You are on page 1of 2

NTClinical

NT Clinical is an essential resource for extending your knowledge base. You can fulfil your continuing professional development PREP requirements by reflecting on the articles in this section.

update

The role of statin therapy in preventing recurrent stroke


Authors Alison M. Turner, BSc, RN, is cardiovascular research nurse; Nigel I. Jowett, MD, FRCP, is consultant in cardiovascular medicine; both at Pembrokeshire and Derwen NHS Trust, Wales. Abstract Turner, A., Jowett, N. (2006) The role of statin therapy in preventing stroke. Nursing Times; 102: 38, 2526. Several interventions may be used to prevent recurrent stroke. The role of statins was recently clarified by a large double-blind trial comparing atorvastatin with placebo. This article outlines the study results and implications for practice.

UPDATE informs you of


highly significant reduction in major vascular events such as myocardial infarction or coronary death (HPS Collaborative Group, 2004). There were similar findings in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial (Sacks et al, 1996), and simvastatin and pravastatin are already licensed for the prevention of stroke in patients with prior coronary disease. Guidelines on stroke prevention from the American Heart Association (Sacco et al, 2006) reflect this and recommend that patients with ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) and coronary artery disease be treated with a statin. They also suggest that those without coronary disease be considered for statin therapy to reduce the risk of vascular events, although not specifically recurrent stroke, a potential benefit that until recently has been unproven. The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial was designed to ascertain whether a more potent statin (atorvastatin) would help prevent stroke recurrence in patients with previous stroke or TIA (SPARCL, 2006). The sample consisted of 4,731 patients who had suffered a stroke or TIA in the past 16 months, had low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of 2.64.9mmol/L, and no known CHD. They were randomised into two groups and given double-blind treatment with 80mg atorvastatin daily or placebo. As its primary endpoint the study was looking at the incidence of fatal or recurrent non-fatal stroke. The mean LDL cholesterol level fell to 1.9mmol/L in those treated with atorvastatin and remained at 3.3mmol/L in the placebo group. Over a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 265 patients (11.2%) receiving atorvastatin and 311 (13.1%) receiving placebo had a fatal or nonfatal stroke, an absolute reduction in risk over five years of 2.2%, a modest
new developments in clinical practice. This week: the role of statin therapy in preventing recurrent stroke

25 28 30 34 38

PRACTICAL PROCEDURES
updates and illustrates a range of clinical procedures you use in your daily practice. This week: mask ventilation

Stroke is the third largest cause of death and a leading cause of adult disability in the UK. There are approximately 66,000 deaths every year, plus around 300,000 non-fatal events mostly in people over the age of 60 years. Those who have suffered a stroke have a 3043% risk of a further stroke within five years (Wolfe, 2000). The incidence of stroke is predicted to rise due to the ageing population but several interventions have been found to reduce the human, social and economic burden of cerebrovascular disease. Table 1, p26 lists known important measures for secondary stroke prevention, although the role of cholesterol-lowering has not been clear.

Knowledge provides guided


learning to help you with your CPD. This week: managing inpatients who have personality disorders

Development highlights how


nurses are developing their practice. This week: the safe use of toys within the healthcare setting

The role of reducing cholesterol


Hypercholesterolaemia is not established as a risk factor for first or recurrent stroke, though it is for coronary heart disease (CHD). The Heart Protection Study (HPS) looked at 3,280 patients with cerebrovascular disease randomly allocated to 40mg simvastatin daily or placebo. While there was no apparent reduction in the stroke rate, there was a

focus examines the evidence


on a wide range of topics. This week: the requirements for original doctoral research in nursing

NT 19 September 2006 Vol 102 No 38 www.nursingtimes.net

update

keywords n Public health n Stroke n Statins

References
Heart Protection Study Collaborative Group (2004) Effects of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin on stroke and other major vascular events in 20,536 people with cerebrovascular disease or other high-risk conditions. The Lancet; 363: 757767. Ovbiagele, B. et al (2004) In-hospital initiation of secondary stroke prevention therapies yields high rates of adherence at follow-up. Stroke; 35: 28792883. Royal College of Physicians (2004) National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke. London: RCP. Sacco, R.L. et al (2006) Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Stroke; 37: 577617. Sacks, F.M. et al (1996) The effect of pravastatin on coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. New England Journal of Medicine; 335: 10011009. Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels Investigators (2006) High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. New England Journal of Medicine; 355: 549559. Wolfe, C.D. (2000) The impact of stroke. British Medical Bulletin; 56: 275286.

