Professional Documents
Culture Documents
D
VE
R
SE
PROGRESSIONS IN CRIMINOLOGY THEORIES:
IS
Gary A McAvin
E
IC
ST
JU
2
Introduction:
Bridging the gap between criminals and the unsuspecting public stands Law
Enforcement. The effectiveness of law enforcement is contingent upon several factors, of which
D
VE
are; one-training, and two-criminal knowledge, et al. The criminal/s usually knows they are
going to commit a crime. The unsuspecting public is unaware of the criminals decision until it is
R
SE
usually too late. How can these criminals be deterred? How can they be identified prior to any
criminal activity or commission of criminal acts? Where can the edge or deterrence factor be
IS
found? The law-enforcement community must have tools to defeat or turn aside criminal
E
activity. Of course; they have weapons and procedures for this purpose, but; is it enough? What
IC
would give them (the law enforcement community) the better or best advantage? Knowing and
ST
identifying the criminal prior to their act? Or; could newer technologies provide the edge law
JU
Law enforcement only has seconds to identify potential criminals. What can they look
for in potential criminals? How can they identify criminal types? Will the scientific aspect of
criminology be able to supply the answers? How can criminology assist on the ground law-
enforcement officials? Would creating a profile help? Yes! Would creating a theory based upon
qualitative and quantified data add anything to the formula? Yes! Would empirically
substantiated results provide the necessary edge that law-enforcement needs to stay ahead of the
criminal mind? Yes! Theories provide compelling standards on how the criminal both looks
3
(physical) and thinks (mental thought processes) but; can theories be improved upon? Have
Theories:
D
VE
Theory Defined:
R
SE
“Some writers regard theory as a collection of concepts. Others say theory is an
interconnected set of hypotheses. Other writers say theory is a set of concepts plus the
IS
interrelationships that are assumed to exist among those concepts (Selltiz, Cook, and
E
and conclusions. If we consult a dictionary, one of the worst places to look for a clear definition
JU
All of these definitions of theory are true. Yet, no single definition above pulls together all of
theory’s essential elements. Perhaps one of the clearer and more comprehensive definitions of
theory may be gleaned from a synthesis of two definitions provided by Robert Merton (1957:96-
99) and the late theorist, Arnold Rose (1965:9-12). According to these social scientists, theory is
an integrated body of assumptions, propositions, and definitions that are related in such a way so
as to explain and predict relationships between two or more variables.” (Champion, 2000:36-37).
4
Now we need to invest some time in the sub categories of theory formulae, assumptions,
Assumptions:
D
VE
First, let’s distinguish between assumptions and propositions. Assumptions are similar to
R
SE
For our purposes, assumptions are statements that have a high degree of certainty. These are
statements that require little, if any, confirmation in the real world. Examples of assumptions
IS
might be, “All societies have laws,” or “The greater the deviant conduct, the greater the group
E
Propositions:
JU
In contrast, propositions are also statements about the real world, but they lack the high
degree of certainty associated with assumptions. Examples of propositions might be, “Burnout
among probation officers may be mitigated or lessened through job enlargement and giving
officers greater input in organizational decision making,” or “Two-officer patrol units are less
Definitions:
logical explanatory framework or theory. A common problem is that often, the same terms are
assigned different definitions by different investigators. If we use the term peer influence in a
D
VE
statement about delinquents and their delinquent conduct, how should peer influence be defined?
[Ibid]
R
SE
Now that we have the base requirements for theory hypothesis, we can investigate former
IS
criminologists and their theory formulations. In search of the criminal man, the trail sometimes
E
becomes obfuscated by prejudice and personal opinion. Some of the basic theories operated with
IC
the premise (what we now call labeling/stereotyping) that certain individuals are atypical
ST
criminals because of their appearance. What can we learn from primitive criminological
JU
theories? Did these criminologists have facts to substantiate their claims? Not always! For the
How did people like DaVinci, Democritus, physicians of Egypt, Galen, Newton and
others see the deeper things without the aid of modern scientific instruments? Were their powers
of observation better than we may suppose or presume? Several theorists must be considered as
we analyze their theories for viability today. Origins of the Classical School of Criminology
reside in a theory composed by Cesare Beccaria, called “On Crimes and Punishment 1764”
6
“Beccaria believed that the function of law was to promote justice (Young, 1984). In his
1764 essay On Crimes and Punishments, he formulated the following principles, which
represented a dramatic departure from how criminal law had previously been perceived (Vold,
D
VE
1970:18-22).
