Kind attention: Honble Ch.

Bhupinder Singh Hooda, CM, Haryana, Greetings, The National KVIB Employees Federation requested to its Patron Ch. B.S. Hooda, now CM, Haryana to look in to this matter because the Principal Secretary to the Govt. of Haryana, Department of Industries handled the matter adopting biased and special tactics related to Naresh Kadyan, DKVIO but presently placed under suspansion due to Honble CM, Haryana above said order of cancellation of Naresh Kadyan posting from Faridabad. To, The Chief Executive, Haryana Khadi and Village Industries Board, Panchkula. Subject: Charge sheet regarding. Sir, Kindly refer to the KVIB letter No. HRB/Admn/EA-1/12363 dated 24-2-2010, HRB/Rewari/Admn/54 dated 10-7-2012, HRB/RTI Act/3095 dated 23-8-2012,HRB/Admn/EA-1/9499 dated 25-3-2013 read with the Govt. of Haryana, Chief Secretarys Office letter No. 48/1/2008/3-V11 dated 4-2-2013 along with many other relevant refrences on the subject cited as above, Distt office Fbd/ Maketing/5 dated 11-4-2007 and objection raised vide letter dated 28-4-2013. It is humbly submitted that undersigned have performed his duties in the interest of the Board dedicatedly and honestly with the consent of then Chief Executive of the Board with out any personnel gain and profit, in fact marketing was the commercial activity of the Board to earn revenue as service charges @ 5% of the transections from the limited suppliers approved by the Board after executing mutual understanding , agreement attached here with as A, there was no option to consult

the rates from the open market and there was no proper training was given to the undersigned to handle the commercial work, it was additional duties and work was given to the officials of the Board, where as no proper registration certificate has been issued by the Board to its so called registered supplier throughout Haryana, principally all transactions were made during the marketing period upperside from the open market rates because suppliers have to pay 5% service charges to the Board and no commercial concern work as chariety, every body have constitutional rights to earn bread and butter for self and their dependents. Till today undersigned have not yet received any objections from the purchasing department about the sub standard materials supplied by the suppliers neither by the head office, if any objections raised by the purchasing department then as per agreement as stated A above it was the duty of the supplier to replace the articles, in fact as per reply given by the Board under RTI Act, 2005 to the undersigned it was cleared that the Board doesnt approved the rates of Chullah Bhathi, no action was required at the level of HO, agreemen copy supplied, HO did not received any objections from the Consignee, HO received the marketing return vide letter No. 5 dated 11-4-2007 for the period 1-1-2007 to 31-3-2007 (which was found in order), purchasing department had inspection committee and after inspection of this committee material was supplied by the supplier, Board supplied those items which were approved under approved source scheme, it means if any material supplied other than the approved list then the transaction can treat out of marketing but in the interest of Board for generating extra revenue, Education department does not issued any guidelines to the Board and this reply attached here with as B for ready refrences. Hence there was no question arrise of sub standard material was supplied through the undersigned as performing his official duties assigned by the Board, principally it was the duty of the purchasing department to abide all the terms and conditions of their department and after receipt of proper material payment should be made. For example some material was supplied to the DEO, Faridabad through the supplier, payment was released by the DEO and after deducting 5% secvice charge rest payment was released to the supplier but objections raised by the purchasing department after release of payment to the supplier by the undersigned but after reciving the objections payment was stopped to the supplier and after satisfaction of the purchasing department payment was released to the supplier, all these 4 correspondences attached here with as C, if any objections received from the DPEO, Gurgaon then definitely objections were removed after replacing the objectionable materials. It would be pertinent to mention here that Board never deputed sufficient required field staff to the undersigned to perform his official duties and undersigned always faced extra burden while performing his official duties. As per the Govt. of Haryana Chief Secretary office letter dated 4-2-2013 Shri M.K. Midha, IAS was appointed as Inquiry officer for group A and B, where as undersigned does not fall under the A and B category as defined by the Govt. of Haryana, hence above said Inquiry officer can not inquire the baseless charges framed against the undersigned, hence under protest undersigned appearing before the Inquiry officer, in fact undersigned is a duty bound while in service but when a IAS officer retired from his Govt. service then he can not be treated as a public servant and he can not abide rules and regulations framed for public servant because after retiremet he became general public and there may be chance of adoption of mal practice by the Inquiry officer and he can oblidged their appointing

