You are on page 1of 26

Outline

1 2 3 4 5 6 What Are the 6 Ss? Sound Pressure Sound Materials Sound Power Sound Source Identification Sound Quality Source-Path-Receiver

Sound Engineering

Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..

The Real world! Youre either meeting the requirements or youre not
What material should I use to reduce the levels? Sound Materials + Components
absorption, transmission loss in-tube, in-situ, in-room

Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track

Sound Power Requirement

Sound Quality
Youve met your requirements and now want to improve the sound quality

You have not met your requirements and need to solve them fast

Source Identification

Does it sound right? Why is it annoying? Sound Quality


replay/filter, psycho-acoustic metrics, objective & subjective evaluations

Where is the sound coming from? Sound Source Localization


intensity beam forming holography focalization

What is the root cause? Source? Path? Source-Path-Receiver


Transfer path Analysis Acoustic Source Quantification Vibro-acoustic modal analysis

Source Ranking

Solution

Acoustics in a Nutshell Source-Path-Receiver

Acoustics in a Nutshell Source-Path-Receiver

Receiver

Path

Source

Receiver
Sound Pressure Sound Quality

Path
Sound Intensity Sound Source Localization Sound Materials+Components

Source
Sound Power

Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..

What material should I use to reduce the levels? Sound Materials/Components


absorption, transmission loss in-tube, in-situ, in-room

Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track

LMS Sound Pressure


Does it sound right? Why is it annoying? Sound Quality
replay/filter, psycho-acoustic metrics, objective & subjective evaluations

Where is the sound coming from? Sound Source Localization


intensity beam forming holography focalization

What is the root cause? Source? Path? Source-Path-Receiver


Transfer path Analysis Acoustic Source Quantification Vibro-acoustic modal analysis

Sound Pressure

What is Sound? Physics


pressure fluctuations which propagate through an elastic medium (air, liquid, gas, solid) Any vibrating action which moves the particles of the medium (vibrating plate, loudspeaker,) may act as a sound source (=structure born noise <-> airborne noise) The pressure fluctuations are propagated through the air with the speed of sound (c = 343 m/s @ 20C)

What is Sound? Speed of Sound Period and Frequency Wavelength Pressure and Decibels Frequency Content

Octave and third Octave Bands A-, B-, C- and D-weighting Interference Combining Sources

= cT =

c f

Freq 34 Hz

Wavelength 10 meter 1.0 meter 0.1 meter

Frequency (Hz) & period (s): 20 Hz to 20,000 Hz Wavelength (m):

1 f= T

340 Hz 3400 Hz

= cT =

c f

Propagation of Sound
Diffraction
Diffraction is the bending of a sound wave around the edges of obstructions (barrier, opening,) in the path of the wave Bending due to diffraction is highly selective with respect to frequency Long wavelength, low frequency sounds are less affected by barriers and openings than short wavelength, high frequency sounds Examples: Highway barriers fail in reducing low frequency truck noise If music is played in a joining room with a partially intervening partition, the bass portion will dominate behind the barrier Diffraction around human head
shadow beam

Appendix Auditory Range


L dB 130 120 110 100 90
effects of diffraction at low frequencies : (a) behind a barrier, (b) through an opening

PAIN THRESHOLD

HEARING DOMAIN

80 70 Adult male 60 50 40 30 20 10 0

MUSIC

Adult Female

Children

SPEECH

effects of diffraction at high frequencies : (a) behind a barrier, (b) through an opening

HEARING THRESHOLD 20 Hz 50 100 200 500 1k 2k 5k 10 k 20 kHz

Sample Sound Levels

Sound pressure level Instrumentation Sound Pressure Level (dB reference = 20*10-6 Pa or 2e-05)
SPL = 20. log10 (
0 dB 94 dB
RMS pressure

p p ) = 10. log10 ( 2 ) p ref p ref


Hearing threshold 1kHz Calibration Pain threshold

20*10-6 Pa 1 Pa 20 Pa

Human hearing is rather logarithmic => dB values

120 dB

Decibel Funny Math

Example 1 Decibel Funny Math

6 dB = Double Sound Pressure Level

Sound Source 1 2 Pa = 100 dB Sound Source 2 2 Pa = 100 dB Source 1 + Source 2*?

? ?

* Assume coherent sources

Example 1 Decibel Funny Math

Example 2 Decibel Funny Math

Sound Source 1 2 Pa = 100 dB Sound Source 2 2 Pa = 100 dB Source 1 + Source 2 4 Pa = 106 dB 100 dB + 100 dB = 106 dB!
* Assume coherent sources

Sound Source 1 10 Pa = 113 dB Sound Source 2 2 Pa = 100 dB Source 1 + Source 2*?

* Assume coherent sources

Example 2 Decibel Funny Math

Example 2 Decibel Funny Math

Sound Source 1 10 Pa = 113 dB Sound Source 2 2 Pa = 100 dB Source 1 + Source 2 12 Pa = 115.5 dB 113 dB + 100 dB = 115.5 dB
* Assume coherent sources

Sound Source 1 10 Pa = 113 dB Sound Source 2 2 Pa = 100 dB Sound Source 3 2 Pa = 100 dB Source 1 + Source 2 + Source 3* 14 Pa = 116.9 dB 113 dB + 100 dB + 100 dB = 116.9 dB
* Assume coherent sources

Adding Sources Together

Summation of Coherent Sinusoidal Sound Sources


1000 Hz - Overall Level: 100 dB
2.00 Pa Amplitude

Coherent vs

100 dB (2 Pa) at 1000 Hz


0.00 Hz 2000.00

60.0e-6

1000 Hz - Overall Level: 100 dB


2.00 Pa Amplitude

+ 100 dB (2 Pa) at 1000 Hz *

Incoherent Makes a Difference!

