Professional Documents
Culture Documents
STATE OF INDIANA, )
Plaintiff, )
vs. )
)
KAY KIM, )
Defendants. )
Comes now the Defendant, Kay Kim, Pro Se filed her Defendant’s Response to State's
Answer to Defendant’s Motion for Production of Evidence filed on April 28, ‘09 on this 29th Day
- The State is unclear what the “Event Hisory Detail” from the Sheriff’s
Department is.
1. For the record, Defendant, Kay Kim, Pro Se requested-Subpoena Duces Tecum
from Marion County Sheriff Communicaition Department for “Event History Detail” and
through this court to make sure that the copy has to provide which is the 911, any and all
Page 1 Of 4
IN CM4 Def RESPONSE to State's ANSWER to Def Motion for PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE CM254608 FILED-28APR09
29APR09 faxed
PREVIOUSLY FACSIMILIED TRANSMISSION ON 29APR09
(emergenty & non-emergenty) of all records on the day of the alleged incident on November 6,
2. For the record, individual’s non-party phone records has been Subpoena thru this
discovery/disclosure – phone records of the State’s Witnesses which vital to prove Defendant’s
innocent and State’s witnesses and State of Indiana’s criminal conspiracy against the Defendant,
4. Defendant, Kay Kim, Pro Se, Demand that the court to order to produce the phone
records as I reqeusted from the State’s witnesses – Rhonda Heath, Patricia Ladenthin & Linda
Handlon.
such phone records cannot be made without State of Indiana’s full cooperation due to they are
the “party” of the State of Indiana as a “witness” and only State of Indiana can provide and order
to provide all the information necessary to Subpoena the records. Having said that, Defendant,
Kay Kim, Pro Se will provide written interrogatories to the State’s witnesses – “party” to either
“party”. Threrefore, Deputy Prosecutor Andrew Wignall found out and produce the records that
the Defendant has requested which on the day of alledged incident and got arrested on November
6, 2008 which one of most important evidence for its due process.
Page 2 Of 4
IN CM4 Def RESPONSE to State's ANSWER to Def Motion for PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE CM254608 FILED-28APR09
29APR09 faxed
PREVIOUSLY FACSIMILIED TRANSMISSION ON 29APR09
request the deny of the Defendant’s request of “Event History Detail” and phone records from
non-party and party which are evidence in the cause. It is absolutey necessary to have all and any
phone records from the party and non-party to prove/show the Defendant’s innocent and State’s
witnesses and State of Indiana’s criminal conspiracy against the Defendant, Kay Kim, Pro Se.
For the record that Deputy Prosecutor Andrew Wignallis engaged in criminal conspiracy intent
against the Defendant, Kay Kim, Pro Se. Defendant Kay Kim, Pro Se respectfully requests that
the Court to take appropriate action against the Deputy Prosecutor Andrew Wignall for
Respectfully submitted
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been delivered to the
court F8 and prosecutor (‘box by F8 clerk) either by U.S. First Class Mail, FAX or server.
Page 3 Of 4
IN CM4 Def RESPONSE to State's ANSWER to Def Motion for PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE CM254608 FILED-28APR09
29APR09 faxed
PREVIOUSLY FACSIMILIED TRANSMISSION ON 29APR09
200 East Washington St.,
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Indianapolis, IN 46254
P#317-327-6652
Page 4 Of 4
IN CM4 Def RESPONSE to State's ANSWER to Def Motion for PRODUCTION OF EVIDENCE CM254608 FILED-28APR09
29APR09 faxed