Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8WamI 0a saaayasa
8annyasa isn'I abouI Iiving in
a rave. ne ran'I geI IiberaIion
iI one doesn'I Iry Io seek
saIvaIion Ior oIhers
3
8eW car 0a the hI0ck
Iord's Ero8porI has been designed
WiIh India in mind. II Iirks many oI
Ihe boxes When iI romes Io drivabiIiIy
buI misses ouI in some oIher areas
l |ove oe|rg a ror
oul l le|| ever]ore |l's
le ardesl, oesl l|rg
ever. ll's so uroe||evao|]
reWard|rg ard l'r prell]
Zer aooul |l oul sore
da]s |l's jusl ard.
.ORGX_*[LL
Now Dolhi, May 12, 2013
wilh Congress regislering an imressive
viclory in Karnalaka, BJF has losl ils lone
baslion in soulh ndia. KESTuR vASuK
analyses lhe Assembly eleclion resull and
how il could aecl nalional olilics
T
he BJPs humiliating defeat in
Karnataka has raised more
questions than answers. How
could the party which regis-
tered such a spectacular victory
in 2008 be reduced to rubble five years
later? Will the BJP be able to make a
comeback in the 2014 Lok Sabha
election? Or, is it all over for the party as
far as its southern dreams are concerned?
It is pertinent to note that former
Chief Minister and Lingayat leader BS
Yeddyurappa, who built the party from
scratch in the State, has now become one
of the main reasons why the BJP is in such
a mess. Apart from the Lingayat vote split,
the consolidation of backward classes in
favour of the Congress has sounded the
death knell for the party. In Karnataka
politics, two steams of voters backward
classes and dominant communities
decide the fate of a political party. This
election has seen the consolidation of the
two groups in favour of the Congress,
thus eroding the BJPs base. Had the BJP
not retained some support in urban
centres, it could not have even got the
face-saving 40 seats which it holds
jointly with HD Deve Gowdas Janata Dal
(Secular). The party has won 13 out of 28
constituencies in Bangalore urban.
In 2008, many Left leaders among
Dalits formed a political platform in the
BJP to defeat the Congress. The division
of the Left and the Right among Dalits
has traditionally been exploited by
different political parties, particularly the
Congress. In 2008, however, the attitude
of the Left Dalits changed favourably
towards the BJP. Likewise, Lingayats
backed Yeddyurappa to bring the BJP to
power. Five years down the line, these
two support bases have eroded
considerably, causing a major electoral
debacle for the party.
No wonder, the BJP not only lost its
strongholds of coastal and Mumbai-
Karnataka districts but also Hyderabad-
Karnataka and Central Karnataka (which
are regarded as the hotbed of Lingayat
politics). Moderate faces in the BJP now
feel that the hardcore Hindutva agenda
pursued by some leaders in coastal
districts of Mangalore and Udupi has
eroded the partys vote base in the region.
An analysis of the voting pattern
clearly indicates that Yeddyurappas KJP
has become a major spoiler for the BJP,
which has got just below 20 per cent of
total votes. By garnering about 10 per
cent votes, the KJP has spelt doom for
the ruling BJP and catapulted the
Congress to power in Karnataka. This
time the Congress has improved its tally
to 121 from 80 in 2008, and secured a
handsome 36.55 per cent vote share in
the Assembly election. We have lost
more than 30 constituencies because of
the KJP, confesses a BJP insider.
Battered in Bellary and coastal
districts, particularly Dakshina Kannada,
besides yielding considerable ground in
other parts of the State, the BJP is
clearly devastated. In around 100
constituencies, Yeddyurappas
KJP and the BSR Congress of
B Sriramulu chipped away its
votes in no small measure.
The KJP and the BSR
Congress could win just
10 seats, but the damage
they have done to the BJP
is immense.
The anti-incumbency
factor and incessant
infighting within the BJP leading to as
many as three Chief Ministers in five
years, coupled with the perception that
some ministers were deeply involved in
corruption, added to the partys woes. The
BJPs first Government in the South was
thus seen in poor light, overshadowing
some of the development works it had
done in the past five years.
