Professional Documents
Culture Documents
755194172] Publisher: Psychology Press Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Friederike H. Treitz a; Katrin Heyder a; Irene Daum a a Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Ruhr University of Bochum, Germany First Published on: 23 July 2006 To cite this Article: Treitz, Friederike H., Heyder, Katrin and Daum, Irene (2006) 'Differential Course of Executive Control Changes During Normal Aging', Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14:4, 370 - 393 To link to this article: DOI: 10.1080/13825580600678442 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13825580600678442
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.informaworld.com/terms-and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article maybe used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14: 370393, 2007 http://www.psypress.com/anc ISSN: 1382-5585/05 print; 1744-4128 online DOI: 10.1080/13825580600678442
ABSTRACT
Normal aging has been associated with executive control deficits, but it is as yet unclear whether different executive subprocesses are differentially affected during the course of aging. The present study aimed to investigate age effects on a range of executive control subcomponents. Four consecutive age groups (2030 years, 3145 years, 4660 years, 6175 years), matched on present state IQ and mood, were compared on tasks of strategic memory processing, verbal fluency, reasoning, inhibition, task management, and self-rating of executive abilities. Deficits concerning the suppression of habitual and experimentally induced prepotent response tendencies and the ability to efficiently divide attention were observed in subjects over 60 years of age compared to the younger groups, while memory, verbal fluency, and reasoning were largely unaffected. Results suggest a sharp decline of executive function after age 60 and a differential course of different executive subcomponents across aging, adding further support to a multi-dimensional model of executive function.
The cognitive decline associated with normal aging is generally discussed in relation to mild neurodegenerative changes, including neuronal shrinkage, loss of dendritic and synaptic density, or alterations in neurotransmitter systems (Backman et al., 2000; Jernigan et al., 2001; Kaasinen et al., 2000; Resnick et al., 2003; Tisserand & Jolles, 2003; Wang et al., 1995, 1998). Disproportionate volume loss occurs within the frontal lobes and the hippocampal region, but changes in the thalamus and the mamillary bodies are also observed (Guttmann et al., 1998; Jernigan et al., 2001; Raz et al., 1992, 2004; Resnick et al., 2003; Salat et al., 2001; Van Der Werf et al., 2001; Woodruff-Pak, 1997). With respect to the prefrontal cortex, grey matter volume loss was reported to reach 8.9% per decade in subjects over 65 years of
Address correspondence to: Friederike H. Treitz, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neuropsychology, Ruhr-University of Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany. E-mail: friederike.treitz@ ruhr-uni-bochum.de 2007 Psychology Press, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
371
age (Van Petten et al., 2004). In addition, functional neuroimaging studies reported evidence of reduced activations within the prefrontal cortex in older compared to younger adults (Logan et al., 2002). Given the frequently reported neuropathological changes in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) relative to other cortical areas (Head et al., 2004; Jernigan et al., 2001; Raz et al., 2004; Resnick et al., 2003), older age has been considered a model of diffuse mild prefrontal dysfunction and associated executive control impairments (West, 1996). This view is supported by parallels in the cognitive profile of healthy elderly subjects and young individuals with acquired PFC lesions (Daum et al., 1996; Daum & Mayes, 2000; Daum & Schugens, 1999), characterized by deficits in source memory, memory for temporal order, or impaired use of cognitive strategies (Daum et al., 1995; Daum & Schugens, 1999; Glisky et al., 2001; Mayes & Daum, 1997). Executive control has recently been described as a heterogeneous concept, involving five major subcomponents (Smith & Jonides, 1999): a.focusing attention on relevant information and inhibiting irrelevant information; b.task management, including switching attention between tasks; c.planning a sequence of subtasks to accomplish a goal; d.updating working memory contents to determine the next step in a sequential task; e.coding context of representations in working memory. Following Shallice and Burgess (1991), the prefrontal cortex is associated with the supervisory attentional system (SAS), which is responsible for strategic control of mental processes, such as the use of strategies or ruleguided retrieval from long-term memory. In novel and unfamiliar situations, the SAS is responsible for strategy formation, planning, and problemsolving to achieve goals. Aging has been reported to adversely affect most of the executive control subcomponents defined by Smith and Jonides (1999), as well as executive processes describes by Shallice and Burgess (1991). Meta-analyses by Verhaeghen and Cerella (2002) yielded a consistent agerelated decline of task management abilities beyond the effect of general slowing. Set-shifting deficits in older adults have been related to mild frontal dysfunction (Keys & White, 2000; Kramer et al., 1999; Kray & Lindenberger, 2000; Meiran et al., 2001). Age effects have been reported for the use of organizational strategies in memory, such as self-generated use of semantic categories (Daum et al., 1996). Inhibition of habitual responses, as assessed by the Stroop Test (e.g., Wecker et al., 2000), as well as inhibition of newly learned prepotent responses, were also found to be affected by age (McDowd, 1997; Verhaeghen