R
SE
• Prevention of crime is more important than punishment for the crime committed. Punishment is
desirable only as it helps to prevent crime and does not conflict with the ends of justice.
IS
E
• Desirable criminal procedure calls for the open publication of all laws, speedy trials, humane
IC
treatment of the accused, and the abolishment of secret accusations and torture. Moreover, the
ST
accused must have every right and facility to bring forward evidence.
JU
• The purpose of punishment is to deter persons from the commission of crime, not to give
society an opportunity for revenge. In addition, punishment must be certain and swift, with
penalties determined strictly according to the social damage wrought by the crime. Therefore,
celerity—the time-span between crime and punishment—is a key element in deterrence (van den
Haag, 1986:100).
7
temporarily removed revenge and retribution as rationales for punishment.” (Vito & Holmes,
1994:75)
Beccaria’s Theory was a prototype of Deterrence Theory that is the cornerstone of the
contemporary criminal justice system’s response to criminals. (Winfree & Abadinsky 2003:36)
D
VE
We must remember that Beccaria was only 26 when his On Crimes and Punishments was
R
SE
deduced the criminal intentions of their time and recorded their results. This foundation in
criminology was built upon by subsequent individuals using different criminology design
IS
patterns or assumptions! Beccaria’s work was read and studied by the men of renown in his era.
E
“The whole question of “sanctions” (meaning both punishment and reward) was an
JU
absorbing one to the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. The father of what came to be
known as the Classical School of Criminal Law was Cesare Bonesana, Marquis of Beccaria. In
1764 Beccaria, then only twenty-six and barely out of law school, published in Leghorn, Italy, a
slim volume entitled Essay on Crimes and Punishments. It appeared anonymously because the
young author, a Milanese whose territory was then under the rule of Austria, feared reprisals if
his authorship were known. Quite the opposite occurred. Beccaria was lionized; his slender
volume was translated into all the languages of Europe. It was read as avidly by the Austrian
Emperor Joseph II as by Sir William Blackstone, then a lecturer on the English law whose
lecture notes would soon be published as Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England.
8
Seldom has a single work had so galvanizing an effect on the legal thinking of an as did
In the same Classical School of Criminology, Jeremy Bentham built upon Beccaria’s work
and offered the following addition to crime deterrence. “In Britain, philosopher Jeremy Bentham
D
VE
believed that people choose actions on the basis of whether they produce pleasure and happiness
and help them avoid pain or unhappiness. The purpose of law is to produce and support the total
R
SE
happiness of the community it serves. Because punishment is in itself harmful, its existence is
justified only if it promises to prevent greater evil than it creates. Punishment, therefore, has four
IS
main objectives: (Siegel 2004:108)
E
IC
2. When it cannot prevent a crime, to convince the offender to commit a less serious crime
Can we use the research and writings of Beccaria and Bentham today, or; are they ideas
relegated to another place in time? Are theories only consigned to a particular historical period?
Or; can we coalesce these older theories with the newer more scientific posits? What does
modern criminology find useful in these theories from Beccaria’s On Crime and Punishments
1764 and Bentham’s Moral Criticism 1789? Obviously; good criminologists build on proven
9
assumptions, propositions and definitions! The foundation of the deterrence theory was strong
and was given new life by Gibbs and Becker circa 1968 and; they found viability in this theory.
“Criminologists’ interest in deterrence theory waned in the last quarter of the nineteenth
century. The influential writings of Charles Darwin, Herbert Spencer, and Cesare Lombroso,
D
VE
explanations of human behavior. Criminologists shifted from the study of laws and punishments
to the study of criminals, both in society and in its prisons, a locus they largely maintained until
R
SE
the 1960s. For 100 years criminologists took one path, and policy makers followed an entirely
different one.
