You are on page 1of 5

Molecular Human Reproduction Vol.11, No.1 pp.

1519, 2004 Advance Access publication November 5, 2004

doi:10.1093/molehr/gah127

Polymorphisms of the genes encoding the GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 in Korean women: no association with endometriosis
Sung Eun Hur1, Ji Young Lee2, Hye-Sung Moon1 and Hye Won Chung1,3
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine and 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, 911-1 Yang-Cheon-Ku Mock-6-Dong 158-710 Seoul, South Korea. E-mail: hyewon@ewha.ac.kr Endometriosis, one of the most common gynaecologic disorders, shows signicantly elevated prevalence in industrial areas and there is also a possible genetic predisposition. Glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) are enzymes involved in the metabolism of many disease-causing carcinogens and mutagens that are present in human environments. An association between the incidence of endometriosis and the GST genotypes of patients has been suggested. The objective of the present study was to investigate whether the polymorphisms of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 are related to endometriosis. Blood samples were available from 259 controls and 194 patients with advanced endometriosis diagnosed by both pathology and laparoscopic ndings. The proportion of the GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 genotypes of the control group were comparable to other populations. There was no signicant evidence that the distribution of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotype differed between the patients and the controls, with an allelic odds ratio (OR) 5 1.074 [95% condence interval (CI) 5 0.7371.564] and 1.239 (95% CI 5 0.853 1.799), respectively. Also, there was no signicant difference in the proportion of GSTP1 genotypes between the women with endometriosis and the control group with the OR 5 0.823 (95% CI 5 0.536 1.264). The higher risk alleles were contended as GSTM1, GSTT1 null mutation and GSTP1 Ile105Ile polymorphism. There was no signicant increase in the risk of endometriosis as the number of higher risk alleles of the GST family increased. In conclusion, our ndings suggest that the GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 genetic polymorphisms are not associated with the development of endometriosis in Korean women. Key words: endometriosis/GSTM1/GSTT1/GSTP1/polymorphism
3 1

Downloaded from http://molehr.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on May 23, 2013

Introduction
Endometriosis is one of the most common gynaecologic disorders, but its aetiology and pathogenesis remain obscure. There is increasing evidence that endometriosis is inherited as a complex genetic trait, implying that multiple gene loci interact with each other and with the environment to produce the phenotypic disease (Kennedy, 1997). A number of candidate genes have been studied to date. Associations have been reported between the endometriosis and the polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor (Georgiou et al., 1999), human arylhydrocarbon receptor repressor gene (Watanabe et al., 2001), p53 codon 72 (Chang et al., 2002), PROGINS receptor gene polymorphism (Wieser et al., 2002), androgen receptor trinucleotide (Hsieh et al., 2001), galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase genes (Cramer et al., 1996) and detoxication enzyme genes (Baranova et al., 1997). Endometriosis shows signicantly elevated frequency in industrial areas (Nisolle et al., 1997) and there is a possible genetic predisposition (Kennedy et al., 1996). The glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs) constitute a family of xenobiotic-detoxifying phase II enzymes catalysing the conjugation of glutathione to a variety of electrophilic compounds including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), which are widely present in the human environment and known to be carcinogenic (Smith et al., 1995; Strange and Fryer, 1999).

Several GSTs are polymorphic and some allelic variants causing enzyme activity impairment are suspected to increase susceptibility to malignancies associated with environmental PAH, particularly colorectal cancer (Strange and Fryer, 1999; Cotton et al., 2000). A very small portion of endometriosis develops into cancer later, but endometriosis itself is not a cancer disease. It has many similar characteristics of cancer diseases, for example progressive growth, invasive growth, estrogen-dependent growth, recurrence and a tendency to metastasis (Gorp et al., 2004). The polymorphic genes GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 are involved in the detoxication of a variety of potential carcinogenic compounds, such as hydrocarbon diol-epoxides, steroids and genotoxic lipoperoxidation products (Ketterer, 1998). Deletion variants or null alleles exist for the GSTT1 and GSTM1 genes and these present biochemically as a failure to express protein (Hu et al., 1999). The GSTP1 polymorphism is the result of a base substitution (A ! G), which leads to an amino acid substitution (codon 105, Isoleucine ! Valine). This amino acid substitution, in the GSTP1 binding site, modies its catalytic activity. The GSTP1 enzymes with val 105 with altered heat stability and specic activity of the val-containing isoform (Zimnick et al., 1994; Ali Osman et al., 1997) have a 7-fold higher efciency for conjugation of PAH diolepoxides, and in vitro this polymorphic form signicantly reduces

