Professional Documents
Culture Documents
David Ross
Professor Wright
12 May 2009
Wearing simple t-shirts underneath full length black trench coats, two seemingly ordinary
senior high school students calmly walked up the West Entrance steps of their high school,
opened the doors and disappeared into the infamy we call Columbine. Approximately 43 minutes
later, the two young men – Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold – “ended their rampage by committing
double suicide amongst the carnage of 10 other dead students in the school library” (Sheperd 6).
The bloody rampage at Columbine High School became an instant catalyst for parents,
educators, and law enforcement to try to find ways to protect the nation’s schools and reduce the
chances of reoccurrence in the future. One of the many incorrect rumors that came out of the
Columbine investigation was that the two killers were members of a school gang called the
trench coat mafia. Upon further investigation, it was revealed there were several groups on
campus that dressed alike to show their unity. This created the first knee-jerk solution to
eliminate the ability for those groups to dress alike and visually create fear or intimidation. The
use of school uniforms began to gain momentum as a solution. As a deterrent, “President Clinton
promoted greater use of school uniforms” and directed his administration to send a Manual on
School Uniforms to the nation's 16,000 school districts” (United 6). With so many options
available, the question must be asked: Are mandatory school uniforms a proven and effective
Let us compare several other ideas against mandatory uniforms and see if they are more
effective. “Many school districts across the nation have a dress code or uniform policy as a way
to deter school violence and bullying. However, there is a divided line between school officials,
parents, and students regarding this sensitive issue (Thompson 6). In 1999 it seemed everyone
had a proposed solution to reducing school violence, but very little data to support it. The Reason
Public Policy Institute found that “there is no one-size-fits-all silver bullet approach to school
The United States Secret Service authored a study called “The Safe School Initiative”
using the same criteria they use to evaluate threats against the President of the United States.
Their goal was to hopefully identify common traits of all thirty-seven past school shooters and
create working profiles that would help prevent future school shootings. Suggestions from the
Secret Service included “using metal detectors, on site police presence, locker searches by police
dogs or administration, closed campuses, and restricted parking (United 6). Then report also
revealed surprisingly enough, only 27% of past shooters “socialized with fellow students who
were disliked by most mainstream students or were considered part of a ‘fringe’ group” (6).
Some law enforcement personnel are of the thought that parents should secure their
weapons at home and also take the additional step of rendering firearms ineffectual by the use of
trigger locks knowledge of where firearms are “hidden” The first rebellious feedback in regard to
mandatory uniforms came from the female population of the schools. They objected for many
reasons, least of all and probably unknown to them, was a bit of information in a report from The
United States Secret Service. While consolidating known facts about all previous school
shootings in hopes of creating a profile of future school shooters, the Secret Service discovered,
Ross - 3
“all of the incidents of targeted school violence examined in the Safe School Initiative were
Females wanted to know the reason for taking away their right to wear what they wanted
to wear when all evidence pointed to the fact it was unlikely females would ever commit this
type of crime. A mandatory school uniform was seen as a sexist decision since females felt only
males should be subjected to this rule as all evidence pointed to the fact that males, not females,
Throughout the country, school administrators worked with school psychologists and the
results were several creative and effective ideas. The state of Colorado has a Safe2Tell
anonymous tip line that covers any potential threat to safety. The program also includes
anonymous and encrypted Web-tipping, says Susan Payne, special agent in charge of school
safety and homeland security for the state. In the past 4½ years, the line has prevented 28
planned school attacks, she says. In one incident, there were 33 weapons found. About two-thirds
of the calls come from kids, Payne says. "All of us have seen these unspeakable tragedies. I can't
think of one that could not have been prevented” (Colorado 6). This idea has proven to be much
Another effective program with set up to reduce school violence is The National
“educate students on the growing problem of school violence” (Swan 6). SAVE promotes non-
violence within the public and private school systems and community, as well as education about
the effects and consequences of violent acts. SAVE strives to focus attention to all forms of
violence, not just the cases of violence that result in death or injury. “In 1995, SAVE was
bestowed the President's Service Award (the nation's highest volunteer award) for the dedication
Ross - 4
and determination in keeping the message of non-violence known and keeping schools and
communities safe” (6). This type of non-invasive action has proven that open dialogues and
continued focus that violence in any form is unacceptable has had an effect on how peers at
school treat each other. Reductions in taunting, bullying, and harassment of individuals creates a
more stable atmosphere. This also is a much more effective tool that mandatory school uniforms.
The ideal solution some people think is the installation and use of stationary metal
detectors that students would have to pass through to enter the school. It seems a logical choice
since guns and knives are made of metal and detection would be ensured. There are specific
issues with this solution which are sometimes overlooked or not addressed as thoroughly as they
should be. The cost of the detector must include a budget for the payroll of the personnel needed
to operate the metal detectors, ongoing training, and maintenance and repair of older equipment.
“How much time will be required to get hundreds, and in many cases thousands, of
students screened through the metal detectors and into their first classes on time without
disrupting educational programs? Assuming a school decides to operate daily stationary metal
detectors at its main entranceway, how will all other doors at the school be secured and staffed to
prevent unauthorized entry during student arrival and processing through the main entrance
metal detectors? Will all ground-level windows be permanently secured at all times so no one
can pass a weapon through an open window to someone who already passed metal detector
screening and is in the building? Would doing so even be allowed by the local fire marshal?
The failure to staff and run a 24/7 metal detection program would create an opportunity
for persons to enter the school during non-detection operation times and store weapons in the
building” (Trump 6). I would have to say the installation of metal detectors is only feasible in
Ross - 5
high gang, high crime, and high violence neighborhoods. In that environment, it is certainly more
As with most complex issues that we seek answers for, I have found there is no single
strategy, or for that matter even a combination of strategies that can provide 100% guarantee that
there will not be a shooting or other act of violence at a school. Good ideas have been
implemented that show great promise in helping reduce or prevent the possibility of future
school violence. School uniforms is not one of them. Mandatory school uniforms are not a
My son attends a public middle school in Lake Havasu City, AZ and he is required to
wear a school uniform. I do not feel that his wearing a school uniform contributes to a safer
Works Cited
index.html>
State of Colorado. Department of Public Safety. "Safe2Tell: Make a Call, Make a Difference."
Colorado Springs: Colorado Prevention Initiative for School Safety. 04 May 2009
<http://safe2tell.org/>.
Swan, Anna. "School Violence: The SAVE Program." Associated Content. 17 May 2006.
<http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/32610/
school_violence_the_save_program.html?cat=48>
Thompson, Dawn. “School Uniforms: Good or Bad?” Associated Content. 01 July 2007
<http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/291547/
school_uniforms_good_or_bad.html?cat=9>
Trump, Ken. "Metal Detectors and School Safety." National School Safety and Security
<http://www.schoolsecurity.org/trends/school_metal_detectors.html>
United States. United States Secret Service. “The Final Report and Findings of The Safe School
Initiative: Implications for the Prevention of School Attacks in the United States.”
Washington: US Secret Service and the United States Dept. of Education, May 2002
<http://www.secretservice.gov/ntac/ssi_final_report.pdf>
Volokh, Alexander., and Lisa Snell. “School Violence Prevention: Strategies to Keep Schools