Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 2 3 4 5 6 What Are the 6 Ss? Sound Pressure Sound Materials Sound Power Sound Source Identification Sound Quality Source-Path-Receiver
Sound Engineering
Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..
The Real world! Youre either meeting the requirements or youre not
What material should I use to reduce the levels? Sound Materials + Components
absorption, transmission loss in-tube, in-situ, in-room
Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track
Sound Quality
Youve met your requirements and now want to improve the sound quality
You have not met your requirements and need to solve them fast
Source Identification
Source Ranking
Solution
Receiver
Path
Source
Receiver
Sound Pressure Sound Quality
Path
Sound Intensity Sound Source Localization Sound Materials+Components
Source
Sound Power
Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..
Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track
Sound Pressure
What is Sound? Speed of Sound Period and Frequency Wavelength Pressure and Decibels Frequency Content
Octave and third Octave Bands A-, B-, C- and D-weighting Interference Combining Sources
= cT =
c f
Freq 34 Hz
1 f= T
340 Hz 3400 Hz
= cT =
c f
Propagation of Sound
Diffraction
Diffraction is the bending of a sound wave around the edges of obstructions (barrier, opening,) in the path of the wave Bending due to diffraction is highly selective with respect to frequency Long wavelength, low frequency sounds are less affected by barriers and openings than short wavelength, high frequency sounds Examples: Highway barriers fail in reducing low frequency truck noise If music is played in a joining room with a partially intervening partition, the bass portion will dominate behind the barrier Diffraction around human head
shadow beam
PAIN THRESHOLD
HEARING DOMAIN
80 70 Adult male 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
MUSIC
Adult Female
Children
SPEECH
effects of diffraction at high frequencies : (a) behind a barrier, (b) through an opening
Sound pressure level Instrumentation Sound Pressure Level (dB reference = 20*10-6 Pa or 2e-05)
SPL = 20. log10 (
0 dB 94 dB
RMS pressure
20*10-6 Pa 1 Pa 20 Pa
120 dB
? ?
Sound Source 1 2 Pa = 100 dB Sound Source 2 2 Pa = 100 dB Source 1 + Source 2 4 Pa = 106 dB 100 dB + 100 dB = 106 dB!
* Assume coherent sources
Sound Source 1 10 Pa = 113 dB Sound Source 2 2 Pa = 100 dB Source 1 + Source 2 12 Pa = 115.5 dB 113 dB + 100 dB = 115.5 dB
* Assume coherent sources
Sound Source 1 10 Pa = 113 dB Sound Source 2 2 Pa = 100 dB Sound Source 3 2 Pa = 100 dB Source 1 + Source 2 + Source 3* 14 Pa = 116.9 dB 113 dB + 100 dB + 100 dB = 116.9 dB
* Assume coherent sources
Coherent vs
60.0e-6
* In Phase
Pa Amplitude
2.00
0.00
* In Phase
Pa Amplitude
0.20
0.11
0.11
0.20 Pa Amplitude
Overall Level of Random Signal1: 100 dB Overall Signal of Random Signal2: 100 dB Summation of Random Signals Overall Level: 103 dB 0.28 Pa Amplitude 0.11 0.00 Hz 24000.00
Rules of Thumb
A-Weighting
Filter with similar attributes to ear Simple curve shape, attenuates low frequencies 1000 Hz - no gain/attenuation, used for microphone cals
Basic Acoustics
A-,B-,C- and D-weighting
BACKUP
A-weighting corresponds to the 40-phone curve, i.e. the equal loudness contour which passes 40 dB at 1 kHz. Is most often used B- and C-weighting are similar to A-weighting in concept, but correspond to the 70- and 100-phone equal loudness contours D-weighting has been introduced for the purpose of measuring aircraft noise. It attributes more significance to the 1-10 kHz region
1/1 70%
1/3 23%
1/12 6%
Center Frequency (Hz) 50 100 200 400 800 1600 3150 6300 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 80 160 315 630 1250 2500 5000
8000 10000
gain (dB)
frequency (Hz)
X2
Basic Acoustics
Octave and third Octave Bands
Octave bands
Grouping frequencies in octave bands provides a crude form of analysis suited for broadband sounds, which do not contain dominant frequencies The word octave is borrowed from music where it refers to a span of eight notes (do to do). The frequency ratio of the highest note to the lowest one in an octave is 2:1 The reference octave band: 1000 Hz as centre frequency The octave band centre frequencies have the following relation to the 1000 Hz band: f c = 1000.10 0.3 N = 1000.2 N
