Ge CR 0091

For official use
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
Hkkjr ljdkj
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
js y ea = ky;
Consultancy Report
On
Rehabilitation Of Weak Formation

Between
Gonda Kacheri & Jarwal Road Stations
Lucknow Division:North Eastern Railway
Consultancy No. RDSO/2006/GE: CR-0091 November 2006

Geo-technical Engineering Directorate
Hkw&rduhdh bathfu;jh funskky;

Research Designs & Standards Organisation
vuqla/kku vfHkdYi vkSj ekud laxBu

Lucknow 226011 y[ku & 226011
INDEX
S. No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Description Introduction Reference Scope of work History, Site Observations and Causes of trouble Track Structure Testing of soil samples Slope stability analysis Site inspection and collection of field data Analysis and discussion of test results Formulation of remedial measures Recommendations Annexure- I Figures (i) Index plan (ii) Existing profiles (Fig 1 to 6) (iii) Proposed profiles (Fig 7 to 12) (iv) Slope stability analysis sheet (Fig 13)
Page No. 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 5 10 10 13
14 15-20 21-26 27
PREFACE This report is based on the basis of soil exploration, field investigation, soil testing and design calculation. The views expressed are subject to modification from time to time in the light of future developments on the subject. The views do not represent the views of the Ministry of Railways (Railway Board), Government of India.
This report is the property of the RDSO and is meant It may not be loaned, essentially for officials use. reproduced in part or in full or quoted as an authority without the permission of Director General, RDSO.
(S.K.Awasthi) Asstt. Research Engineer/GE
(Alok Kumar) Executive Director/GE
SYNOPSIS
The down line between stations Colonelganj and Jarwal Road of Gonda Kacheri - Jarwal Road section, Lucknow division North Eastern Railway is troublesome requiring frequent track maintenance due to presence of a number of weak formation locations. Sectional speed of this route is 100 km/h. However, temporary speed restriction varying from 30 kmph to 50 kmph has been imposed in the year 2006 at number of locations due to unstable formation. On request of NE Railway, detailed field investigation including collection of undisturbed/disturbed soil samples from troublesome sites have been undertaken by RDSO.
This report includes remedial measures for rehabilitation of weak formation on six such locations on the abovementioned line.
----------------------
1.0 INTRODUCTION The down line between stations Colonelganj and Jarwal Road of Gonda Kacheri - Jarwal Road section, Lucknow division, North Eastern Railway is troublesome requiring frequent track maintenance due to presence of a number of locations of weak formation. The section was opened for traffic on 01-09-2002. RDSO team visited locations of weak formation in the month of August 06 to investigate and to suggest remedial measures. The present report covers with following stretches:1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Km Km Km Km Km Km 687/13-14 691/1-2 695/1-2 698/1-2 699/5-6 702/2-3
2.0 REFERENCE Divisional Railway Manager (Engg.)/N.E.Rly, Lucknow Jn. vide his letter No. W/275/L/Da-3A dated 24.07.2006 requested RDSO for field investigation of the problematic stretches and advise necessary measures. 3.0 SCOPE OF WORK Scope of this report consists of site inspection, soil explorations, testing of soil samples and recommendations for the stabilisation of unstable formation on the above locations. 4.0 HISTORY, SITE OBSERVATIONS AND CAUSES OF TROUBLE This doubling work was completed in the year 1999 & was opened to traffic in year 2002. Railway Board had given dispensation for onemeter thick blanket on top of formation vide Boards letter no. 96/W1/NE/DL/1 dated 05.05.2000. RDSO issued a certificate in year 2001 vide letter no RS/G/95/NER dated 17.04.2001: 4.1 Following observations were made during site visit: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) No blanket has been provided during construction. Low cess and deep rain cuts have been observed throughout the section. At km 691/1-2, slip was reported to occur twice in the year 2006. Flattening of slope has been observed at most of the locations. Deep ballast penetrations have been observed at many locations particularly more than 1.5 m at km 691/1-2. 1
4.2 On the basis of site investigation, the main causes of formation problems appears to be as given below: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) Cess is eroded and its width is less than standard. Non-provision of blanket material. Bank is constructed with fine-grained soil. At many locations, the degree of compaction (NDD/MDD x100) has been found less than 98%. Ballast penetration indicates that there is bearing failure of formation in general.
