Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Abstract
This study examined the release characteristics of different N forms in an uncoated slow/controlled-release compound
fertilizer (UCRF) and the N uptake and N-use efficiency by rice plants. Water dissolution, soil leaching, and pot
experiments were employed. The dynamics of N release from the UCRF could be quantitatively described by three
equations: the first-order kinetics equation [N,= N o( 1 -e-")], Elovich equation (N,= a + blnt), and parabola equation (N,= a
+ btos), with the best fitting by the first-order kinetics equation for different N ( r = 0.9S69**- 0.9999**). The release
potentials (Novalues estimated by the first-order kinetics equation) of different N in the UCRF decreased in the order of
total N > DON > urea-N > NH,+-N > NO,--N in water, and total N > NH,+-N > DON > urea-N > NO,--N in soil, respectively,
being in accordance with cumulative amounts of N release. The constants of N release rate ( k values and b values) for
different N forms were in decreasing order of total N > DON > NH,+-N > NO,--N in water, whereas the k values were urea-
N >DON > NH,+-N > total N > NO,--N, and the b values were total N > NH,+-N > DON > NO,--N > urea-N in soil. Compared
with a common compound fertilizer, the N-use efficiency, N-agronomy efficiency, and N-physiological efficiency of the
UCRF were increased by 1 1.4%, 8.32 kg kg-1, and 5.17 kg kg-1, respectively. The ratios of different N to total N in the UCRF
showed significant correlation with N uptake by rice plants. The findings showed that the first-order kinetics equation
[N,=N,(l-e-k~)jcould be used to describe the release characteristics of different N forms in the fertilizer. The UCRF
containing different N forms was more effective in facilitating N uptake by rice compared with the common compound
fertilizer containing single urea-N form.
Key words: slow/controlled release compound fertilizer, nitrogen forms, release kinetics, nitrogen use efficiency
'O.M., soil organic matter; Av-P and Av-K, soil available P and K, respectively.
mg N kg-' soil). Each treatment had 10 replicates. Two N physiological efficiency (NPE, kg kg-')= (GN-Go)/
rice plants were grown in each pot (14 cm x 9 cm) (T,-To).
filled with 2.5 kg of soil. At 30,35,40,45, 5 0 , 5 5 , and
60 d of growth, plant samples were collected, thor- RESULTS
oughly washed, and then placed in oven at 90°C for 15
minutes to inactivate enzymes, after which the samples Release of different N forms from UCRF in water
were oven dried at 60°C for 24 hours. Plant dry mass
was recorded. The samples were ground to pass through Various N forms (total-N, NH,f-N, NO,--N, urea-N,
a 0.5-mm sieve for N analysis. and DON) in the UCRF exhibited differences for the
cumulative N release amounts in pure water at both
Analyses temperatures (25 and 35°C); however, their cumula-
tive release curves showed similar patterns (Fig. 1). On
The basic agrochemical properities of soils and total N the first day, the release amounts of different N ac-
of plant samples were measured using traditional analysis counted for more than 50% of their respective total
methods (Peiqi and Mile 1991; Bao 2000). release amounts. After 3 d, the cumulative releases of
N-efficiency parameters (Peng ef al. 2002,) were total N, NH,+-N, NO;-N, urea-N, and DON became
calculated as follows: stable, suggesting that N release was easy when UCRF
Apparent N-use efficiency (N-use efficiency, NUE, was in water. During day 7, the cumulative amounts
9%)= 100 x [Total plant N accumulation in the pot with of N release of all N forms were less at 25°C compared
N fertilizer (T,) - total plant N accumulation in the pot to those at 30°C indicating that higher temperature en-
without fertilizer (T,)]/the amount of N fertilizer ap- hanced N releases from UCRF in water.
plied (FJ. The cumulative releases of different N forms from
N agronomic efficiency (NAE, kg kg-') = [Grain yield the UCRF at both temperatures could be described by
in the pot with N fertilizer (G,) - grain yield in the pot the first-order kinetics equation [N, = N o ( I&)], Elovich
without fertilizer (G,,)]/FN. equation ( N , = a + blnt), and parabola equation (Nr= a
+25C B +25% C
:E
-0-30-C 24 +30%
DON
- 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 I 2 3 4 5 6 7
Fig. 1 Effect of temperature on N cumulative release of different forms from UCRF in water.
25°C NH,+-N 15.04 0.5923 0.9960" 10.85 2.306 0.9737" 8.680 2.586 0.9324"
NO,--N 13.50 1.759 0.9937" 10.12 2.047 0.8693" 8.407 2.186 0.7925"
Urea-N 23.30 0.6332 0.9567" 18.47 2.151 0.9369" 16.47 2.403 0.8936"
DON 50.15 0.661 2 0.9868" 44.89 2.950 0.9774" 42.00 3.366 0.9521"
Total N 100.6 0.8030 0.9970" 84.33 9.543 0.9607" 75.55 10.54 0.9145"
35°C NH,+-N 16.18 0.6082 0.9962" 11.54 2.554 0.9771" 9.118 2.874 0.9385"
NO,--N 14.20 1.4983 0.9999" 10.43 2.231 0.8553" 8.577 2.372 0.7764"
Urea-N 24.05 0.5523 0.9773" 19.39 1.823 0.9170" 17.75 2.006 0.86 1 I '*
DON 55.01 0.6126 0.9790" 47.42 4.739 0.9792" 43.30 4.824 0.9513"
Total N 107.4 0.8131 0.9981" 88.78 10.85 0.9598" 78.74 12.08 0.9121"
"Significance at P<O.Ol leve1 (n=7, r0,=0.707, r,,,=O.834).