It is amply clear that Yeddyurappa
vowed to demolish the BJP for what it
did to him and he succeeded in his
endeavour. The Congress didnt have to
do much as disarray in Opposition ranks
was certainly to its disadvantage. As for
the JD(S), it could not become the
kingmaker, but improved its tally from
28 in 2008 to 40 this year. Though the
JD(S) tried hard to spread its influence
beyond its stronghold of the Old Mysore
region, it couldnt make any significant
breakthrough and was well below 58
seats it had won way back in 2004. Also,
to its disappointment, the verdict has
been decisively in favour of the Congress,
thus eliminating any role of the JD(S) in
government formation. People clearly
did not favour a coalition government;
they saw the Congress and not the
JD(S) as an alternative to the BJP.
According to Prof Suresh Misra of the
Indian Institute of Public Administration,
New Delhi, the Yeddyurappa factor has
loomed large over the BJP. It is clear that
Yeddyurappa has spoiled the BJPs party.
His influence remains strong among his
caste members. Looking at the poll
impact, it was a bad decision by the BJP to
throw him out of the party, says he.
Even the BJP leadership is divided on
the Yeddyurappa factor. Many feel that it
was a blunder on the part of the senior
party leadership to isolate Yeddyurappa
over the issue of corruption. A senior BJP
leader says on the condition of anonymity
that it was the ego of a senior leader that
destroyed the party in Karnataka.
Corruption was not at all an issue. A
senior leader simply made it an ego issue
taking a moral high ground on corruption.
Who is not corrupt here? We have not
only lost a great experiment in Karnataka
abut also an opportunity, says he.
Some party workers believe that the
BJP should have taken a leaf out of Sonia
Gandhis Himachal Pradesh experiment.
The Congress decided to go ahead with
Virbhadra Singh as the partys mascot in
Himachal Pradesh despite unsubstan-
tiated corruption charges levelled against
him by his adversaries. This gamble
worked for the Congress.
Yeddyurappas eviction from the BJP
cost the party about 20 of 33 seats it had
won in the Lingayat belt of Mumbai-
Karnataka in 2008. The BJP, which won
33 of 50 seats in the region then, has
now been reduced to a mere 13. The
KJP essentially split the BJP votes by
half in many of these constituencies.
While Yeddyurappas KJP could win
only two of the 50 seats here and the
Sriramulus BSR Congress none, the
two breakaway parties handed the
Congress victory in 31 seats 19 more
than what it had won in 2008.
The BJP, which swept Bagalkot,
Bijapur, Gadag and Haveri in 2008, has
virtually been wiped out in these districts,
winning only three of the 25 seats. The
BSR Congress, too, contributed to the
BJPs downfall, particularly in Gadag.
An analysis
of the voting
pattern clearly
indicates that
Yeddyurappa's
KJP has
become a
major spoiler
for the BJP,
which has got
just below 20
per cent of
total votes. By
garnering
about 10 per
cent votes,
the KJP has
spelt doom for
the BJP and
catapulted the
Congress to
power in
Karnataka
>> Z
sunday
magazino
mi11l it1iJ !
JM C0RBETT'S huhTh0 SuCCESSES A0AhST
MAhEATh0 T0ERS EARhE0 hM A L0h0hEL0
RESFECT Ah0 FAME AM0h0 Th0SE RES0h0 h
ThE vLLA0ES 0F KuMA0h. S0ME L0CALS
EvEh CLAM ThAT hE wAS A SAhT
Now Dolhi, May 12, 2013
W
hen I was young, I loved stories
about tigers and leopards. My
father would often tell me about
Jim Corbetts adventures in the
wild. Thirty years later, I still
remember the spell those words would create.
My eyes would focus on his lips incessantly
drawing pictures in my mind. But a regret
remained over the years: Of not visiting Jim
Corbett National Park. So, when my friend
Emelda rang me up asking if I would join her
with her husband Umarjit and kids to
Corbett, I got excited. For, it would not only help
me find some relief from the approaching sum-
mer heat, but also allow me to see the land
named after one of my childhood heroes.