IS
The 1960s brought about many changes in American society; ranging from desegregation
E
to near political anarchy. In those tumultuous times two social scientists shifted criminologists’
IC
attention back to deterrence theory. In 1968, Jack Gibbs published “Crime, Punishment, and
ST
Deterrence,” in which he attempted to test the deterrence hypothesis. This was the beginning of
JU
perceptual deterrence studies. Also in 1968 economist and 1992 Nobel Prize winner Gary S.
Becker published “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach,” a work that generated great
interest in a perspective called cost—benefit analysis. With the publication of these two works,
deterrence theory was once more on the agenda of criminologists. One irony in this rediscovery
attempt to reveal punishments’ deterrent effects.” (Winfree & Abadinsky 2003: 36)
Proof in point; that good criminologists build upon the foundation already laid in
previous generations. We must remember the intelligence of ancient civilizations and the people
10
responsible for historical preservation. How could for instance; Democritus understand the
theory of the atom unless he was extremely intelligent? It is not good investigative practice to
Positivist Criminology:
D
VE
Nineteenth-Century Positivism:
R
SE
“The classical position served as a guide to crime, law, and justice for almost 100 years,
but during the late nineteenth century a change in the way knowledge was being gathered created
IS
a challenge to its dominance. The scientific method was beginning to take hold in Europe. Rather
E
than rely on pure thought and reason, careful observation and analysis of natural phenomena was
IC
being undertaken to understand the way the world worked. This movement inspired new
ST
discoveries in biology, astronomy, and chemistry. If the scientific method could be applied to the
JU
study of nature, then why not use it to study human behavior?” (Siegel 2004:6)
Biological Theory:
“The earliest “scientific” studies examining human behavior were biologically oriented.
determine whether the shape of ears, nose, and eyes and the distance between them were
associated with antisocial behavior. Phrenologists, such as Franz Joseph Gall (1758—1828) and
Johann K Spurzheim (1776—1832), studied the shape of the skull and bumps on the head to
11
determine whether these physical attributes were linked to criminal behavior. Phrenologists
believed that external cranial characteristics dictate which areas of the brain control physical
activity though their primitive techniques and quasi-scientific methods have been thoroughly
discredited, these efforts were an early attempt to use a “scientific” method to study crime.”
[Ibid]
D
VE
What can we determine from these theories that began using scientific methods to study
criminology? Exact measurements and astute observations were used to determine the criminal
R
SE
possibility; as the search for the “Born Criminal” took a new dimension! Positivists believed
that there were specific indicators for defining a criminal. Now the attention was directed
IS
towards behavior patterns, body types, head size and shape and other physical factors that were
E
significantly identifiable in criminals but; not in the norm of society, or so it was posited.
IC
ST
skull provide clues, or; answers to what resides within? Phrenology was the forerunner of brain
mapping or neuroimaging. Spurtzheim assisted Gall in his studies. Gall eventually charted 27
different regions of the skull and attributed numbers and physical possibilities to each one. For
sexual desire today) Location 2. Conjugal love=Tenderness to the offspring, or parental love.
This process was mapped and studied by phrenologists, and still is today! But is this theory
useful today? Yes! But only the premise! Because of this exterior expedition, interior brain
mapping (neuroimaging) became a study and is now accepted intelligence that is scientifically
provable.
12
And; before we pass this point; it might be of interest to consider the face recognition
software now being integrated into antiterrorist applications. Considering Physiognomy and the
theory behind it; can it be that this is only a progression now found in this newer identification
theory? Another facial distinctions theory built upon the older theory of Lavater? Is there
correlation between the two? With this technology, face identification can be utilized in the
D
VE
same processes that are used for fingerprint searches.