with N = ,-2,-1,0,1,2,
Basic Acoustics
BACKUP
BACKUP
31.5
The third octave band centre frequencies have the following relation to the 1000 Hz band:
1
63
f c = 1000.100.1N = 1000.(2 3 ) N
Band limiting frequencies:
125
250
f lower = 10 0.05.f c
f upper = 100.05. f c
500
1000
The mean square pressure of a sound, described in octave or third octave bands, is the sum of the mean square pressures of the different bands:
p = pi
_ _
i =1
8000
16000
The spectral density of an octave or third octave band, i.e. the mean square pressure per Hz, is found by dividing the mean square pressure in that band by the bandwidth
0.15
Propagation of Sound
Anechoic Room
Propagation of Sound
Semi-anechoic Room
Highly absorbing surfaces Source radiates as in a free field Almost no reverberation To measure: sound power of source directivity pattern of radiating source Anechoic rooms are more effective at high than at low frequencies. The lowest frequency at which an anechoic room can be used depends on the room volume and the depth of the wedges A very large room (several ms) with 1-2 m wedges is effective down to 100 Hz
anechoic room
To test sources that are normally mounted on or operate in the presence of a reflecting surface (e.g. cars,)
Propagation of Sound
Reverberation Room
High-reflecting, non-parallel walls Diffuse field: nearly uniform sound intensity To measure: sound power of sources Sound absorptive properties of materials Sound transmission through building elements
typical reverberation room
Sound Source Sound path
Other Terms
NearField FarField
At low frequencies, the frequency response to wide-band noise shows several peaks corresponding to the room modes. At higher frequencies, the individual modes begin to overlap and are less obvious To make the room response more uniform at lower frequencies, low-frequency sound absorptive elements and rotating diffusers are often used
node
anti-node
first harmonic: = 2L
second harmonic: = L
third harmonic: =
2L 3 2L 4
fifth harmonic: =
2L 5
nodes:
destructive interference
for
2L n
f =
nc 2L
Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..
Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track
Sound Pressure Not a predictable indicator of strength of source Sound Power is the Universal Acoustic metric Quantifies the acoustic potential of an object independent of: Environment Operator distance Acoustic field Can be used to predict sound pressure Preferred use Certification
Blue Angel, GOSH, UL, OSHA, The European Union's Council Directive 86/594/EEC, The Noise Emission Directive 2000/14/EC, Human Vibration Directive 2002/44/EC, Noise at Work Directive 2003/10/EC
Sound path
Sound Source
Pressure based
Regulations
Comply with target specification Comply with Market Specifications Declaration of certification
Intensity based
Intensity Probe ISO 9614 Complex & time consuming More engineering inside
Regulations
Microphones around object ISO 37xx-series fast & easy One number
Comparison
Compare equipment (same / different types) Compare with competitive product Purchasing parameter in the selection process
Product Engineering
Engineering
Verification of the developed product Indicator for developing quieter product Quality control in production
Product Comparison
Quantification Certification
The EU has created following directives dealing with noise and vibration in the working environment Human Vibration Directive 2002/44/EC Noise at Work Directive 2003/10/EC Noise Emission Directive 2000/14/EC Implemented in national legislation by 2010 (2014 for agriculture and forestry) Pressure on manufacturers and suppliers New quality norm can be competitive advantage Can become a branding identity Often products must be ISO certified Pressure on end-user or employer Limit daily exposure of employees to noise/vibration Switch to tools generating less noise/vibration
Hierarchy of Standards
