Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Data handling
NCMRWF got access to dds.nesdis.noaa.gov through an exclusive user account. Radiance data from NPOES satellites in level 1B data format Derived products in WMO BUFR format -120 km pre-processed NPOES-ATOVS retrievals - quickscat scatterometer winds - SBUV/2 ozone retrievals - DMSP SSM/I retrievals
Global Model & Data Assimilation at T170/L28 & T80/L18 Resolutions also Ensemble Prediction at T80/L18 Resolution 8 Member Ensemble (Breed Vector)
MM5 ETA RSM These Models are run using Initial and Boundary Conditions from NCMRWF Global Models
The analysis is that choice of model variables which most closely fits both the observations (via forward model) and prior estimate , as measured by the following objective function: J= [ (X Xb)T B-1(X Xb ) + (yo HX)TR-1 (yo HX)]
Where X Xb B yo H R -
resultant analysis vector the background or first guess vector background error covariance matrix the observation vector forward model Observational error covariance matrix
The objective function J is a weighted least square fit ; the model state which minimizes the J provide an optimal estimate if the error covariances B and R known and are defined by normal probability distribution.
Solution Algorithm Solve series of simpler problems with some nonlinear components eliminated Outer iteration, inner iteration structure Outer iteration QC More complete forward model Inner iteration Preconditioned conjugate gradient Often simpler forward model Variational QC Solution used to start next outer iteration Possibly lower resolution
Atmospheric analysis problem (Practical) Outer (K) and Inner (L) iteration operators
Variable
Temperature surface obs. at 2m
K operator
3-D sigma interpolation adjustment to different orography
L operator
3-D sigma interpolation Below bottom sigma assumed at bottom sigma
Wind surface obs. at 10m over land, 20m over ocean, except scatt.
3-D sigma interpolation 3-D sigma interpolation reduction below bottom reduction below bottom level using model factor level using model factor Integrated layers from forecast model 2-D interpolation Linearized model physics Radiances Full
Ozone used as layers Integrated layers from forecast model Surface pressure Precipitation Radiances 2-D interpolation plus orography correction Full model physics Radiances Full
IRSP4-Oceansat-I
IRS-P4 / MSMR Launched 1999 Swath 1360 Km 6.6 , 10.6 , 18 and 21 G Hz (V, H) Over data sparse oceanic region ( 150 km grid data used ) Surface wind speed Total precipitable water content The operational assimilation code was modified for including the ocean surface wind speeds and TPWC from the microwave channel retrievals in GDAS. The changes were extended to DMSP-SSM/I
Satellite data
Satellite data differ from many conventional data in that the observations are often indirect observations of meteorological parameters If x is the vector of meteorological parameters we are interested in and y is the observation, then y = K(x,z), where z represents other parameters on which the observationsis dependent K is the physical relationship between x, z
Satellite radiance
Example y are radiance observations, x are profiles of temperature, moisture and ozone. K is the radiative transfer equation and z are unknown parameters such as the surface emissivity(dependent on soil type, soil moisture, etc.), CO2 profile,methane profile, etc. Radiative transfer (CRTM) developed and maintained by JCSDA
Level 1B format
NOAA digital data is supplied to users in a predefined format called Level-1B format defined by NOAA. Other organizations in the world, who supply the data, follow the same format. It is a packed format and all the band data exists in a 10 bit format. The data product, in addition to video data, contains ancillary information like Earth Location Points (ELPs), solar zenith angle and calibration. All the commercially available Image Analysis Packages have the facility to read data in Level-1B format. The current Level-1B format has been modified from NOAA 15 data onwards. The new format is called NOAA KLM format. The data in this format can be read on any system. All variables are declared as integers. The real values are also converted into integers with scaling factor. The earlier format had some problems regarding real numbers ie., ELPs, calibration values etc. They followed either IEEE or VAX floating point format. Only the latest versions of image analysis packages have the facility to read the data in this format. Older versions will not have this feature.
The raw counts in the level 1b files are transformed using the calibration coefficients in the data file to antenna temperatures and then to brightness temperatures (for AMSU-A data) using the algorithm of Mo (1999). Then, the following data is extracted from orbital data is then binned in 6 hour periods (+/3hrs) of the analysis time for use in the assimilation system
year month day hour Minute second Latitude Longiude Satellite id Sensor id Scan element Land/sea flag Satellite Zenith angle Solar Zenith angle Surface elevation Satellite height Brightness Temp. of each channel
AMSU/A
Total number of channels 15 Chs 11-14 are not used because of vertical resolution of the forecast model. Because of difficulties in estimating the surface emissivities and surface skin temperature over snow/ice/land, chs 1-6 are used only on open water. Ch 1-6 and 15 are assumed contaminated by precip./ large cloud droplets,and not used if chs 13 are simulated properly.
