You are on page 1of 6

Journal of Food Engineering 74 (2006) 523–528

www.elsevier.com/locate/jfoodeng

Physical properties of sweet corn seed (Zea mays saccharata Sturt.)


_
M. Bülent Cosßkun, Ibrahim Yalçın *, Cengiz Özarslan
Department of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of Agriculture, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey

Received 26 October 2004; accepted 7 March 2005


Available online 23 May 2005

Abstract

The physical properties of sweet corn seed were determined as a function of moisture content in the range of 11.54–19.74% dry
basis (d.b.). The average length, width and thickness were 10.56 mm, 7.91 mm and 3.45 mm, at a moisture content of 11.54% d.b.,
respectively. In the moisture range from 11.54% to 19.74% d.b., studies on rewetted sweet corn seed showed that the thousand seed
mass increased from 131.2 to 145.5 g, the projected area from 59.72 to 75.57 mm2, the sphericity from 0.615 to 0.635, the true density
from 1133.8 to 1225.5 kg m3, the porosity from 57.48% to 61.30% and the terminal velocity from 5.56 to 5.79 m s1. The bulk den-
sity decreased from 482.1 to 474.3 kg m3 with an increase in the moisture content range of 11.54–19.74% d.b. The static coefficient
of friction of sweet corn seed increased the linearly against surfaces of four structural materials, namely, rubber (0.402–0.494), alu-
minium (0.321–0.441), stainless steel (0.267–0.401) and galvanised iron (0.364–0.477) as the moisture content increased from 11.54%
to 19.74% d.b.
Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords: Sweet corn seed; Physical properties; Moisture content

1. Introduction carried out on the physical properties of sweet corn seed


and their relationship with moisture content. Hence,
Sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata Sturt.) is a culti- this study was conducted to investigate some moisture
vated plant grown for fresh consumption and raw dependent physical properties of sweet corn seed
material of canned food industry. It contains 3.35 g pro- namely, sphericity, thousand seed mass, projected area,
tein, 10 g oil, 221 g carbohydrates, 0.03 g calcium, 1.11 g bulk density, true density, porosity, terminal velocity
phospor, 2.8 g potassium per kg (Çetinkol, 1989). and static coefficient of friction against different
Planted area of sweet corn is increasing year by year materials.
in Turkey. Also, it has been estimated that the planted
area of sweet corn will increase with the knowledge
about sweet corn (Turgut, 2000). 2. Material and methods
In order to design equipment for the handling, con-
veying, separation, drying, aeration, storing and pro- The dry seeds of sweet corn cultivar, Merit F1 were
cessing of sweet corn seed, it is necessary to determine used for all the experiments in this study. The seeds were
their physical properties as a function of moisture con- cleaned manually to remove all foreign matter such as
tent. However, no published work seems to have been dust, dirt, stones and chaff as well as immature, broken
seeds. The initial moisture content of the seeds was
determined by oven drying at 105 ± 1 °C for 24 h (Özar-
*
Corresponding author. Fax: +90 256 7727233. slan, 2002). The initial moisture content of the seeds was
_ Yalçın).
E-mail address: iyalcin45@yahoo.com (I. 11.54% d.b.

0260-8774/$ - see front matter Ó 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.03.039
524 M.B. Cosßkun et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 74 (2006) 523–528

Nomenclature

Ap projected area, mm2 a angle of tilt, degree


L length of seed, mm l static coefficient of friction
m1000 thousand seed mass, g qb bulk density, kg m3
Mc moisture content, % d.b. qt true density, kg m3
Mf final moisture content of sample, % d.b. / sphericity of seed
Mi initial moisture content of sample, % d.b.
Pf porosity, % Subscripts
Q mass of water to added, kg al aluminium
T thickness of seed, mm gi galvanised iron
Vt terminal velocity, m s1 ru rubber
W width of seed, mm ss stainless steel
Wi initial mass of sample, kg