5.0 TRACK STRUCTURE Rail Sleeper Sleeper Density GMT Ballast : : : : : 52 Kg, LWR PSC M+7 24.275 300 mm
6.0 TESTING OF SOIL SAMPLES The soil samples were tested in Geotechnical Engineering Laboratory of RDSO for the following tests: (a.) (b.) (c.) (d.) (e.) Natural Moisture Content (NMC) Natural Dry Density (NDD) Grain Size Analysis OMC & MDD Triaxial shear test in consolidated Undrained condition with measurement of pore pressure (Cu)
7.0 SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS Slope stability analysis has been carried out with the help of slope/W software using results of soil testing carried out in GE Lab., RDSO. Slope stability analysis for the location km 691/1-2 (DN) has been done. The height of bank at this location is 3.81m. Existing slope has been found safe as the factor of safety is > 1.4. The output (sketch) of the analysis is given as Fig.13. 8.0 SITE INSPECTION AND COLLECTION OF FIELD DATA 8.1 Km 687/13-14 Height of the bank is 1.06 m. 2
Low cess, pot holes on cess and slopes and pond filled with water upto toe level were observed. The maximum ballast penetration has observed as 70 cm. Cross section & ballast penetration profile has been plotted. Pattern and extent of ballast penetration and bank profiles is shown in Fig. 1. One undisturbed and one disturbed soil samples were collected from formation to determine the type of soil & its behaviour.
8.2 Km 691/1-2 The height of the bank is 3.81 m. As reported by SSE/Pway/Jarwal Road, slips have occurred twice in Monsoon of 2006 and the temporary speed restriction of 30 kmph and 50 kmph were imposed subsequently. The maximum ballast penetration of 100 cm (below right rail) has been measured. Cross section & Ballast penetration profile has been plotted showing the pattern and extent of ballast penetration and bank profiles (Fig. 2). Low cess has also been observed. One undisturbed and one disturbed soil samples were collected from formation to determine the type of soil & its behaviour.
8.3 Km 695/1-2 Height of the bank is 1.58 m. One undisturbed and one disturbed soil samples were collected from formation to understand their behaviour and to assess the capacity to withstand dynamic loads. The ballast penetration has been measured and it varies from 37 cm to 46 cm. Cross section and ballast penetration profile has been shown in (Fig 3). Flattening of slope and low cess has also been observed.
8.4 Km 698/1-2 Height of the bank is 1.50 m. Flattening of slope and low cess has also been observed. The ballast penetration has been taken and observed as negligible. Existing cross section and ballast penetration profile has been shown in (Fig 4). One undisturbed and one disturbed soil samples were collected from formation to understand their behaviour and to assess the capacity to withstand dynamic loads.
8.5 Km 699/5-6. Height of the bank is 1.45 m.
Flattening of slope has been observed The ballast penetration has been taken and it vary from 26 cm to 33 cm. Existing cross section and ballast penetration profile has been shown in (Fig 5) One undisturbed and one disturbed soil samples were collected from formation to understand their behaviour and to assess the capacity to withstand dynamic loads.
8.6 Km 702/2-3 Height of the bank is 2.95 m. Flattering of slope has been observed. Toe of the right side of the bank is submerged in pond water. The ballast penetration has been taken and it vary from 34 cm to 45 cm. Existing cross section and ballast penetration profile has been shown in (Fig 6) One undisturbed and one disturbed soil samples were collected from formation to understand their behaviour and to assess the capacity to withstand dynamic loads. Table-II Summery of observations S. No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6 Items Formation soil type Degree of compaction (%) Blanket Bank height (m) Cross section Max. ballast Penetration(cm) Ballast Penetration Profile Proposed profiles Km 687/ 13-14 MI 86.24 Nil 1.06 Fig 1 47 to 70 Fig 1 Fig 7 Km 691/ 1-2 ML Nil 3.81 Fig 2 33 to > 100 Fig 2 Fig 8 Km 695/ 1-2 CL 96.27 Nil 1.58 Fig 3 37 to 46 Fig 3 Fig 9 Km 698/ 1-2 CL 97 Nil 1.5 Fig 4 Not appr eciab le Fig 4 Fig 10 Km 699/ 5-6 CL 83.83 Nil 1.45 Fig 5 26 to 33 Fig 5 Fig 11 Km 702/ 2-3 CI 86.6 Nil 2.95 Fig 6 34 to 45 Fig 6 Fig 12
7.
9.0 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF TEST RESULTS 9.1 Location- Km 687/13-14 (DN line) One undisturbed and one disturbed soil samples collected from this location were tested & test results are as under:-
Soil Properties
S. No. 1. 2. Soil Parameters Classification Grain size distribution: Gravel (%) Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Fines passing 75 sieve (%) Consistency Limits: Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index OMC (%) MDD(g/cm3) NMC NDD Cu Cc Shear parameters: C(kg/cm2) (degree) Formation Soil (UDS) MI 05 14 80 01 81 37 25 12 19.33 1.63 11.1 1.05 Formation Soil (DS) CI 00 09 81 10 91 42 24 18 11.5 1.89 13 0.32 -