Kashipur was our first stop. We had our
breakfast at a local food stall there. After driving
for two hours we crossed Ramnagar. From
there, the road traverses flanking along the
gorge of the river Kosi, the sorrow of Bihar. On
the way, we saw the famous Garjiya temple. The
road led us to a flat terrain and we saw a beauti-
ful village along the river. All the houses were
thatched and trees were laden with wild orchids.
The name of the village was Sunderkhal. The
beauty of the place, however, was occasionally
marred by man-animal conflicts. An old woman
told me how a tigress killed six people, includ-
ing five women, in 2010. I then realised why the
village was surrounded by an electric fencing.
At around 11 am we crossed Dhangari Gate,
the main entry of Dhikala. On the way, I noticed
a number of resorts and properties for sale.
Suddenly, a few spotted deer jumped down the
hill slope and we almost hit a calf. We stopped
the car and watched them disappear in the
woods. We were both worried as well as exited
with the encounter.
After 15 minutes of drive, we saw a wooden
hanging-board. On it was written The
Den. So, here we were finally at our
resort. The rooms were well-fur-
nished. We unpacked our bags,
went to the reception and enquired
about the safari jeep. Much to the
disappointment of Emelda, she was told that
the jeep wont be coming to pick us up. She
rang up the adventure club and shouted at
them. Finally, they agreed to send the vehicle.
The manager showed us the way to the dining
hall where food was served in a buffet style.
By the time we finished our lunch, the jeep
had arrived. On the way, the driver showed us the
spot where the tigress had killed her first victim
in 2010. He also said that the Government would
soon be moving the villagers away. Around 2.30
pm, we entered Bijrani Gate. A few locals were
trying to rent us binoculars. Meanwhile, Gaurav
Kulbe, our forest guide, checked the papers and
got into the jeep. He was young, energetic and
quite serious about his work. He told us how he
wished to visit the Northeastern States.
Gaurav took us to many places, and we saw
spotted deer, sambar, langur, turtle, monitor lizard
and a snake-eagle. When we reached the foothills,
we saw a golden mahseer swimming in the brook.
From there, the grassland started. We stopped at
the government rest house. Few vehicles were
already parked there. The boundaries were sur-
rounded by an electric fencing. At the centre of
the compound stood a gigantic silk-cotton tree.
Once our papers got verified, we started mov-
ing again. Driving a little further, we saw tiger
claw marks on the bark of a tree. So, we were in a
tigers territory! We stopped by a waterhole, wait-
ing for the animal. Failing to find him, we moved
into the grassland and again there were pugmarks
of a tiger near the riverbed. We were soon in the
middle of a vast grassland and could see a watch-
tower at Bijrani. A couple of trucks were parked at
the base of a hillock and we watched them from a
distance. Half-an-hour later, as
we were losing hope, a
tigress appeared and
a woman shouted: Oh!
there it is. Gaurav yelled at her to
maintain silence. We watched the beautiful ani-
mal for a few minutes and headed back.
As we were returning, I thought of how in
1936 Corbett attained the distinction of being the
first national park to be established in mainland
Asia. To recognise the contributions of James E
Corbett, the park which was earlier termed
Hailey National Park and then Ramganga
National Park was christened as Jim Corbett
National Park in 1957. I also remembered how
the park had been closely linked with tigers
this despite the fact that with about 600 species of
avifauna Corbett had been one of the richest bird
sanctuaries in the country. Corbetts tiger associa-
tion is understandable because not just the
endangered Bengal tiger resides here but also the
sanctuary has been the first to come under
Project Tiger initiative.
Next morning, we got up early for the ele-
phant safari. When we reach the Way Mark
Adventure office, a man took us to the stable. I
was a bit disheartened to see the size of the ele-
phant given to us for ride. It was the smallest of
all and I sarcastically asked the mahout if she
could carry us. He roared into laughter. On the
way, the mahout told us that Larli was the
youngest elephant they had. She was only 20
years old and would attain maturity at the age of
40. Soon we reached the riverbed; the Sitabani
forest was just across it.