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
METHODS Subjects Sixty-two healthy subjects (34 men and 28 women) were selected from a large subject pool to form four consecutive age groups matched on general intellectual abilities. The first group comprised the 2030 year age range, the
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
373
TABLE 1. Group Size, Mean (SDs) Age, IQ Estimates, and Scores in the VAS (Visual Analogue Scales) for the Consecutive Age Groups 2030 yrs. Mean age in yrs. N IQ estimate VAS 25.4 (3.3) 16 111.4 (4.8) 29.9 (11.9) 3145 yrs. 38.8 (4.3) 16 114.4 (4.6) 24.4 (9.3) 4660 yrs. 52.4 (3.9) 13 112.0 (5.7) 25.4 (11.4) 6175 yrs. 67.5 (4.4) 17 112.0 (7.4) 20.7 (13.3) p 0.45 0.17
second group the 3145 year range, the third group the 4660 year range, and the oldest group the 6175 year range. The four groups were closely matched on present state IQ, as assessed by the Similarities and Picture Completion subtests of the short German version from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (Dahl, 1972). The groups were also matched on sex ratio and present-state mood (Visual Analogue Scales; Bond & Lader, 1974). For an overview of background data see Table 1. Subjects were recruited by advertisements in the local press. They were screened in an interview for health problems. Based on the interview, subjects were excluded from participation if they had suffered from psychiatric or neurological disease in the past or present or from diseases potentially effecting the central nervous system. Subjects gave written informed consent and received a 20 euro reimbursement. Neuropsychological Assessment Strategic Memory Processing To assess the self-generated use of memory strategies, verbal memory was assessed by word list recall (Daum & Mayes, 2000). Three lists consisting of 16 items each were read to the subject at a one word per second presentation rate. The first list consisted of four items of each of four categories (metals, animals, landscape formations, vegetables), which were presented in order of category membership (consecutive categories list; CC). The second list also contained four items of each of four categories (items of clothing, fruit, furniture, and weather conditions), which were presented in randomized order (randomized categories list; RC). Encoding and retrieval of the RC list can be improved by self-generated categorization of the list according to semantic categories. The third list was uncategorized (RR), i.e., the 16 items were unrelated. List order was randomized across subjects. Subjects were asked to reproduce each list immediately after presentation. Delayed free recall was assessed after a 30-min delay. The number of correctly reproduced items per list during both delays (immediate, delayed) as well as retention rates (correct items delayed recall/immediate recall) were analyzed.
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
375
color and color names being incongruent (interference (INT)). To account for reading speed and color-naming speed, reaction times (RTs) in the interference condition were analyzed using RTs in the RCW and NCP conditions as covariates. The number of errors in the interference condition was also recorded. In the AX-CPT task, letters were presented sequentially on a computer screen. Letter size was 3.8 3.8 visual angle at a distance of 40 cm. In 70% of the trials, the letter X followed the letter A and subjects had to press a target key to the A-X sequence. The remaining trial types were A followed by the letter Y (the inhibition trial type), B-X and B-Y trial types (Y represents all letters except X, and B represents all letters except A) with a frequency of 10% each. To these combinations, subjects had to press a nontarget key on the keyboard. Subjects used the index and middle finger of their dominant hand. The high frequency of the A-X combination induced a prepotent response tendency to the target key after presentation of the letter, A which had to be suppressed for the rare A-Y sequence (which requires the nontarget key). The task was administered in a short- and a long-delay condition (100 trials each), with order being randomized across subjects. Each trial started with a hyphen presented for 200 ms in the center of the screen for fixation, followed by the first letter (200 ms). The interstimulus interval (ISI) was 1000 ms (short-delay condition) or 4000 ms (long-delay condition), thereby varying working memory load. Then the second letter appeared for 200 ms, to which the subject had to respond. Median RTs and errors were recorded for each trial type. Based on the procedure used by Braver et al. (1999) and Carter et al. (1998), difference scores representing inhibition and use of context entered analysis: 1. Context cost: RTs A-Y minus RTs B-Y: Degree of response slowing in nontarget trials where the prepotent response tendency has to be suppressed. 