Authorities, natural justice might be ignored, hence you are humbly requested to change the Inquiry officer as per rules and regulations. It would be pertinent to mention here that undersigned is facing transefer and suspansion due to this baseless chage sheet, where as Board have failed to abide the agreement, which was executed between the Board and suppliers, May I ask to the Board that why supplier was not directed to replace the objectionable material supplied in question and no apportunity was given to the undersigned to explain his position before issuing charge sheet, which prove that special procedure is being adopted in this particular matter with hidden agenda, where as baseless charges were framed against the undersigned as transactions procedure was over on 27-2-2007 then how it could be possible to comply with the HO instructions, which were issued on 16-11-2007 para 4 and 5 of the charge sheet and this is enough sufficient evidence to prove that while preparing and issuing baseless charge sheet no one has applied its healthy and sound mind, undersigned preparing its mind to challenge this baseless charge sheet on the appropriate court of law for natural justice because this is enough and undersigned feel torture and unnecessary harasment. Reply of the charges: 1. There was no proper list was provided by the Board from which three quations were called nor sufficient subordinate staff was deputed, Can these three quations were being called from the open market? As per past practice, which reflect in the Board agenda item No. 3 that supply order be given to those suppliers who procure the supply orders from the purchasing department and this is being reflected in the basic guidelines para lll Order procured and prsented. Supply in question was properly done as per past practice, the material was supplied by the supplier after satisfaction of the purchasing department and then payment was released after reiving goods receipt, 5% service charges were deposited to the Board and rest amount was released to the supplier, hence this charge is denied as baseless. 2. That the purchasing department approved rates as its own and asked the undersigned to supply the material @ Rs. 3170/- each, where as these orders were being procured and presented by the supplier, hence he was asked to execute the order as per agreement made between Board and supplier, if there are any substandard material supplied by the supplier then he is bound to replace the proper material, hence it is requested to please direct the supplier to replace the objectionable materials in question. It would be pertinent to mention here that the undersigned is not a duty bound to obey those instructions, which were issued to the purchasing department officials by their senior officers, in fact undersigned is working under the control of the Board, hence Board senior officers orders and directions can be obeyed. May I ask question that when Board surveyed the cost of articles in question? It is obserbed during the inquiry, when basic order copy was supplied to the undersigned that said department asked to the purchasing officials to purchase gas chullah not gas chullah bhatti, hence purchasing officials are responsible for any lapses and irregulaties, hence this cahrge is denied and baseless. 3. All procedures were being adopted and nothing was concealed willingly and it is assumed that when goods reciept was issued along with the payment by the purchasing department and

after deduction of 5% service charges rest payment was issued to the supplier by the undersigned, hence this cahrge is denied and baseless. 4. This para is irrelevant, baseless and biased on the supply order in question, hence strongly denied. 5. This para is irrelevant, baseless and biased on the supply order in question, hence strongly denied. 6. This para is also baseless because proper intimation was given to the then Chief Executive of the Board and after proper consent on phone, supply order was executed, hence this charges also denied and baseless. It was assumed that when Board accepted the marketing return after proper examination at their level for the period of 1-1-2007 to 31-3-2007 and nothing was conveyed to the undersigned, if any questions raised after a long period then it is a coresponsibilty as per administrative principles and all channel officials are co responsible, where as order was executed in the interest of Board for generation of revenue not for personnel gain and profit, hence this charge denied and baseless. May I ask one more question to the Board, please supply me the registration certificate issued by the HO after aceepting the agreement executed between Board and suppliers because as per my knowlede, not a single certifate was issued officialy by the HO and undersigned placing mark of interogation on all the work done during marketing by the Board and its all field functionaries, when a matter became sujudice after lodging FIR then it will be in the interest of natural justice to try and decide the matter by the competent court of law. Hence you are humbly requested to drop all the baseless charges and give personnel hearing to the undersigned to represent the matter along with evidences, in the interest of natural justice. Sincerely yours,

Naresh Kadyan, Technical Supervisor (Leather) A copy is forwarded for information and necessary action to: 1. The Chief Secretary to the Govt. of Haryana, Chandigarh. 2. The Chairman, Haryana Khadi and Village Industries Board, Panchkula. 3. Sh. M.K. Midha, IAS (Rtd), 999 / 15 part-2, Gurgaon. Naresh Kadyan, Secretary General, National Khadi and Village Industries Board Employees Federation, (Apex body of All State KVIB Employees Unions), C-38, Rose Apartment, sector-14, Prashant Vihar, Rohini, Delhi 110085.