The day was cloudy and pleasant. We saw a
sambar sitting under the bushes but wont just
run away. I had a feeling that something was
going to happen. Suddenly, cheetals and mon-
keys started making alarm calls. The mahout
guided the elephant towards the direction. Lo
and behold, we saw a big Royal
Bengal tiger. Hailing high his
head, he gave us a long
look. And then, he leaped across the
stream to vanish into the forest.
On our return journey, we saw some girls
cutting firewoods not far from the spot we saw
the tiger. When we reached the elephant stable,
there were many people awaiting us. They all
admired the tiger snaps we had taken. A kid
complained to his mother that they must buy a
good camera to click tigers. Before we left for the
resort, Emelda gave the mahout a tip of C200 and
bought some edibles for the young elephant.
In the afternoon, Umarjit and I had a canter
safari for Dhikala. We dropped Emelda and her
kids at the resort and headed for Dhangari Gate.
At the checkpost, we were informed that our
canter will arrive at 2.30 pm. We felt sorry for
ourselves that we skipped both breakfast and
lunch in order to report on time. With nothing
else to do, we went to see Corbett Museum.
There was, however, not much to see.
When the canter finally arrived, we were
shocked to see the kind of companions we had.
Some boys from Delhi were making a lot of noise.
Some of them constantly made false alarms of
sighting animals. They showed no respect for the
wildlife or people around them. If Wikipedia is to
be believed, every season more than 70,000 people
come to the park. I am sure most of them wont be
better than those I encountered that afternoon.
Worse, we had an indifferent guide and driver.
They wouldnt stop for any photographic moment
and the canter appeared more like a public trans-
port and the guide our conductor!
We stopped for a while at Dhikala. From
there, we saw Ramganga river, famous for
ghariyals and golden mahseer. But we saw noth-
ing from that distance. However, we sighted a
few animals crocodile, spotted deer, sambar,
wild boar, among others.
When we returned, Emelda and kids were still
playing in the lawn. We took our dinner and
retired to bed early. Next morning, I sneaked out
early and spent some time in the river. When I
returned, my friends were still at the breakfast
table. We took light food and went to pack our
bags. As we were taking our luggage out, we
had a sinking feeling: We were, after all,
going back to the madness of the city life.
Corbell has over GOO
secies o aviauna,
making il one o lhe
richesl bird sancluaries in
lhe counlry, bul lhe lace
remains invariably
associaled wilh ligers.
M JA0A0Sh Sh0h visils
lhe nalional ark and lells us
aboul his exeriences
footprints
tiger
Tracking
h 1O8G, C0RBETT
ATTAhE0 ThE
0SThCT0h 0F BEh0
ThE FRST hAT0hAL FARK
T0 BE ESTABLShE0 h
MAhLAh0 ASA. ThE
FARK, whCh wAS
EARLER TERME0 hALEY
hAT0hAL FARK Ah0
ThEh RAM0Ah0A
hAT0hAL FARK, wAS
ChRSTEhE0 AS JM
C0RBETT hAT0hAL
FARK h 1O57
I
n Shirahatti, the Congress got
44,738 votes while the second-
placed BJP candidate won 44,423.
The BSR Congress took away 26,791
votes; even the KJPs 3,841 votes was
more than the winning margin.
JD(S) president HD Kumaraswamy
acknowledges the role played by the
two parties in the rise of the Congress
and the consequent decline of the
BJP. The KJPs agenda was to divide
votes. This has been achieved as is
evident from the results, says he.
State BJP president Prahlad Joshi
agrees. Many factors have damaged
our interests. More than corruption, it
was differences of opinion and the
breaking away of a splinter group. The
party will try to address all issues
immediately, says he.
Within the BJP, there are many
takers of this viewpoint. Says a senior
party leader, Factional feud in the BJP
has affected governance. This, along
with political instability, has led to
loss of confidence in the BJP. Also,
corruption at the State level seems to
have overshadowed the corruption
charges against the Congress-led UPA
Government at the Centre.