2. Inhibition cost: RTs A-Y minus RTs A-X. Index of inhibition, where the prepotent response to the target key induced by A needs to be inhibited if Y occurs. 3. Context use: RTs B-X minus RTs B-Y. Degree of response slowing in nontarget trials on the ambiguous X stimulus. Small differences between both trial types indicate benefit from use of context. Task Management Task management in stimulus processing was assessed by two tasks, the Divided Attention subtest of a German Attention Test Battery (Zimmermann & Fimm, 1993) and by a dual-task paradigm described by Stablum et al. (2000). In the Divided Attention task, subjects had to
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
377
significance level was set to p < .05. In addition, eta2 effect sizes were calculated in case the demands for ANOVA were met. RESULTS Strategic Memory Processing The results for word list recall are presented in Table 2. Repeated measures ANOVA with Group, List (CC, RC, RR) and Delay (immediate vs. delayed free recall) as factors did not yield a significant group effect (p = .19) or significant interactions involving the group factor (all p > .59). Effect size was eta2 = 0.3. A significant delay effect [F1,58 = 450.808; p < .001] indicated better recall at immediate relative to delayed recall. A significant list effect [F2,116 = 51.146; p < .001], followed by a paired t-test indicated best recall of the consecutive categories and randomized categories list and poorest recall of the uncategorized list (all p < .001). Analysis of retention rates with group and list as factors indicated a significant main effect for List [F2,116 = .511; p < .001], but no significant effects involving the group factor (all p > .79). For the CC-list, effect size was eta2 = 0.04, for the RC list it was eta2 = 0.01 and eta2 = 0.06 for the RR-list. Verbal Fluency/Cognitive Flexibility The results for the three fluency subtests are presented in Table 2. The four age groups did not differ significantly with respect to the number of correctly produced items in the semantic (p = .18; eta2 = 0.08), phonemic (p = .60; eta2 = 0.03), or switching condition (p = .25; eta2 = 0.07). Reasoning The results for the Cognitive Estimation Test are presented in Table 2. Nonparametric group comparisons did not reveal significant age group differences (Hdf = 3.58 = 2.265; p = .52). Everyday Consequences of Executive Impairment The results for the DEX questionnaire are presented in Table 2. Repeated measure ANOVA with group and condition (self-rating vs. independent rating of dysexecutive behavior) as factors did not yield a significant group effect (p = .56, eta2 = 0.04) or a significant interaction (p = .12, eta2 = 0.11). Separate group comparisons of subjects DEX self-rating and relatives independent rating of dysexecutive behavior did not reveal significant group differences [(F3,58 = .241; p = .87; eta2 = 0.01) and (F5,50 = 1.392; p = .26; eta2 = 0.07), respectively].
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
TABLE 2. Means (SDs) for Cognitive Performance in the Four Age Groups 2030 Yrs. Strategic Memory Processing Word list recall immediately (no. correct) consecutive categories 10.6 (2.0) randomized categories 9.1 (2.3) uncategorized 7.6 (2.2) Word list recall delayed (no. correct) consecutive categories 6.8 (2.2) randomized categories 6.1 (3.2) uncategorized 2.6 (1.6) Verbal Fluency/Cognitive Flexibility (no. correct) semantic 29.9 (9.5) phonemic 13.1 (3.8) switching 16.3 (4.0) Reasoning Cognitive Estimation Test 4.5 (2.5) Subjective Rating DEX self-rating 22.1 (6.0) DEX independent rating 14.9 (8.0) Inhibition Stroop Test RTs RCW 25.9 (2.1) RTs NCP 44.1 (6.9) RTs INT 67.4 (10.2) INT no. corrected errors 2.9 (2.3) INT no. uncorrected errors 0.8 (0.7) AX-CPT context use 10.8 (35.7) context costs 220 (53) inhibition costs 145 (43) Multi-tasking Divided Attention RTs in msec 597 (67) no. errors 2.4 (2.5) Dual task RTs single condition 298 (33) single condition no. errors 0.7 (0.9) RTs dual condition 386 (48) dual condition no. errors 2.2 (2.0) 3145 Yrs. 4660 Yrs. 6175 Yrs.
10.9 (2.6) 8.4 (3.5) 7.7 (2.6) 6.4 (2.8) 5.3 (3.8) 3.4 (2.8) 28.1 (6.5) 12.9 (2.6) 17.1 (2.5) 3.7 (3.1) 22.7 (11.7) 17.4 (9.7)
9.5 (3.6) 7.5 (2.3) 6.3 (1.8) 5.7 (2.9) 4.9 (2.6) 2.6 (2.0) 25.7 (7.4) 13.2 (3.2) 14.7 (2.7) 3.4 (2.5) 22.3 (7.6) 21.7 (10.7)
9.7 (2.1) 8.2 (2.3) 6.4 (1.7) 5.1 (2.4) 5.3 (2.5) 1.8 (1.5) 24.5 (5.9) 11.8 (3.8) 15.9 (3.0) 3.5 (2.4) 20.4 (7.0) 23.7 (17.8)
28.6 (5.0) 45.0 (8.4) 70.9 (14.6) 3.0 (2.7) 0.6 (1.0) 6.4 (34.8) 189 (85) 147 (59)
30.0 (5.8) 43.2 (9.5) 80.2 (18.8) 2.5 (2.9) 2.6 (2.8) 16.4 (60.3) 200 (57) 137 (64)
33.8 (3.8) 48.7 (6.7) 91.5 (14.6) 4.0 (4.1) 2.5 (2.4) 13.5 (38.7) 341 (117) 211 (93)
641 (55) 2.4 (2.2) 345 (45) 0.4 (0.6) 431 (116) 1.3 (1.5)
694 (51) 5.2 (3.4) 364 (65) 0.4 (0.7) 454 (66) 2.1 (3.2)
707 (74) 4.4 (3.4) 397 (44) 0.4 (0.7) 675 (138) 5.6 (4.2)
Inhibition Stroop Test Results for the Stroop Test are presented in Figure 1. ANCOVA with RTs in the RCW and NCP conditions as covariates indicated a significant group effect for RTs in the INT condition (F3,56 = 6.302; p = .001, eta2 = 0.25).