Table 1. Secondary prevention of stroke or transient ischaemic attack


An individualised prevention strategy should be implemented within seven days of acute stroke or TIA General measures Blood pressure Smoking cessation, regular exercise, healthy diet and a satisfactory weight, limiting salt intake, avoiding excess alcohol Elevated BP persisting for over two weeks should be treated (ACE inhibitor +/a thiazide). Targets <140/85mmHg (<130/80mmHg in those with diabetes) Aspirin (50300mg) or low-dose aspirin and modified-release dipyridamole. Clopidogrel 75mg if aspirin is not tolerated For patients with persistent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation unless contraindicated For patients with total cholesterol of >3.5mmol/L unless contraindicated

Anti-platelet therapy Anticoagulation Treatment with a statin

Any patient with a carotid artery territory stroke but without severe disability should be considered for carotid endarterectomy

but significant reduction. The atorvastatin group had 218 ischaemic strokes and 55 haemorrhagic strokes, while the placebo group had 274 ischaemic strokes and 33 haemorrhagic strokes. The incidence of fatal haemorrhagic stroke did not differ significantly between the groups (17 in the atorvastatin and 18 in the placebo group). In common with other statin trials, there was a reduction in other major cardiovascular events by 3.5%, although total mortality was not affected.

Practice implications
These positive results support the initiation of atorvastatin treatment soon after a stroke or TIA. Hospitalisation provides an excellent opportunity for initiation of all preventative therapy, and is associated with better compliance than when such measures are instigated in primary care (Ovbiagele et al, 2004). Primary care nurses involved with chronic disease management can ensure the dose of the chosen statin is maintained and titrated to achieve optimum blood cholesterol levels, as in the follow-up of other patients with cardiovascular disease.

Whether the benefits of statins are as great in this early, vulnerable phase is not known. Patients in SPARCL entered the trial 16 months after their first stroke, while in the HPS this was on average 4.3 years later. This delay may have adversely affected outcome. The ongoing Fast Assessment of Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack to Prevent Early Recurrence (FASTER) trial is focusing on the initial period of high risk, starting patients on stroke prevention treatments (aspirin, clopidogrel, statin) in the hours following a TIA or minor stroke. While these drugs have been shown to reduce recurrent cardiac events in patients with unstable angina when commenced early, strokes are a diverse group of conditions, and only a minority are caused by large-vessel thrombosis.

Is the statin or dose important?


This is the first trial to show the benefits of statin therapy in preventing recurrent stroke. Whether a lower dose of atorvastatin or an alternative statin would also reduce the risk is unknown. It is possible that other less potent generic statins may have similar benefits. The UK stroke guidelines published prior to SPARCL already recommend treatment with a statin for all patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA, and total cholesterol of >3.5mmol/L, unless contraindicated.

Limitations
Patients with atrial fibrillation and other cardiac sources of emboli were excluded from the trial, so the SPARCL results cannot apply to the roughly one in five ischaemic strokes where emboli originate in the heart. There is also some concern for patients who present with cerebral haemorrhage. The relative risk of haemorrhagic stroke was increased by 66% in those patients in the atorvastatin group. The speed of intervention is also likely to be important. TIAs and minor strokes are considered a medical emergency. The risk of completing a stroke after a TIA may be as high as 20% within the first month, with half occurring within the first two days.

Conclusion
Current UK stroke guidelines on lipid management have been supported by SPARCL (RCP, 2004). Lipid-lowering therapy should aim to reduce total serum cholesterol to <4mmol/L, or LDL cholesterol to <2mmol/L, or to reduce total cholesterol by 25% or LDL cholesterol by 30%, whichever results in the lower cholesterol level. A multifaceted approach to the prevention of stroke recurrence remains important, and all patients with TIA or cerebral infarction should be offered a statin to prevent further cardiovascular events. n

This article has been double-blind peer-reviewed. For related articles on this subject and links to relevant websites see www.nursingtimes.net

26

NT 19 September 2006 Vol 102 No 38 www.nursingtimes.net

You might also like