC) Korea USA USA UK USA Venezuela USA USA Brazil Australia South American countries Z i Zaire Australia Hong Kong India Malaysia Thai, Philippines, Asia Saudi Arabia, Yemen USA, Canada, Mexico Congo Hong Kong, China, worldwide Netherland, Belgium, Germany China and 11 countries of Asia, Fareast, and Africa Angola Congo H Human cases 318 (279 daeths) 388 73,000(61 deaths) 9,000 , 113(-2001) 1,200 105(35 deaths) 22,000 80 (50 deaths) 26 (10 deaths) 2 (1 dath) 239 (30 deaths) 318 (249 deaths) d th ) 2 deaths 18 (6 deaths) 16 (4 deaths) 258 (100 deaths) >30,000 (>700 deaths) 884 (124 death) 17,000 (>600 deaths) 210175 deaths 8,437 (813 deaths) 86 ( death) 331204 deaths 424363 deaths 1210 deaths
Bloody diarrhea, Hemolytic uremic syndrome Escherichia coli O157:H7 Lyme y disease Borreria burgdorferi g HIV of Retroviridae AIDS BSE Prion Ehrlichiosis Ehrlichia chaffensis, E. phagocytophila Venezuelan hemorrhagic fever Guanarito virus of Arenaviridae Cat scratch disease Bartonella hensele Sin Nombre virus of Bunyaviridae Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome Brazilian hemorrhagic fever Sabia virus of Arenaviridae Hendra virus of Paramyxoviridae Morbillivirus infection from horses Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome Ebola Eb l hemorrhagic h h i fever f Rabies from bat Avian influenza virus (H5N1) infection Pneumonic plague Nipah virus infection Leptospirosis-present Rift Valley fever West Nile fever
Yersinia pestis
Morbillivirus of Paramyxoviridae
Leptospira interrogans
Rift Valley fever virus of Bunyaviridae West Nile virus of Flaviviridae Ebola virus of Filoviridae Coronavirus Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus Marburg virus of Filoviridae Ebola virus of Filoviridae
Avian influenza virus (H7N7) infection 2004 Avian influenza virus (H5N1) infection 2008 2004 Marburg hemorrhagic fever 2005 2005 Ebola hemorrhagic fever
Emerging Zoonoses
Many of the agents responsible for epidemics throughout human history have their origins in animals. Nearly all emerging disease episodes of the past 40 years have involved zoonotic infectious agents. Episodes of zoonoses are increasing around the globe. Zoonoses should be controlled when the novel field of science for the control of zoonoses is established by the collaboration with and fusion of Veterinary y Medicine, Medicine, Public Health, Ecology, Epidemiology, Entomology, Pharmacology, Social Sciences and Computer Science.
The nature of the threat of new, emerging and re-emerging re emerging infections
Climate, weather, rainfall, temperature (global warming) Population movements and the intrusion of humans and domestic animals into arthropod p habitats Deforestation and settlement of new tropical forest/farm margins Expanding E di primitive i iti irrigation i i ti systems t The opening up of isolated ecosystems such as islands Increased long-distance air travel Increased long long-distance distance livestock transportation New routings of long-distance bird migrations Uncontrolled urbanization and environmental pollution
Medicine
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Transmission of Pathogens
Prevention and therapeutics of diseases in livestock Ecology of zoonotic pathogens Prevention and control of zoonoses Maintenance and improvement of human and public health
OIE
WHO
CONTROL OF ZOONOSES
Development of measures for diagnosis and prevention Clarification of the molecular basis of pathogenesis
Zoonoses should be controlled when the novel field of science is established by the collaboration with and fusion of Veterinary Medicine Medicine, Medicine Medicine, Public Health Health, Ecology, Epidemiology, and Computer Science.
Global surveillance
Isolate from ducks Genetic reassortant
Interspecies transmission
Antivirals
Department of Global Epidemiology Identification of natural host animals of zoonotic pathogens Genetic analysis of pathogens Database development of genome information Prevention and control of zoonoses
Department of Molecular Pathobiology Diagnosis of zoonotic diseases Identification of determinant for host specificity Molecular basis of pathogenicity Development of rapid and highly sensitive detection methods of zoonotic pathogens
Department of Bioresources P Preservation ti and d supply l of f zoonotic ti pathogens, cells, genes, antibodies and animal strains Development of prevention and prophylactic measures
Department of Collaboration and Education Coordination of collaboration programs with international and domestic organizations Training of experts for the control of zoonoses Improvement of IT infrastructure for the international collaboration for research and education
CZC Facilities
BSL2 and BSL3 animal room Bioclean room Ultramicromorphology room P2 and P3 room Cold room Warm room W Freezer room Meeting room Office room
2nd floor
1st floor
BSL3 Area
BSL2 Area
Bioclean Area
Office Area
Engineering
Others
Development of vaccines
Development of antivirals
Pathogenesis