The samples of the desired moisture contents were 150 mm at a constant rate and then weighing the
prepared by adding the amount of distilled water as cal- content.
culated from the following relation (Sacilik, Öztürk, & The average true density was determined using the
Keskin, 2003): toluene displacement method. The volume of toluene
W i ðM f  M i Þ displaced was found by immersing a weighed quantity
Q¼ ð1Þ of sweet corn seed in the toluene (Öğüt, 1998; Singh &
ð100  M f Þ
Goswami, 1996).
The samples were then poured into separate polyethyl- The porosity was calculated from the following rela-
ene bags and the bags sealed tightly. The samples were tionship (Mohsenin, 1970):
kept at 5 °C in a refrigerator for a week to enable the P f ¼ ð1  qb =qt Þ  100 ð3Þ
moisture to distribute uniformly throughout the sample.
Before starting a test, the required quantity of the seed where Pf is the porosity in %; qb is the bulk density in
was taken out of the refrigerator and allowed to equili- kg m3; and qt is the true density in kg m3.
brate to the room temperature for about 2 h (Singh & The terminal velocities of seeds at different moisture
Goswami, 1996). contents were measured using a cylindrical air column
All the physical properties of the seeds were deter- (Joshi, Das, & Mukherjee, 1993). For each experiment,
mined at four moisture contents in the range of 11.54– a sample was dropped into the air stream from the top
19.74% d.b. with 10 replications at each moisture of the air column, up which air was blown to suspend
content. These values are within the range of moisture the material in the air stream. The air velocity near the
contents for sweet corn seed recommended for safe location of the seed suspension was measured by a hot
module storage as 14.94% d.b. (Kırtok, 1998). wire anemometer having a least count of 0.01 m s1.
To determine the average size of the seed, 100 seeds The static coefficient of friction of sweet corn seed
were randomly picked and their three linear dimensions against four different structural materials, namely rub-
namely, length L, width W and thickness T were mea- ber, aluminium, stainless steel and galvanised iron was
sured using a micrometer with a accuracy of 0.01 mm. determined. A polyvinylchloride cylindrical pipe of
The sphericity of seeds / was calculated by using the 50 mm in diameter and 50 mm in height was placed on
following relationship (Mohsenin, 1970): an adjustable tilting plate, faced with the test surface
1=3
and filled with the seed sample. The cylinder was raised
ðLWT Þ slightly so as not to touch the surface. The structural
/¼ ð2Þ
L surface with the cylinder resting on it was raised gradu-
The one thousand seed mass was determined by means ally with a screw device until the cylinder just started to
of an electronic balance reading to 0.001 g. slide down and the angle of tilt a was read from a grad-
The projected area of a seed was measured by a scan- uated scale (Singh & Goswami, 1996; Suthar & Das,
ner connected to a computer. For this purpose, a special 1996). The coefficient of friction was calculated from
computer program was used (Özarslan, 2002). the following relationship:
The average bulk density of the sweet corn seed was l ¼ tan a ð4Þ
determined using the standard test weight procedure re-
ported by Singh and Goswami (1996) by filling a where l is the coefficient of friction; and a is the angle of
container of 500 ml with the seed from a height of tilt in degrees.
M.B. Cosßkun et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 74 (2006) 523–528 525

3. Results and discussion m1000 ¼ 112.43 þ 1.656 M c ðR2 ¼ 0.9858Þ ð5Þ


A linear increase in the one thousand sweet corn seed
3.1. Seed dimensions and size distribution
mass as the seed moisture content increases has been
noted by Sacilik et al. (2003) for hemp, Yalçın and Özar-
The mean dimensions of 100 seeds measured at a
slan (2004) for vetch and Öğüt (1998) for white lupin.
moisture content of 11.54% d.b. are: length 10.56 ±
0.78 mm, width 7.91 ± 0.57 mm, and thickness 3.45 ±
3.3. Projected area of seed
0.35 mm. The frequency distribution curves (Fig. 1)
for the mean values of the dimensions show a trend to-
The projected area of sweet corn seed increased from
wards a normal distribution. About 84% of the seeds
59.72 to 75.57 mm2, when the moisture content of seed
have a length ranging from 9.0 to 12.0 mm; about
increased from 11.54 to 19.74% d.b. (Fig. 3). The varia-
89%, a width ranging from 6.0 to 9.0 mm; and about
tion in projected area with moisture content of corn seed
83%, a thickness ranging from 2.5 to 4.0 mm at
can be represented by the following equation:
11.54% d.b. moisture content.
Ap ¼ 38.057 þ 1.8576M c ðR2 ¼ 0.9886Þ ð6Þ
3.2. One thousand seed mass
Similar trends have been reported by Çarman (1996) for
lentil, Özarslan (2002) for cotton and Konak, Çarman,
The one thousand sweet corn seed mass m1000 in-
and Aydın (2002) for chick pea seed.
creased linearly from 131.2 to 145.5 g as the moisture
content increased from 11.54% to 19.74% d.b. (Fig. 2).
3.4. Sphericity
An increase of 10.9% in the one thousand seed mass,
was recorded within the above moisture range. The lin-
The sphericity of sweet corn seed increased from
ear equation for one thousand seed mass can be formu-
0.615 to 0.635 with the increase in moisture content
lated to be:
(Fig. 4). The relationship between sphericity and

70
90

60
80
Projected area, mm2

50
Number of seed

40 70

30
60
20

50
10

0 40
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 8 12 16 20 24
Seed dimension, mm Moisture content, % d.b.