Its not that the voters have
not rewarded honest representatives
BJPs Suresh Kumar and CN
Aswath Narayan have easily retained
their seats. But caste consideration
did play its part, especially among
those who were not exactly seen to be
honest. No less than 23 former
ministers, who held various portfolios
in governments headed by
Yeddyurappa and DV Sadananda
Gowda and Jagadish Shettar, lost
their seats. Even Deputy Chief
Minister KS Eshwarappa could not
retain his seat. He was pushed to the
third position in Shimoga.
The impressive Karnataka victory
has brought temporary reprieve to a
beleaguered Congress, infusing a bit of
cheer into an otherwise gloomy
scenario. But there has been admission
on the part of senior Congress leaders
that this victory, however significant it
may be, is more of an exception than
rule. People in Karnataka, after all,
have voted for a State Government. To
take a national meaning out of a State
election would be highly misplaced,
says a Congress worker.
Many analysts, too, caution
the UPA not to take the Karnataka
victory as a referendum on the
national scale. Message is loud and
clear that this election was fought on
local issues, a vote on the quality of
governance delivered by the BJP in
Karnataka. By no means, national
issues got any traction during
the campaign.
It is interesting to note NCP chief
Sharad Pawars comment on the
Karnataka election. He said that the
result would not set the tone for the Lok
Sabha election in 2014. Addressing a
rally in Satara, he said: Dont jump to
any conclusion because of the win in
Karnataka. The forthcoming elections
in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and
Chhattisgarh are more important and
pose a bigger challenge to the UPA. One
cant predict which way the wind will
blow with just one electoral victory.
Pawars comment may not appear
soothing to the Congress leadership,
especially at the Centre, but its a
realistic analysis of the political
scenario in the country.
Hano rises in Soutl
F R O M P A G E 1
sunday
magazino
s|it| l
BLAME huMAhS F0R ThE EXThCT0h 0F
MAST000hS. wE KLLE0 ThE B00EST MALES
whLE huhTh0 F0R F000, whCh LE0 T0
FTChE0 BATTLES AM0h0 Y0uh0ER MALES AS
ThEY C0MFETE0 T0 FLL ThE 0AFS LEFT
Now Dolhi, May 12, 2013
F
irst off, Ford really does not describe the EcoSport as a
sports utility vehicle (SUV). Vinay Piparsania, Ford
Indias Director of Marketing and Sales, describes the
car as an Urban SUV. It is not a big car; it does not
have the dominating sense that, say, its bigger sibling
from the Ford stable, the Endeavour, has.
0L8I6k k0 IkLI08
Ford has designed this car to fit into a very specific box, a box
that has to ensure that it is under four metres in length. It has
high ground clearance, which is what basically qualifies it to
wear the SUV moniker. As Ehab Kaoud, the chief designer of the
car, explains, the car has well-defined lines but does not have
overly complex ridges running all over the place.
The EcoSport clearly looks like a Ford with its big, almost
agape radiator grille. It also has a side-opening rear door, a
function necessitated by the spare wheel on the door. The
neatest feature on the exterior of the car is the fact that instead
of a big, ugly handle, the EcoSport has a button to open the
rear door which is embedded in the rear light cluster. This has,
however, meant the reverse lights have been pushed down and
integrated into the rear bumper.
Inside, the front of the car is a replica of the interiors of
the Ford Fiesta, which is a place to be. The major change is
that the EcoBoost-engined Titanium-spec car we were driving
had nice cyan-coloured dials and centre-console.
Rear legroom is acceptable when you subscribe to the belief
that the EcoSport is essentially a big hatchback on stilts. Luggage
space is also acceptable if you use the big hatch concept. Space
for a couple of smallish suitcases or one large suitcase. But the
roof-rails do come equipped with tie-down points to secure lug-
gage which you can store up there as well.
0I8ILI1
Ford wanted journalists to not just experience the EcoSport
but also the revolutionary EcoBoost engine that would be one
of the engine options on the vehicle. This one-litre three-cylin-
der petrol engine deserves the revolutionary tag.
