Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Why is it that nowadays you need a professional license to help someone by talking to him? Why do you need four to eleven years of academic study leading to a degree, two or three years of supervised training, membership in a professional organization, and a government license? I trained in the modern secular era: ten years of academic training in some of the best universities in Israel and the United States. I trained with some the most respected professionals. I learned many theories and secrets of the trade. Note that professional training throughout the worldwithout exceptiondoes not accredit students for successful helping, but rather for proficiency in repeating what they have learned and for acting according to the theory of choice taught at their chosen institute. Likewise, professional licensing is knowledge based and not dependent on actual empirical success in helping. I worked for government mental health services, did good things, and, like all the other successful psychotherapists, opened a private practice. I began to teach and run workshops for professionals in Europe, Israel, and the United States. I almost had it all, but something was still missing.
Lets ask another question. Here I am about to propose a new model while implying that I am right and the others are wrong. Im not trying to present myself as the sole arbiter of truth, so what is my justification for presenting this model? Am I proposing an I for an I? Saying that my I is better than his or her I? No. I am not proposing or creating a new model, the product of I the individual. Rather, this is a proposal for the restoration of simple, effective principles that deal with speech and truth, principles that are both simple and effective. What does the Jerusalem Formula style of talking have that others dont? It is based solely on positive vocabulary and actions. Thus, there is little chance of it causing harm. Research shows that between 5 to 10 percent of people actually are hurt by the helping process. It subjugates talking techniques to religious goals through adherence to concise religious vocabulary. It is as effective as (professional) model of psychotherapy, with an 80 percent success rate. It is more efficient, i.e., faster, than most other models in achieving its goals, with an average of just six sessions. The Jerusalem Formula works for what I call the walking wounded: unhappy kids; people with marital problems; single adults who are lost; people suffering from depression, anxiety, anger; adolescents in trouble; and parenting problems. It does not work for the severely wounded: cases of severe mental problems that require hospitalization; addictions; some eating disorders; ongoing severe violence; longstanding incest, and so on. These should be referred to paraprofessionals or professionals with proven track records, and not those just with professional accreditations. It is a thousand times easier to learn and to implement, and you dont have to learn a foreign language (professional jargon) to use it in the field of helping others. It takes only about thirty to fifty hours of study, and lots of practice. And finally, as a model of talking based on religious wisdom and vocabulary, it is particularly suited to people who identify with this type of understanding of life. Most surveys show this includes up to 80 percent of the populations in Western countries. In these surveys, religious is usually defined without identifying formal religious observance. I would like to invite you (as I do those people I work with individually2) to join me in a conversation about these issues: helping others, talking effectively, and being in control of yourself (and not other people).
See page 226 for the contract for working together successfully