Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SHEAR PROPERTIES
PROPERTIES IN SHEAR
Shear stress plays an important role in the failure of ductile materials (which resist to normal stress by undergoing large plastic deformations, but fails by rupturing under shear stress. )
However, the shear tests have not met wide acceptance and use that have been given to tension test.
This unpopularity may largely be due to the fact that an idea about the shear properties of a material can often be obtained from the tensile properties (eg. Ssy=~0.5Sy). Consequently the shear test are usually conducted to obtain a measure of shear strength for specific applications.
Differences between shear tests Direct or transverse shear tests are usually employed to obtain a shear strength (Ssy or Ssu) for specific applications
Whereas torsion test is usually employed to evaluate the shear behavior and properties of a material (similar to the tensile test of materials)
3 types of direct shear tests are: Single shear test (a) Double shear test (b) Punch shear test (c)
Torsion Test
Torsion tests are done on special type of machines which have been developed especially for this purpose. These tests are carried out applying a given twisting moment to one end of a specimen while measuring the deformation as angular displacement at the other end.
Torsion Test
The torsion test is not used in material specification to the same extent as the tension test.
The main reason for lack of popularity of torsion tests arises from the fact that no uniform shear stress can be generated within the material.
Torsion Test
Nevertheless, the torsion test is still useful in determination of material properties such as;
Torsion tests can be also carried out on full sized engineering components themselves such as: shafts, twist drills etc. in order to determine their behavior under service conditions.
Plastic deformation is almost uniform over the whole length of specimen, which makes it possible to determine deformations and stress more reliably for highly ductile materials, especially pure metals.
Crank Shaft
Twist drill
Axles
Twisted member
Materials with very low ductility (or brittle materials), which are often difficult to test in tension, undergo quite measurable deformation in torsion tests which facilitates the determination of their mechanical properties. During torsional tests no neck forms in solid specimens. Consequently the torque increases up to the moment of failure. Thin walled tubes or hollow sections are sometimes used to determine the mechanical properties more accurately, but the danger of buckling in these sections has to be avoided before the material fails from shear stress.
A- Loading Unit
B- Indicating Unit
The two units are seperated from each other by the specimen. While one unit is fixed to the bed the other is free to move along the bed to compensate for the variation in the length of the specimen when subjected to the torsional load. Otherwise the specimen will be subjected to axial stresses which will then disturb the state of pure shear stress
The test specimens for torsional tests are cylindrical, usually having square or hexagonal shaped ends to be hold easily at the chucks, as shown in the figure.
The deformation here is circumferential and equal to s=R on the surface of the bar.
This equation is valid only for materials which behave linearly in the elastic range.
Modulus of Rigidity G, can also be determined from a materials Youngs Modulus, E, provided that the Poissons ratio, , for that material is known.
As can seen from equation of G, the higher the E, the higher the G value in torsion.
Simply, thinner is the wall thickness, more sensitive is the measure of elastic strength since all fibers are at about the same stress.
Because thin walled tubular specimens do not benefit from the strengthening effect of inner fibers which were at lower shear stress values than surface. For Ssy & G determination a tubular specimen with; L 10d and d 10t is recommended. However, if a thin walled tube is subjected to torsion, it would first fail by buckling before the shear strength of material is reached, if the geometry is not in suitable proportion. If L/d and d/t ratios are not kept within limits, tubular specimens generally fail by buckling before the Ssy point is reached. Failure by buckling, however, happens generally if d > 10t.
For thin walled specimens during torsion tests, the both end should be plugged, so that the jaws of the testing machine will not collapse the specimen
The general equation of shear stress for solid specimen is not directly used for tubular specimens and a new equation is derived For tubular thin walled specimens the shear stress is derived as:
where Tsy is the torque at yield point and has to be measured during test
The first start point of yielding is not readily appearent with most materials because of the stress gradient across the diameter of a solid bar.
Outer most fibers are restrained from yielding by the less stressed inner fibers. It is not until considerable yielding has taken place that any noticeable effect is apparent unless the material has very marked upper and lower yield points as shown in figure below.
Consequently, the off-set-yield is commonly empolyed in torsion testing (similar to tension test) to provide a common basis for comparison. The offset angle of twist is generally taken as 4 x 10E-5 radian/mm of gauge length. The elastic shear strength, Ssy , is thus determined employing;
Where Tsy is the torque at proportional limit or the torque at specified offset angle of twist.
Modulus of Resilience
Resilience is the capacity of a material for returning to original dimension after deformation. More mathematically; modulus of resilience is, the elastic energy per unit volume which can be stored in the material with no plastic deformation.
It is, however, customary for comparison purposes with similar materials, to employ the previous equation. Though they do not represent the actual situation.
For purposes of comparison only the modulus of rupture gives a sufficiently accurate index of the ultimate shear strength.
Failure of a crankshaft
Fracture Surface of Sector Shaft The fracture surface had circumferential smearing and a slightly off-center final fracture zone
Side View of Sector Shaft The side view of the broken shaft, at right, showed twisting deformation from torsional forces during fracture. The fracture showed no indications of fatigue cracking, which would possibly point to a defect in the shaft as the cause for failure
One of the retention studs was fractured through the shank in a spiral fashion from the region of the first thread. A second stud was intact but cracked in the same manner.
A close-up view of the fractured retention stud. A brittle torsional spiral fracture is observed