HIRS/3
Total Channels : 20 Ch #1 and 16-20 not used Over land only channel 2 and 3 used and over ocean channel 2 to 15 are used Over ocean Ch # 4 15 used, only if the surface sensing channel 8 simulated with proper accuracy. Ch 2 and 3 in most cases are not affected by the clouds. For this reason too many channel 2 and 3 observations for the assimilation system to handle. Therefore for these channels , every 5th HIRS observation is selected.
GOES Image
NCEP and ECMWF assimilate Clear Sky Brightness Temperatures(CSBT) from GOES images. CSBT data are averaged over boxes of ~ 50 km. Each box consists of 187 (11rows by 17 columns field of view (fovs) For each box average BT for each ir band and albedo for visible band are calculated with the average clear and cloudy BTs. Additional parameters are the number of clear and cloudy fovs, center lat and long of box, center local zenith and solar zenith angles of box, land sea flag, standard deviation of average clear and cloudy BTs and two qc flags. The quality indicator flags provide information on the likelihood of a particular observation being effected by sunglint and relative quality of SST. CIMSS extract the above information from GOES image data and packs it in BUFR format and make it available.
CRTM
CRTM is updated RTM based on Optran transmittance model described bye Kleespies et al. (2004) A summary of these development works are given by Weng et al., (2005). The CRTM computing algorithms based heavily on a set of pre-prepared data sets. These data are stored in several binary files, and all loaded into the CRTM data variables during the CRTM initialisation phase.
These files may be dived into two groups: - one with data specific to a collection of sensors
a) Spectral coefficient (SpcCoeff) file. b) Optical depth (TauCoeff) coefficient file -
the other valid for all sensors or sensors in whole spectral region such as Microwave and Infrared
a) Cloud Coefficient (cloudCoeff) file : The file contains cloud optical parameters and look up tables such as mass extinction coefficients, single scattering albedo, asymmetry factors and Legendre expansion coefficients. b) Surface Emissivity coefficient (EmisCoeff) file : The file currently contains coefficients data for computing infrared ocean surface emissivity. c) Aerosol coefficient (AerosolCoeff) file : Currently it is a dummy file.
Predictor_index
Coefficients
INSAT SYSTEM
INSAT system is commissioned with launch of INSAT-1B. It is a joint venture of Depts of Space, Telecommunications,Indian Meteorological Dept., All India Radio and Doordarshan. The meteorological payload consist of Very High Resolution Radiometer(VHRR) with 2km resolution in visible and 8 km in infrared band. The INSAT space segment consists of INSAT-1D(74oE), the last of INSAT series launched in 1990s and three ISRO built satellites INSAT-2A (74oE)launched in jul,1992, INSAT-2B ( 93.5oE) launched in Jul, 1993 and INSAT- 2C launched on Dec,1995( 93.5oE). INSAT-2E launched in April,1999. It is located at 83oE and after INSAT-2B this satellite again carries meteorological payloads. It carries , a new Charge Coupled Device (CCD) camera operating in visible, near infrared, and shortwave infrared band with 1km resolution along with normal VHRR. The CCD camera is still operating while VHRR is shut off. INSAT-3B(83oE) and INSAT-3C(74oE) are exclusively communication satellites and they have been advanced to precede that of 3A to cater the immediate requirement of the extended C band capacity that was depleted due to INSAT-1D failure.
INSAT- 3A (93.5E) launched on April 2003, and Kalpana-I (74 E), launched on September 2002 , are having operational meteorological payloads at present.
INSAT-3D which is scheduled to be launched soon will first time carry a sounder along with VHRR
METSAT
VHRR on board of METSAT has capability to take images in 3 spectral bands visible, water vapor and thermal infrared. The pictures provide a spatial resolution
INSAT
The daily rainfall analysis procedure was developed to provide grided rainfall values by merging INSAT QPE and raingauge values. Experiments were conducted to include INSAT OLR data in the Global Data Analysis (GDAS) system. The satellite imagery can provide data as much better resolution, but its direct use in operational models is not yet common. This information can be used in models by generating proxy data sets such as satellite image based moisture profiles and tropical cyclone bogus. NCMRWF already tested various moisture bogusing schemes and these schemes may be used to nudge moisture in mesoscale models.
AMSUA Brightness Temperature for a typical day 15 Jul 2007. a) Satellite observed (NOAA-16 and NOAA18). B) Difference between Model simulated and Observed BTs. C) Difference between simulated BT with and no Bias correction
Impact study
A low resolution impact (T62L64) study experiment to study the impact of radiance data was conducted during monsoon-2007 period. Level 1B radiance data sets from NOAA-16 and 18 viz AMSU-A , AMSU-B and HIRS/3 data sets were used in the experiment. Experiment was conducted by running GDAF cycle with and without including radiance data sets.
Analysis increment at the first cycle of exp. 00z01Jun2007 A) no radiation B) with radiation
Mean error observed-background fields for June 2007 over Indian region
7 6 5 RMSE 4 3 2 1 0 1
3 Day