Molecular Human Reproduction vol. 11 no. 1 q European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved

15

S.E.Hur et al. the level of benzo(a)pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide-induced DNA adducts (Hu et al., 1999). These and other GST variants have been investigated as risk factors for predisposition to numerous cancers, including lung, bladder, breast, colorectal, gastric, liver, larynx and skin cancer, with conicting results between and within cancer types (Rebbeck, 1997; Hengstler et al., 1998; dErrico et al., 1999; Dunning et al., 1999). The increased interest in this particular gene is due to its contribution to the metabolism of dioxin as a phase II enzyme, indicating that the GSTM1 may increase susceptibility to endometriosis. Dioxin is considered a possible contributor to the development of this disease (Rier and Yeaman, 1997), even if evidence for such a role in humans is limited (Mayani et al., 1997) and the other studies show no association (Eskenazi et al., 2002). Current investigations are devoted to detoxication system genes, such as arylamine N-acetyltransferase 2, GSTM1 and GSTT1 in the development of endometriosis, but results are not consistent. There are very few studies reported on investigation of the effects of GSTP1 on endometriosis development. In this study, we have investigated the potential inuence of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphism in Korean women with and without endometriosis to assess the risk of individuals or combined genotypes that alter the metabolizing capabilities for dioxin and estrogen in the development of endometriosis.

Figure 1. Electrophoresis of the digested PCR products showing individuals homozygous for the GSTP1 BsmAI polymorphism (lane 13; val/val homozygous), heterozygous for the polymorphism (lanes 1012; ile/val heterozygous) and without the polymorphism (lanes 19; ile/ile homozygous). M DNA marker.

GSTP1 genotyping
The GSTP1 exon 5 105 ile ) val polymorphisms were determined by PCR and restriction fragment length polymorphism according to the method of Harris et al. (1997). DNA samples were amplied with the primers 50 -ACCCCAGGGCTCTATGGGAA-30 and 50 -TGAGGGCACAAGAAGCCCCT-30 (Bioneer, Seoul, Korea). The PCR amplication was carried out with 50 ng DNA in 10 mM Tris HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.3 mM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (PerkinElmer), 200 ng of each primer and 1.0 U of Taq polymerase (PerkinElmer) in a total volume of 40 ml. Amplication was performed with an initial denaturation step at 958C for 12 min, followed by 35 cycles at 948C for 30 s, 558C for 30 s and 728C for 45 s and a nal extension at 728C for 10 min. The amplication product (20 ml) was digested with 5 U of BsmAI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) in 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM TrisHCl, 10 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM dithiothreitol, and incubated at 558C for 16 h. Then fragment lengths were analysed on a 3.5% agarose gel with ethidium bromide (0.5 mg/ml). When the BsmAI restriction site was present, the fragment of 176 bp was digested into two lengths of 91 and 85 bp. Electrophoresis of the digested PCR products showed individuals homozygous (ile/ile) for the GSTP1 BsmAI polymorphism as one band of 176 bp. Heterozygous (ile/val, val/val) for the polymorphism showed three bands of 176, 91 and 85. Homozygotes (val/val) showed two bands of 91 and 85 bp (Figure 1).

Downloaded from http://molehr.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on May 23, 2013

Materials and methods


Subjects
The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board on the Use of Human Subjects in Research at Ewha Womans University and informed consent was obtained from each patient. The endometriosis patients had undergone laparotomy or laparoscopy at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of Ewha Womans University Hospital. Patients consisted of 194 unrelated Korean women and were diagnosed with advanced stage endometriosis (stages III and IV) by both pathological and laparoscopic ndings according to the revised American Fertility Society classication of endometriosis (American Fertility Society, 1985). Blood samples were collected from the patient group for DNA. The 259 women undergoing laparoscopic surgery or laparotomy for non-malignant lesions, such as benign ovarian cyst, were included in the control group. Blood samples were collected for DNA extraction.