R
SE
Face recognition next in terror fight:
The government is paying for some of the most advanced research into controversial face-
JU
recognition technology, which converts photos into numerical sequences that can be instantly
compared with millions of photos in a database. Facial-recognition research was sought to enable
federal air marshals to surreptitiously photograph people in airports and bus and train stations to
check whether they were on terrorist databases. The air marshals disavowed the technology to
focus on identifying suspects through methods that don't use cameras.” (www.usatoday.com)
“Until just a few decades ago, it was very difficult to detect, non-invasively,
physiological signals from the brain. However, the discoveries in physics, the evolution of
13
information technology, and the invention of non-invasive biomedical technologies in the last
decades of the twentieth century transformed this scenario and created numerous opportunities
for studying the brain in living subjects. The authors trace the extraordinary evolution of brain
neuroimaging?) in the second part of the twentieth century. Not only have these methods had a
remarkable clinical impact, they have also been outstanding research tools in the field of the
D
VE
neurosciences. In their most recent applications, they are employed in the quest to uncover the
R
SE
Can we correlate the foundational theories of Gall, Spurtzheim, and Lavater et al; and
IS
apply them to this new scientific information? There are distinct correlations applicable to
E
today’s criminology understandings. Galls, Spurtzheim, were forerunners of brain mapping, and;
IC
Lavater with his facial recognition possibilities. His theory is now being utilized in fast face scan
ST
applications. Although only given a glimpse of their potentiality, these theorists laid foundational
JU
intelligence. There are periods of illumination called; “Enlightenment” and periods of darkness
when no intellectual discoveries are made called; “The Dark Ages.” Since the enlightenment,
criminology has advanced from the so-called primitive form, i.e. Classic, to the most advanced
era in time; now! Most of the criminology theories and techniques were discovered in the
Twentieth Century. Science now provides new investigative proficiencies unparalleled in history.
14
Biological Determinism:
Cesare Lombrosco an Italian physician was one of the first to take the scientific approach
to the study of criminal man. Lombrosco advanced the theory that physical traits were indicative
D
VE
of criminality. He believed that criminality was inherited from generation to generation.
(Lombrosco’s theory is not one I want to pursue, but; what progressions that come after; is where
R
SE
modern interests lie.) And; following Lombrosco’s physical characteristics pattern were others
that applied physical features as indicators for criminality. Goring’s “defective intelligence”
IS
findings; Hooten’s physiological inferiority characterizations; and then we come to William
E
Sheldon’s Somatotypes theory. But; Sheldon built his work, research and theory on the work of
IC
others.
ST
JU
Biological Theory:
“Body types and crime. The search for a constitutionally determined criminal man did not
stop with Goring’s (1913) conclusions. Kretschmer (1925) took up the theme as the result of his
study of 260 insane people in Swabia, a southwestern German town. He was impressed with the
fact that his subjects had definite types of body builds that he thought were associated with
certain types of psychic dispositions. First published in German in 1922 and translated into
English in 1925, Kretschmer’s study identified four body types: asthenic, athletic, pyknic, and
some mixed unclassifiable types. He found asthenics to be lean and narrowly built, with a
deficiency of thickness in their overall bodies. These men were so flat-chested and skinny that
15
their ribs could be counted easily. The athletic build had broad shoulders, excellent musculature,
a deep chest, a flat stomach, and powerful legs. These men were the 1920s counterpart of the
modern “hunks” of media fame. The pyknics were of medium build with a propensity to be
rotund, sort of soft appearing with rounded shoulders, broad faces, and short stubby hands.
Kretschmer argued that the asthenic and athletic builds were associated with schizophrenic
personalities, whereas the pyknics were manic-depressives.” (Lilly, Cullen, & Ball, 2003:22-23)
D
VE
“Kretschmer’s work was useful in Mohr and Gundlach’s report published in 1929-30 on
R
SE
the various body types cataloged by Kretschmer. [Ibid] Ten years later Earnest A. Hooten
followed this same line of research and offered, “criminals are inferior to civilians in nearly all
IS
their body measurements.” [Ibid] This search continued into the 1940s and 1950s with William
E
H. Sheldon changing the research paradigm away from adults to delinquent male youths. He
IC
produced an index that subjected the juvenile to degrees of troubles. With the extreme, (score of
ST
10) calling for institutionalization and lower scores, (6) implying various degrees of adjustment
JU
possibilities. Sheldon also categorized body types into three classifications, endomorphs,
mesomorphs, and ectomorphs. Each type had different physical features. These features were
The problem with body typing resides in the potential for change. Will a mesomorph
always remain a mesomorph? Changes take place in all three body types. Several factors for
example can be considered. Body types can be altered by conditioning programs and diets.