Market definition Operating condition of test object Limits or label? Reporting templates Calculation microphone setup precision environmental correction
Market specific: - products - industries - regions - customer (internal) Hand-held power tools
Non-electrical (ISO 15744 (pneumatic, hydraulic)), Electrical ,Electrical safety test, splash proof test, drop test, sound power test,
Instrumentation
Keyboards Personal computers Workstations Card readers Printers & scanners Punchers Tape storage units Disk storage units Displays Facsimile machines
Standard defines how to determine sound-power Measure pressure at by-stander position How to handle: impulsiveness & tonal components How to average different operating conditions of a printer or copier Blue angel quality label for Computer (based on
compliance with ISO 7779)
Must comply to sell in Europe Strong impact on importing regions Sets reference on exporting regions
Electronic units (processors, electronic memories and controllers, containing electronic circuits, power supplies with cooling parts) Microform readers Self service automatic teller machines Enclosures or rack systems
Measurement Overview
Microphones spread over a surface enveloping the test object (typically half-spherical) Calculate sound power
Experimental setup
1 Lw = 10 log N
10
i =1
0.1L'pi
S K1 K 2 + 10 log S 0
Calibration
Average pressure over microphones K1 correction for background noise At least 6 db above background Recommend is 15 dB above background K2 correction for test environment Reverberation increases SPL S area of measurement surface (S0= 1m2) Measurement distance decreases SPL
Measurement
ISO Report
Experimental setup
Calibration
Microphone selection
As specified in IEC60651 , IEC60805 (accuracy, stability & frequency
response)
Measurement
Sensitivity must not change more than 0.2 dB during test period
Environmental parameters
K2 correction a measure of reverberation decay time Calculation methods: - Measure reverb time according to ISO 3741 - Comparison method (ISO 3741) - Approximation method (ISO 3744) Temperature & static pressure
ISO Report
Experimental setup
Experimental setup
Calibration
Calibration
Measurement
Measurement
ISO Report
ISO Report
Acoustical calibrator:
Accuracy of +/- 0.5 dB Verification once a year (at least)
Calibration
Measurement
Extra flexibilities
Auto detection of microphones Audible & visual feedback Tolerance on calibration value Comparison with previous values ISO Report
General Definitions
Experimental setup
Test duration
30 seconds for f 100 - 160 Hz 10 seconds for f 200 Hz Repetitive operation cycles; minimum of 3 cycles Varying operation cycles; total sequence Calibration
Measurement
Background noise Lb
Measurement when the equipment is not operating Subtract from the operational situation Lc (at each measurement points and each frequency band) Correction is required if 6 dB > Lb <15 dB of Lc ISO Report
10
i =1
0.1 L'pi
S K1 K 2 + 10 log S0
General Definitions
General Definitions
correction for background noise correction for test environment (reflecting planes) area of the measurement surface in m2 reference surface areas 1m2
Experimental setup
Experimental setup
Calibration
Measurement control
Start / Stop / Record / Accept & Reject Automatic data storage & management Simultaneous verses batch measurement Parallel measurements (e.g. throughput)
Calibration
Measurement
Measurement
ISO Report
Discrete tones
To identify tones masked by the noise in the critical band Determine discrete tone prominent if 10 dB above the audibility threshold
Operating modes
Expert / standard operator Password protection
General Definitions
Environment
Dimensions and physical properties of the test room Acoustical qualification of the test room (as described in ISO) Temperature, humidity & pressure
Experimental setup
Calibration Instrument
Test equipment (name, type, S/N, manufacturer) Acquisition specifications (bandwidth, frequency response, etc) Calibration of microphones
Measurement
Data
Microphone locations, background noise, LP (per Octave), LW (per Octave), tabular & plot of the corrected LW , impulsiveness, discrete tones, directivity index, data annotations (time & date).
