You are on page 1of 24

EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN UNIVERSITY

PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELING GUIDANCE & RESEARCH CENTER (EMU-PDRAM)

DOMESTIC VIOLENCE REPORT


Assoc. Prof. Dr. Biran Mertan Uur Maner, M.A. enel Bimen, M.Sc. Gzde Pehlivan, M.Sc. Yurdagl Yksel, M.A.

September 2008

Content PART I: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SURVEY INTRODUCTION PRETRAINING ATTITUDES AND KNOWLEDGE POSTTRAINIG ATTITUDES AND KNOWLEDGE CONCLUSIONS PART II: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORKSHOPS EVALUATION CONCLUDING REMARKS REFERENCES ANNEXES Appendix 1: Domestic Violence Survey Appendix 2: Pretraining Statistics Appendix 3: Posttraining Statistics Appendix 4: Domestic Violence Workshop Evaluation Form

3 4 7 9 10 11 14 15 16 16 20 21 22

TABLES Table 1: Mean and Standard Deviations for presenters Table 2: Mean and Standard Deviations for presentations 11 12

Eastern Mediterranean University Psychological Counseling, Guidance and Research Centre Domestic Violence Report

The following report consists of two parts. In the first part we present a report on the Domestic Violence Workshops that we psychologists at Eastern Mediterranean University Psychological Counseling, Guidance and Research Centre organized and the data we collected as a pilot study to assess attitudes and knowledge on domestic violence in North Cyprus. The second part is an evaluation of the participants of the workshops we conducted. We conclude by summarizing the current state of affairs in North Cyprus regarding domestic violence and the steps that need to be taken to heighten public awareness on this ever present societal issue.

PART I: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SURVEY

Introduction The present research was conducted by Eastern Mediterranean UniversityPsychological Counseling, Guidance and Research Centre (EMU-PDRAM)* psychologists as a pilot study in order to assess attitudes and knowledge on domestic violence. Domestic violence has become a serious problem and epidemic around the world. Violating the fundamental human rights of an individual, domestic violence can result in serious injury or death. Domestic violence can be defined as any type of aggressive act directed toward a persons partner, children, parents, siblings and/ or relatives. Violence of a physical nature is not the only type that is included in this definition; derogation, threatening, limiting financial expenditures, coercing into marriage, forcing or prohibiting one from getting work, and limiting or preventing involvement with friends and family members are also forms of domestic violence which serve to reduce the dignity and selfesteem of the individual, creating a false sense of insecurity in oneself and ones environment. While statistics may vary, women are victims of violence in approximately 95% of the cases of domestic violence. Statistics on the prevalence of the problem however indicate that domestic violence has become a worldwide societal issue (American Bar Association, Commission on Domestic Violence, 2008). Studies show that between one quarter and one half of all women in the world have been abused by intimate partners. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that in 48 surveys from around the world,

10-69% of women state to have been physically assaulted by an intimate partner at some point in their lives. The WHO also reports that studies from a range of countries show that 40-70% of female murder victims were killed by an intimate partner (WHO Multicountry Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women, 1997). The situation in North Cyprus is sadly no different. Domestic violence is also prevalent in many Turkish Cypriot homes although it is very rarely brought to light. Being a collectivistic culture, Turkish Cypriot traditions and norms generally dictate that issues related to the familial unit are personal and impenetrable to outside influence or opinion. Accordingly many women deny or silently endure the physical and psychological abuse they experience. In a recent study by akc, Dnmez and akc (2007) participants were 500 women of Turkish Cypriot origin, asked whether they had experienced psychological abuse at least one time in their lives 73.8% agreed that they had so by family members, 54.5% stated this abuse was directed from their husband. Approximately 64% stated experiencing physical abuse by family members and 36.7% stated being physically abused by their husband at least once. A further 29.6% stated experiencing sexual abuse by another at one pint in their life. These findings illustrate the critical situation women of North Cyprus find themselves in creating a need for societal intervention and prevention. On this note, Human Rights, particularly that pertaining to women are a severely neglected area to be dealt within North Cyprus. An impetus in Womens Rights in North Cyprus was the passing of The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW, 1979). CEDAW defines discrimination against

women as "...any distinction, exclusion or restriction made on the basis of sex which has the effect or purpose of impairing or nullifying the recognition, enjoyment or exercise by women, irrespective of their marital status, on a basis of equality of men and women, of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the political, economic, social, cultural, civil or any other field." The Convention aims to undertake a series of measures to end discrimination against women in all forms, including equality of men and women in the legal system, other public institutions and to ensure elimination of all acts of discrimination against women by persons, organizations or enterprises. Although CEDAW and Human Rights Laws have been passed in the judicial system of North Cyprus, these laws are commonly ineffective and not practiced, this leaves several women as well as individuals unaware of the legal rights they possess, giving them a more powerful voice to stand up against the violence they may be facing. As domestic violence is commonly misconceived as being solely physical in nature, particularly in North Cyprus, we aimed to assess the attitudes and knowledge of different target populations in order to get a clearer picture of their views and perceptions of domestic violence. We chose three target student populations as data shows that children growing up in violent families are more likely to engage in violence. Research also suggests that the social and economic risk factors for youth violence correspond to the risk factors for domestic violence and child abuse. Given these findings, it is vital that an effective strategy is developed to combat domestic violence in such a sensitive age group. Our early intervention effort aims at exactly this- to train these groups on domestic with extensive workshops that will tackle their preconceptions on domestic violence,