60.0e-6 0.00 Hz 2000.00

* In Phase

Summation of Coherent Sinusoidal Sound Sources


1000 Hz - Overall Level: 100 dB
2.00 Pa Amplitude

Summation of Incoherent Sinusoidal Sound Sources


1000 Hz - Overall Level: 100 dB

0.00 0.00 Hz 2000.00

1000 Hz - Overall Level: 100 dB


2.00 Pa Amplitude

+ 100 dB (2 Pa) at 1000 Hz * =

Pa Amplitude

100 dB (2 Pa) at 1000 Hz

2.00

100 dB (2 Pa) at 1000 Hz


0.00 Hz 3000.00

0.00

+ 100 dB (2 Pa) at 2000 Hz

2000 Hz - Overall Level: 100 dB


2.00 Pa Amplitude 0.00 0.00 Hz 3000.00

0.00 0.00 Hz 2000.00

106 dB (4 Pa) Overall

Summation of Coherent Sources: 106 dB


4.01 Pa Amplitude 0.00 0.00 Hz 2000.00

* In Phase

Summation of Incoherent Sinusoidal Sound Sources


1000 Hz - Overall Level: 100 dB
2.00 Pa Amplitude

Summation of Incoherent Random Sound Sources


Overall Level of Random Signal1: 100 dB

0.00 0.00 Hz 3000.00

+ 100 dB (2 Pa) at 2000 Hz = 103 dB (2.82 Pa) Overall

Pa Amplitude

100 dB (2 Pa) at 1000 Hz

0.20

100 dB Overall Level +


0.00 Hz 24000.00
Overall Level of Random Signal2: 100 dB

0.11

100 dB Overall Level

2000 Hz - Overall Level: 100 dB


0.20 Pa Amplitude
2.00 Pa Amplitude

0.11 0.00 Hz 24000.00

0.00 0.00 Hz 3000.00

Summation of Incoherent Sources: 103 dB


2.00 Pa Amplitude 89.9e-6 0.00 Hz 3000.00

Summation of Incoherent Random Sound Sources


Overall Level of Random Signal1: 100 dB 0.20 Pa Amplitude

Decibel Funny Math

100 dB Overall Level +


0.00 Hz 24000.00 Overall Level of Random Signal2: 100 dB

6 dB = Double Sound Pressure Level 3 dB = Double Sound Power Level

0.11

100 dB Overall Level =

0.20 Pa Amplitude

0.11 0.00 Hz 24000.00

103 dB Overall Level

Overall Level of Random Signal1: 100 dB Overall Signal of Random Signal2: 100 dB Summation of Random Signals Overall Level: 103 dB 0.28 Pa Amplitude 0.11 0.00 Hz 24000.00

Rules of Thumb

A-Weighting

10 dB = Perceived twice as loud 3 dB = Minimum perceived change

Filter with similar attributes to ear Simple curve shape, attenuates low frequencies 1000 Hz - no gain/attenuation, used for microphone cals

Basic Acoustics
A-,B-,C- and D-weighting

BACKUP

Octave analysis Constant % bandwidth


1/3 octave

A-weighting corresponds to the 40-phone curve, i.e. the equal loudness contour which passes 40 dB at 1 kHz. Is most often used B- and C-weighting are similar to A-weighting in concept, but correspond to the 70- and 100-phone equal loudness contours D-weighting has been introduced for the purpose of measuring aircraft noise. It attributes more significance to the 1-10 kHz region

1/n OCTAVE filter Filter bandwidth (about % of the center frequency)


80 70 60 50 40 30 20 Octaves 16 31.5 Traces: 2/2 63

1/1 70%

1/3 23%

1/12 6%

Center Frequency (Hz) 50 100 200 400 800 1600 3150 6300 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 80 160 315 630 1250 2500 5000

Pressure dB/2e-005 [Pa]

8000 10000

12600 16000 20160

gain (dB)

125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 Frequency [Hz]

Logarithmic frequency scale

frequency (Hz)

X2

Basic Acoustics
Octave and third Octave Bands
Octave bands
Grouping frequencies in octave bands provides a crude form of analysis suited for broadband sounds, which do not contain dominant frequencies The word octave is borrowed from music where it refers to a span of eight notes (do to do). The frequency ratio of the highest note to the lowest one in an octave is 2:1 The reference octave band: 1000 Hz as centre frequency The octave band centre frequencies have the following relation to the 1000 Hz band: f c = 1000.10 0.3 N = 1000.2 N
with N = ,-2,-1,0,1,2,

Basic Acoustics
BACKUP

Octave and third Octave Bands


Third octave bands

BACKUP

31.5

The third octave band centre frequencies have the following relation to the 1000 Hz band:
1

63

f c = 1000.100.1N = 1000.(2 3 ) N
Band limiting frequencies:

with N = ,-2,-1,0,1,2, road noise third octave spectrum measured: synthesized:`

125

250

f lower = 10 0.05.f c
f upper = 100.05. f c

500

1000

Pressure and spectral density


2000 4000

The mean square pressure of a sound, described in octave or third octave bands, is the sum of the mean square pressures of the different bands:

p = pi
_ _

i =1

8000

Band limiting frequencies of octave bands:

16000

The spectral density of an octave or third octave band, i.e. the mean square pressure per Hz, is found by dividing the mean square pressure in that band by the bandwidth

flower =10 .fc

0.15

fupper =10 .fc


0.15

octave and third octave bands

Propagation of Sound
Anechoic Room

Propagation of Sound
Semi-anechoic Room

Highly absorbing surfaces Source radiates as in a free field Almost no reverberation To measure: sound power of source directivity pattern of radiating source Anechoic rooms are more effective at high than at low frequencies. The lowest frequency at which an anechoic room can be used depends on the room volume and the depth of the wedges A very large room (several ms) with 1-2 m wedges is effective down to 100 Hz
anechoic room

Flat, reflecting floor

Sound-absorptive walls and ceiling

To test sources that are normally mounted on or operate in the presence of a reflecting surface (e.g. cars,)

Roller bench inside: sound power TPA ASQ pass-by noise


semi-anechoic room with roller bench

Propagation of Sound
Reverberation Room
High-reflecting, non-parallel walls Diffuse field: nearly uniform sound intensity To measure: sound power of sources Sound absorptive properties of materials Sound transmission through building elements
typical reverberation room
Sound Source Sound path

Other Terms

NearField FarField

At low frequencies, the frequency response to wide-band noise shows several peaks corresponding to the room modes. At higher frequencies, the individual modes begin to overlap and are less obvious To make the room response more uniform at lower frequencies, low-frequency sound absorptive elements and rotating diffusers are often used

Basic Acoustics Standing Waves

node

anti-node

first harmonic: = 2L

second harmonic: = L

third harmonic: =

2L 3 2L 4

LMS Sound Power

fourth harmonic: formation of a standing wave

fifth harmonic: =

2L 5

nodes:

destructive interference

for

anti-nodes: constructive interference

2L n

f =

nc 2L

Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..

