Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thank you for downloading this document from www.e-textile.org, the on-line toolbox for efficient
textile production. E-textile.org provides a wide range of useful, informative and sector-specific
features, such as benchmarks, success stories, tips for action, regulations, links and contacts. Key
features of e-textile are three tools, namely
5.1.1 INTRODUCTION
Water management is a philosophy whose principal aims are to:
• Recover energy
The benefits are clearly measured in terms of cost reduction. Water is an expensive
resource. Within Asian region the average cost of water supply and disposal to sewer
are around 0.5 US$/m3. (WHO/UNICEF, 2000) The reduction of water consumption
therefore has a very real effect on factory operating costs. The cost of tertiary treatment
of raw water by deionisation for special process use will probably add a further cost.
Moreover, the cost of effluent treatment by chemical or biological processing will add
further to the costs, 1.5-2 US$/m3 (WHO/UNEP, 1997) All these aspects means that
management of water offers cost benefits.
When an industrial facility is set up it competes for the same water resources that are
used for public health and agriculture. This Unit will examine the impact of industry on
water resources in particular:
• Industrial wastewater
• Socio-economic aspects
A 1998 study by the Johns Hopkins University’s School of Public Health noted that nearly
half a billion people do not have enough fresh drinking water, and that this number is
expected to increase to 2.8 billion by 2025.
The map in Figure 5.1 gives an indication of fresh water resource availability in the world
in 1998 and Figure 5.2 shows the projected situation in 2020 taking into account
projected population growth.
Global annual water use by industry is expected to rise from an estimated 725 km3 in
1995 to about 1,170 km3 by 2025, by which time industrial water usage will represent 24
percent of all water abstractions. Much of this increase will be in developing countries
now experiencing rapid industrial development. Figure 5.3 shows industrial water usage
per region, compared with other main uses.
Figure 5.3: Competing water uses for main income groups of countries. (World Bank 2001)
Over the last decade mains water supplies in the UK have risen considerably in price,
largely due to the requirement to meet current drinking water quality standards.
Consequently many factories are changing to alternative sources of water, abstracting
directly from boreholes and rivers because, even after treatment to industrial water quality
standards, the cost is lower than that of mains water which, frequently, needs some
treatment for industrial use. Table 5.1 shows the pattern of water abstraction in England
and Wales for 1997/8. Taking into account the fact that much of the water which is
designated as “public water supply” is, in fact, used by industry, we can see that industry
actually consumes considerably more than half of the total water abstraction.
On the other hand there are many industrial wastes that contain “hard COD” by which we
mean organic chemicals which are not biodegradable. Typically the BOD:COD ratio will
be greater than 3. The pharmaceutical industries, plastics industries and within specifics
process in the textile industries produce wastewaters of this type. Many of these
wastewaters are toxic to activated sludge bacteria, making them unsuitable for treatment
in domestic sewage treatment works, and are likely to be damaging to the environment.
Volatile solvents may also pose explosion risks in sewers and pumping stations.
It is usually central or local government that is responsible for the protection of the
environment and the introduction of legislation to prevent contamination of surface water
by industrial discharges has significantly reduced contamination incidents. However, in
1999 the UK Environment Agency published a list of the top ten polluters of 1998
assessed by fines imposed. This is shown in Table 5.3.
Three of these, Tysely Waste Disposal, London Waste and Alco Waste Management, are
merchant waste disposal companies who are paid by industry to dispose of hazardous
wastes. Wessex Water and Anglian Water Services are water supply and sewerage
operators and their prosecutions were for exceeding discharge standards from sewage
treatment works. The others are manufacturing companies, some with an international
profile.
The average fine for each prosecution was about 5400US$. Ed Gallagher the Chief
Executive of the UK Environment Agency said: “Clearly this is not sending out a strong
enough message to deter large businesses that have the potential to seriously damage
the environment.” Clearly paying 5400US$ fines is, for a large multinational like Shell,
cheaper than the capital and operating costs of an effluent treatment plant.
As we have seen, industry may abstract water from the environment, depleting natural
resources which are already stressed. It may add to the demand from the public water
supply system which is likely to be inadequate. Discharging industrial wastewater to
sewer will add to the load on sewage treatment works whilst discharges to surface waters
may contaminate not only the surface water but also groundwater resources.
So industry brings questions about priorities. If a tannery that is the only source of
employment in a village is causing pollution of the river, should it be closed to protect the
environment or should the pollution problem be ignored to preserve employment?
Another way of looking at this problem is asking the question “Who should pay for
pollution remediation?” The Environmentalist would say that the polluter (industry) should
pay for remediation, but imposing heavy fines on the tannery will probably mean that it
will go out of business. The Sociologist would probably suggest that the government (the
taxpayer) should pay in order to preserve jobs, but this implies that it is acceptable for
industry to continue polluting.
If this small scale example is difficult, then consider the situation of a larger employer. In
Table 5.3 the worst polluter was ICI Chemicals, a company employing several thousand
people. The Environment Agency’s ultimate sanction of closing the factory would have
such social and, more important, political results that government would not allow it to
happen. So the Environment Agency’s powers are limited.
Where industry is supplied with water from public mains, reductions in water consumption
means a reduction in the revenue of the water supply company. Similarly industrial
discharges are a source of revenue to municipal sewer operators and the loss of the
industrial biological and hydraulic load from a sewage treatment works designed to
accept it can cause operational problems.
How, then, should we address the problem of pollution prevention? Legislation has
proved to be ineffective because of the problems of implementation. In the long term,
education will ensure that the people running industries will understand the need for
environmental protection, but this will take a generation. There is, however, one driving
force which will persuade industry to invest in water conservation and effluent treatment
in the short term, and that is overall profitability. If an investment has a short payback
period industry will generally spend the necessary money so, when we consider industrial
water use, the most important characteristic of the water and wastewater streams is cost.