ISO Report
Final statement
State full conformity with the procedure
LMS Intensity
Receiver
Sound Pressure Sound Quality
Path
Sound Intensity Sound Source Localization Sound Materials+Components
Source
Sound Power
Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..
What is Intensity?
What material should I use to reduce the levels? Sound Materials/Components
absorption, transmission loss in-tube, in-situ, in-room
Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track
Sound intensity is the average rate of sound energy transmitted in the specified direction through a unit area (1 m2) normal to this direction at the point considered.
Intensity = Pressure x Particle Velocity Force Distance Energy Power Watts = = 2 Area Time Area Time Area m
Sound is a vector quantity that has both magnitude and direction, because the energy will flow in some directions but not others Intensity is dependent on the sources properties and the distance from the source
Measurement Equipment
Mic Signal Conditioning Card for SCADAS III USB Remote for Test.Lab
Spacers
Sound Power Determination Noise Source Localization: Mapping and Ranking Transmission Loss of Structures Sound Absorption of Materials and Structures Specific Acoustic Impedance Measurements Measurement of Radiation Efficiency of Sources
Grade of Accuracy
PRII Measurement
Intensity Analysis
Overall Intensity Level of Speaker from 100 to 4100Hz
Source Identification
Once you identity your issue (either via Sound Power or Sound Quality) you need to find the source Multiple techniques are available today Sound Pressure Mapping Not very accurate Time consuming Sound Intensity Mapping Very accurate and well accepted technique Calculate Sound Power from results Time Consuming Array Acoustics Techniques Accurate results Very fast testing (typically less than a minute) Compelling graphical output NAH, Beamforming, and Focalization
Strengths
Allows measurement of energy flow (intensity = vector quantity) No influence of environment: what flows in from one side flows out from another side can cope with extraneous noise (other sources in the background) no need for special test room (anechoic, semi-anechoic or reverberant room) or specific test conditions
Weaknesses
Frequency range is limited compared to measurements based on sound pressure Time consuming, requires experienced personnel Expensive equipment compared to free field microphones
Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..
Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track
Intensity Measurements
Positive Supported by ISO/ANSI standards Widely accepted and used in industry Supports Power Calculations Negative expensive intensity probe measurements normally in far-field (low spatial resolution) TIME CONSUMING for troubleshooting
Holography
Predominant 10 years ago Array bigger than object High frequencies require high mics
Beamforming
Array smaller than object Double frequency for same mics Far field only Poor spatial resolution at low freq
Focalization
Same as Beamforming Extend to Nearfield
Holography vs focalization
NAH
Focalization
Solution: Use NAH for LF Double the frequency range on the SAME data by using focalization
What is Beamforming?
Assumption: antenna measures planar waves => Farfield measurement Time signal simultaneously recorded at a number of microphones Source
What is Focalization?
Assumption: antenna is in the near-field => measures spherical waves => Time signal simultaneously recorded at a number of microphones
What is Focalization?
Assumption: antenna is in the near-field => measures spherical waves => Time signal recorded at a number of microphones
s (t )
S Rj D
1 N
p j (t j ) with j = d cos
j =1
S ( f ) Pj ( f )e
j =1
ikR j
with kRj = 2f j
SNAP ON MICS
Source Identification
dB A(P a) 100 89 81
40
Structural Noise Problem Accurate FE Model Correlation and Pre-Test Aero Acoustic Problem CFD based Input Accurate Loads CAE based Loads Test Based Loads Or a combination
Solutions: Simple box or sphere mesh generated in software used for trucks & trains Picture wrapped around mesh Library of simple meshes for different car interiors Import mesh generated with other program Special sheet to position sphere against mesh/picture LMS offers the best solution on the market with respect to: Visualization Interactivity Accuracy (from a geometry and technological viewpoint)
Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..
Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track
The next step in product characterization make your product sound better When just having the quietest product is not enough The Sound Power values are the same but this product sounds better Quantifies the human perception of product sound Psychology + Acoustics = Psychoacoustics Varies based on age, demographics, socio-economic status, etc Can be used as a Brand Recognition differentiator
Fridge A
Fridge C
Source-Path-Receiver
Transfer path Analysis Acoustic Source Quantification Vibro-acoustic modal analysis
Fridge B
Sounds right Looks right
Perceived Quality
BINAURAL HEAD
BINAURAL HEAD
Mic1 Mic2
Binaural = 2 Ears
Digital, Not Analog SPDIF or AES-EBU Embedded information on 16th bit: Sound Field (DF, ID, FF) Range (94 db, 104 db, etc)
On VS8 Card, last two channels can switch between Analog and Digital to read Head data directly
Sound Metrics
Sound Metrics
Subjective Testing: A Story Noise problem for IT server design 10 servers chosen for jury testing - 5 good/5 bad 30 people listen - rate on scale of 1 to 10
Engineers sent from fan supplier How do their ratings compare to others? Worse Same Better
Sound Metrics
Sound Metrics
Getting closer to product launch date How do the ratings compare to previously? Worse Same Better
Better!
Sound Metrics
Sound Metrics
Getting closer to vehicle launch date How do the ratings compare to previous?
Sound Metrics attempt to predict the subjective response of people in an objective manner The field is still evolving, known also as psychoacoustics
Better!
Loudness
200 Hz
A-Weighting
Loudness
Filter with similar attributes to ear Simple curve shape, attenuates low frequencies 1000 Hz - no gain/attenuation, used for microphone cals
6 dB -> Twice the amplitude (sound pressure) 76 dB vs. 70 dB 60 dB vs. 54 dB Not intuitive that 6 dB (or 10 dB perceived) is twice as loud
Loudness - Mark VI
Stevens Mark VI
frequency (Hz)
Loudness
Articulation Index
What does the sum of a 400 Hz sine wave and 405 Hertz sine wave look like? What do you hear? Measure of Modulation Fluctuation 0-20 Hz, Max at 4 Hz Roughness 20-300 Hz, Max at 70 Hz
Engine Harmonics
Lets take two sweeping sine tones over 10 secs: 10 Hz to 100 Hz 11 Hz to 110 Hz
110
600 Hz
600
500 Hz
300 Hz
4th order
200 Hz
60 Hz 50 Hz
150 Hz 100 Hz
1 Hz!
0 0 seconds 10
40 Hz 30 Hz 20 Hz 15 Hz 10 Hz0
6000
Quantifying subjective quality on statistical basis Understand how quality perception depends on the profile of the listener Correlation of objective measurements with subjective quality perception
All possible pairs from a set of stimuli are exposed to the jury in random-like sequence For every pair, subjects are asked to indicate which stimulus (A or B) is superior for some given criterion Pro : Possible with multiple subjects Works fine for naive subjects Easy method for analysis Contra : Limited to about 15 stimuli Test takes a lot of time
A B C D E F G A B C D E F G Total 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 -
9 Sound samples 5 original samples Vehicle 2 with orders 2.5 & 5.5 boosted Vehicle 2 with resonance filtered out Vehicle 4 with increased loudness Vehicle 4 with orders 3, 6 and 9 boosted Conditioning Equalization for equal global loudness
1 1
0 0 0
4 5 1 6
Consistency Compared to Self Concordance Compared to Group Eliminate inconsistent people from final analysis!