Table 4 N-use efficiency by rice plants during growth stage in UCRF and CCF treatments
Samoling dates (d)
N use N agronomy N physiological
. I
Table 5 The ratios between different N forms and total N in water (N,/N,) (%)
lncuhation time (d)
Temperature N form
____ 1 3 7 14 21 28 42 X (average value)
25°C NH,+-N 12.62 13.91 14.29 14.43 14.58 14.76 14.86 14.21
NO; -N 10.96 13.66 13.69 13.49 13.37 13.33 13.31 13.12
Urea-N 22.10 21.42 22.20 22.27 22.07 22.00 21.96 22.00
DON 54.32 51.01 49.83 49.81 49.98 49.91 49.86 50.67
35°C NH,*-N 12.87 13.86 14.38 14.55 14.71 14.87 14.98 14.32
NO, -N 10.58 13.55 13.41 13.20 13.07 13.03 13.01 12.84
Urea-N 21.93 21.15 21.51 21.16 20.97 20.90 20.86 21.21
DON 54.62 51.45 50.70 5 1.08 5 I .24 51.21 51.15 51.64
times greater on d 42 than on d 1, respectively (Table 6). tive correlation was found for DON (Table 7). The Nx/
However, the ratios of DON and urea-N to total N de- N, for NH,+-N and NO,--N obtained from soil incuba-
creased with time, with the decrease being 33.9 and tion experiment showed very significant positive cor-
38.7% on d 42, respectively, compared with d 1. relation with N uptake by rice (r=0.8947**- 0.9540**),
Correlation analysis showed that there were signifi- but very significant negative correlation was observed
cant and very significant correlations between the ra- for urea-N and DON (r=-0.9146**--0.9619**). These
tios (N,/N,) and N uptake by rice plants at different results showed that the quantity and ratios of different
growth stages. The Nx/N, ratio for NH,+-N and urea- N released from the UCRF at different periods impacted
N obtained from the water dissolution experiment had N uptake by the plant, having implications for develop-
very significant positive correlations with N uptake by ment of uncoated slow and controlled release fertilizers
rice (r= 0.8437**- 0.9347**),whereas significant nega- with nutrient configuration.
Table 7 Correlation coefficients between the ratios (Nx/N,) and N uptake by rice plants ( r )
N form
Medium and temperature
NH,+-N NO,--N urea-N DON
In water 25°C 0.9073" 0.5494 0.8437" -0.7626'
30°C 0.9347" 0.5133 0.8824" -0.7524'
In soil 35°C 0.8947" 0.9540" -0.9619" -0.9146"
"Significance at P<0.01 level; 'Significance at P<0.05 level (n=7. roo,=0.707,ro,,=0.834).
Medium not only affects the rate and quantity of N Kinetic characteristics of release of different N
release from a fertilizer, but also alters the transforma- forms from UCRF
tion of different N forms. The results of this study
showed that the different N in the UCRF dissolved eas- The first-order kinetics equation, Elovich equation, and
ily and released rapidly in water, which did not fully parabola equation could be used to describe the N re-
meet the definition of slow and controlled release fertil- lease characteristics, as evidenced by high correlation
izer by Europe Standard Committee. However, many coefficients with the best for the first-order kinetic
researchers have recently suggested that the release of equation. Stanford and Smith (1972) and Wang and
slow and controlled release fertilizer should be evalu- Qing (1994) have successfully described long-term min-
ated in soil-plant system (Du et al. 2003) or fertilizer- eralization of organic N in soil using the first-order ki-
soil-plant system (Xi 2003; Liao et al. 2003). This has netics equation. Under soil conditions, the k value for
been demonstrated in the current study. Moreover, urea-N was the greatest among different N forms, which
because of both release of NH,+-N and NO,--N and is attributed to rapid decomposition and transformation
different N to total N in a fertilizer need further irrigated rice in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 35, 1095-
1103. (in Chinese)
investigation.
Song B, Mao X Y, Du J J, Liao Z W. 2003. Study on fertilizer
efficiency and its mechanism of urea and ammonium
CONCLUSIONS bicarbonate treated with controlled-release technology. Plant
Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 9, 50-56. (in Chinese)
The release characteristics of different N forms in UCRF Stanford G, Smith S J. 1972. Nitrogen mineralization potentials
showed significant differences for water and soil. The of soils. Soil Science of America Journal Proceedings, 36,
UCRF release parameters obtained from soil incubation 465-472.
Tinker P B, Nye P H. 2000. Solute Movement in the Rhizosphere.
better reflect N uptake and utilization by rice plants
Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
compared with those from water. The first-order ki-
Shavit U, Shaviv A, Shalit G, Zaslavsky D. 1997. Release
netic equation could be successfully used to describe
characteristics of a new controlled release fertilizer. Journal
N release from UCRF. Compared with the common
of Controlled Release, 43, 13 1 - 138.
compound fertilizers with only urea-N, the UCRF with
Walher R F. 2001. Growth and nutritional responses of
multiple N forms significantly improved the NUE, NAE,
containerized sugar and Jeffrey pine seedlings to controlled
and NPE by rice plants during later growth stage.
release fertilization and induced mycorrhization. Forest
Ecology and Management, 149, 163-179.
Acknowledgements Wang R F, Zhang F D, Liu X M, Zhang S Q. He X S, Wang Y J.
The project was supported by National 863 Program 2005. Responses of wheat to felted slow-release fertilizer.
of China (2001AA246022,2004AA246020). Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 11, 340-344. (in