In addition to the technical tweaks, Ford has also added a
turbocharger to the engine, upping the power output of this
engine to an incredible 125PS (123 horsepower). Keep in
mind, there are 1.5 litre engines on bigger sedans that do not
produce that much power.
So, how does the power come on? A bit gradually, to be
very honest. While there is no perceptible turbo lag, it does take
some time to get the engine to get to the higher ranges of the
rev range. That said, in city-driving conditions where most gear
changes take place at around 2,500rpm, the car does just fine.
Acceleration in third gear between 40-60 km/hour is impressive,
although on some uphill stretches you do need to downshift.
You have to keep on reminding yourself that this is a small
engine trying to act like a big brute of an engine.
If you, however, do want to put the pedal to the metal, once
you get going, the EcoBoost can surprise you. You can almost
reach an indicated 100 km/hour on second gear, and a few
aggressive gear shifts can get the EcoSport up and going,
although after some time the car seems to run out of breath.
Ford will also be coming up with another petrol option
(the engine on the Figo) as well as its 1.5 litre TDCi diesel that
does duty on both the Fiesta and Figo. The EcoBoost, however,
is the most powerful of the three and the only engine option
that we drove. The EcoBoost is also good on emissions,
being cleaner than all other engines in its class, deserving the
Eco tag there as well. Fuel economy is claimed at over 18 km
per litre in testing; but in a 150-km long drive in Goa, on
both open road and through crowded villages and towns, we
managed 11 km per litre but then again this was heavy
right foot driving. Drive sensibly and one ought to get 13-14
km per litre in real-world conditions.
Ford vehicles have historically been supple on the road
and true to form the EcoSport handles it beautifully. Fords
last attempt at a small Utility Vehicle in India was the Fusion,
and while sales were dismal, the 1.6-litre petrol engine version
of that car was a fabulous mix of fun and practicality.
The EcoSport does not disappoint, although again you
have to remind yourself that the high ground clearance does
have a negative impact on handling. But handling and riding
comforts are both impressive as is the fairly powerful air-con-
ditioner. All in all, a very solid package.
L6hk0L061
The EcoSport is also the first Ford to have the Microsoft Sync
system installed (on higher spec Titanium and Titanium +
models). Now, one should realise that gadgets and toys are as
vital in selling cars as performance. However, after having dri-
ven the Fiesta extensively, the Sync system on the EcoSport felt
very similar to the non-Sync system on the Fiesta.
Now, while Sync is all well and good, Fords Sync system is
nowhere near as smooth to use as systems on the luxury
German brands (Audi, BMW and Mercedes). While they are
not in the same price bracket, things could have been better.
The voice command system recognises Indian accents and
voices well enough, but trying to get music to play over
Bluetooth was a challenge. And a full-colour display would
have been so much nicer than the monochrome display. It is
not that expensive anymore.
Piparsania did clarify that Ford would have representa-
tives who would explain the entire Sync system for cus-
tomers, including how to sync devices and voice commands
and so on. Smart move, although I believe Ford can do more
with Sync (as it has done in the US market). Maybe in some
of its future products!
008L 0 L608F0
This is a question that several people have been asking, and
frankly, having driven both cars, it is difficult to find a com-
parison. Sure, it is likely that they will be in similar price
brackets and appeal to same kind of buyers. The Ford is defi-
nitely better put together, has far superior plastics and in the
EcoBoost at least, a better engine. But the Duster is much larg-
er and has much more luggage space, and might be more
practical for larger families, moving dogs and the like.
Some might even find the Fords look a bit too modern
while others find the Duster dowdy, although it will be inter-
esting to see what Nissan does when it comes out with a
rebadged Duster later this year. Both cars could easily do with
bigger engines, but it will be interesting to drive the EcoSport
with the diesel motor once it launches to do a fair comparison.
This is not a car or an engine designed for boy racers,
and Fords target buyer is a 30-something family man with a
single kid. And you know what? This car suits the target
market just fine.
M08kFI8 00 8 IF 80M88 00