Fig. 1. Frequency distribution curves of seed dimensions at a moisture Fig. 3. Effect of moisture content on projected area.
content of 11.54% d.b.: (d) length; (j) width and (m) thickness.

0.660
160
Thousand seed mass, g

150 0.640
Sphericity. decimal

140
0.620

130

0.600
120

110 0.580
8 12 16 20 24 8 12 16 20 24
Moisture content, % d.b. Moisture content. % d.b.

Fig. 2. Effect of moisture content on thousand seed mass. Fig. 4. Effect of moisture content on sphericity.
526 M.B. Cosßkun et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 74 (2006) 523–528

moisture content Mc in % d.b. can be represented by the 1300

following equation:
1250
/ ¼ 0.5883 þ 0.0022M c ðR2 ¼ 0.8569Þ ð7Þ

True density, kgm-3


Similar trends have been reported by Aydin, Öğüt, and 1200
Konak (2002) for Turkish Mahaleb, Sacilik et al. (2003)
for hemp seed and Sahoo and Srivastava (2002) for okra 1150
seed.
1100
3.5. Bulk density
1050
8 12 16 20 24
The values of the bulk density for different moisture
Moisture content, % d.b.
levels varied from 482.1 to 474.3 kg m3 (Fig. 5). The
bulk density of seed was found to bear the following Fig. 6. Effect of moisture content on true density.
relationship with moisture content:
qb ¼ 492.62  0894M c ðR2 ¼ 0.9698Þ ð8Þ 66

A similar decreasing trend in bulk density has been re-


ported by Sahoo and Srivastava (2002) for okra, Konak 62
et al. (2002) for chick pea and Gupta and Das (1997) for

Porosity, %
sunflower seed.
58

3.6. True density


54
The true density varied from 1133.8 to 1225.5 kg m3
when the moisture level increased from 11.54% to
19.74% d.b. (Fig. 6). The true density and the moisture 50
8 12 16 20 24
content of seed can be correlated as follows: Moisture content, % d.b.

qt ¼ 1008.5 þ 10.919 M c ðR2 of 0.9973Þ ð9Þ Fig. 7. Effect of moisture content on porosity.

The results were similar to those reported by Özarslan


(2002) for cotton and Singh and Goswami (1996) for P f ¼ 52.291 þ 0.4524M c ðR2 ¼ 0.996Þ ð10Þ
cumin seed.
Konak et al. (2002), Öğüt (1998), Gupta and Das (1997)
and Yalçın and Özarslan (2004) reported similar trends
3.7. Porosity
in the case of chick pea, white lupin, sunflower and
vetch, respectively.
The porosity of sweet corn seed increased from
57.48% to 61.30% with the increase in moisture content
3.8. Terminal velocity
from 11.54% to 19.74% d.b. (Fig. 7). The relationship
between porosity and moisture content can be repre-
The experimental results for the terminal velocity of
sented by the following equation:
sweet corn seed at various moisture levels are shown

520 6.2

6
Terminal velocity. m s-1
Bulk density, kgm-3

500
5.8

480 5.6

5.4
460
5.2

440 5
8 12 16 20 24 8 12 16 20 24
Moisture content, % d.b. Moisture content. % d.b.

Fig. 5. Effect of moisture content on bulk density. Fig. 8. Effect of moisture content on terminal velocity.
M.B. Cosßkun et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 74 (2006) 523–528 527