Statistical analysis
For statistical analysis, x2-test and logistic regression analysis were used. A P value of , 0.05 was considered statistically signicant. The Hardy Weinberg equilibrium analyses were performed to compare observed and expected genotype frequencies using a chi-square test. All analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for Social Science version 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotyping


GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotyping for gene deletions were carried out by PCR as described by Lin et al. (1998) with minor modications. DNA samples were amplied with the primers: 50 -GAACTCCCTGAAAAGCTAAAGC-30 and 50 -GTTGGGCTCAAATATACGGTGG-30 (Bioneer, Seoul, Korea) for GSTM1, which produced a 219 bp product; 50 -TCACCGGATCATGGCCAGCA-30 and 50 -TTCCTTACTGGTCCTCACATCTC-30 (Bioneer, Seoul, Korea) for GSTT1, which produced a 459 bp product. Amplication of beta actin gene with the primers 50 -GCCCTCTGCTAACAAGTCCTAC-30 (Bioneer, Seoul, Korea) and 50 -GCCCTAAAAAGAAAATCCCCAATC-30 (Bioneer, Seoul, Korea) was used as an internal control and produced a 350 bp product. PCR was performed in a nal volume of 50 ml, consisting of DNA (0.1 mg), dNTP (0.2 mM each) (PerkinElmer), MgCl2 (2.5 mM), each primer (1.0, 0.3 and 0.2 mM for GSTM1, GSTT1 and beta actin, respectively), Taq polymerase (1.25 U) (PerkinElmer), reaction buffer and 2% dimethylsulphoxide. Amplication was performed with an initial denaturation at 958C for 12 min, followed by 35 cycles of amplication which was performed at 948C for 1 min, 628C for 1 min and 728C for 1 min and a nal extension at 728C for 10 min, using a GeneAmp 9600 thermal cycler (PerkinElmer). The amplied product was visualized in an ethidium bromide stained 1.5% agarose gel. If the study subject is null for the gene, no PCR product is present, but the beta actin gene fragment acts as a positive PCR control.

Results
GSTM1 gene polymorphism
The proportion of control group individuals with GSTM1 null mutations was 56%, which is comparable to population controls in other studies. No signicant differences were found between the endometriosis group (57.7%) and the control group (56%) for the GSTM1 null mutation. The GSTM1 null mutation did not increase the risk of endometriosis development [odds ratio (OR) 1.074, 95% condence interval (CI) 0.737 1.564, P 0.774] (Table I).

GSTT1 gene polymorphism


The proportion of control group individuals with GSTT1 null mutations was 48.3% comparable to population controls in other studies. No signicant differences were found between the endometriosis group (53.6%) and the control group (48.3%) for the GSTT1 null mutation. The GSTT1 null mutation did not increase the risk of endometriosis development (OR 1.239, 95% CI 0.853 1.799) (Table I).

16

GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms in Korean women


Table I. Allelic frequencies and ORs for GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms in Korean women with and without endometriosis Polymorphism GSTM1 Null Present Total GSTT1 Null Present Total Endometriosis (%) Control (%) OR 95% CI

112 (57.7) 82 (42.3) 194 104 (53.6) 90 (46.4) 194

145 (56.0) 114 (44.0) 259 125 (48.3) 134 (51.7) 259

1.074

0.7371.564 (P 0.774) 0.8531.799 (P 0.296)

1.239

OR odds ratio; CI condence interval.

GSTP1 gene polymorphism


The frequencies of GSTP1 ile/ile genotype were 72.7% (141/194) in patients and 67.6% (175/259) in controls. The frequencies of GSTP1 ile/val were 23.7% (46/194) in patients and 27.4% (71/259) in controls. The frequencies of GSTP1 val/val were 3.6% (7/194) in patients and 5% (13/259) in controls. No signicant differences were found between the endometriosis group and the control group. Using the GSTP1 homozygote (ile/ile) as a reference group, the OR of GSTP1 heterozygotes (ile/val) and GSTP1 homozygotes (val/val) was 0.823 (95% CI 0.536 1.264, P 0.388). It did not reach statistical signicance (Table II).

