You are on page 1of 2

I question which has been asked, seriously, in some quarters is, if we want to improve society, just kill old

people or people over a certain age. The idea is that with an aging population, more and more resources will be required to sustain them and they get increasingly ill and cost a lot in medical terms. The problem with that is the simple precept that we all earn off each other in this world. Whatever you have, whatever skills, money, possessions and so on, you earn it off other people. In other words, what we are starting to understand is that because, in general, children have a lot of exuberant energy and old people don't, that is where they are earning it from. In other words, children have the energy levels they do, precisely because old people don't. It has been said to be like a kind of vampire wars. In other words, then, if very frail old people didn't exist in society, then that the exuberance of youth wouldn't either. For our own holistic health, which means, looking at the whole, this is important to understand. Our lives are a war from beginning to end and we fight each other for the energies we want. The alternative to having old people supporting young people would be to actually remove the qualities that children have from them. The youthful buoyancy and curiosity so on. Old people are much less curious, precisely because young children are. This would be an engineering of society into a flat society. In other words, children would have their jest engineered out, medications for example, of them and old people wouldn't be allowed to get frail and decrepit to pay for the youth's zest. Once you understand the mechanics, it is a question of the type of world we want. The pain of old age is an incredibly altruistic thing to go through because you are creating the conditions under which the youth can have their zest and high energies. I don't know if people can get this in their heads, but the qualities in life are always divvied up in such a way that if one person has it it means another hasn't. So think about what qualities you have had in your life, intimacy, compassion, friendships, relationships, humour, education all these things which, always, someone is paying for. Everything about this world is sacrificial ritual. I wish there was a sentence I could think up to summarise this, but there isn't. The simplest thing to understand though is that all people make sacrifices in their lives for each other, but they also reap from the sacrifices of others and it all plays out around the ground of overall neutrality. You know someone has a car, some one doesn't. Someone is happy (reaper), someone isn't (sacrifice). Someone is clever (reaper), someone isn't (sacrifice). Someone is kind(reaper), someone isn't(sacrifice). Someone is caring (reaper), someone isn't (sacrifice). This is the process of life. We all reap and we all sacrifice. The most notorious thing about this process is that someone is born(reaper), someone dies(sacrifice). In other words, the hatchers and the dispatchers work hand in hand and are intimately connected. This is why giving birth is such a schizophrenic thing. It is probably a very happy thing, but also, on a deeper level it has always been known that someone somewhere has been dispatched in the process. 'He' oversees all undertakings and knows where to force dispatches to make room for hatches. When humanity gets less exuberant in its procreational practices, then it will also see a reduction in the dispatching. There has been this unbridled procreation going on in humanity and it goes a long way to explaining the issues of our world. I am a mind mechanic. Why people don't say what they already know about things like me, don't ask me, but this is the way it, life, works and always has. Knowing and saying these things years ago might have made it possible to make different decisions and avoid some of this excruciating torment. At some time, we are the hatched and at some time we are the dispatched. This is the succession pageant of life. By relieving the pressure on the system, by people hatching less, maybe things will get better for us all? The thing which strikes me is how incredibly similar, overall average, normal and sane we all are in the cold light of day and the question has to be asked whether the hatchers are creating a force of will in our world which overpowers the dispatchers and they can't resist which confuses me because that was not the way that I was brought up to look at the world. I just want to say that I am not trying to judge here, this is pure mechanics of life stuff. We all sacrifice ourselves and we all reap from each other. We are all as bad as each other or if you are an optimist and look at the bright side of life, we

are all as good as each other. The harsh reality is, if you want angels in society, then you have to have demons to but them on their perch. The uncaring pay for the caring, so to speak. It is shocking to realise that giving birth is an evil thing. Hatching is always an accomplice to dispatching. They work together. Some would say it is bipolar disorder. You have the north pole (hatching) and the south pole (dispatching). All the universe is like this. It works under the same mechanical system. You can break all this stuff down to logic. The reason why a person might be illogical is that illogicality and irrationality can be used as a weapon against the rational mind. There are two realities living side by side in this world. There is the dream reality where anything is possible in people's minds and then there is the real reality where things are as they are. The tendency for people to go off into dream realities is high but we have to keep grounded in the real world.

You might also like