Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Note : No warranty is given (including warranty as to fitness for a particular purpose or use or application and any user of this report agrees to absolve and hold Impact Fluid Solutions harmless against any consequences resulting or liabilities from the use thereof.
FLC2000 and Wellbore Strengthening 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. Introduction 1.1 Wellbore Strengthening 1.2 Technical Approaches
1.2.1 Chemical Consolidation of Weak Rocks
3 3 3 3 4 4 5 6 7 7 7 7 8 10
1.2.2 Stress Caging 1.2.3 Formation of an Ultra-Low Permeability Seal 2. Proof of Performance that FLC2000 Provides Wellbore Strengthening 3. The Effect of Shear on the Sealing Ability of FLC2000 versus Calcium Carbonate 4. How Does FLC2000 Work 4.1 Formation of Small Deformable Aggregates 4.2 Broad Particle Size Distribution 4.3 Formation of a Low Permeability Barrier 4.4 Preventing Fracture Propogation 5. FLC2000 Proof of Performance Case History Summary
1. Introduction
FLC2000 is Impact Fluid Solutions key additive to engineer ultra-low invasion drilling fluids, completion fluids and work-over fluids. To date, FLC2000 has been used successfully in over 1,000 wells world-wide. FLC2000 greatly reduces fluid invasion into matrix permeability and micro-fractures. By forming a very low permeability barrier over pores and micro-fractures, FLC2000 limits transmission of the well-bore pressure to the pore fluid. This is instrumental in preventing formation fracturing by preventing fracture propagation and effectively raises the fracture initiation pressure. For reservoir applications, laboratory studies have shown that properly formulated FLC2000 fluids typically give return permeabilitys in excess of 90% and show low flow initiation pressures. Excellent results have been obtained for solids-free fluids as well as weighted systems.
1.2.2 Stress Caging The concept of stress caging involves forming fractures around the well bore and propping these open with a hard material such as a coarse marble. Propping open these fractures (resisting the fracture closure stress) alters the hoop stress around the well-bore and, in theory, increases rock strength. An additive such as graphite is also frequently added to reduce the permeability of the proppant and hence reduce fluid and pressure transmission into the fracture. Several SPE papers have been published describing the success of this technique and programs exist to calculate the amount and size of proppant required for a particular rock type and stress regime. Information supplied by several users of this technique indicates that it works best in permeable formations. The stress cage method has been less successful in shales and it is difficult to see how it can be effective in soft formations where the rock will deform around the propped fracture. The stress cage mechanism is challenged by some groups who suggest that rather than creating fractures, invasion of fluid into the pores is more likely to be a key factor. Solids added to the fluid form a protective filter cake at the well-bore wall rather than act as a proppant in an induced fracture. Since the method, irrespective of which of the above mechanisms might operate, generally uses coarse solid additives, it is difficult to maintain the materials in the mud system. Hence it is often best suited to short sections of open hole or to treating prior to, for example, casing running operations. 1.2.3 Formation of an ultra-low permeability seal If an impermeable barrier can be formed on the wellbore wall such that the mud pressure (and accompanying fluid) is not transmitted to the formation pore fluid then rock mechanics considerations tell us that the rock will stay strong. If pressure invasion is allowed to take place, this will increase the pore pressure, which reduces the effective stress and thus reduces the rock fracture pressure. While theoretically attractive, it is difficult to explain how a totally impermeable barrier can be set up immediately fresh rock is exposed to the drilling fluid. All fluids in overbalance will invade to some degree. In actual practice, there is emerging evidence that fluids that form an ultra-low permeability barrier very quickly across matrix permeability or micro-fracture openings can restrict pressure and fluid invasion enough to give an appreciable measure of wellbore strengthening. Impacts FLC2000 mud additive falls into this category of material.
3. The Effect of Shear on the Sealing Ability of FLC2000 versus Calcium Carbonate
Calcium carbonate is often used as a bridging agent to protect permeable formations from the excessive invasion that can contribute to formation damage and differential sticking. To be most effective, it should be sized for the specific pore throat sizes of the rocks being drilled. However, these pore sizes are not always known and, even when they are, pore sizes commonly vary both horizontally and vertically in a formation. Even if the particle size distribution (PSD) of the carbonate can be optimized at the start of drilling, the particles are ground down as drilling proceeds, so the size distribution shifts from the ideal case and increased formation invasion can result. An alternative is to replace the calcium carbonate with particles that are much more resistant to grinding. The flexible particles formed by FLC2000 meet this requirement. Laboratory tests were carried out to compare how sized calcium carbonate and FLC2000 fluids respond to shear. The carbonate chosen for the study was a commercially available material commonly used in drilling fluids. The carbonate had a PSD with a d90 of about 120 microns, a d50 of about 50 microns and a d10 of about 10 microns. The materials were mixed into a 20 ppb bentonite mud and sheared at two different shear rates on a Silverson mixer for varying lengths of time. The depth of penetration of each fluid into a bed of 20/40 frac sand in the Impact sand bed test (SBT) was measured. The figure below shows that the base bentonite mud cannot seal the sand and the fluid completely penetrates the 15 cm bed. Addition of 20 ppb CaCO3 or 10 ppb FLC2000 into a 20 ppb bentonite mud produces a good seal in the SBT with penetrations of less than 3 cm. However after only 5 minutes of shearing on the Silverson mixer at 6000 rpm, the CaCO3 mud completely penetrates the sand bed. 10 minutes of shearing at the slower mixer speed of 3000 rpm also produces a CaCO3 fluid that cannot seal the sand bed. In comparison, after 30 minutes of shear at 6000 rpm, the fluid containing FLC2000 still seals with fluid penetration still less than 3 cm.
