Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Felix Lu
Duke University
January 18, 2007
http://www.sandia.gov/mstc/images/galileo.gif
From wikipedia
Outline
• Motivation and background
• Radiation types and effects
• Radiation testing
• Effects on materials
• Effects on Devices
• Examples
• Mitigation techniques
• Summary http://see.msfc.nasa.gov/pf/pf.htm
2
Background & Components
• Radiation
– Degrades electrical and optical components
– Induces noise in detectors
– Induces errors and latch-ups in digital circuits
– Builds up charge in insulators
– Harmful to organisms
3
MEMS in harsh environments
• “Adverse Environment” features
– Large temperature swings
– Corrosive elements
• Materials need to be corrosion resistant and/or kept away from corrosive
elements
– Radiation
• Radiation hardened
– Remote location (not easily serviceable)
• power conservation, robustness of devices important
– Large amplitude vibrations (20 g’s)
• MEMS considered a good candidate for operation in
adverse environments (~$4-10K/lb. for launch) *
– Small, lightweight, low power, robust, low cost
– Small mass small forces (e.g. mN for 1000G)[8]
* http://http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=301 4
Radiation in space
From Solar wind and flares
• Electrons, protons, and heavy ions
From Van Allen belts
• Inner belt : primarily protons > 10-100 MeV
– Reaches in about 250 km above
Brazilian coast
• Outer belt: primarily electrons < 10 MeV
– http://www.oulu.fi/~spaceweb/textbook/radbelts.htmlMagnetosphere http://www.eas.asu.edu/~holbert/eee460/tiondose.html
Electromagnetic pulse
After Mehlitz[1] 5
* Contains also helium, heavy ions, gamma rays, electrons…(from wikipedia)
Annual Dose vs. altitude
Assuming 4 mm of
spherical aluminum
shielding
Rad =
radiation
absorbed
dose
1 rad = .01 J
per kg of
absorbing
matter (e.g.
tissue, Si, Al…)
Source: E.J. Daly, A. Hilgers, G. Drolshagen, and H.D.R. Evans, "Space Environment Analysis: Experience and Trends," ESA 1996 Symposium on Environment Modelling for
Space-based Applications, Sept. 18-20, 1996, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands
http://www.eas.asu.edu/~holbert/eee460/tiondose.html 6
Radiation Dose and Dose Rates
• Total Ionizing Dose – long term failure
• Threshold shifts
• Increased leakage currents
• Timing changes
• Units of rad (R) (radiation absorbed dose) or grays
– 1 Rad(Si) = 1 R = 100 ergs/g in silicon,
1 Gray (Gy) = 1 J/Kg = 100 R
• Dose Rate
• Effects on dose rate seem to be different for
different materials[6]
• Simulating low dose rate effects using high dose
rate irradiation is not well understood.
7
Radiation testing
• Radiation sources
– Particles (cyclotron – 3 MeV to 3 GeV)*
– Low energy x-rays
• 8-160 keV
– Flash x-rays
• 250 keV x-rays, 1.4 MeV electrons
– Cobalt60 gamma source
• 2.5 Mev photons, 97 keV β particles
http://www.ilhamalqaradawi.com/ph
ysics-dept/gamma_cell.htm
9
Effects on Materials
• Mechanical properties
– Defects
– Dislocations
– Probably does not affect
much but not much data on
this.
• Electrical properties
– Oxides
– p-n junctions
– SOI
From Space Radiation effects on microelectronics, JPL
10
Effects on silica optical fiber
http://www.fiber-optics.info/fiber-history.htm
11
Effects on electronic devices
• Transient errors
• Single Event Effects (SEEs)
– Single ions hitting the device
• Single Event Upsets (SEUs) SEL – Single event Latchup
After Mehlitz [1] SEB – Single event burnout
– flipped bits SEFI – Single event function interrupt
• Charging
http://www.aero.org/publications/crosslink/summer2003/03.html
12
Effects on Devices and circuits
Radiation induced photocurrent
shorts out Vdd
http://www.aero.org/publications/cr
osslink/summer2003/03.html
13
Transient Effects
http://www.aero.org/publications/crosslink/summer2003/03.html
http://www.ieee-uffc.org/freqcontrol/quartz/vig/vigrad.htm
14
Example of clamping circuit
Protected node
Protecting node
Protected node
If particle causes protected gate (G) to turn on:
D2 turns on and clamps voltage
15
Effect on mechanical properties of
materials
• Not much published data on effect of
radiation on mechanical properties
• Shea[8] says that:
– “even at high end of space mission doses, the
mechanical properties of silicon and metals
are mostly unchanged (Young’s modulus,
yield strength not significantly affected).”