Heavy weight lifting can change a body type from thin, or overweight, into a very muscular type.
Also; overweight people can lose weight, develop an exercise routine and subsequently change
16
their appearance also. Consider the programs allowed in prisons for routine exercise. These
programs (if they are weight lifting oriented) can definitely alter body types; and; all three of
Sheldon’s body types can be altered, and very significantly at times. It is known by cessation of
weight lifting programs you can become obese in a matter of time; from mesomorph to
endomorph in a short time for some. At one time, these body types could be useful for quick
identification by patrolling police officers, but; now the paradigm is changing. Something that
D
VE
the general public is probably unaware of, took place in criminal typing; and this could be cause
for concern!
R
SE
“Efforts to connect body shape and behavior were not limited to crime alone. In 1995, it
IS
was revealed that between the 1940s and the 1960s, Hooton and Sheldon had been involved with
E
a eugenics experiment that took “posture photos” of freshmen as they entered some of the
IC
nation’s most prestigious Ivy League schools including Harvard University, Yale University, and
ST
Wellesley College. They were pursuing the now discredited idea that body shape and intelligence
JU
are somehow connected & Some of “America’s Establishment” photographed for the experiment
included New York Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, former president George H. W. Bush, New
York Governor George Pataki, University of Oklahoma President David Boren, and television
journalist Diane Sawyer. Although some of the photographs had been destroyed since the
experiment was ended during the late 1960s, in 1995 the Smithsonian museum in Washington,
D.C., still had as many as 20,000 photographs of men and 7,000 photographs of women. Since
then, the photographs have been destroyed (“Naked Truth Returns,” 1995; “Naked Truth
Revealed,” 1995; “Smithsonian Destroys,” 1995).” (Criminology Theory, Lilly, Cullen, Ball,
2003:24)
17
This can be problematical in wrongful applications of criminology technology. In the not too
distant past; the unsuspecting public was the subject of eugenic studies that ended in tragedy.
D
VE
Theories by Pavlov and Skinner revealed the conditioned response in learning. You can
R
SE
train dogs (Pavlov) and people (Skinner et al) to respond accordingly.
“Behaviorists see all behavior as resulting from learned responses to distinct stimuli. As noted by
IS
Skinner, when some aspect of behavior (animal or human) is followed by a certain type of
E
consequence—a reward—it is more likely to recur. The reward is a positive reinforcer. However,
IC
a reward becomes a positive reinforcer, and punishment becomes a negative reinforcer, only
ST
when actually influencing behavior in a specified manner. These concepts form the basis for
JU
Can we apply this premise to behavior modification procedures? For example if we posit;
the child learns via family, peer groups, environment, observation, and social settings, et al, can
we produce the proper input for the expected outcome? If criminals learn to be criminals; what
must change? The learning environment or conditions of learning must change or be adjusted. In
order to change or modify criminals you must go to the source of their criminality; the mind! I
“The behavioral psychologist operates from a radically different perspective than the
therapist oriented toward the psychoanalytic model. The focus is on specific behavior, which is
the end result of the values, attitudes, interests, skills, and basic personality patterns of the
individual.
The basic principle underlying behaviorism is that all behavior is learned. The father of
D
VE
behaviorism, John B. Watson, believed that the purpose of psychology is to understand, predict,
and control human behavior (Bartol, 1986:79). B. F. Skinner, a dominant figure in behaviorism,
R
SE
felt that there is nothing emotionally or morally wrong with persons who commit crimes. Rather,
they are simply responding to rewards and punishments within their environments. Thus,
IS
behavior is repeated if it is rewarded; conversely, behavior that is not rewarded is not repeated.