Risk of endometriosis with allele combination of GST genotypes


We contend that the GSTM1, GSTT1 null mutation and GSTP1 Ile105Ile polymorphisms are putative high-risk alleles. In order to assess the existence of any interaction between the polymorphism of GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1, we calculated the frequency of the simultaneous presence of the three putative high-risk genotypes. Individuals carrying all three presumptive low-risk genotypesGSTM1 and GSTT1 non-deleted (present) and GSTP1 val/val and ile/val genotypeswere used as the reference group. Table III shows the OR of endometriosis associated with each combination of genotypes. The gures (0, 1, 2 and 3) are the number of putative high-risk genotypes. There was no statistically signicant risk with the number of highrisk GST alleles [1, 0.995 (95% CI 0.602 1.644), 1.462 (95% CI 0.853 2.507), 1.367 (95% CI 0.559 3.339)] (Table III) and no trend according to the number of putative risk genotypes (by linear association, df 1, P 0.11; data were not shown).

Discussion
Endometriosis is a multifactorial disease with signicantly elevated frequency in industrial areas (Nisolle et al., 1997). The lack of
Table II. Allelic frequencies and ORs of the GSTP1 genotypes in Korean women with and without endometriosis Control n (%) Ile/Ile Ile/Val Val/Val Total 175 (67.6) 71 (27.4) 13 (5.0) 259 Endometriosis n (%) 141 (72.7) 53 (27.3) 194 OR (95% CI) 1.0 0.823* (0.5361.264) P

*The OR of the combined group of GSTP1 heterozygotes (ile/val) and GSTP1 homozygotes (val/val), using the GSTP1 homozygote (ile/ile) as a reference group. OR odds ratio; CI condence interval.

detoxication, which is genetically determined, might be a risk factor for endometriosis development. So, analysis of GST gene status, particularly detection of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null mutation, and GSTP1 polymorphism could have a prognostic and pathologic importance. One of the strengths of our study may be a relatively larger number of endometriosis cases. Although it is at the lower end of what is required for studies of complex diseases, it is larger than those that have been commonly used in endometriosis studies. Also, the population of our study consisted of all Korean women and they are thought to be genetically homogeneous. GSTM1 activity is absent in about 50% of Caucasians as a consequence of the inheritance of two null alleles (deletion of the gene). A Japanese control population showed a 47.5% frequency of the GSTM1 null genotype, whereas Caucasian control populations showed higher frequencies (53.1%), e.g. 54.3% in USA and 50.4% in The Netherlands (Garte et al., 2001). In our study, the Korean control population showed a 56% frequency of the GSTM1 null genotype. It is comparable to another Korean controls frequency of 53.7% (Choi et al., 2003). Similarly, the GSTT1 activity is decient in about 20% of Caucasians, resulting from homozygous deletion. A Japanese control population showed a 35.3% frequency of the GSTT1 null genotype, whereas Caucasian control populations showed lower frequencies, e.g. 27.6% in USA and 22.9% in The Netherlands (Garte et al., 2001). In our study, the control population showed a 48.3% frequency of the GSTT1 null genotype and it was comparable to Asian control population average frequencies (47%) from the report of Garte et al. (2001). The GSTP subfamily comprises only GSTP1. The A1578G substitution in GSTP1 creates the Ile105Val polymorphism that leads to the expression of an enzyme with reduced activity. In our study, the proportion of the GSTP1 genotype of the control group was comparable to other Korean populations (allele frequency of genotype*ile; our study/other Korean study 0.8145/0.8230; data not shown) (Pae et al., 2003). These are similar to the allele frequency in the Chinese population (0.8705) (Lewis et al., 2002), whereas Caucasian populations showed lower frequencies, e.g. 0.6689 in the UK population (Seiawan et al., 2001). Our study showed no signicant difference in the frequencies of the GSTM1 null mutations between the cases and the controls (57.7 versus 56%). These data conict with previously published ndings reporting an association between the GSTM1 null mutation and endometriosis (Baranov et al., 1996; Baranova et al., 1997). However, according to more recent reports, there were similar results to our study: no signicant differences in the frequency of the GSTM1 null mutation in control and endometriosis cases in south-east England (Baxter et al., 2001) and the OXEGENE collaborative group report (Hadeld et al., 2001) were found. Moreover, in the Japanese population, there is no association of endometriosis with the GSTM1 mutations (Morizane et al., 2004). In our study, no signicant difference in the frequencies of the GSTT1 null mutations between the endometriosis patients and the controls was observed (53.6 versus 48.3%). The lack of an association between the GSTT1 null mutation and the endometriosis is consistent with the previous reports of Baranova et al. (1999), the OXEGENE collaborative group (Hadeld et al., 2001) and of the Japanese population (Morizane et al., 2004). There was no previously reported data about endometriosis associated with the GSTP1 polymorphism. We report here that GSTP1 polymorphism does not inuence the overall risk of advanced stage endometriosis. When the effect of the combined genotypes is different from the sum of the independent effects of each genotype, there is a possible