in Fig. 8. The terminal velocity was found to increase lss ¼ 0.0627 þ 0.0166M c ðR2 of 0.9439Þ ð14Þ
linearly from 5.56 to 5.79 m s1 as the moisture content
increased from 11.54% to 19.74% d.b. The relationship lgi ¼ 01823 þ 0.0148M c ðR2 of 0.9398Þ ð15Þ
between terminal velocity and moisture content can be
Similar results were found by Sahoo and Srivastava
represented by the following equation:
(2002), Özarslan (2002), Çarman (1996) and Shepherd
V t ¼ 5.239 þ 0.0263M c ðR2 ¼ 0.9203Þ ð11Þ and Bhardwaj (1986) for okra, cotton, lentil and pigeon
pea seeds, respectively.
Similar results were reported by Gupta and Das (1997),
Suthar and Das (1996), and Joshi et al. (1993) in the case
of sunflower, karingda and pumpkin seeds, respectively.
4. Summary
3.9. Static coefficient of friction
(1) The thousand seed mass increased from 131.2 to
The static coefficient of friction of sweet corn seed on 145.5 g and the sphericity increased from 0.615
four surfaces (rubber, aluminium, stainless steel and gal- to 0.635 with the increase in moisture content from
vanised iron) against moisture content in the range 11.54 to 19.74% d.b. The projected area increased
11.54% to 19.74% d.b. are presented in Fig. 9. It was ob- from 59.72 to 75.57 mm2 and the porosity
served that the static coefficient of friction increased increased from 57.48% to 61.30%. The bulk den-
with increase in moisture content for all the surfaces. sity decreased linearly from 482.1 to 474.3 kg m3,
This is due to the increased adhesion between the seed whereas the true density increased from 1133.8 to
and the material surfaces at higher moisture values. In- 1225.5 kg m3.
creases of 22.89%, 37.38%, 50.19% and 31.04% were re- (2) The terminal velocity increased from 5.56 to
corded in the case of rubber, aluminium, stainless steel 5.79 m s1. The static coefficient of friction
and galvanised iron, respectively, as the moisture con- increased for all four surfaces, namely, rubber
tent increased from 11.54% to 19.74% d.b. At all mois- (0.402–0.494), aluminium (0.321–0.441), stainless
ture contents, the least static coefficient of friction was steel (0.267–0.401) and galvanised iron (0.364–
on stainless steel. This may be owing to smoother and 0.477).
more polished surface of the stainless steel sheet than
the other materials used. The relationships between sta-
tic coefficients of friction and moisture content on References
rubber lru, aluminium lal, stainless steel lss and galvan-
ised iron lgi, can be represented by the following Aydin, C., Öğüt, H., & Konak, M. (2002). Some physical properties of
equations: Turkish Mahaleb. Biosystems Engineering, 82(2), 231–234.
Çarman, K. (1996). Some physical properties of lentil seeds. Journal of
lru ¼ 0.2812 þ 0.0103M c ðR2 of 0.9594Þ ð12Þ Agricultural Engineering Research, 63(2), 87–92.
Çetinkol, M. (1989). Production of sweet corn. Hasat Dergisi, 46,
lal ¼ 0.1428 þ 00155M c ðR2 of 0.9844Þ ð13Þ 20–23.
Gupta, R. K., & Das, S. K. (1997). Physical properties of sunflower
seeds. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 66, 1–8.
Joshi, D. C., Das, S. K., & Mukherjee, R. K. (1993). Physical
properties of pumpkin seeds. Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Research, 54(3), 219–229.
Kırtok, Y. (1998). Production and use of corn. Tarsus, Turkey:
0.55
Kocaoluk Press.
Konak, M., Çarman, K., & Aydın, C. (2002). Physical properties of
0.50 chick pea seeds. Biosystems Engineering, 82(1), 73–78.
Mohsenin, N. N. (1970). Physical properties of plant and animal
Coefficient of friction

0.45 materials. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.


Öğüt, H. (1998). Some physical properties of white lupin. Journal of
0.40
Agricultural Engineering Research, 69(3), 273–277.
0.35
Özarslan, C. (2002). Physical properties of cotton seed. Biosystems
Engineering, 83(2), 169–174.
0.30 Sacilik, K., Öztürk, R., & Keskin, R. (2003). Some physical properties
of hemp seed. Biosystems Engineering, 86(2), 191–198.
0.25 Sahoo, P. K., & Srivastava, A. P. (2002). Physical properties of okra
seed. Biosystems Engineering, 83(4), 441–448.
0.20
8 12 16 20 24
Shepherd, H., & Bhardwaj, R. K. (1986). Moisture-dependent physical
Moisture content. % d.b. properties of pigeon pea. Journal of Agricultural Engineering
Research, 35(4), 227–234.
Fig. 9. Effect of moisture content on static coefficient of friction: (m) Singh, K. K., & Goswami, T. K. (1996). Physical properties of cumin
rubber; (d) aluminium; (s) galvanized iron and (h) stainless steel. seed. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 64(2), 93–98.
528 M.B. Cosßkun et al. / Journal of Food Engineering 74 (2006) 523–528

Suthar, S. H., & Das, S. K. (1996). Some physical properties of Sturt.) grown under Bursa conditions. Turkish Journal of Agricul-
karingda [citrullus lanatus (thumb) mansf] seeds. Journal of ture and Forest, 24, 341–347.
Agricultural Engineering Research, 65(1), 15–22. _ & Özarslan, C. (2004). Physical properties of vetch seed.
Yalçın, I.,
_ (2000). Effects of plant populations and nitrogen doges on
Turgut, I. Biosystems Engineering, 88(4), 507–512.
fresh ear yield components of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata

You might also like