E
According to the behaviorists, behavior can be changed through either positive or negative
IC
interactions with the environment. Because the personality develops through the interaction of
ST
the unique biological and social forces that make up the learning process, the viability for change
JU
comes from the person making rational decisions based on what is pleasing. Thus, all behavior
can be studied and predicted if the positive reward system driving it is efficient enough.” (Vito &
Holmes 1994:128)
Now; if we consider the premise posited by Watson, that all behaviors are learned, how
can we change the behavior patterns in criminals? Can we use various deterrence sanctions,
reward and punishments? Can we treat prisoners like Pavlov’s dogs with positive or negative
reinforcement? If they learned it; they can unlearn it and; or; change! But; what if the criminal
Psychological-Psychoanalytic Theories:
“Although by the middle 1970s psychoanalytic theory had lost considerable standing and
was to come under considerable attack by the early 1990s, partly because of new evidence
suggesting that Freud had either misjudged or actually suppressed much of his critical case
D
VE
material and partly because of sharp feminist critiques, Yochelson and Samenow (1976)
published a popular book, The Criminal Personality, arguing that crime is the result of
R
SE
pathological thought patterns constituting a “criminal mind.” Offenders were described in the
characterized by some pathological mentality, if only it could be identified, had gained more
IC
favor, with many different psychological characteristics suggested as the origin of crime.” (Lilly,
ST
drugs, or unemployment. Crime resides within the minds of human beings and is not caused
by social conditions. Once we as a society recognize this simple fact, we shall take measures
radically different from current ones. To be sure, we shall continue to remedy intolerable social
conditions for this is worthwhile in and of itself. But we shall not expect criminals to change
Only if society knows who the criminal is can genuine progress be made in fighting crime. Here,
I shall propose still another approach to the crime problem, a method of dealing with criminals
20
that has had positive results and therefore offers a ray of hope. It begins with holding the
criminal completely accountable for his offenses. This is to say that a person is responsible for
having committed a crime, regardless of his social background or the adversities that have
confronted him. However, the fact that a criminal commits crimes out of choice should not result
only in locking him up for he will emerge from prison still a criminal. Just as he has chosen a life
of crime, so a criminal can make choices in a new direction and learn to lead a responsible life.
D
VE
This is not an attempt to resuscitate rehabilitation under another name, for all the traditional
rehabilitative programs in the world will be of no use unless the criminal changes his
R
thinking.” (Samenow, 1984:6) (Emphasis Mine)
SE
IS
If we follow this train of thought; we can arrive at possibilities. Today we have the
E
technology to effect change. We have mind altering drugs that can change the mental state of
IC
individuals. And; these drugs are found on the street as well as in the pharmaceutical. If we can
ST
apply the advances of mind altering technologies on willing participants, changes can be
JU
realized. If the criminal wants to change; they can. Also of use is subliminal mind altering
processes, now; I suggest this type of therapy on a willing criminal base. Volunteers only! A
control group could be established composed of criminals that really want to change. These
people could be used in a controlled scientific experimental basis (control group) and then tested
“Subliminal therapy has been used for many decades, dating back as far as the early
1900's. The first recorded use of subliminal messages was seen in the form of whisper therapy, in
which a therapist whispers suggestions to the patient in hopes of subconsciously persuading the
21
patient to improve his/her behavior. In the whisper therapy example, the therapist whispers the
suggestion to the patient at a level inaudible to the conscious mind; or at a time when the patient
is not expecting it. If the patient is unaware of the suggestion because it is below his/her level of
Though use of subliminal messages was not recorded until the twentieth century, research began
much earlier. The research of Suslowa in 1863 demonstrated that there is a threshold between
D
VE
conscious and subliminal that was seen through the use of "subliminal electrical stimulation."
The patient was administered electrical impulses at different levels of intensity, and brain activity
R
SE
was observed to change at the specific threshold point. This border between the conscious and
Is there validation for this process? Consider the following: “Currently, not much is
IC
being done to curb the use of subliminal messages in advertising and daily use. In Australia and
ST
Britain, the use of subliminal advertising has been banned with severe consequences for those
JU
who disobey the strict laws. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United
States will now revoke a company's broadcast license if the use of subliminal messages is
proven. Subliminal message usage has also been banned for all members of The National
Association of Broadcasters. In a Nevada court case, the judge ruled that the First Amendment's
protection of freedom of speech and press does not extend as far as subliminal messages
(Pratkanis200).” (http://library.thinkquest.org/)
If the FCC will revoke a station’s license for intentionally using subliminal messaging,
this would validate it authenticity, wouldn’t you think? Ok! Say this works! If scientists would
22
utilize this process to go below the conscience level of communication to the sub-conscience,
could change be affected? We are looking for things that can change behavior patterns.