Downloaded from http://molehr.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on May 23, 2013

17

S.E.Hur et al.
Table III. Risk of endometriosis according to the number of putative higher risk GST genotypes No. of high-risk genotypes GST status GSTM1 0 1 2 3 Present Present Null Present Null Null Present Null GSTT1 Present Null Present Present Null Present Null Null GSTP1 val/val, ile/val ile/val, val/val ile/val, val/val ile/ile ile/val, val/val ile/ile ile/ile ile/ile Cases (n 194) 10 52 91 41 Controls (n 259) 16 89 106 48 OR 1.0* 0.995 1.462 1.367 0.602 1.644 (P 0.493) 0.853 2.507 (P 0.167) 0.559 3.339 (P 0.493) 95% CI

*GSTM1 and GSTT1 non-deleted (present) and GSTP1 val/val and ile/val-genotypes used as the reference group. OR odds ratio; CI condence interval.

interaction or synergic effect of each genotype. Some studies have reported the association of combined gene polymorphisms with endometriosis and cancer risk. But in our study, the combination of GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null did not increase the risk of endometriosis. Kihara and Noda (1999) reported an indication of a potential interaction between the GSTP1 and GSTM1 genes in a population of Japanese male smokers aged 50 69 years, in which a higher risk of lung cancer was associated with the combination of the variant allele for the GSTP1 and GSTM1 null genotype. We found that risk of endometriosis was not associated with the combination of the GSTP1 and GSTM1 null genotypes. The increased risk for women with GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null genotypes together with GSTP1 val/val genotype (OR 3.77, 95% CI 1.10 12.88) was reported in breast cancer (Charrier et al., 1999), and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (Yuille et al., 2002). In this present study, we think there is no possibility of a trend of an increasing risk of endometriosis with the number of putative high-risk alleles of the GST family. The hypothesis of various GST polymorphisms possibly being associated with pathophysiology of endometriosis is not proven in this study. In conclusion, an association between endometriosis with GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms did not exist. The genotypes and allele frequencies of these polymorphisms are not useful markers for the prediction of endometriosis susceptibility.

References
Ali Osman F, Akande O, Antoun G, Mao JX and Buolamwini J (1997) Molecular cloning, characterization and expression in Escherichia coli of fulllength cDNAs of three human glutathione S-transferase Pi gene variants. Evidence for differential catalytic activity of the encoded proteins. J Biol Chem 272,1000410012. American Fertility Society (1985) Revised American Fertility Society classication of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 43,351. Baranova H, Bothorishvilli R, Canis M, Albuisson E, Perriot S, Glowaczowr E, Bruhat MA, Baranov V and Malet P (1997) Glutathione S-transferase M1 gene polymorphism and susceptibility to endometriosis in a French population. Mol Hum Reprod 3,775780. Baranova H, Canis M, Ivaschenko T, Albuisson E, Bothorishvilli R, Baranov V, Malet P and Bruhat MA (1999) Possible involvement of arylamine N-acetyltransferase 2, glutathione S-transferases M1 and T1 genes in the development of endometriosis. Mol Hum Reprod 5,636641. Baranov VS, Ivaschenko T, Bakay B, Aseev M, Belotserkovskaya T, Baranova H, Malet P, Perriot J, Mouraire P, Baskakov VN et al. (1996) Proportion of the GSTM1 0/0 genotype in some Slavic populations and its correlation with cystic brosis and some multifactorial diseases. Hum Genet 97,516 520. Baxter SW, Thomas EJ and Campbell IG (2001) GSTM1 null polymorphism and susceptibility to endometriosis and ovarian cancer. Carcinogenesis 22,63 66.