16
MEMS piston actuator [2]
• Under low energy X-rays and gamma rays
– 250, 500, 750, 1000 krad (Si)
No change with
Gamma rays:
Attributed to energy
being deposited in
silicon substrate –
away from actuators.
17
Effects on MEMS piston actuator [2]
– X-ray irradiated samples under positive and negative
bias
• +: increased voltage/deflection
• -: decreased voltage/deflection
18
Mitigation techniques and tradeoffs
• Shielding
– High density material (HDM) , e.g. Lead
• not always practical due to weight
• Bremsstrahlung radiation from HDM may be
harmful due to short wavelengths from
secondary emission. [J.H. Adams, “The variability of single event
upsets rate sin the natural environment”, IEE Trans. On Nuclear Science, vol., NS-30,
no.6, Dec 1983]
• Material structure
– Semiconductor on Insulator (SOI)
• Reduced bulk material reduces e-h pairs From Space Radiation Effects in microelectronics,
JPL/NASA
generated by passing particles.
19
Mitigation techniques and tradeoffs
• Minimizing use of dielectrics
– Trapped charge causes permanent electric field
• Software
– Periodic scanning programs to catch errors
– Eat up CPU cycles and slow down the system
20
Summary
• TID, dose rate, radiation type(s) depend
on orbit.
• Techniques for mitigating detrimental
effects are available but no panacea is
offered
• Radiation induced effects are often
complex and difficult to model – mitigation
done on a case by case basis.
21
References
1. Peter C. Mehlitz, John Penix, “Expect the unexpected – Radiation hardened software”, 2005, Intelligent systems Division, AMES
Research center, http://ic.arc.nasa.gov/ase/papers/AIAA05/rhs.pdf
2. J.R. Caffey and P. E. Kladitis, “The Effects of ionizing radiation on microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) actuators: electrostatic,
electrothermal, and Bimorph”, 2004 IEEE, p. 133-6
3. “Space Radiation effect in microelectronics”, Presented by the Radiation effects group; Sammy Kayali, Section Manager,
http://parts.jpl.nasa.gov/docs/Radcrs_Final.pdf
4. Brian Stark (Editor), “MEMS Reliability Assurance guidelines for Space Applications”, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, JPL Publication 99-
1, 1999; http://parts.jpl.nasa.gov/docs/JPL%20PUB%2099-1.pdf
5. Mario Jorge Moura David, “Low Dose Rate Effects in scintillating and WLS fibers by ionizing radiation”, Masters Thesis, University of
Lisbon, 1996
6. http://nepp.nasa.gov/photonics/spietre/reffects.htm
7. H. Henschel, O. Kohn, U. Weinand,” A new radiation hard optical fiber for high dose values”, IEEE Trans. On Nuc. Sci, vol. 49, no. 3,
2002, pg. 1432
8. Madsen, Anne; Design Techniques for the prevention of radiation induced latchup in bulk CMOS processes, 1995, Naval
postgraduate school
9. Herbert R. Shea, “Reliability of MEMS for space applications”, Reliability, Packaging, Testing and Characterization of
MEMS/MOEMS V, edited by Danele M. Tanner, Rajeshuni, Ramesham, Proc. Of SPIE Vol 6111, 61110A, (2006)
10. Rajesh Garg, Nikhil Jayakumar, Sunil P. Khatri, Gwan Choi, “A Design Approach for radiation hard digital electronics”, DAC 2006,
July 24.28, 2006, San Francisco, California, USA, p. 773
22