Sound Power Testing Why & When


What material should I use to reduce the levels? Sound Materials/Components
absorption, transmission loss in-tube, in-situ, in-room

Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track

Sound Pressure Not a predictable indicator of strength of source Sound Power is the Universal Acoustic metric Quantifies the acoustic potential of an object independent of: Environment Operator distance Acoustic field Can be used to predict sound pressure Preferred use Certification
Blue Angel, GOSH, UL, OSHA, The European Union's Council Directive 86/594/EEC, The Noise Emission Directive 2000/14/EC, Human Vibration Directive 2002/44/EC, Noise at Work Directive 2003/10/EC

Does it sound right? Why is it annoying? Sound Quality


replay/filter, psycho-acoustic metrics, objective & subjective evaluations

Where is the sound coming from? Sound Source Localization


intensity beam forming holography focalization

What is the root cause? Source? Path? Source-Path-Receiver


Transfer path Analysis Acoustic Source Quantification Vibro-acoustic modal analysis

Sound path

Sound Source

The Importance of the Sound Power Test

How? Two methods to determine sound-power

Pressure based
Regulations
Comply with target specification Comply with Market Specifications Declaration of certification

Intensity based
Intensity Probe ISO 9614 Complex & time consuming More engineering inside

Regulations

Microphones around object ISO 37xx-series fast & easy One number

Comparison
Compare equipment (same / different types) Compare with competitive product Purchasing parameter in the selection process

Product Engineering

Engineering
Verification of the developed product Indicator for developing quieter product Quality control in production

Product Comparison

Quantification Certification

In-situ use Troubleshooting

Products Concerned with Sound Power Test

EU Directive - Protecting the Workforce

The EU has created following directives dealing with noise and vibration in the working environment Human Vibration Directive 2002/44/EC Noise at Work Directive 2003/10/EC Noise Emission Directive 2000/14/EC Implemented in national legislation by 2010 (2014 for agriculture and forestry) Pressure on manufacturers and suppliers New quality norm can be competitive advantage Can become a branding identity Often products must be ISO certified Pressure on end-user or employer Limit daily exposure of employees to noise/vibration Switch to tools generating less noise/vibration

Hierarchy of Standards

Market Specific Standards & Regulations


Market definition Operating condition of test object Limits or label? Reporting templates

Market specific: - products - industries - regions - customer (internal)

EC/2000/14 CE marking ISO15744 ISO7779 , ECMA-74 ISO9296 , ECMA-109 ... ...

Market definition Operating condition of test object Limits or label? Reporting templates Calculation microphone setup precision environmental correction

Market specific: - products - industries - regions - customer (internal) Hand-held power tools

EC/2000/14 CE marking ISO15744 ISO7779 , ECMA-74 ISO9296 , ECMA-109 ... ...

Non-electrical (ISO 15744 (pneumatic, hydraulic)), Electrical ,Electrical safety test, splash proof test, drop test, sound power test,

How to measure Sound Power?

ISO3741 , ISO3742 , IS03743 ISO3744 ISO3745 , ISO3746

IT & Telecommunication equipment


ISO7779, ECMA-74

Instrumentation

IEC60651 & IEC60804 ANSI S1.11 & IEC1260

Microphones Sound Pressure Levels Octave bands

Computer & Business Equipment


ISO9296, ECMA-109

Market Specific Standards & Regulations

ISO 7779 - Computer & Business Machines


CD and DVD ROM Drives

EU Directive EC/2000/14 Sound-power for outdoor equipment


European directive for outdoor equipment: gardening, construction, (57 categories) Obligation for marking & limit or marking only (labeling products)
Categories Product subjected to limiting (maximum SP level) Products subjected to marking (indicate SP level on every system)

Keyboards Personal computers Workstations Card readers Printers & scanners Punchers Tape storage units Disk storage units Displays Facsimile machines

Standard defines how to determine sound-power Measure pressure at by-stander position How to handle: impulsiveness & tonal components How to average different operating conditions of a printer or copier Blue angel quality label for Computer (based on
compliance with ISO 7779)

Must comply to sell in Europe Strong impact on importing regions Sets reference on exporting regions

Electronic units (processors, electronic memories and controllers, containing electronic circuits, power supplies with cooling parts) Microform readers Self service automatic teller machines Enclosures or rack systems

Driven by harmonization & comfort

European Directive EC/2000/14 : Outdoor equipment


Noise LIMITING
Builders hoists compaction machines Compressors concrete breakers and picks construction winches Dozers & Dumpers Excavators excavator-loaders Graders hydraulic power packs landfill compactors Lawnmowers lawn trimmers/edge Trimmers lift trucks Loaders mobile & tower cranes motor hoes pave-finishers power generators welding generators

Subjected to Noise MARKING


Aerial access platforms brush cutters builders hoists building site band saw machines building site circular saw benches chain saws pressure flushers and suction vehicles compaction machines concrete or mortar mixers construction winches conveying and spraying machines conveyor belts cooling equipment on vehicles drill rigs equipment for loading and unloading silos or tanks on trucks glass recycling containers grass trimmers/grass edge trimmers hedge trimmers high pressure flushers high pressure water jet machines hydraulic hammers joint cutters leaf blowers & collectors lift trucks mobile waste containers pave-finishers piling equipment pipe layers piste caterpillars power generators power sweepers refuse collection vehicles road milling machines Scarifiers shredders/chippers snow-removing machines with rotating tools suction vehicles Trenchers truck mixers water pump units

Sound Power Measurement Test Sequence

Measurement Overview
Microphones spread over a surface enveloping the test object (typically half-spherical) Calculate sound power

