Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A partnership approach to tackling drugs was at the heart of the Government drug strategy ‘Tackling Drugs to Build a
Better Britain’ (1998). At a local level, DATs became responsible for commissioning services for drug users according to
local need. In April 2001 DAT boundaries became co-terminus with local authorities to ensure more effective co-
ordination with services such as housing, social services and education.
The Updated Drug Strategy (2002) set out plans to break the link between drug use and crime by extending and
integrating a range of criminal justice interventions which aim to get drug users into treatment and provide appropriate
aftercare. The Criminal Justice Interventions Programme (CJIP) is a critical part of the strategy.
There will be links between CJIP and the new Prolific and Other Priority Offenders Scheme (PPO). Probation areas will
need to engage with both these initiatives. Partnership guidance for Criminal Justice Integrated Teams (CJITs) and PPOs
schemes will be issued to DATs shortly and will be the subject of another PC.
The first phase of CJIP, which started in April 2003 focused on those areas with the highest levels of acquisitive crime
such as burglary, shoplifting, and robbery. 25 Drug Action Team partnerships covering 30 police Basic Command Units
(BCU) were identified and started an intensive package of interventions, including drug testing on charge. Those DATs
also received funding for throughcare and aftercare. “Throughcare” is the term used to describe arrangements for
managing the continuity of care provided to a drug misuser. “Aftercare” is the package of support that needs to be in
place after a drug misusing offender reaches the end of prison-based treatment, completes a community sentence or
leaves treatment. The 25 DATs were also required to establish an integrated approach to working with drug misusing
offenders in the Criminal Justice System and those leaving treatment, through the development of Criminal Justice
Integrated Teams (CJITs).
From April 2004, the second phase of CJIP was started and included extension of drug testing on charge to a further 36
police Basic Command Units covering 22 DAT partnerships. It also included piloting of Restrictions on Bail and
interventions for young offenders. Funding for the Throughcare and Aftercare elements of CJIP was, however, made
available to all DAT partnerships in England and partnerships in Wales. This funding is in addition to existing funding for
enhanced arrest referral.
In summary, from April 2004, 47 DAT partnerships with high acquisitive crime are introducing a package of intensive
interventions, which include drug testing on charge, enhanced arrest referral and throughcare and aftercare. This means
that 14 probation areas are involved in intensive CJIP areas.
All probation areas will work with a DAT funded to deliver throughcare and aftercare as well as enhanced arrest referral.
Funding for Wales is being allocated by the Welsh Assembly. CJIP developments are therefore taking place in all
probation areas.
Key partners in the programme with the Home Office are the Department of Health, the National Treatment Agency
(NTA), police, the Prison Service, the National Probation Service, treatment service providers and those who provide
linked services such as housing and job-seeker support.
Information relating to CJIP is predominately distributed via the DATs, although NPD are currently considering what
additional information needs to be distributed directly from NPD. Probation areas have received a video and leaflets about
CJIP for distribution to all relevant staff. Information, including copies of guidance relating to the various elements of the
programmes, is also available via the CJIP link from the drugs website at www.drugs.gov.uk.
PC47/2004 - Guidance on Funding of Substance Misuse Partnerships and the Criminal Justice Interventions
Programme (CJIP) 2
3. CJIP and arrangements for Probation Service funding of substance misuse partnerships
The National Probation Service is a key partner in delivery of the drug strategy. As a statutory member of the DAT and its
Joint Commissioning Group (JCG) the service has a duty to co-operate with the responsible authorities as a member of
Crime and Disorder Reduction Partnerships (CDRPs) which were created under 1998 Crime and Disorder Act. CDRPs
and DATs are now working as one partnership in unitary authorities. Where this merger has not taken place e.g. in two
tier authorities the CDRPs and DATs should be working very closely.
CDRPs are currently undertaking crime and drugs audits in preparation for the development of their three year strategies.
Where the DAT and CDRP have not already merged, the audit and strategy should form part of the planning and
commissioning by the DATs.
Historically probation areas have provided a range of services for drug users both directly and through their funding of
partnership agencies. With the move towards a pooling of resources for drug users through the work of the DATs, JCGs
and CDRPs, it is anticipated more efficient and effective services can be provided for drug users to meet local need. The
creation of the pooled treatment budget (PTB) aimed to progress this approach. It was always intended that the PTB
should be an additional resource and should not be used to replace agencies’ mainstream spending on drug treatment.
Similarly, new monies from the CJIP initiative are intended to improve and develop services for drug misusing offenders
and must not be used to replace funding which was previously provided by other agencies.
Cuts to drug service partner agencies by probation areas have raised concern by key partners about the impact this may
have on the provision of treatment for drug misusing offenders.