3.
4.
5. 6.
From the above test results, it is seen that the formation soil is classified as MI, i.e. silt with intermediate compressibility. High pore pressure develops on application of load in such type of soil depending on drainage boundary. In such type of soil, dissipation of pore pressure will take place by draining out water through slope or from top of the embankment leading to slope flattening and disturbance to track geometry. The degree of compaction indicates that the compaction at this location is only 86.24%, which is much less than the required value of 98%. Bank height is 1.06 m, which is low and does not require any slope stability analysis. 5
Under above circumstances for MI type of soil, minimum 100 cm thick compacted blanket layer is required at top of formation as per Para4.3.2 and 4.3.4 of Guidelines For Earthwork In Railway Projects: July 2003. 9.2 Km 691/1-2 Soil Properties S.No. 1. 2. Soil Parameters Classification Grain size distribution: Gravel (%) Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Fines passing 75 sieve (%) Consistency Limits: Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index OMC(%) MDD(g/cm3) NMC NDD Cu Cc Shear parameters: C(kg/cm2) (degree) Formation Soil (UDS) ML 00 36 64 00 64 NP NP NP 15.28 1.60 5.5 1.4 0.02 33.68 Formation Soil (DS) SP-SM 01 87 12 00 12 NP NP NP 3.94 1.63 -
3.
4.
5. 6.
From the above test results, it is seen that the formation soil is classified as ML i.e. silt with low plasticity. High pore pressure develops on application of load in such type of soil depending on drainage boundary. In such type of soil, dissipation of pore pressure will take place by draining out water through slope or from top of the embankment leading to slope flattening and disturbance to track geometry. The height of bank at this location is 3.81m. Slope stability analysis has been done for this location is attached as Fig.13. Under above circumstances for ML type of soil, minimum 100 cm thick compacted blanket layer is required at top of formation as per
Para-4.3.2 and 4.3.4 of Guidelines For Earthwork In Railway Projects: July 2003 9.3 Km 695/1-2 Soil Properties S.No. 1. 2. Soil Parameters Classification Grain size distribution: Gravel (%) Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Fines passing 75 sieve (%) Consistency Limits: Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index OMC(%) MDD(g/cm3) NMC NDD Cu Cc Shear parameters: C(kg/cm2) (degree) Formation Soil (UDS) CL 01 21 74 04 78 29 20 09 15 1.81 20.3 1.16 Formation Soil (DS ) ML 01 07 81 11 92 NP NP NP 10.0 1.88 11.6 0.55 -
3.
4.
5. 6.
From the above test results, it is seen that the formation soil is classified as CL i.e. clay having low compressibility. Hence, minimum 100 cm thick compacted blanket layer is required at top of formation as per para no. 4.3.2 and 4.3.4 of Guidelines for earthwork in Railway projects, July 2003. Bank height is 1.58 m, which is low and does not require any slope stability analysis. 9.4 Km 698/1-2 Soil Properties S.No. 1. Soil Parameters Classification Formation soil (UDS) CL Formation soil (DS) CL-ML
2.
Grain size distribution: Gravel (%) Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Fines passing 75 sieve (%) Consistency Limits: Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index OMC(%) MDD(g/cm3) NMC NDD Cu Cc Shear parameters: C(kg/cm2) (degree) 00 21 75 04 79 27 17 10 15.06 1.94 15.6 1.36 00 19 81 00 81 26 19 07 9.50 2.00 14.0 1.27 -
3.
4.
5. 6.
From the above test results, it is seen that the formation soil is classified as CL i.e. clays having low compressibility. Hence, minimum 100 cm thick compacted blanket layer is required at top of formation as per para no. 4.3.2 and 4.3.4 of Guidelines for earthwork in Railway projects, July 2003. Bank height is 1.5 m, which is low and does not require any slope stability analysis. 9.5 Km 699/5-6 Soil Properties S.No. 1. 2. Soil Parameters Classification Grain size distribution: Gravel (%) Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Fines passing 75 sieve (%) Consistency Limits: Liquid Limit Plastic Limit 8 Formation Soil (UDS) CL 00 11 85 04 89 27 19 Formation Soil (DS) CL 00 18 74 08 82 33 22
3.
4.
5. 6.
Plasticity Index OMC(%) MDD(g/cm3) NMC NDD Cu Cc Shear parameters: C(kg/cm2) (degree)
08 15.12 1.66 14.5 0.54 -
11 11.0 1.93 19.2 0.27 -
From the above test results, it is seen that the formation soil is classified as CL i.e. clay having low compressibility. Hence, minimum 100 cm thick compacted blanket layer is required at top of formation as per para no. 4.3.2 and 4.3.4 of Guidelines for earthwork in Railway projects, July 2003. Bank height is 1.45 m, which is low and does not require any slope stability analysis. 9.6 Km 702/2-3 Soil Properties S.No. 1. 2. Soil Parameters Classification Grain size distribution: Gravel (%) Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%) Fines passing 75 sieve (%) Consistency Limits: Liquid Limit Plastic Limit Plasticity Index OMC(%) MDD(g/cm3) NMC NDD Cu Cc Shear parameters: C(kg/cm2) (degree) Formation Soil (UDS) CI 00 02 92 06 98 40 24 16 22.02 1.56 14.8 0.38 0.07 32.17 Formation Soil (DS) CI 02 02 86 10 96 42 25 17 15 1.8 7.9 0.91 -