Sound Power test sequence


Well defined test sequence 1st Step: ISO selection Size of the source Character of noise Grade of accuracy Application of data Acoustical information Test environment
General Definitions

Experimental setup

1 Lw = 10 log N

10
i =1

0.1L'pi

S K1 K 2 + 10 log S 0

Calibration

Average pressure over microphones K1 correction for background noise At least 6 db above background Recommend is 15 dB above background K2 correction for test environment Reverberation increases SPL S area of measurement surface (S0= 1m2) Measurement distance decreases SPL

Measurement

ISO Report

Sound Power test sequence


Selection of specific ISO standard Data acquisition parameters
Hardware setting (signal conditioning, bandwidth, etc) Octave calculation method & weighting Acquisition time Single or batch measurement Data management General Definitions

Sound Power test sequence

Experimental setup

Calibration

Microphone selection
As specified in IEC60651 , IEC60805 (accuracy, stability & frequency
response)

Measurement

Sensitivity must not change more than 0.2 dB during test period

Environmental parameters
K2 correction a measure of reverberation decay time Calculation methods: - Measure reverb time according to ISO 3741 - Comparison method (ISO 3741) - Approximation method (ISO 3744) Temperature & static pressure

ISO Report

Sound Power test sequence


Configuration of measurement surface
Spherical 6/12 & 10/20 Rectangular Cylinder Cylinder + sphere Full sphere ISO6798 General Definitions

Sound Power test sequence


Typical configuration
General Definitions

Experimental setup

Experimental setup

Bystander & operator (# & position) ISO7779


Detailed requirement for microphone positioning

Calibration

Calibration

Measurement

Measurement

ISO Report

ISO Report

Sound Power test sequence

Sound Power test sequence


Required during each series of measurements
General Definitions

Calibration of the entire measuring system


At one or more frequencies Over the measuring frequency range Experimental setup

Acoustical calibrator:
Accuracy of +/- 0.5 dB Verification once a year (at least)

Calibration

Measurement

Extra flexibilities
Auto detection of microphones Audible & visual feedback Tolerance on calibration value Comparison with previous values ISO Report

Sound Power test sequence


Global
Sound pressure levels during equipment operation Sound pressure level of the background noise Sound pressure level during sound source operation
- only for comparison method ISO3741 - replaces measuring the reverberation time

Sound Power test sequence

General Definitions

Experimental setup

Test duration
30 seconds for f 100 - 160 Hz 10 seconds for f 200 Hz Repetitive operation cycles; minimum of 3 cycles Varying operation cycles; total sequence Calibration

Measurement

Background noise Lb
Measurement when the equipment is not operating Subtract from the operational situation Lc (at each measurement points and each frequency band) Correction is required if 6 dB > Lb <15 dB of Lc ISO Report

Sound Power test sequence


Calculation of the Sound Power Level ( A weighted)
1 Lw = 10 log N
K1: K2: S: S0:

Sound Power test sequence


Actions during the measurement No specific ISO actions during the measurement Common sense & experience Expected flexibility Oscilloscope
On-line presentation of data (SPL, directivity, 1/3 & 1/1 Octaves, Octave band level, etc) Level indicator for each microphone

10
i =1

0.1 L'pi

S K1 K 2 + 10 log S0

General Definitions

General Definitions

correction for background noise correction for test environment (reflecting planes) area of the measurement surface in m2 reference surface areas 1m2

Experimental setup

Experimental setup

Calibration

Measurement control
Start / Stop / Record / Accept & Reject Automatic data storage & management Simultaneous verses batch measurement Parallel measurements (e.g. throughput)

Calibration

Additional / Optional measurements Impulsiveness


To decide whether the noise contains significant impulsive components If impulsive noise index 3 dB impulsive

Measurement

Measurement

Feedback & quality status ISO Report


Graphical representation of microphone positions Overload indicator per microphone Visual feedback on conformity to ISO standard (Compliance, F2, F3 & F4)

ISO Report

Discrete tones
To identify tones masked by the noise in the critical band Determine discrete tone prominent if 10 dB above the audibility threshold

Operating modes
Expert / standard operator Password protection

Sound Power test sequence

Sound Power test sequence


Sound Source
Description of the sound source, operating conditions, mounting conditions & location in the test room

General Definitions

Environment
Dimensions and physical properties of the test room Acoustical qualification of the test room (as described in ISO) Temperature, humidity & pressure

Experimental setup

Calibration Instrument
Test equipment (name, type, S/N, manufacturer) Acquisition specifications (bandwidth, frequency response, etc) Calibration of microphones

Measurement

Data
Microphone locations, background noise, LP (per Octave), LW (per Octave), tabular & plot of the corrected LW , impulsiveness, discrete tones, directivity index, data annotations (time & date).

ISO Report

Final statement
State full conformity with the procedure

Sound Power test sequence

Sound Power Simulation Why?


Sound Power is the Universal Acoustic metric Predict Lw earlier in the development cycle Quickly predict effects of changes without requiring a physical prototype Can be used to compare results later in the development cycle

Acoustics in a Nutshell Source-Path-Receiver

LMS Intensity

Receiver
Sound Pressure Sound Quality

Path
Sound Intensity Sound Source Localization Sound Materials+Components

Source
Sound Power

Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..

What is Intensity?
What material should I use to reduce the levels? Sound Materials/Components
absorption, transmission loss in-tube, in-situ, in-room

Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track

Sound intensity is the average rate of sound energy transmitted in the specified direction through a unit area (1 m2) normal to this direction at the point considered.

