You are on page 1of 2

6/18/13

News: Nobody knows who he works


Publish

Raquel deny Protoescribidora. WRITING MULERA

Nobody knows who he works


Are social networks promote terrorism?
PUBLISHED: JUNE 17, 2013

When transmitting real-time news, social networks are not without a focus of attention for a whole day. Nothing is more desirable for a political or social group that aims to impart terror attention. And this is only the first of several benefits that social networks could have for terrorists. Thanks to Pajamas Surf, here the note. During the hunt that the FBI and CIA conducted to arrest the suspects in the recent attacks in Boston, the police department of the city asked people to refrain from sharing through social networks the location of the police units, both to avoid compromising their own safety to warn suspects not. The phenomenon is not new. Max Abrahms, a researcher specializing in the subject, says that what is sought in the academic space is "knowing the reasons for the terrorist. [We know that] to deprive terrorism of any utility. If we take courage to committing terrorism, [this] would not be done. "This is because, according to Abrams, that" one of the main goals of the terrorists is to gain attention. By its own definition, terrorism needs an audience ... Social networking certainly spread the message of the terrorists much faster and to more people. " And is that journalism has been around since the crimes English anarchist cafes planted bombs in London in the late nineteenth century: what is the proper treatment of information? Does being informed go hand in hand with fear, and
redaccion.lamula.pe/2013/06/17/nadie-sabe-para-quien-trabaja/kelito/ 1/2

6/18/13

News: Nobody knows who he works

indirectly to promote a state of tension between the people who read the news? A few months ago, Christopher Dorner (a police officer who allegedly sought revenge for a corruption case where his name was sullied definitely) issued a long manifesto through Facebook, even though the media would pay attention, was the ripple effect of social networks which ultimately allowed Dorner made a brief and terrible fame after he hunted one by one of those involved in his disgrace. Even in large-scale terrorism means are involved: according to statements of special forces found and killed Osama Bin Laden, this would have been looking at his own image on TV when the team stormed the room. Advertising and echo of the media results in useful for terrorism to the extent that broadcasts your message, or simply left unattended. In that sense, real-time updates on networks like Twitter can be harmful, however, is that users understand that everyone is both editor while information reader, and that what we put in the Social networking has an impact, whether at least in the perception of the information received by the people around us. We are both producers and disseminators of information: our role in this new era of journalism is to inform and adopt decentralized journalistic practices (check several sources, do not spread rumors, etc..) Just to filter such information availability. Whether or disturbed individuals innocuous information, each user of social media has a responsibility in this new state transferable rhizomatic information transmission.

Me gusta

Tw ittear

CULTURE

AND SO CIAL NETWO RK S

TERRORISM

A bout la mula

Priva c y Polic y

T e rms a nd c onditions

He lp

Fa c e book

T witte r

Y outube

redaccion.lamula.pe/2013/06/17/nadie-sabe-para-quien-trabaja/kelito/

2/2

You might also like