3.
4.
5. 6.
From the above test results, it is seen that the formation soil is classified as CI i.e. Clay with intermediate compressibility. Hence, minimum 100 cm thick compacted blanket layer is required at top of formation as per para no. 4.3.2 and 4.3.4 of Guidelines for earthwork in Railway projects, July 2003. The degree of compaction i.e. NDD/MDD x100 indicates that the compaction of this location is only 86.6 % against requirement of 98%. Bank height is 1.06 m, which is low and does not require any slope stability analysis. 10.0 FORMULATION OF REMEDIAL MEASURES The remedial measures should aim to increase the bearing capacity of formation to prevent ballast penetration and sinking of formation due to traffic movement. The analysis and discussion of test results suggests provision of adequate thickness of the blanket of specified material as mentioned in Annexure-I. 11.0 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the details of site inspection of problematic stretches and test results of soil samples, the location wise recommendations are as follow: General: (i) Laying of blanket of required thickness and specified material is the only effective remedial measure against bearing capacity failure. The thickness of blanket as per para no. 4.3.2 and 4.3.4 of Guidelines for earthwork in Railway projects, July 2003. should be ensured and it should be provided in full width of formation including widened portion.
(ii) Top of formation must have a cross slope 1:30. (iii) 30 cm clean ballast cushion should be ensured. (iv) Boulder pitching should be done at toe of slope upto height 30 cm above HFL.
10
11.1
For Km. 687/13-14
(i) Minimum 100 cm thick compacted blanket cushion shall be provided as per the specification. (ii) Rain cuts, low cess, pot holes should be made good with compacted sand and turfing of slopes should be done. (iii) All locations where embankment is submerged & pond exists should be filled with soil upto sufficient distance (height of bank + 3 m) from the toe so that water logging can be avoided at the toe of embankment. Alternatively, a toe wall may be provided at this location. 11.2 For Kms 691/1-2, 695/1-2, 698/1-2, 699/5-6 (i) (ii) 11.3 Minimum 100 cm thick compacted blanket layer should be provided. Low cess should be repaired and turfing should be done.
For Km. 702/2-3 (i) Minimum 100 cm thick compacted blanket cushion should be provided.
(ii) Low cess should be repaired and turfing should be done. (iii) All locations where embankment is submerged & pond exists should be filled with soil upto sufficient distance (height of bank + 3 m) from the toe so that water logging can be avoided at the toe of embankment. Alternatively, a toe wall may be provided at this location. (iv) Boulder pitching should be done at toe of slope upto height 30 cm above HFL.
--------------------
11
OFFICERS AND STAFF ASSOCIATED WITH PREPARATION OF REPORT The report has been prepared by Shri S.K.Awasthi ARE/Geotechnical Engineering under guidance of Shri Alok Kumar, Executive Director/Geotechnical Engineering. Following staff of Geo-technical Engineering Directorate of RDSO were associated in soil exploration and testing: 1. 2. Shri S.K. Gupta, SRE Shri G.P. Shukla, SRE associated in preparation of the
Following staff were Consultancy Report: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.
Shri S.K.Chourasia, SSRE Shri Y.R.Tirpude,SSE(Design) Shri S.K.Gupta, SRE Shri G.P.Shukla, SRE Shri R.K.Premi , SRE Shri Shiv Kumar, SRE Shri S.D.Sharma, JRE-I Shri Jayant Cahudhary, JRE-I
12
ANNEXURE - I SPECIFICATIONS FOR BLANKET MATERIAL
1.0 Blanket material should generally conform to following specifications: i) It should be coarse, granular and well graded. ii) Skip-graded material is not permitted. iii) Non-plastic fines (particles of size less than 75 micros) are limited maximum to 12% whereas plastic fines are limited maximum to 5%. iv) The blanket material should have particle size distribution curve more or less within the enveloping curves shown in Sketch The material should be well graded with Cu and Cc as under: v) Uniformity coefficient Cu = D 60 / D 10 > 4 (preferably >7) vi) Coefficient of curvature, Cc = (D30) 2 / D 60 X D 10 should be within 1 and 3. vii) The material for upper blanket layer shall be well-graded sandy gravel or crushed rock within the enveloping curves for upper blanket layer as shown in annexure II.
13
14
Figure. 1
C L (UP)
5.40m
C L (DN)
2. 6
:1
1.06m W. L.
Pond filled with wate
Bank Profile At Km 687/13-14 (DN) Between Colonelganj And Saryu stations