Intensity = Pressure x Particle Velocity Force Distance Energy Power Watts = = 2 Area Time Area Time Area m

Does it sound right? Why is it annoying? Sound Quality


replay/filter, psycho-acoustic metrics, objective & subjective evaluations

Where is the sound coming from? Sound Source Localization


intensity beam forming holography focalization

What is the root cause? Source? Path? Source-Path-Receiver


Transfer path Analysis Acoustic Source Quantification Vibro-acoustic modal analysis

Sound is a vector quantity that has both magnitude and direction, because the energy will flow in some directions but not others Intensity is dependent on the sources properties and the distance from the source

Applications of Sound Intensity

Measurement Equipment
Mic Signal Conditioning Card for SCADAS III USB Remote for Test.Lab

Spacers

Sound Power Determination Noise Source Localization: Mapping and Ranking Transmission Loss of Structures Sound Absorption of Materials and Structures Specific Acoustic Impedance Measurements Measurement of Radiation Efficiency of Sources

Mic Signal Conditioning Card for SCADAS Mobile

Measurement Considerations Frequency Limitations


Lower Frequency Limit
Phase mismatch between microphones Typically < 0.3 degrees for matched probe microphones Ex: At 63 Hz the wavelength is approximately 5.5 m and the change of phase over a 12mm spacer is only 0.8 so a phase mismatch of 0.3 will cause a significant error in the intensity

Pressure Residual Intensity Index (PRII)


Upper frequency Limit Spacer distance : < 1/6th of the wavelength
Pressure Residual Intensity Index (PRII) quantifies the phase mismatch Defined as a noise floor below which measurements cannot be made Caused by a small phase difference between the 2 signals, which is interpreted as intensity along the spacer Measured in an intensity calibrator which gives the same signal to both mics (0 intensity) Phase change in degrees along the spacer distance must be over 5 times the phase mismatch for accuracy within 1dB Dynamic Capability Index (Ld) gives a limit to the Pressure Intensity Index that can be measured with accuracy, applying a bias error correction factor (K)

Grade of Accuracy

Bias Error Factor (dB) 10 10 7

Precision (Grade 1) Engineering (Grade 2) Survey (Grade 3)

PRII Measurement

ISO Quality Checks


ISO 9614 Field Indicators ensure the quality of the measurements and meshes Notice the PRII Index is small at the low and high octave bands, which is to be expected because the phase difference for intensity microphones is large in these frequency ranges
F2: Surface pressure-intensity indicator Examines the difference between the pressure and the absolute values of intensity, which tells how diffuse or reactive a field is Small value = good measurement conditions Large value = probe not aligned well or measuring in a diffuse field F3: Negative partial power indicator Examines the difference between measured intensity and pressure while taking the direction of the intensities into account, which gives amount of extraneous noise Positive direction = intensity from source under investigation Negative direction = intensity from extraneous sources F4: Non-uniformity indicator Indicates the measure of spatial variability that exists in the field, which verifies the mesh adequacy

Intensity Analysis
Overall Intensity Level of Speaker from 100 to 4100Hz

Software Presentation Techniques Operational Deflection Shapes


Sound Intensity of Speaker at 720Hz

Measurement Considerations Strengths and Weaknesses

Source Identification
Once you identity your issue (either via Sound Power or Sound Quality) you need to find the source Multiple techniques are available today Sound Pressure Mapping Not very accurate Time consuming Sound Intensity Mapping Very accurate and well accepted technique Calculate Sound Power from results Time Consuming Array Acoustics Techniques Accurate results Very fast testing (typically less than a minute) Compelling graphical output NAH, Beamforming, and Focalization

Strengths
Allows measurement of energy flow (intensity = vector quantity) No influence of environment: what flows in from one side flows out from another side can cope with extraneous noise (other sources in the background) no need for special test room (anechoic, semi-anechoic or reverberant room) or specific test conditions

Weaknesses
Frequency range is limited compared to measurements based on sound pressure Time consuming, requires experienced personnel Expensive equipment compared to free field microphones

Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..

What material should I use to reduce the levels? Sound Materials/Components


absorption, transmission loss in-tube, in-situ, in-room

Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track

LMS Acoustic Arrays


Does it sound right? Why is it annoying? Sound Quality
replay/filter, psycho-acoustic metrics, objective & subjective evaluations

Where is the sound coming from? Sound Source Localization


intensity beam forming holography focalization

What is the root cause? Source? Path? Source-Path-Receiver


Transfer path Analysis Acoustic Source Quantification Vibro-acoustic modal analysis

Is this source identification ?

Intensity Measurements

Acoustic Sound Source Localization Evolution

Positive Supported by ISO/ANSI standards Widely accepted and used in industry Supports Power Calculations Negative expensive intensity probe measurements normally in far-field (low spatial resolution) TIME CONSUMING for troubleshooting

Holography
Predominant 10 years ago Array bigger than object High frequencies require high mics

LMS has solutions for all 3 domains

Beamforming
Array smaller than object Double frequency for same mics Far field only Poor spatial resolution at low freq

Focalization
Same as Beamforming Extend to Nearfield

Holography vs focalization

Holography Array Examples

Very good resolution at any frequency with holography


Great number of microphones or positions for HF

Good resolution on for HF Fewer microphones required for HF poor resolution in LF

NAH

Focalization

Solution: Use NAH for LF Double the frequency range on the SAME data by using focalization

What is Beamforming?
Assumption: antenna measures planar waves => Farfield measurement Time signal simultaneously recorded at a number of microphones Source

What is Focalization?
Assumption: antenna is in the near-field => measures spherical waves => Time signal simultaneously recorded at a number of microphones

What is Focalization?
Assumption: antenna is in the near-field => measures spherical waves => Time signal recorded at a number of microphones

LMS Acoustic Array: Just Point and Shoot

Nearfield and Farfield


400 to 6000 Hz

s (t )
S Rj D

1 N

p j (t j ) with j = d cos
j =1

Quick, Easy Setup

Fast and Accurate

Stationary and Runup

S ( f ) Pj ( f )e
j =1

ikR j

with kRj = 2f j

Uses Test.Lab & Scadas

Delay depends on the radius not distance

Array configurations for Beamforming

SNAP ON MICS

INFRARED DISTANCE SENSOR

WIDE ANGLE LENS

Where is the sound coming from?