Chang CC, Hsieh YY, Tsai FJ, Tsai CH, Tsai HD and Lin CC (2002) The proline form of p53 codon 72 polymorphism is associated with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 77,4345. Charrier J, Maugard CM, Mevel BL and Bignon YJ (1999) Allotype inuence at glutathione S-transferase M1 locus on breast cancer susceptibility. Br J Cancer 79,346353. Choi SC, Yun KJ, Kim TH, Kim HJ, Park SG, Oh GJ, Chae SC, Oh GJ, Nah YH, Kim JJ et al. (2003) Prognostic potential of glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 null genotypes for gastric cancer progression. Cancer Lett 195,169175. Cotton SC, Sharp L, Little J and Brockton N (2000) Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and colorectal cancer: a Huge review. Am J Epidemiol 151,732. Cramer DW, Hornstein MD, Ng WG and Barbieri RL (1996) Endometriosis associated with the N314D mutation of galactose-1-phosphate uridyl transferase (GALT). Mol Hum Reprod 2,149152. Dunning A, Healey C, Pharoah P, Teare M, Ponder B and Easton D (1999) A systematic review of genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8,843854. dErrico A, Malats N, Vineis P and Boffetta P (1999) Review of studies of selected metabolic polymorphisms and cancer. In Vineis P. (ed.), Metabolic Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Cancer, IARC Scientic Publications no. 148. IARC, Lyon, pp. 323 445. Eskenazi B, Mocarelli P, Warner M, Samuels S, Vercellini P, Olive D, Needham LL, Patterson DG, Brambilla P, Gavoni N et al. (2002) Serum dioxin concentrations and endometriosis a cohort study in Seveso, Italy. Environ Health Perspect 110,629634. Garte S, Gaspari L, Alexandrie AK, Ambrosone C, Autrup H, Autrup JL, Baranova H, Bathum L, Benhamou S, Boffetta P et al. (2001) Metabolic gene polymorphism frequencies in control populations. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10,12391248. Georgiou I, Syrrou M, Bouba I, Dalkalitsis N, Paschopoulos M, Navrozoglou I and Lolis D (1999) Association of estrogen receptor gene polymorphisms with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 72,164166. Gorp TV, Amant F, Neven P and Vergote I (2004) Endometriosis and the development of malignant tumours of the pelvis. A review of literature. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 18,219232. Hadeld RM, Manek S, Weeks DE, Mardon HJ, Barlow DH and Kennedy SH and OXEGENE Collaborative Group (2001) Linkage and association studies of the relationship between endometriosis and genes encoding the detoxication enzymes GSTM1, GSTT1 and CYP1A1. Mol Hum Reprod 7,10731078. Harris M, Stubbins M, Forman G, Howard D and Wolf C (1997) Identication of genetic polymorphisms at the glutathione-S-transferase Pi locus and association with susceptibility to bladder, testicular and prostate cancer. Carcinogenesis 18,641 644. Hengstler JG, Arand M, Herrero ME and Oesch F (1998) Polymorphisms of N-acetyltransferases, glutathione S-transferases, microsomal epoxide hydrolase and sulfotransferases: inuence on cancer susceptibility. Recent Results Cancer Res 154,4785. Hsieh YY, Chang CC, Tsai FJ, Wu JY, Tsai CH and Tasi HD (2001) Androgen receptor trinucleotide polymorphism in endometriosis. Fertil Steril 76,412413. Hu X, Herzog C, Zimniak P and Singh S (1999) Differential protection against benzo(a)pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol-9,10-epoxide-induced DNA damage in