C L (DN)
DEPTH BELOW RAIL LEVEL 000
400 810 1100 DS-1
UDS-1
Ballast Penetration Profile At Km Km 687/13-14

NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm. 2. DS INDICATES DISTURBED SAMPLE. 3. UDS INDICATES UNDISTURBED SAMPLE. NOT TO SCALE
Rehabilitation Of Weak Formation From Km 687/0 to 703/0 (DN) Between Colonelganj & Jarwal Road stations on Lucknow Jn Division, North Eastern Railway DRG. NO. GE/SK/NE/464/Rev.0/2006
15
Figure. 2
C L (UP) (> 10.0m)
C L (DN)
Pucca Drain
3. 1: 1
4.40m
3.81m
Bank Profile At Km 691/1-2 (DN) Between Colonelganj And Saryu stations
G.L.
C L (DN)
Depth Below Rail Level 000
400 >1000 DS-2 UDS-2 >1000 (Digging was not possible)
Ballast Penetration Profile At Km Km 691/1-2

16
Figure. 3
C L (UP)
5.30m
C L (DN)
3 .1
:1
1.58m
G.L.
Bank Profile At Km 695/1-2 (DN) Between Saryu And Jarwal Road stations
C L (DN)
Depth Below Rail Level 000
400 750 860
DS-6
UDS-6
Ballast Penetration Profile At
Km 695/1-2
17
Figure. 4
C L (UP)
5.230m 0.1m
C L (DN)
3:1
5.97:1
1.50m G. L.
Depth Below Rail Level
C L (DN)
000
400 550 760 DS-5 UDS-5
Km 698/1-2
18
Figure. 5
L (UP) C
5.85m 0.2m
C L (DN)
3.75
:1
G. L.
Depth Below Rail Level
C L (DN)
000
400 600 700 DS-4 UDS-4
Km 699/5-6
19
Figure. 6
C L (UP)
5.35m 0.31m
C L (DN)
2 . 38
:1
2.95m
Pond filled with wate Depth Below Rail Level 000
W. L.
C L (DN)
400 700 850 DS-3 UDS-3
Ballast Penetration Profile At Km 702/2-3