Juror 8
Juror 9
Juror 20
Juror 2
Juror 4
0.8000
Total
0.7000 Concordance 0.6000 0.5000 0.4000 0.3000 0.2000 0.1000 0.0000 0.00
Experience Briefed Vehicle 1 Vehicle 1 Modif 1 Vehicle 2 Vehicle 3 Vehicle 4 Vehicle 5 Vehicle 5 Modif 2
3 No 3 5 4 2 1 6 7
0 No 2 4 6.5 1 4 4 6.5
0 No 3 5 4 1 2 7 6
0 Yes 3 5 7 2 1 5 5
3 No 3 4 7 2 1 6 5
0 0 0 Yes Yes Yes 2.5 6.5 1 1 6.5 4.5 7 3 7 2.5 3 2.5 4 1 2.5 5.5 5 6 5.5 3 4.5
0 No 3 1 7 2 5 6 4
10 No 7 6 1 3 3 5 3
1 1 0 1 0 0 Ins. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 5 3 6.5 6.5 6 7 6 1 6.5 4.5 5 3 4 6 1.5 6.5 7 2 2 4 3 1 1.5 1 1 2 1.5 4.5 3.5 5 3 7 4 3 1.5 4 7 5 5 2 3.5
3 4 5 1 2 7 6
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
Consistency
A linear model
Convert jury testing scores to a real valued function Bradley-Terry model to map jury test results onto this scale.
Juror 10 Juror 12 Juror 13 Juror 15 Juror 19 Juror 2 Juror 5 Juror 8 Juror 9 Juror 20 Total 3 4 5 1 2 7 6
3 5 4 1 2 7 6
2 5 4 2 2 6 7
3 5 4 2 1 6 7
2 4 6.5 1 4 4 6.5
3 5 4 1 2 7 6
3 5 7 2 1 5 5
3 4 7 2 1 6 5
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
0 1 1 9 8 0 0
9 0 6 9 10 4 0
9 4 0 10 10 4 5
1 1 0 0 4 0 1
2 0 0 6 0 0 1
10 6 6 10 10 0 6
10 10 5 9 9 4 0
Vehicle-1 modif 1
Vehicle 5 modif 1
% Ord 12 PSIL PSIL/Zwicker) SIL AI % half Imp_Peak %half/%even % oth even Sharpness % odd Order 8 %even/%odd Order 12 Imp_OccRate %even/(%half+%odd) SB Imp_RiseRate Order 4 Odd Roughness Imp_Duration CRP Half % Ord 8 Other Even % even Fluct_strength % Ord 4
0.0104 63.38 1.87 58.65 0.53 0.19 0.21 0.74 0.03 0.74 0.09 52.85 2.92 49.46 8.35 0.93 29.94 5958.48 63.37 57.07 0.23 0.00 70.35 60.09 0.03 49.51 0.26 0.17 0.19
0.0114 63.98 1.88 59.25 0.51 0.15 0.19 0.53 0.02 0.76 0.09 59.04 3.10 55.63 8.80 1.18 28.19 5742.97 69.62 62.94 0.19 0.00 70.38 64.65 0.03 55.06 0.28 0.20 0.21
0.0114 63.43 1.87 58.76 0.51 0.15 0.10 0.53 0.02 0.77 0.09 59.04 3.10 55.63 7.73 1.18 34.77 6180.26 69.62 62.94 0.15 0.00 72.91 64.65 0.03 55.06 0.28 0.16 0.21
0.0063 62.68 1.85 57.66 0.54 0.22 0.21 0.75 0.02 0.77 0.05 55.97 5.43 53.46 7.22 1.07 32.58 8062.36 68.51 62.60 0.16 0.00 72.29 67.83 0.02 57.36 0.29 0.14 0.24
0.0058 63.33 1.87 58.58 0.51 0.28 0.14 1.13 0.03 0.77 0.10 60.80 2.43 52.38 4.81 0.65 34.54 4241.61 68.27 66.52 0.17 0.00 73.40 69.76 0.06 60.10 0.25 0.14 0.15
0.0112 64.83 1.90 60.28 0.45 0.18 0.12 0.70 0.02 0.86 0.10 60.93 2.58 53.35 7.06 0.92 31.25 5297.64 67.17 64.41 0.18 0.00 72.89 67.68 0.04 58.20 0.26 0.13 0.19
0.0111 64.80 1.91 60.90 0.43 0.18 0.12 0.70 0.02 0.87 0.10 60.62 2.58 53.03 7.26 0.92 29.96 5555.82 66.86 64.10 0.18 0.00 72.81 67.37 0.04 57.88 0.26 0.12 0.19
-0.88 -0.84 -0.83 -0.82 0.78 0.73 0.68 0.65 0.63 -0.62 -0.53 -0.51 0.49 -0.46 -0.39 -0.38 0.32 0.23 -0.16 -0.15 0.10 -0.09 -0.09 0.07 -0.06 -0.03 -0.03 0.01 0.01
Regression
Correlation
Vehicle -1
Vehicle 2
Vehicle 3
Vehicle 4
Vehicle 5
Physical Modifications
Metric * 100
Real Value