LMS interior SSL: SW


What are the challenges in doing the interior SSL? Readable pressure results Accurate propagation Interactive displays

Sound Source Localization

Source Identification
dB A(P a) 100 89 81

_641800rpm _droit 1-[4.000 - 5.700 s] [ 2340 - 2580 Hz]-d -0.47

40

Structural Noise Problem Accurate FE Model Correlation and Pre-Test Aero Acoustic Problem CFD based Input Accurate Loads CAE based Loads Test Based Loads Or a combination

Solutions: Simple box or sphere mesh generated in software used for trucks & trains Picture wrapped around mesh Library of simple meshes for different car interiors Import mesh generated with other program Special sheet to position sphere against mesh/picture LMS offers the best solution on the market with respect to: Visualization Interactivity Accuracy (from a geometry and technological viewpoint)

Source Ranking Why & When


Natural next step after Source Identification Find out how much energy each major noise source is radiating Pay attention to frequency content ala Sound Quality! Rank noise sources to: Find the worst offender and attack that first Determine which sources are irrelevant Get an idea of the acoustic landscape

LMS Sound Quality

Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..

What is Sound Quality?


What material should I use to reduce the levels? Sound Materials/Components
absorption, transmission loss in-tube, in-situ, in-room

Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track

The next step in product characterization make your product sound better When just having the quietest product is not enough The Sound Power values are the same but this product sounds better Quantifies the human perception of product sound Psychology + Acoustics = Psychoacoustics Varies based on age, demographics, socio-economic status, etc Can be used as a Brand Recognition differentiator

Does it sound right? Why is it annoying? Sound Quality


replay/filter, psycho-acoustic metrics, objective & subjective evaluations

Where is the sound coming from? Sound Source Localization


intensity beam forming holography focalization

What is the root cause? Source? Path?


Noisy

Fridge A

Fridge C

Source-Path-Receiver
Transfer path Analysis Acoustic Source Quantification Vibro-acoustic modal analysis

Fridge B
Sounds right Looks right

Perceived Quality

Making the Subjective Objective

Sound Quality Why & When


Measurement Use a binaural head to record true stereo Measure in a realistic environment Follow good acoustic testing practices Analysis Listen to the sound Apply filters to remove artifactsWhat If Use Psychoacoustic Metrics like Zwicker Loudness, Roughness, Tone to Noise Ratio Dont forget the classic acoustic metrics Jury Testing Controlled listening tests with real customers Statistically analyze results to find what customers prefer Use results to refine your product and specifications

BINAURAL HEAD

BINAURAL HEAD

Mic1 Mic2

Binaural = 2 Ears

Directional Sound Effects

106 fit for the future - copyright LMS International - 2009

Binaural Recording and Equalization

DIGITAL BINAURAL HEAD

Accounting for Torso and Ear

Digital, Not Analog SPDIF or AES-EBU Embedded information on 16th bit: Sound Field (DF, ID, FF) Range (94 db, 104 db, etc)

DF = Difuse Field FF = Free Field ID = Independent of Direction

ScadasMobile VS8 Digital/Analog Card

Digital Playback and Equalization


Digital Playback Equalization Unique Serial #

On VS8 Card, last two channels can switch between Analog and Digital to read Head data directly

Sound Metrics

Sound Metrics

Subjective Testing: A Story Noise problem for IT server design 10 servers chosen for jury testing - 5 good/5 bad 30 people listen - rate on scale of 1 to 10

Engineers sent from fan supplier How do their ratings compare to others? Worse Same Better

Sound Metrics

Sound Metrics

Engineers from fan supplier How do their ratings compare to others?

Getting closer to product launch date How do the ratings compare to previously? Worse Same Better

Better!

Sound Metrics

Sound Metrics

Getting closer to vehicle launch date How do the ratings compare to previous?

Sound Metrics attempt to predict the subjective response of people in an objective manner The field is still evolving, known also as psychoacoustics

Better!

Human perception psycho-acoustics


The human hearing is not linear Sensitivity is frequency dependent: most sensitive in speech range => A-weighting Sensitivity is level dependent => curves of equal loudness Human perception also depends on level & frequency spectrum: broadband noise/tonal component, sharpness, masking effects variation: fluctuation, roughness, modulations, transients context: day/night; music/machine
20 Hz

Loudness

2 tones, same magnitude, different frequencies Which is louder?

You cannot hear 20 Hz!

200 Hz

Individual preferences: sportive sound (low/high frequency)

A-Weighting

Loudness

Filter with similar attributes to ear Simple curve shape, attenuates low frequencies 1000 Hz - no gain/attenuation, used for microphone cals

6 dB -> Twice the amplitude (sound pressure) 76 dB vs. 70 dB 60 dB vs. 54 dB Not intuitive that 6 dB (or 10 dB perceived) is twice as loud

Loudness Sones & Phons

Loudness - Mark VI

Equal Loudness Curves 1 sone = 40 phon 2 sones twice as loud as 1 sone


SPL (dB)

Stevens Mark VI

4 sones twice as loud as 2 sone


Phons 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 Sones 64 32 16 8 4 2 1

frequency (Hz)

Loudness - Mark VII

Loudness

ISO532B - Zwicker Loudness - Masking Stevens Mark VII

Articulation Index

SIL and PSIL

Percentage of syllables understood Ranges from 0 to 100%

Rates how much a given sound interferes with human speech

Roughness and Fluctuation Strength

Roughness and Fluctuation Strength

What does the sum of a 400 Hz sine wave and 405 Hertz sine wave look like? What do you hear? Measure of Modulation Fluctuation 0-20 Hz, Max at 4 Hz Roughness 20-300 Hz, Max at 70 Hz

Roughness and Fluctuation Strength

Engine Harmonics

Lets take two sweeping sine tones over 10 secs: 10 Hz to 100 Hz 11 Hz to 110 Hz
110

600 Hz
600

500 Hz

5th order 6th order


400 Hz

What is end modulation frequency (at time 10)?


10 Hz!
Hz

300 Hz

What is initial modulation frequency (at time 0)?


Hz

4th order
200 Hz

60 Hz 50 Hz

3th order 2nd order 1st order


600 RPM

150 Hz 100 Hz

1 Hz!
0 0 seconds 10

40 Hz 30 Hz 20 Hz 15 Hz 10 Hz0

6000

Jury testing : why ?