Another technology that can change/alter mind states is found in neuroscience and
psychoacoustics.
D
VE
The Scientific Research Behind
R
SE
Acoustic Brainwave Entrainment:
IS
“David Krech, University of California at Berkeley psychologist predicted almost
E
twenty-five years ago: "I foresee the day when we shall have the means, and therefore,
IC
inevitability, the temptation, to manipulate the behavior and intellectual functioning of all people
ST
That day may very well be here now, and the gentle altering of brain wave patterns using sound
may be the easiest, most potent, and safest way to do it. Acoustic Brainwave Entrainment uses
sound technology to entrain brain wave patterns, giving us the ability to influence and/or create
tranquility, pain control, creativity, euphoria, excitement, and focused attention, relief from
stress, enhanced learning ability and problem solving ability, increased memory, accelerated
(http://www.neuroacoustic.com/acoustic.html)
23
Today; believe it or not; technology exists that can change brainwave patterns and
thought processes. This could prove effective in Criminal Justice if applied. Criminal mind
states must be changed at point of origin-within. If this technology could be applied in control
groups across the criminal spectrum, results could be studied and verified as to validity.
Something must be found or we will continue to process and warehouse our criminals. Nothing
seems to have any lasting effect on criminals because it is applied to the wrong location-external,
D
VE
rather than-internal, the seat and origin of all affections, good or evil.
R
SE
Conclusion:
IS
If we make the assumption that effective changes reside within our capabilities; via
E
modern mind altering technology, it becomes our responsibility to implement such. It has
IC
become paramount to find and implement new workable procedures to reduce the criminal
ST
behavior. Deterrents work if applied swiftly and consistently, albeit; the outcry against severe
JU
sanctions (death penalty) will restrict and minimize severe sanctions, emboldening the criminal
Putting into propositional form the concept of changing criminal behavior from within,
could gain substantial support, providing the test results were empirically validated. This would
require beta testing at several penal locations, and perhaps the worst criminals could be in the
initial control groups. If proven empirically, this could become policy followed by application.
Defining the problem of deterrence and providing useful solutions can change the criminal
paradigm. What is the overall problem? Finding answers for societies burgeoning criminal
problem. Criminals no longer fear harsh sanctions as they once did. Their probability of even
getting apprehended for their crimes is; infinitesimally small. The solution resides in change.
D
VE
Changing the criminals desire to commit crimes and to become beneficial instead of detrimental,
R
SE
IS
E
IC
ST
JU
25
References:
Champion, Dean J. (2000). Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology (Second
ed., Vol. 1) (Marion Gottlieb. Neil Marquardt, Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-
Lilly, Robert J. & Richard A. Ball. (2002). Criminological Theory Context and Consequences
(1st ed., Vol. 1) (Vonessa Vondera. James Westby, Ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.
D
VE
(Original work published 2002)
Rennie, Ysabel Fisk. (1978). The Search For Criminal Man (1st ed., Vol. 1) (Dinitz. Conrad,
R
SE
Ed.). N/A, Canada: D.C. Health and Company. (Original work published D. C. Health
and Company)
IS
Samenow, Stanton E. (1984). Inside the Criminal Mind (1st ed., Vol. 1) (Samenow, Ed.). New
E
York: Time Books, a Division of Random House. (Original work published Time Books)
IC
Siegal, Larry J. (2004). Criminology Theories, Patterns, & Typologie (1st ed.) (Horne. Whitney,
ST
Vito, Gennaro F. & Holmes, Ronald M. (1994). Criminology Theory, Research, and Policy (1st
ed., Vol. 1) (Brian Gore, Ed. et al.). Belmont, CA: International Thompson Publishing.
Winfree, L., Thomas & Abadinsky, Howard (2003). Understanding Crime Theory and Practice
Learning.
(http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-05-10-facial-recognition-
terrorism_N.htm