Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANGELO MELISI
VS.
ANSWER, SpECtAL DEFENSES AND COUNTERCLATMS OF DEFENDANTS TOWN OF OXFORD, GEORGE TEMPLE AND CAYENNE SPREMULLO
Pursuant to Practice Book S 10-46 ef seq., Defendants Town of Oxford, George
Melisi's
1. 2.
Paragraph 1 is admitted.
knowledge or information upon which to form an opinion or belief, and therefore leave
plaintiff to his proof.
3.
knowledge or information upon which to form an opinion or belief, and therefore leave
plaintiff to his proof.
4.
the current owner", these defendants have insufficient knowledge or information upon
to his proof.
The
5.
knowledge or information upon which to form an opinion or belief, and therefore leave
plaintiff to his proof.
6.
knowledge or information upon which to form an opinion or belief, and therefore leave
plaintiff to his proof.
7. B.
Paragraph 7 is admitted.
knowledge or information upon which to form an opinion or belief, and therefore leave
plaintiff to his proof.
knowledge or information upon which to form an opinion or belief, and therefore leave
plaintiff to his proof.
10.
knowledge or information upon which to form an opinion or belief, and therefore leave
plaintiff to his proof.
11. 12.
o'f
the Facts,
Paragraph 13 is admitted. Paragraph 14 is denied. So much of Paragraph 15 as alleges, "[t]he fraudulent non-disclosures",
is
16.
disclosure",
defendants have insufficient knowledge or information upon which to form an opinion or belief, and therefore leave plaintiff to his proof. SECOND COUNT: (Fraudulent Mislepresentatiqn)
13.
F_OU
Paragraph 13 is denied.
1-12. These defendants' responses to Paragraphs 1 through 12 of the Facts, are hereby made defendants'responses to Paragraphs 1 through 12 of this Fourth
Count, as if fully set out herein.
13. 14.
13.
Paragraph 13, these defendants have insufficient knowledge or information upon which
to form an opinion or belief, and therefore leave plaintiff to his proof,
14.
deed for the property after the six month redemption period", is denied. As to so much
of Paragraph 14 as alleges,
"ar'rd failed
insufficient knowledge or information upon which to form an opinion or belief, and therefore leave plaintiff to his proof. The remaining allegations of Paragraph 14 are
admitted.
15.
Paragraphs 13, 13a, 13b and 13c are denied. Paragraph 14 is denied. Paragraph 15 is denied.
Plaintiff's damages,
if
$ 12-159a.
1. 2. 3.
located
municipal
corporation with a principal place of business at 486 Oxford Road, Oxford, Connecticut.
Davies, Connecticut State Marshal, held a tax sale for a certain parcel of real property
4. 5.
pursuant to the terms and conditions of the sale provided to him at that time.
balance of $500,000 within ten (10) days in consideration of and for his purchase of the Property, as set forth in the executed acknowledgment attached hereto as Exhibit A.
6.
Melisi paid the $100,000 deposit but has breached his agreement by
failing, refusing or neglecting to pay the balance of $500,000, despite due demand
having been made thereof,
7.
$500,000.
has
COUNT TWO
UNJUST ENRICHMENT
1-7.
Paragraphs 1 through
alleged herein.
8. 9.
Property.
Title to the Property has been recorded in Melisi's name. Melisi has inequitably appropriated, accepted and retained the value of the
The value of the Property which remains unpaid by Melisi, to his benefit,
despite having been duly demanded is $500,000. Melisi has been unjustly enriched in the sum of $500,000, plus interest, at
the Town's expense and to its detriment. By reason of the foregoing, Melisi is indebted to the Town in an amount to
be determined at trial but in no event less than $500,000 plus interest on the basis of
unjust enrichment. WHEREFORE, the Town claims:
Expenses; and Such other relief as the Court may deem as just and proper.