Quantifying subjective quality on statistical basis Understand how quality perception depends on the profile of the listener Correlation of objective measurements with subjective quality perception

Development of Strong and Powerful Sound Metric

132 copyright LMS International - 2009

Jury Test Methods : Paired Comparison

Jury Test preparation

All possible pairs from a set of stimuli are exposed to the jury in random-like sequence For every pair, subjects are asked to indicate which stimulus (A or B) is superior for some given criterion Pro : Possible with multiple subjects Works fine for naive subjects Easy method for analysis Contra : Limited to about 15 stimuli Test takes a lot of time

A B C D E F G A B C D E F G Total 1 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 -

9 Sound samples 5 original samples Vehicle 2 with orders 2.5 & 5.5 boosted Vehicle 2 with resonance filtered out Vehicle 4 with increased loudness Vehicle 4 with orders 3, 6 and 9 boosted Conditioning Equalization for equal global loudness

1 1

0 0 0

4 5 1 6

133 copyright LMS International - 2009

Results of Initial Jury Test

Consistency of Results from Initial Test

Kendall's RCC vs Consistency


1.0000 0.9000
Juror 10 Juror 11 Juror 12 Juror 13 Juror 14 Juror 15 Juror 17 Juror 19 Juror 16 Juror 18 Juror 1 Juror 3 Juror 5 Juror 6 Juror 7

Consistency Compared to Self Concordance Compared to Group Eliminate inconsistent people from final analysis!

Juror 8

Juror 9

Juror 20

Juror 2

Juror 4

0.8000
Total

0.7000 Concordance 0.6000 0.5000 0.4000 0.3000 0.2000 0.1000 0.0000 0.00

Experience Briefed Vehicle 1 Vehicle 1 Modif 1 Vehicle 2 Vehicle 3 Vehicle 4 Vehicle 5 Vehicle 5 Modif 2

2 10 0 Ins. Ins. Yes 3 3 2 4.5 5 5 4.5 4 4 2 1 2 1 2 2 6.5 7 6 6.5 6 7

3 No 3 5 4 2 1 6 7

0 No 2 4 6.5 1 4 4 6.5

0 No 3 5 4 1 2 7 6

3 No 3.5 6.5 3.5 1 2 6.5 5

0 Yes 3 5 7 2 1 5 5

3 No 3 4 7 2 1 6 5

0 0 0 Yes Yes Yes 2.5 6.5 1 1 6.5 4.5 7 3 7 2.5 3 2.5 4 1 2.5 5.5 5 6 5.5 3 4.5

0 No 3 1 7 2 5 6 4

10 No 7 6 1 3 3 5 3

1 1 0 1 0 0 Ins. Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 6 5 3 6.5 6.5 6 7 6 1 6.5 4.5 5 3 4 6 1.5 6.5 7 2 2 4 3 1 1.5 1 1 2 1.5 4.5 3.5 5 3 7 4 3 1.5 4 7 5 5 2 3.5

3 4 5 1 2 7 6

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

Consistency

Reduced Jury Set

A linear model

Convert jury testing scores to a real valued function Bradley-Terry model to map jury test results onto this scale.
Juror 10 Juror 12 Juror 13 Juror 15 Juror 19 Juror 2 Juror 5 Juror 8 Juror 9 Juror 20 Total 3 4 5 1 2 7 6

Vehicle -1 Vehicle-1 modif 1 Vehicle 2 Vehicle 3 Vehicle 4 Vehicle 5 Vehicle 5 modif 1

3 4.5 4.5 2 1 6.5 6.5

3 5 4 1 2 7 6

2 5 4 2 2 6 7

3 5 4 2 1 6 7

2 4 6.5 1 4 4 6.5

3 5 4 1 2 7 6

3.5 6.5 3.5 1 2 6.5 5

3 5 7 2 1 5 5

3 4 7 2 1 6 5

1 4.5 7 2.5 2.5 6 4.5

Signal 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

7.00

Score 41.00 22.00 18.00 53.00 51.00 12.00 13.00

Real Values 0.96 -0.63 -1.04 1.84 1.72 -1.44 -1.41

Kendall's RCC vs Consistency


1.00 0.80 Concordance 0.60 0.40 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 Consistency

0 1 1 9 8 0 0

9 0 6 9 10 4 0

9 4 0 10 10 4 5

1 1 0 0 4 0 1

2 0 0 6 0 0 1

10 6 6 10 10 0 6

10 10 5 9 9 4 0

Correlation with Metrics

Metric for Strong and Powerful

Vehicle-1 modif 1

Vehicle 5 modif 1

Significantly present in the signal No overlap in phenomena Sufficient dynamics

% Ord 12 PSIL PSIL/Zwicker) SIL AI % half Imp_Peak %half/%even % oth even Sharpness % odd Order 8 %even/%odd Order 12 Imp_OccRate %even/(%half+%odd) SB Imp_RiseRate Order 4 Odd Roughness Imp_Duration CRP Half % Ord 8 Other Even % even Fluct_strength % Ord 4

0.0104 63.38 1.87 58.65 0.53 0.19 0.21 0.74 0.03 0.74 0.09 52.85 2.92 49.46 8.35 0.93 29.94 5958.48 63.37 57.07 0.23 0.00 70.35 60.09 0.03 49.51 0.26 0.17 0.19

0.0114 63.98 1.88 59.25 0.51 0.15 0.19 0.53 0.02 0.76 0.09 59.04 3.10 55.63 8.80 1.18 28.19 5742.97 69.62 62.94 0.19 0.00 70.38 64.65 0.03 55.06 0.28 0.20 0.21

0.0114 63.43 1.87 58.76 0.51 0.15 0.10 0.53 0.02 0.77 0.09 59.04 3.10 55.63 7.73 1.18 34.77 6180.26 69.62 62.94 0.15 0.00 72.91 64.65 0.03 55.06 0.28 0.16 0.21

0.0063 62.68 1.85 57.66 0.54 0.22 0.21 0.75 0.02 0.77 0.05 55.97 5.43 53.46 7.22 1.07 32.58 8062.36 68.51 62.60 0.16 0.00 72.29 67.83 0.02 57.36 0.29 0.14 0.24

0.0058 63.33 1.87 58.58 0.51 0.28 0.14 1.13 0.03 0.77 0.10 60.80 2.43 52.38 4.81 0.65 34.54 4241.61 68.27 66.52 0.17 0.00 73.40 69.76 0.06 60.10 0.25 0.14 0.15

