Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Paulin Research Group 11211 Richmond Ave. Suite 109 Houston, Texas 77082 www.paulin.com 281-920-9775 November 18, 2003
Audience
Vessel Engineers Saddles with or without wearplates Piping Engineers Saddles & Pipe Shoes with or without wearplates
Finite Element Analysis can evaluate geometries and loads when no other solutions are possible CONSISTENT DESIGNS ARE PRODUCED.
External Loads (sloshing, wind, seismic, piping induced thermal) Fatigue Analysis Multiple Saddles Ovalization effect due to liquid head Influence of Pressure on Circumferential Bending Geometries beyond Zicks Scope (b +10t, etc)
Ovalization
When L*D/t > 15 vessel weight and fluid caused ovalization can contribute significantly to stresses at saddle horn for vessels without stiffening rings. NozzlePRO analyzes filled, partially filled or empty vessels. Ovalization does not affect stresses due to external loads as strongly.
61%
0.6 Stress Reduction 0.5
52%
24%
Non-Integral Model shows lowest shell stresses due to weight and external loads and compares best to Zick and PRG strain gage data.
t / T = 0.375
t / T = 0.50
t / T = 1.0
t / T = 1.50
40000
30000
20000
10000
Stress in Shell is not strongly effected by the wearplate thickness for external loads. Below t/T of 1.0 the high stress due to external loads moves into the wearplate. Non-Integral models are the most conservative.
Piping Support Axial Loads are typically due to primary and fatigue loading:
Thermal Expansion of Pipe (Fatigue?) Seismic/Wind (Primary & Fatigue?) Water Hammer (Primary?) Pulsations (Fatigue?) Pitch & Roll (Primary & Fatigue?)
Horizontal Vessel Support Axial Loads are typically due to primary and fatigue loading:
Seismic (Primary & Fatigue?) Pitch & Roll (Primary & Fatigue?) Acoustic (Surge Protection and Noise Attenuation Devices) (Fatigue?)
ASME Section VIII Div 2 Secondary/Peak Stress Criteria (plus Markl and B31 fatigue criteria)
Secondary Stress must be less than 3Sm (Pl+Pb+Q < 3Sm) Alternating Peak Stress (Fatigue) must be less than Sa (Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa). Markl Test alternating Peak Stress limit for carbon steels = 245,000 N-0.2 psi B31 Alternating Peak Stress Limit = f(1.25(Sc+Sh)) = 6N-0.2(Sc+Sh)
Recommended FEA Method (NozzlePRO/FEPipe/Ansys/Abacus etc.) Programs mentioned are the top three used in Europe as listed in the Current Industrial Practices for Pressure Equipment Design Against Fatigue.
A variety of options are available for saddle geometry, model and boundary condition type.
Tabular Reports
Plastic Deformation
Using NozzlePRO and ASME rules a 28,000 lb. load showed to be 291% overstressed 100% of allowable would be here.
30000
25000
15000
Safety Factor
10000
5000
0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Axial Displacement (in.)
Primary Load Evaluation with NozzlePRO gives the desired Safety Factor
Accurate Fatigue predictions are difficult to make. It has been said: The Good Lord watches over: 1) Children 2) Fools 3) People that try to predict fatigue failures of PVP geometries with FEA programs.
Of critical importance in cyclically loaded systems is weld profile and quality. (The analysis doesnt mean anything if youve got a poor weld. The welds shown below by Cen-Tex Marine were exceptional.)
NozzlePRO fatigue evaluation per ASME Section VIII Div. 2 Appendix 4 and 5.
Load that produced plastic deformation in the saddle would overstress the vessel if applied 7000 times.
Anticipated number of fatigue cycles to failure. 490,000 N-0.2 = Stress-to-Failure 490,000 N-0.2 = 137,614 N to Fail = (137,614/490,000)-5 = 572 cycles
Conclusions
Two stress catagories must be evaluated:
Primary (Pl<1.5Sm) Fatigue (Pl+Pb+Q<3Sm and Pl+Pb+Q+F < Sa)
Saddles on wearplates can fail thru the pressure containment section or thru the support section. Integral Models are Less Conservative but tend to more accurately predict the stress. Non-Integral Models are More Conservative but may simulate fit-up and actual fabrication better. Fatigue Integrity is VERY weld profile and weld quality dependant. FEA can be used to produce good design guidance. Watch www.paulin.com for latest on test results.
Pick the Vessel Size, the Grid Size and the depth of fluid
2) Enter pitch and roll sloshing period and maximum g load or El Centro Earthquake multiplier.