20
Figure. 7
C L (UP)
5.40m
C L (DN)
Existing Profile Proposed Profile 1 IN 30 1 IN 30 1.0m Thick Blanket
2.6 :1
1.06m G.L.
Recommended Profile At Km 687/13-14 (DN) Between Colonelganj And Saryu stations
NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm. NOT TO SCALE
21
Figure. 8
C L (UP) (> 10.0m)
C L (DN) Existing Profile Proposed Profile 3:1 3.1:1 1 IN 30 1.0m Thick Blanket
Pucca Drain
4.40m
3.81m
G.L.
Recommended Profile At Km 691/1-2 (DN) Between Colonelganj And Saryu stations
Rehabilitation Of Weak Formation From Km 687/0 to 703/0 (DN) Between Colonelganj & Jarwal Road stations on Lucknow Jn Division, North Eastern Railway
DRG. NO. GE/SK/NE/472/Rev.0/2006
22
Figure. 9
C L (UP)
5.30m
C L (DN)
900 1 IN 30 1 IN 30 1.0m Thick Blanket
3:1
Existing Profile
3 :1
Proposed Profile 1.58m G.L.
Recommended Profile At Km 695/1-2 (DN) Between Saryu And Jarwal Road stations
23
Figure. 10
C L (UP)
5.230m
0.1m
C L (DN)
900 1 IN 30 1 IN 30 1.0m Thick Blanket Existing Profile
2:1
3:1
Proposed Profile
5.97:1
1.50m G. L.
24
Figure 11
L (UP) C
5.85m 0.2m
C L (DN)
Existing Profile
2:1
Proposed Profile 3.75 :1 G. L.
25
Figure 12
C L (UP)
5.35m 0.31m
C L (DN)

2:1
Proposed Profile
Existing Profile
2 .3 8:1
G. L.
26
27
28

Ge CR 0091

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ge CR 0091

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

For official use

Rehabilitation Of Weak Formation

Gonda Kacheri & Jarwal Road Stations

Lucknow Division:North Eastern Railway

Consultancy No. RDSO/2006/GE: CR-0091 November 2006

Hkw&rduhdh bathfu;jh funskky;

vuqla/kku vfHkdYi vkSj ekud laxBu

(S.K.Awasthi) Asstt. Research Engineer/GE

(Alok Kumar) Executive Director/GE

8.5 Km 699/5-6. Height of the bank is 1.45 m.

08 15.12 1.66 14.5 0.54 -

11 11.0 1.93 19.2 0.27 -

For Km. 687/13-14

Following staff were Consultancy Report: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

ANNEXURE - I SPECIFICATIONS FOR BLANKET MATERIAL

Pond filled with wate

Bank Profile At Km 687/13-14 (DN) Between Colonelganj And Saryu stations

400 810 1100 DS-1

Ballast Penetration Profile At Km Km 687/13-14

C L (UP) (> 10.0m)

Bank Profile At Km 691/1-2 (DN) Between Colonelganj And Saryu stations

Depth Below Rail Level 000

400 >1000 DS-2 UDS-2 >1000 (Digging was not possible)

Ballast Penetration Profile At Km Km 691/1-2

Research Designs & Standards Organisation

400 750 860

Ballast Penetration Profile At

Depth Below Rail Level

400 550 760 DS-5 UDS-5

Ballast Penetration Profile At

400 600 700 DS-4 UDS-4

Ballast Penetration Profile At

400 700 850 DS-3 UDS-3

Ballast Penetration Profile At Km 702/2-3

Recommended Profile At Km 687/13-14 (DN) Between Colonelganj And Saryu stations

Research Designs & Standards Organisation

NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm. NOT TO SCALE

C L (UP) (> 10.0m)

Recommended Profile At Km 691/1-2 (DN) Between Colonelganj And Saryu stations

Research Designs & Standards Organisation

DRG. NO. GE/SK/NE/472/Rev.0/2006

Proposed Profile 1.58m G.L.

Research Designs & Standards Organisation

DRG. NO. GE/SK/NE/473/Rev.0/2006

Research Designs & Standards Organisation

DRG. NO. GE/SK/NE/474/Rev.0/2006

900 1 IN 30 1 IN 30 1.0m Thick Blanket

Proposed Profile 3.75 :1 G. L.

Research Designs & Standards Organisation

DRG. NO. GE/SK/NE/475/Rev.0/2006

900 1 IN 30 1 IN 30 1.0m Thick Blanket

Research Designs & Standards Organisation

DRG. NO. GE/SK/NE/476/Rev.0/2006

You might also like