0.0112 64.83 1.90 60.28 0.45 0.18 0.12 0.70 0.02 0.86 0.10 60.93 2.58 53.35 7.06 0.92 31.25 5297.64 67.17 64.41 0.18 0.00 72.89 67.68 0.04 58.20 0.26 0.13 0.19

0.0111 64.80 1.91 60.90 0.43 0.18 0.12 0.70 0.02 0.87 0.10 60.62 2.58 53.03 7.26 0.92 29.96 5555.82 66.86 64.10 0.18 0.00 72.81 67.37 0.04 57.88 0.26 0.12 0.19

-0.88 -0.84 -0.83 -0.82 0.78 0.73 0.68 0.65 0.63 -0.62 -0.53 -0.51 0.49 -0.46 -0.39 -0.38 0.32 0.23 -0.16 -0.15 0.10 -0.09 -0.09 0.07 -0.06 -0.03 -0.03 0.01 0.01

Regression

Correlation

Vehicle -1

Vehicle 2

Vehicle 3

Vehicle 4

Vehicle 5

% HALF ORDERS 5.13 PSIL/Zwicker + 9.24


* * * * *

Verification with real values (model)

Physical Modifications

Metric * 100

Real Value

Unequal runner in intake manifolds Unequal runner in exhaust manifold Change firing order of engine Presents packaging challenge Example: Transverse engine for exhaust Wraparound exhaust Modifications to transmission Requires decisions early in program

Signal Vehicle 2 Vehicle 2 modif 1 Vehicle 1 Vehicle 3 Vehicle 5 Vehicle 4 Vehicle 4 modif 1

3.57 -5.48 -1.10 11.94 13.01 -7.33 -8.38

0.96 -0.63 -1.04 1.84 1.72 -1.44 -1.41

Extra bend for equal length = smooth sound

Correlation 96%

Rear of Car

Sound Quality via Simulation

Replay the simulated sound levels of various club designs

Sample A

LMS Sound Materials/Components

Sample B

Six Ss
Do I meet quality objectives? Sound Pressure
SLM, Leq, Octave, Loudness, AI,..

Instrumentation: Measurements setups for material testing.


What material should I use to reduce the levels? Sound Materials/Components
absorption, transmission loss in-tube, in-situ, in-room

Do I meet standards?
Sound Power & Pass-by Noise
Pressure & intensity based In-room, in-vehicle, near track

Absorption 2-mic transfer-function method Test on small samples or mufflers Impedance tube (Kundt tube) FRF based method ISO 354 standard

Sound Transmission Loss 4-mic transfer matrix

ISO 10534-2 ASTM E1050

Mainly used for mufflers

ISO 140-3

Does it sound right? Why is it annoying? Sound Quality


replay/filter, psycho-acoustic metrics, objective & subjective evaluations

Where is the sound coming from? Sound Source Localization


intensity beam forming holography focalization

What is the root cause? Source? Path? Source-Path-Receiver


Transfer path Analysis Acoustic Source Quantification Vibro-acoustic modal analysis

Test om larger samples or complete objects like doors 1 or 2 rooms pressure & reverberation

Test om larger samples or complete object 1 or 2 rooms intensity

N.A.

Combine source localization & sound transmission loss testing

LMS solutions are available via specials

Propagation of Sound
Reflection
Incident sound wave on a surface: (a) part of it is reflected (b) part is absorbed (c) part is transmitted
Reflected energy absorbed incident energy

Propagation of Sound
Absorption
absorption coefficient

Absorption coefficient is defined as:


absorbing material
transmitted energy

100 mm 50 mm 30 mm

= 1

E reflected Eincident

< 0.1: extremely hard surfaces (e.g. steel, dense concrete,): high reflection, low absorption > 0.9: highly absorbent material (e.g. foam,): low reflection, high absorption

Typical effects in a room: Convex surface: dispersion Concave surface: focusing


dispersion Convex surface

100

1000 frequency (Hz)

1000 0

Parallel surface: standing waves: gives large variation in sound pressure from node to anti-node
focusing standing waves and echo

Absorption characteristics of a material depend on a number of parameters: thickness, porosity, frequency, flow resistence, roughness,

echo: time delay of 0.05 s is serious enough to confuse or irritate a listener in a room Standing waves and echos can be avoided by use of rough, non-parallel, acoustically soft walls
Concave surface

foam

Propagation of Sound
Transmission
Transmission coefficient (-):

Acoustic material testing using impedance tube

E transmitte d E incident
Absorption 2-microphones
sound insulation against environmental noise

Sound transmission loss or sound reduction factor TL (dB):

1 TL = 10 log( )

transfer-function method ISO 10534-2 and ASTM E1050 Sound Transmission Loss

TL is a measure of the noise reduction in decibels for specific frequency ranges. In general, there is a better sound insulation at higher frequencies

Cases: thick concrete wall: high resistance to passage of sound, high sound reduction index TL thin plaster wall: low resistance to passage of sound, low sound reduction index TL
Hz

4-microphone
Transfer Matrix method

TL of sound barrier mats

Impedance tube

Sound Transmission Loss: 2-room method

Covers a wide frequency range with only 1 tube/measurements: 50 - 5700 Hz Design for optimal signal/noise quality High signal: Stable & distortion free JBL driver (max. 150 dB) Low Noise: Heavy and thick-wall brass design Tube length > 20 * diameter (required for pure plane wave) Extendible for Sound Transmission Loss

Sending room: N mics (typical 6) Source (loudspeaker) Test variance between mics in sending room (quality criteria) Overload check Receiving room Average pressure M mics Back ground noise check S/N ratio quality criteria Re-use of room reverberation characteristics

Transmission Loss with Muffler

CAE: Transmission Loss


To do this we compared results obtained by J. W. Sullivan and M. J. Crocker (predicted and measured) in their paper Analysis of concentric-tube resonators having unpartitioned cavities. As you can see the transmission loss curves closely match each other

Transmission loss obtained from Sullivan & Crocker Transmission loss obtained from Virtual.Lab

CAE: Transmission Loss

40.00

CAE Predicted Test Measured

-20.00 0.00 Hz 2500.00

/ dB

You might also like