You are on page 1of 2

Designing A Performance Management System

Your performance management system should be:

job-related

practical

have measurable standards


Perhaps the most important design consideration is to develop a process that is practical and
easy to understand and use. The focus should be on the results of the performance management
process - effective and motivated staff - not the steps of the process.

When developing a new performance management process, use a committee made up of


employees and managers. A collaborative approach will increase employee buy-in, understanding
and support of the process.

Once the process has been developed, communicate with all staff about the purpose and the
steps in the performance management process.
You should be prepared to make adjustments to your new system as necessary.

Different Types of Performance Management Systems


There are a variety of ways to measure performance including:

Self Appraisal: the employee is asked to evaluate his/her own work

Peer Appraisal: staff of equal rank within the organization are asked to evaluate the employee

Team Appraisal: similar to peer appraisals; employees who work as part of a team are asked to
evaluate the team's work

Assessment Centre: the employee is assessed by professional assessors using several types of
evaluation such as work simulations and actual activities

360-Degree or Full Circle Appraisal: the employee's work is reviewed by gathering input from
representatives of all the groups the employee interacts with such as supervisor, peers,
subordinates and clients.

Management-by-Objectives: the employee's achievement of work objectives that are set in


collaboration with his/her supervisor are assessed.

Combination of Methods: Some organizations combine different methods into their performance
management process. In particular some organizations include an evaluation of competencies -
the knowledge, skills and abilities that distinguish superior performance. Establishing
competencies for performance management in an organization requires careful thought. Without
careful preparation, evaluating competencies can be very subjective.
In the voluntary sector, 360-degree appraisals are sometimes used for evaluating the Executive
Director. Management-by-objectives is an effective approach to performance management for all
other employees.
Because it's the most practical system for most non-profit organizations, we will be focusing in
this section of the website on Management-by-Objectives.

Management-by-Objectives
Performance management using a management-by-objectives (results-based) approach has
three phases:

Phase 1 - Planning

a work plan for the next year is developed;

measures for assessing progress are established.


Phase 2 - Monitoring

progress toward the goals identified in the work plan is monitored;

the plan is adjusted if required;

corrective action is taken if necessary.


Phase 3 - Reviewing

at the end of the performance management cycle the manager and employee meet to document
the work of the past year;

accomplishments and shortfalls relative to the work plan are summarized using a performance
management form;

a new performance management cycle begins.


Each of these phases is discussed in detail in the section below.

You might also like