NPD acknowledges that probation areas will need to review partnership spending in order to ensure value for money, but
supports the position outlined above that agencies should not disinvest their mainstream spending on drug treatment
provision. All areas have received additional money for 2004/5 and any reduced spending on partnerships should be
revisited in light of this additional money.
4.Principles for probation areas when reviewing funding of drug treatment partnerships
The following principles should be taken into account when reviewing funding of drug treatment partnerships in order to
ensure the quality or quantity of drug treatment provision locally is not reduced.
• Probation areas are a statutory member of the DAT and its Joint Commissioning Group (JCG). Representation on the
DAT and JCG should be at senior management level and areas should have mechanisms for ensuring DAT/JCG
business is consistent with probation area plans.
• The pooling of resources to provide drug treatment services which meet local need is an approach endorsed by NPD.
Probation managers should therefore be involved in all DAT/JCG business relating to the provision of treatment and
must not restrict their involvement to the delivery of DTTOs.
• Probation Boards have a duty to co-operate with the responsible authorities of the CDRP in the delivery of their
strategies. Probation contribution to the CDRP is one way of ensuring there are sufficient partnerships to meet local
need regardless of individual probation areas funding situation. CDRPs can hold probation areas to account for their
co- operation with the CDRP strategy.
• Where a probation area is reviewing its funding to drug services, either directly or through its contribution to the DAT,
discussion must be held with the DAT/JCG, NTA regional manager and probation regional manager at the earliest
opportunity. The NPD Drugs and Alcohol Performance & Interventions Manager should also be informed.
• Discussion should focus on whether existing expenditure is providing the best value for money and whether the same
output could be achieved by alternative funding arrangements.
• At a more general level, the JCG will monitor existing contracts with treatment providers and advise on whether they
are delivering the required outputs at the most efficient cost. Probation managers have an active role in this process
which should reduce the need for unilateral decisions regarding funding of specific services.
PC47/2004 - Guidance on Funding of Substance Misuse Partnerships and the Criminal Justice Interventions
Programme (CJIP) 3
• All parties should try to agree an acceptable way forward which maintains the quality and quantity of services to drug
misusers.
• Where funding is being reviewed sufficient notice must be given to treatment providers and agencies who will be
affected by this.
• Probation areas or regions should hold regular meetings with the relevant NTA regional manager to review progress
and ensure early identification of any difficulties relating to drug treatment provision locally/ regionally.
The above process requires full co-operation of all parties. There have been examples of this approach working to
resolve problems to all agencies’ satisfaction.
CJIP is about the whole process of managing offenders in drug treatment and probation need to play a full role in
planning, implementation and delivery of the programme.
Probation regional managers (RMs) play a key role in ensuring area’s strategic planning takes account of CJIP
developments. RMs also have a role in overseeing arrangements that are put in place by their areas to link probation into
CJIP delivery.
Senior managers who represent areas on DATs need to be fully engaged in the planning and commissioning process and
ensure that delivery of DTTOs and access to aftercare provision is fully integrated into local treatment provision.
Probation areas should ensure they are involved in the process of signing off CJIP plans and should assess whether
there are any gaps in the end to end process that could result in offenders falling through the system.
Areas should develop local stakeholder and communication action plans for engaging internal partners and external
audiences which are consistent with the central CJIP communication strategy.
CJITs will allocate a worker after a drug misusing offender has been assessed and it has been agreed that he/she will be
taken onto the CJIT caseload. This can happen at any point in the criminal justice system or on leaving treatment. The
CJIT worker will develop a care plan with the offender and link with appropriate interventions. At pre-sentence stage this
may include identifying offenders as possible candidates for DTTOs.
PC47/2004 - Guidance on Funding of Substance Misuse Partnerships and the Criminal Justice Interventions
Programme (CJIP) 4
CJIP, NTA, prisons and probation have developed a national framework which sets out arrangements for continuity of
care between community (CJIT) and custody. These arrangements are currently operational in 47 intensive DAT areas
and will be extended to the remaining 102 DATs by the end of October 2004. Arrangements for Wales are to be
confirmed.
Local arrangements for the development of CJITs may mean that in some areas probation staff will become part of the
CJIT. Whatever model is established, probation areas need to ensure that local protocols are in place to ensure the
probation service is integrated into the local CJIP structure and that these are communicated to staff.
With all prison establishments in England and Wales becoming part of the Through and Aftercare CJIP initiative from April
2004 and the number of offenders who are given DTTOs set to increase, a significant number of probation offenders will
have contact with a CJIT. All probation staff who are engaged in PSR assessment, case management of offenders who
have drug related problems, hostel or resettlement work need to have a good knowledge of:
• the local CJIP arrangements
• the role of CJITs
• what is required of them to work collaboratively with their local CJIT
PC47/2004 - Guidance on Funding of Substance Misuse Partnerships and the Criminal Justice Interventions
Programme (CJIP) 5