Unequal runner in intake manifolds Unequal runner in exhaust manifold Change firing order of engine Presents packaging challenge Example: Transverse engine for exhaust Wraparound exhaust Modifications to transmission Requires decisions early in program
Signal Vehicle 2 Vehicle 2 modif 1 Vehicle 1 Vehicle 3 Vehicle 5 Vehicle 4 Vehicle 4 modif 1
Correlation 96%
Rear of Car
Sample A
Sample B
Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..
Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track
Absorption 2-mic transfer-function method Test on small samples or mufflers Impedance tube (Kundt tube) FRF based method ISO 354 standard
ISO 140-3
Test om larger samples or complete objects like doors 1 or 2 rooms pressure & reverberation
N.A.
Propagation of Sound
Reflection
Incident sound wave on a surface: (a) part of it is reflected (b) part is absorbed (c) part is transmitted
Reflected energy absorbed incident energy
Propagation of Sound
Absorption
absorption coefficient
100 mm 50 mm 30 mm
= 1
E reflected Eincident
< 0.1: extremely hard surfaces (e.g. steel, dense concrete,): high reflection, low absorption > 0.9: highly absorbent material (e.g. foam,): low reflection, high absorption
100
1000 0
Parallel surface: standing waves: gives large variation in sound pressure from node to anti-node
focusing standing waves and echo
Absorption characteristics of a material depend on a number of parameters: thickness, porosity, frequency, flow resistence, roughness,
echo: time delay of 0.05 s is serious enough to confuse or irritate a listener in a room Standing waves and echos can be avoided by use of rough, non-parallel, acoustically soft walls
Concave surface
foam
Propagation of Sound
Transmission
Transmission coefficient (-):
E transmitte d E incident
Absorption 2-microphones
sound insulation against environmental noise
1 TL = 10 log( )
transfer-function method ISO 10534-2 and ASTM E1050 Sound Transmission Loss
TL is a measure of the noise reduction in decibels for specific frequency ranges. In general, there is a better sound insulation at higher frequencies
Cases: thick concrete wall: high resistance to passage of sound, high sound reduction index TL thin plaster wall: low resistance to passage of sound, low sound reduction index TL
Hz
4-microphone
Transfer Matrix method
Impedance tube
Covers a wide frequency range with only 1 tube/measurements: 50 - 5700 Hz Design for optimal signal/noise quality High signal: Stable & distortion free JBL driver (max. 150 dB) Low Noise: Heavy and thick-wall brass design Tube length > 20 * diameter (required for pure plane wave) Extendible for Sound Transmission Loss
Sending room: N mics (typical 6) Source (loudspeaker) Test variance between mics in sending room (quality criteria) Overload check Receiving room Average pressure M mics Back ground noise check S/N ratio quality criteria Re-use of room reverberation characteristics
Transmission loss obtained from Sullivan & Crocker Transmission loss obtained from Virtual.Lab
40.00
/ dB