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
379
FIGURE 1. Mean interference scores and SDs of the four age groups in the Stroop Test. INT-interference; RCW-read color words; NCP-name color pictures.
After Bonferroni correction, subsequent paired group ANCOVAs revealed significant group effects for comparisons of the oldest and the two youngest groups (all p < .008), indicating a significant slowing of the 61+ group in the interference condition. The results for errors in the interference condition are presented in Table 2. The four age groups did not differ with respect to corrected errors (Hdf = 3 = 1.344; p = .72), but there was a significant group difference for uncorrected errors (Hdf = 3 = 12.092; p < .01), with the oldest group making more errors than the youngest group (p = .001). Continuous Performance Task Because repeated measures ANOVA of RTs with Group, Condition, and Delay as factors did not yield any significant interactions involving the delay factor (all p > .38), further analyses were performed with RTs pooled for the two delays. Analysis of inhibition costs (RTs A-Y minus A-X, see Figure 2) and context costs (RTs A-Y minus B-Y, see Figure 3) yielded significant age group differences [(F3.58 = 4.159, p < .01, eta2 = 0.18) and (F3,58 = 11.418, p < .001, eta2 = 0.37), respectively], with higher inhibition cost for the oldest compared to the youngest and second oldest group (all p < .05) and higher context cost (all p .001) for the oldest group compared to all
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
FIGURE 2. Means and SDs of inhibition costs (RTs A-Y minus A-X) in the AX-CPT task for the four age groups.
FIGURE 3. Means and SDs of context costs (RTs A-Y minus B-Y) in the AX-CPT task for the four age groups.
other groups. Analysis of context use (RTs B-X minus B-Y, see Table 2) did not yield significant group differences (F3,58 = 1.594, p = .20, eta2 = 0.08). In further analyses, group differences were explored using RTs in the B-Y condition as covariate. ANCOVA yielded highly significant age group
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
381
differences for inhibition cost (p < .01) and context cost (p < .001), and the respective paired age group comparisons also remained significant for context costs (all p .001). For inhibition costs, paired group comparisons revealed significant differences between the oldest and youngest group (p < .004). Task Management Divided Attention Results for the Divided Attention task are presented in Figure 4. There was a significant age group difference for RTs (F3,58 = 10.193; p < .001, eta2 = 0.35), with the oldest group showing longer RTs than the youngest (p < .001) and the second youngest group (p < .02). The second oldest group was also slower than the youngest group (p = .001). There was a significant age group difference for errors (Hdf = 3 = 10.655; p < .01). Post-hoc comparisons did not yield significant differences for error rates (all p > .008). Dual Task The results for the dual task are illustrated in Table 2 and Figures 5 and 6. RT analysis with Group and Task as factors yielded a significant interaction (F3,57 = 24.482; p < .001, eta2 = 0.55). Post-hoc paired group comparisons revealed significant Group Task interactions (all p < .001) in all comparisons involving the oldest group, suggesting that the oldest group showed larger dual task costs than any of the other groups.
FIGURE 4. Means and SDs of RTs and number of errors in the divided attention task for the four age groups.
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
FIGURE 5. Scattergram of mean RTs in the single and dual condition of the dual task.
FIGURE 6. Mean RTs and SDs in the single and dual condition of the dual task for the four age groups.