Figure 3.1 Sand Bed Test Results
than conventional mud additives and as such greatly reduces formation damage, the risk of differential sticking and (by controlling leak-off into micro-fractures in shales) certain types of wellbore instability. The barrier also effectively increases the fracture initiation pressure and widens the safe drilling window by allowing the wellbore fluid density to be raised without inducing losses. Effective concentrations of FLC2000 in a drilling, completion or work-over fluid range between 3 and 8ppb. This concentration is much lower than more conventional additives such as sized calcium carbonates where 30 to 40ppb may be required and, even then, sealing is not as efficient as with FLC2000. The optimum FLC2000 concentration within the above range will depend on the base fluid properties determined both in the laboratory and in the field by using a simple sand bed invasion test. The effectiveness of FLC2000 in giving wellbore strengthening in permeable formations is undoubtedly due to the very low permeability of the filter cake formed. It is too soft a material and is present in too low a concentration to work by a stress cage mechanism (see discussion of the stress cage method in Section 3). 4.4 Preventing Fracture Propagation While it is feasible that the product can form a very low permeability seal that is complete enough, and formed quickly enough, to prevent the initial pressure penetration into a permeable formation, and hence stop a fracture initiating, it is more likely that the additive mainly functions by plugging a fracture with a very low permeability membrane once it starts to grow. The formation of this seal will stop the fracture propagating, much in the way a tip screen-out will stop a hydraulic fracture from growing. In low permeability formations such as shales, FLC2000 works by one of 2 mechanisms: In fracture blocking experiments on Ohio Sandstone, the product can seal the mouth of a 250 micron fracture. Since in the timescale of the experiment the Ohio Sandstone can be treated as an impermeable rock, we can envision a similar seal will form on a low permeability shale. While a base mud without FLC2000 could not seal the fracture, mud with FLC2000 sealed and held a differential pressure of almost 1600psi before failing.
There is growing support for the concept that, when shale breaks down, the failure is at an interface between the low permeability shale and a higher permeability streak of sand, silt or marl. Alternatively the failure can occur within a thin streak of more permeable rock enclosed in the shale. If this is the case, then the invading fluid can leak off and a filter cake forms to stop fracture propagation in the same way as in a more massive permeable rock.
Impact Fluid Solutions LLC is a technology driven company supplying specialty chemicals to the drilling fluids, completion fluids and cementing applications market and has a worldwide distribution network as well as a world-class R&D and Field Support laboratory in Cornwall, England.
Contact Addresses United States: 2800 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2000, Houston, TX 77056. USA. Tel: 1 713 964 7736 United Kingdom: Unit 8, Wheal Kitty, St. Agnes, TR5 0RD Cornwall, UK. Tel: 44(0)1872 553655
Regional Contacts: North America: Douglas Byrne Tel: 1 713 964 7736 Dir: 1 713 551 4611 Cell: 1 713 484 9205 Email: douglas.byrne@impactfluids.net Jay Haas Tel: 1 713 964 7736 Dir: 1 713 551 4613 Cell: 1 713 204 4617 Email: jay.haas@impactfluids.net Mike Wilder Cell: +6012 393 1062 Email: michael.wilder@impactfluids.net www.info@impactfluids.net Website: www.impactfluids.net Europe/CIS/Africa: Scott Chesney Cell: 44(0)7825 289056 Email: scott.chesney@impactfluids.net
South America:
Middle East:
Peter Robottom Impact Solutions Oilfield Services Co. (ISOS) Tel: +9712 6454 117 Cell: +97150 4567 301 Email: peter.robottom@impactsolutions.ae (Exclusive distributor for the Middle East)
Asia/Pacific:
Information:
No warranty is given (including warranty as to fitness for a particular purpose or use or application) and any user of this report agrees to absolve and hold Impact Fluid Solutions harmless against any consequences resulting or liabilities from the use thereof.
11