Downloaded from http://molehr.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on May 23, 2013

18

GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms in Korean women


HepG2 cells stably transfected with allelic variants of class human glutathione S-transferase. Cancer Res 59,23582362. Kennedy SH (1997) Is there a genetic basis to endometriosis? Semin Reprod Endocrinol 15,309317. Kennedy S, Hadeld R, Mardon H and Barlow D (1996) Age of onset of pain symptoms in non-twin sisters concordant for endometriosis. Hum Reprod 11,403 405. Ketterer B (1998) Glutathione S-transferases and prevention of cellular free radical damage. Free Radic Res 28,647658. Kihara M and Noda K (1999) Lung cancer risk of the GSTM1 null genotype is enhanced in the presence of the GSTP1 mutated genotype in male Japanese smokers. Cancer Lett 137,5360. Lewis SJ, Cherry NM, Niven RM, Barber PV and Povey AC (2002) GSTM1, GSTT1 and GSTP1 polymorphisms and lung cancer risk. Cancer Lett 180,165171. Lin D, Tang Y, Peng Q, Lu S, Ambrosone CB and Kadublar FF (1998) Susceptibility to esophageal cancer and genetic polymorphisms in glutathioneS-transferase T1 P1 and M1 and cytochrome P450 2E1. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 7,10131018. Mayani A, Barel S, Soback S and Almagor M (1997) Dioxin concentrations in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 12,373375. Morizane M, Yoshida S, Nakago S, Hamana S, Maruo T and Kennedy S (2004) No association of endometriosis with glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 null mutations in a japanese population. J Soc Gynecol Investig 11,118121. Nisolle M, Casanas-Roux F and Donnez J (1997) Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum: a different histopathogenesis? Gynaecol Endosc 6,203209. Pae CU, Kim JJ, Lee SJ, Lee CU, Lee C, Paik IH, Park HR, Yang S and Serretti A (2003) Association study between glutathione S-transferase P1 polymorphism and schizophrenia in the Korean population. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 27,519523. Rebbeck TR (1997) Molecular epidemiology of the human glutathione Stransferase genotypes GSTM1 and GSTT1 in cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 6,733743. Rier SE and Yeaman GR (1997) Immune aspects of endometriosis: relevance of the uterine mucosal immune system. Semin Reprod Endocrinol 15, 209 220. Seiawan VW, Zhang ZF, Yu GP, Lu QY, Li YL, Lu ML, Wang MR, Guo CH, Yu SZ, Kurtz RC et al. (1997) GSTP1 polymorphism and gastric cancer in a high-risk Chinese population. Cancer Causes Control 12,673681. Smith G, Stanley LA, Sim E, Strange RC and Wolf CR (1995) Metabolic polymorphisms and cancer susceptibility. Cancer Surv 25,27 65. Strange RC and Fryer AA (1999) The glutathione S-transferases: inuence of polymorphism on cancer susceptibility. In Vineis P, Malats N, Lang M, dErrico A, Caporaso N, Cuzick J, and Boffetta P (eds) Metabolic Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Cancer. IARC Scientic Publications No. 148. IARC, Lyon 231249. Watanabe T, Imoto I, Kosugi Y, Fukuda Y, Mimura J, Fujii Y, Isaka K, Takayama M, Sato A and Inazawa J (2001) Human arylhydrocarbon receptor repressor (AHRR) gene: genomic structure and analysis of polymorphism in endometriosis. J Hum Genet 46,342346. Wieser F, Schneeberger C, Tong D, Tempfer C, Huber JC and Wenzl Rene (2002) PROGINS receptor gene polymorphism is associated with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 77,309312. Yuille M, Condie A, Hudson C, Kote-Jarai Z, Stone E, Eeles R, Matutes E, Catovsky D and Houlston R (2002) Relationship between glutathione S-transferase M1, T1, and P1 polymorphisms and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 99,42164218.

Downloaded from http://molehr.oxfordjournals.org/ by guest on May 23, 2013

Submitted on September 24, 2004; revised on October 14, 2004; accepted on October 21, 2004

19

You might also like