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
383
Comparable results emerged for the dual task costs variable (DTC: (RTs dual task RTs single task)/RTs single task). The groups differed significantly on DTC [F3,57 = 18.112; p < .001, eta2 = 0.49]. Post-hoc comparisons revealed significant differences between the oldest group and all other groups (all p < .001). Repeated measures ANOVA of errors with Group and Task as factors yielded a significant interaction (F3,57 = 7.205; p < .001, eta2 = 0.28). Posthoc analyses yielded significant Group Task interactions (all p < .003) when the oldest group was compared to the two youngest groups. Comparisons including the oldest group, indicating a disproportional increase in errors from the single to the dual task condition in the oldest group. After statistical control of response speed by using RTs of the single task as covariate, ANCOVA yielded a highly significant age group difference for RTs in the dual task (F3,56 = 14.823; p < .001, eta2 = 0.44), which was due to slower RTs in the oldest compared to the second youngest and second oldest group (all p .001). Correlations To supplement the group comparisons, cognitive test performance was correlated with age. Significant correlations were found for found for a range of executive function variables of the Stroop Test (INT-RCW, r = .50, p < .001; INT-NCP, r = .63, p < .001; uncorrected errors, r = .45, p < .001), the AX-CPT (inhibition cost, r = .34, p < .01; context cost, r = .32, p = .01; context benefit, r = .26, p = .05), divided attention (RTs, r = .58, p < .001; errors, r = .36, p = .004) and the dual task (RTs: single condition, r = .65, p < .001; dual condition, r = .73, p < .001; errors, r = .39, p < .01). Intercorrelations between tests yielded correlations between AX-CPT context costs and Stroop INT-RCW (r = .28, p = .03) as well as INT-NCP (r = .35, p < .01). DISCUSSION The present study aimed to investigate the effect of normal aging on the course of executive function subcomponents in four consecutive age groups covering age ranges from 20 to 75 years. The groups were well matched for present state IQ and mood. Taken together, the results show a differential effect of normal aging on different subcomponents of executive control. Following Smith and Jonides (1999) subdivision of executive control, the inhibition and task management subcomponents were both significantly affected by age. Combined inhibition and task management deficits were observed in subjects over 60 years of age on all tests, which addressed such abilities. Impairments involved both the inhibition of strong habitual response tendencies as well as weaker, experimentally induced predominant responses. Abilities to coordinate information from two sensory channels and to coordinate
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
385
combinations (70%). This tendency had to be suppressed for the rare A-Y sequence (requiring the nontarget key). Subjects over 60 needed more time than younger subjects to inhibit the inappropriate response towards the target key, which was indicated by an increase of both context and inhibition cost. Inhibition took longer, even if general age-associated response slowing was statistically accounted for. Use of context, on the other hand, was unaffected by age, indicating a preserved ability to benefit from the unambiguous information for response preparation. Unlike the Stroop Test, where inhibition can be prepared and needs to be upheld throughout the task, the need to inhibit a prepotent response emerges phasically and unpredictably and therefore requires a high degree of flexibility. These more demanding tasks might be of particular use to study mild executive impairments in healthy older subjects. Task management was consistently found to be impaired in subjects over 60, irrespective of whether or not stimulus input was within the same modality. Deficits in divided attention tasks or tasks requiring the coordination of two responses have been frequently reported in the elderly (Verhaeghen et al., 2003), although it is unclear whether these effects are due to age-associated response slowing (Salthouse et al., 1995). The task management deficit of older subjects observed in our study was significant even when simple RT differences were taken into account. In younger subjects, the dual task cost (relative to single task RT) was 30%, while it was 70% in the oldest group who also committed more errors. This pattern is more consistent with genuine impairment than response-slowing alone. As to the course or development of executive impairment, it is of interest that middle-aged subjects (age range 46 to 60 years) had only difficulties in dividing attention between two input modalities, while inhibition and the coordination of two motor responses was still unimpaired. This pattern suggests an early onset of executive problems, which manifest themselves during the more difficult tasks, and extend to a wider range with increasing age. The interindividual variability of inhibition and task management performances also appeared to increase with age, which is consistent with previous reports (Glisky et al., 2001; Rosen et al., 2002). While some older adults are able to maintain their cognitive performance at a level comparable to young individuals (successful aging; Rowe & Kahn, 1997, 2000), others suffer from significant cognitive decline. Whether preservation of executive function relates to factors such as activation of additional brain resources (Cabeza et al., 2002; Grady, 2000; Langenecker & Nielson, 2003; Reuter-Lorenz et al., 2000; Rosen et al., 2002), level of education (Albert et al., 1995; Chou & Chi, 2002), low blood pressure (Kilander et al., 2000), cognitively stimulating activities during middle age (Hartman-Stein & Potkanowicz, 2003), emotional support (Seeman et al., 2001), or depression (Fischer, 1996) needs to be clarified.
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
387
independent ratings of executive behavior, the data indicate an increase of dysexecutive behavior as well as an increase of interindividual variability of dysexecutive behavior. This is in accordance with the findings of increased between-subject variability in cognitive performance in older age groups (Hultsch et al., 2002; Shammi et al., 1998). A major problem in the study of age effects on executive function is that performance is mainly assessed via speed measures, and global slowing contributes significantly to cognitive deficits in normal aging (Lowe & Rabbitt, 1997; Uttl & Graf, 1997; Verhaeghen & De Meersman, 1998b). It has been suggested that RTs of older subjects can be represented by multiplying younger subjects RTs with a constant (Verhaeghen et al., 2003). This procedure implies a disproportional RT increase of older subjects in complex compared to simple conditions, which poses a problem for the interpretation of significant group condition interactions. An age-related decline in performance is only considered valid if the constant, i.e., the age-related slowing factor, changes from the simple to the complex task. There is, however, disagreement as to whether cognitive decline in aging can simply be attributed to RT slowing (Van der Linden, 2000; West & Alain, 2000). In a meta-analysis of 33 aging studies of task management, Verhaeghen et al. (2003) concluded that the larger dual-task costs in older subjects go beyond the effect of general slowing. As the present study involved simple, easy-tolearn tasks (Hartley, 2001) with an emphasis on both speed and accuracy and as age changes were observed for both RTs and errors, the task management deficits in the oldest group most likely reflect genuine executive control impairments. Of course, fatigue effects cannot totally be excluded for the Stroop Test or the Dual Task which were administered towards the end of the session. But older subjects were also impaired on the Divided Attention task and the AX-CPT which were administered early in the test session. Several attempts have been made to relate age-associated impairments to specific PFC regions. MacPherson (2002) suggested that the dorsolateral PFC undergoes more extensive changes than the ventromedial PFC, although there is little direct evidence from neuroimaging studies for this distinction (Raz et al., 1997; Salat et al., 2001; Tisserand et al., 2002). Although the conclusions about brain location on the basis of behavioral data alone are limited and speculative, the combined age-related inhibition and task management changes observed in the present study would be consistent with dorsolateral PFC mechanisms, but would also be consistent with a possible involvement of the anterior cingulate cortex (Cummings, 1993; Dreher & Grafman, 2003; Loose et al., 2003; Sturm & Zimmermann, 2000; Suchan et al., 2003, 2005). This is also supported by neuroimaging results of decreased rCBF within the frontal cingular gyri in older subjects (Larsson et al., 2001). Taken together, our results suggest a differential effect of normal aging on the inhibition and task management subcomponents of executive control.
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
REFERENCES
Albert, M. S., Jones, K., Savage, C. R., Berkman, L., Seeman, T., Blazer, D., & Rowe, J. W. (1995). Predictors of cognitive change in older persons: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Psychology and Aging, 10, 578589. Amieva, H., Phillips, L., & Della Sala, S. (2003). Behavioral dysexecutive symptoms in normal aging. Brain and Cognition, 53, 129132. Backman, L., Ginovart, N., Dixon, R. A., Wahlin, T. B., Wahlin, A., Halldin, C., & Farde, L. (2000). Age-related cognitive deficits mediated by changes in the striatal dopamine system. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 635637. Bumler, G. (1985). Farb-Wort-Interferenztest (FWIT) nach J. R. Stroop. Handanweisung. Gttingen: Hogrefe. Bond, A., & Lader, M. (1974). The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 47, 455460. Brady, C. B., Spiro, A., III, McGlinchey-Berroth, R., Milberg, W., & Gaziano, J. M. (2001). Stroke risk predicts verbal fluency decline in healthy older men: Evidence from the normative aging study. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Science and Social Science, 56, 340346. Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., & Cohen, J. D. (1999). Cognition and control in schizophrenia: A computational model of dopamine and prefrontal function. Biological Psychiatry, 46, 312328. Brink, J. M., & McDowd, J. M. (1999). Aging and selective attention: An issue of complexity or multiple mechanisms? Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Science and Social Science, 54, 3033. Bryan, J., Luszcz, M. A., & Crawford, J. R. (1997). Verbal knowledge and speed of information processing as mediators of age differences in verbal fluency performance among older adults. Psychology and Aging, 12, 473478. Burke, D. M., & Mackay, D. G. (1997). Memory, language, and ageing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Science, 352, 18451856. Cabeza, R., Anderson, N. D., Locantore, J. K., & McIntosh, A. R. (2002). Aging gracefully: Compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults. Neuroimage, 17, 13941402. Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280, 747749. Chou, K. L., & Chi, I. (2002). Successful aging among the young-old, old-old, and oldest-old Chinese. International Journal of Aging Human Development, 54, 114. Cummings, J. L. (1993). Frontal-subcortical circuits and human behavior. Archives of Neurology, 50, 873880. Dahl, G. (1972). Reduzierter Wechsler Intelligenztest (short version of the Wechsler Intelligence Test). Meisenheim: Hain. Daum, I., Graber, S., Schugens, M. M., & Mayes, A. R. (1996). Memory dysfunction of the frontal type in normal ageing. Neuroreport, 7, 26252628. Daum, I., & Mayes, A. R. (2000). Memory and executive function impairments after frontal or posterior cortex lesions. Behavioural Neurology, 12, 161173.
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
389
Daum, I., Reimhold, C., & Spieker, S. (1994). Kognitive Beeintrchtigungen im Frhstadium der Parkinsonschen Krankheit - Eine explorative Studie an 18 unmedizierten de novo Patienten. Zeitschrift fr Gerontopsychologie und-Psychiatrie, 2, 8594. Daum, I., & Schugens, M. M. (1999). Changes in memory functions during ageing: A neuropsychological perspective. In M. Falkenstein, J. Hohnsbein, & P. Ullsperger (Eds.), Cognitive changes due to ageing and fatigue as revealed in the electric brain activity. Bremerhaven: Wirtschaftsverlag. Daum, I., Schugens, M. M., Spieker, S., Poser, U., Schonle, P. W., & Birbaumer, N. (1995). Memory and skill acquisition in Parkinsons disease and frontal lobe dysfunction. Cortex, 31, 413432. Della-Maggiore, V., Grady, C. L., & McIntosh, A. R. (2002). Dissecting the effect of aging on the neural substrates of memory: Deterioration, preservation or functional reorganization? Reviews in Neuroscience, 13, 167181. Della Sala, S., MacPherson, S. E., Phillips, L. H., Sacco, L., & Spinnler, H. (2004). The role of semantic knowledge on the cognitive estimation task-evidence from Alzheimers disease and healthy adult aging. Journal of Neurology, 251, 156164. Dreher, J. C., & Grafman, J. (2003). Dissociating the roles of the rostral anterior cingulate and the lateral prefrontal cortices in performing two tasks simultaneously or successively. Cerebral Cortex, 13, 329339. Dursun, S. M., Robertson, H. A., Bird, D., Kutcher, D., & Kutcher, S. P. (2002). Effects of ageing on prefrontal temporal cortical network function in healthy volunteers as assessed by COWA. An exploratory survey. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 26, 10071010. Fischer, P. (1996). The spectrum of depressive pseudo-dementia. Journal of Neural Transmission Supplements, 47, 193203. Gamboz, N., Russo, R., & Fox, E. (2000). Target selection difficulty, negative priming, and aging. Psychology and Aging, 15, 542550. Gamboz, N., Russo, R., & Fox, E. (2002). Age differences and the identity negative priming effect: anupdated meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 17, 525531. Gillespie, D. C., Evans, R. I., Gardener, E. A., & Bowen, A. (2002). Performance of older adults on tests of cognitive estimation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24, 286293. Glisky, E. L., Rubin, S. R., & Davidson, P. S. (2001). Source memory in older adults: an encoding or retrieval problem? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 27, 11311146. Grady, C. L. (2000). Functional brain imaging and age-related changes in cognition. Biological Psychology, 54, 259281. Grant, J. D., & Dagenbach, D. (2000). Further considerations regarding inhibitory processes, working memory, and cognitive aging. American Journal of Psychology, 113, 6994. Guttmann, C. R., Jolesz, F. A., Kikinis, R., Killiany, R. J., Moss, M. B., Sandor, T., & Albert, M. S. (1998). White matter changes with normal aging. Neurology, 50, 972978. Hartley, A. A. (2001). Age differences in dual-task interference are localized to responsegeneration processes. Psychology and Aging, 16, 4754. Hartman-Stein, P. E., & Potkanowicz, E. S. (2003). Behavioral determinants of healthy aging: good news for the baby boomer generation. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 8, 6. Head, D., Buckner, R. L., Shimony, J. S., Williams, L. E., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., McAvoy, M., Morris, J. C., & Snyder, A. Z. (2004). Differential vulnerability of anterior white matter in nondemented aging with minimal acceleration in dementia of the Alzheimer type: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 410423. Heyder, K., Suchan, B., & Daum, I. (2004). Cortico-subcortical contributions to executive control. Acta Psychologica (Amsterdam), 115, 271289.
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
391
Mathuranath, P. S., George, A., Cherian, P. J., Alexander, A., Sarma, S. G., & Sarma, P. S. (2003). Effects of age, education and gender on verbal fluency. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 10571064. Mayes, A. R., & Daum, I. (1997). How specific are the memory and other cognitive deficits caused by frontal lobe lesions? In P. M. Rabbitt (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive functions (pp. 155175). Hove, UK: Psychology Press. McDowd, J. M. (1997). Inhibition in attention and aging. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Science and Social Science, 52, 265273. Meiran, N., Gotler, A., & Perlman, A. (2001). Old age is associated with a pattern of relatively intact and relatively impaired task-set switching abilities. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Science and Social Science, 56, 88102. Mejia, S., Pineda, D., Alvarez, L. M., & Ardila, A. (1998). Individual differences in memory and executive function abilities during normal aging. International Journal of Neuroscience, 95, 271284. Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Talsma, D., Coles, M. G., Holroyd, C. B., Kok, A., & van der Molen, M. W. (2002). A computational account of altered error processing in older age: Dopamine and the error-related negativity. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 2, 1936. Park, D. C., Smith, A. D., Lautenschlager, G., Earles, J. L., Frieske, D., Zwahr, M., & Gaines, C. L. (1996). Mediators of long-term memory performance across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 11, 621637. Raz, N., Gunning-Dixon, F., Head, D., Rodrigue, K. M., Williamson, A., & Acker, J. D. (2004). Aging, sexual dimorphism, and hemispheric asymmetry of the cerebral cortex: Replicability of regional differences in volume. Neurobiology of Aging, 25, 377396. Raz, N., Gunning, F. M., Head, D., Dupuis, J. H., McQuain, J., Briggs, S. D., Loken, W. J., Thornton, A. E., & Acker, J. D. (1997). Selective aging of the human cerebral cortex observed in vivo: Differential vulnerability of the prefrontal gray matter. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 268282. Raz, N., Torres, I. J., & Acker, J. D. (1992). Age-related shrinkage of the mamillary bodies: In vivo MRI evidence. Neuroreport, 3, 713716. Resnick, S. M., Pham, D. L., Kraut, M. A., Zonderman, A. B., & Davatzikos, C. (2003). Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging studies of older adults: A shrinking brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 32953301. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., Hartley, A., Miller, A., Marshuetz, C., & Koeppe, R. A. (2000). Age differences in the frontal lateralization of verbal and spatial working memory revealed by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 174187. Rodriguez-Aranda, C. (2003). Reduced writing and reading speed and age-related changes in verbal fluency tasks. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17, 203215. Rosen, A. C., Prull, M. W., OHara, R., Race, E. A., Desmond, J. E., Glover, G. H., Yesavage, J. A., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2002). Variable effects of aging on frontal lobe contributions to memory. Neuroreport, 13, 24252428. Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1997). Successful aging. Gerontologist, 37, 433440. Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (2000). Successful aging and disease prevention. Advances in Renal Replacement Therapy, 7, 7077. Salat, D. H., Kaye, J. A., & Janowsky, J. S. (2001). Selective preservation and degeneration within the prefrontal cortex in aging and Alzheimer disease. Archives of Neurology, 58, 14031408. Salthouse, T. A. (2003). Memory aging from 18 to 80. Alzheimer Diseases and Associated Disorders, 17, 162167. Salthouse, T. A., Fristoe, N. M., Lineweaver, T. T., & Coon, V. E. (1995). Aging of attention: Does the ability to divide decline? Mem. Cognit., 23, 5971.
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
Downloaded By: [Washington University in Saint Louis] At: 22:29 27 February 2008
393
Verhaeghen, P., & De Meersman, L. (1998a). Aging and the negative priming effect: a metaanalysis. Psychology and Aging, 13, 435444. Verhaeghen, P., & De Meersman, L. (1998b). Aging and the Stroop effect: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 13, 120126. Verhaeghen, P., Steitz, D. W., Sliwinski, M. J., & Cerella, J. (2003). Aging and dual-task performance: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 443460. Wang, G. J., Volkow, N. D., Logan, J., Fowler, J. S., Schlyer, D., MacGregor, R. R., Hitzemann, R. J., Gur, R. C., & Wolf, A. P. (1995). Evaluation of age-related changes in serotonin 5-HT2 and dopamine D2 receptor availability in healthy human subjects. Life Sciences, 56, L249L253 Wang, Y., Chan, G. L., Holden, J. E., Dobko, T., Mak, E., Schulzer, M., Huser, J. M., Snow, B. J., Ruth, T. J., Calne, D. B., & Stoessl, A. J. (1998). Age-dependent decline of dopamine D1 receptors in human brain: a PET study. Synapse, 30, 5661. Wecker, N. S., Kramer, J. H., Wisniewski, A., Delis, D. C., & Kaplan, E. (2000). Age effects on executive ability. Neuropsychology, 14, 409414. Wegesin, D. J., Jacobs, D. M., Zubin, N. R., Ventura, P. R., & Stern, Y. (2000). Source memory and encoding strategy in normal aging. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22, 455464. West, R. (2004). The effects of aging on controlled attention and conflict processing in the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 16, 103113. West, R. L. (1996). An application of prefrontal cortex function theory to cognitive aging. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 272292. West, R., & Alain, C. (2000). Age-related decline in inhibitory control contributes to the increased Stroop effect observed in older adults. Psychophysiology, 37, 179189. Wilson, B. A., Alderman, N., Burgess, P. W., Emslie, H., & Evans, J. J. (1996). Behavioural assessment of the dysexecutive syndrome. Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk: Thames Valley Test Company. Woodruff-Pak, D. S. (1997). The neuropsychology of aging (Understanding aging). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. Zimmermann, P., & Fimm, B. (1993). Testbatterie zur Aufmerksamkeitsprfung. Wrselen: PSYTEST.