question their myths and misconceptions on the subject and educate them on its causes and different forms, with the hope of empowering them and heightening awareness. Pretraining Attitudes and Knowledge The attitudes and knowledge of three different target groups were assessed prior to our workshop intervention. We administered a test composed of various items concerning domestic violence, its prevalence, causes and consequences in North Cyprus. A total of 170 participants (115 female, 55 male) from three departments of education: Nursing School at Near East University (N =70); Department of Psychology (N =43); and The Faculty of Law (N =57) were administered the questionnaire (see Appendix 1). Their age range was 18-35 (M= 22.15, SD= 3.46). Most of the students (48.5%) were of Turkish nationality followed by Turkish Cypriot nationality (27.8%) and mixed nationality of both Turkish and Turkish Cypriot (23.1%). Students mainly resided in Gazimausa (34.9%) followed by Lefkoa (13.5%). Participants generally reported not being employed (83.4%) however the remaining were mostly employed at either hospitals (10%) or as student assistants at their university (4.7%). Most of the participants reported not having taken any previous courses or workshops on domestic violence (85.9%). This was reinforced by the fact that 82.9% stated not knowing whether a law regarding domestic violence existed in North Cyprus. Despite the fact that a large percentage (65.7%) stated knowing someone who had been subject to domestic violence. In order to analyze the results of the surveys, SPSS 14 was used. Due to limited sample size, factor analyses only revealed the existence of a single latent variable we labeled Negativity Scale (= .77). Those individuals endorsing this scale were more

likely to agree with sentiments in support of domestic violence. For instance, items such as A woman experiencing domestic violence has behaved in a manner that has upset her partner; It is natural for a man to be violent toward his wife; Women experiencing violence should give their partners a chance to change; A man has the right to both love and beat his wife (1= Strongly agree, 5= Strongly Disagree). The mean score of this scale was relatively high (M= 4.0, SD= .53) suggesting low endorsement of attitudes supporting domestic violence. A high percentage of participants strongly agreed to statements stressing the importance of domestic violence as a serious health issue in North Cyprus, such as: Domestic violence is an important health issue (77.6%, M= 1.31, SD= .71); Domestic violence is a crime (78.2%, M= 1.32, SD= .85); Domestic violence negatively influences a childs development (82.9%, M= 1.38, SD= 1.035) further stating the need for creating a database on domestic violence in North Cyprus (54.7%, M= 1.73, SD= .98). As for the role of societal forces, 38.8% of participants stated that police officials were not objective in cases of domestic violence, 32% also agreed with the statement police officers do not consider cases of domestic violence as a crime. Furthermore, participants stated that social services were insensitive to cases of domestic violence (32.8%). Several factors were stated to be a cause or triggering factor for domestic violence such as low socio-economic status, alcohol and substance use, low education level however most participants (85.3 %) tended to regard unemployment as the most important factor leading to domestic violence.

A majority of participants stated that domestic violence was a serious duty of health professionals (71.2%), also disagreeing with the statement Health professionals do not have time to deal with cases of domestic violence (76.8%, M= 4.16, SD= 1.29). They also suggested that health professionals were not educated well enough to deal with such cases (25.9%). For further details of the findings please check the appendix 2 for mean and standard deviations. The second part of the survey included items concerning each individuals personal and familial experience with domestic violence. Participants generally reported not experiencing any physical abuse from their parents or siblings (M mother = 3.33, SD = .85, M father = 3.54, SD = .72, M siblings = 3.67, SD = .92). As for domestic violence within the household, participants stated not witnessing between parents (M = 3.54, SD = .82 and between parents and siblings (M = 3.46, SD = .92). Participants also reported hardly ever experiencing physical abuse from teachers during their primary school years M = 3.39, SD = .89). For further details of the findings please check the appendix 1 for mean and standard deviations.

Posttraining Attitudes and Knowledge We visited The Nursing School at Near East University on three consecutive weeks in March 2008 and organized an extensive workshop on domestic violence with reference to the prevalence in North Cyprus, the role of the media and causes and consequences of domestic violence. Following our workshop sessions, we readministered the domestic violence survey to once again assess participants attitudes and

knowledge. We randomly chose 31 students (28 female, 3 male) to re-administer the test, their age range was 18-35 (M= 21.68, SD= 4.36). In order to analyze the findings dependent samples t-test was conducted using SPSS 15. The negativity scale was used once again and results showed that a significant difference was not observed between pretraining (M= 4.0, SD= .53) and posttraining (M= 3.69, SD= .57), t (882)= .074, p = .94. In terms of the remaining items analyses revealed a significant difference between pretraining and posttraining attitudes on three items on the survey. These were Battery (phyiscal violence) alone should be considered as domestic violence t (56)= -2.101, p = .029 Being insulting and derogatory are the most common forms of domestic violence t (82)= 2.22, p = .029 and The reason for desensitization toward domestic violence is the media t (82)= -2.626, p = .010. For further details of the findings please check the appendix 3 for mean and standard deviations.

Conclusions The aim of the workshop was to enhance awareness on the issue of domestic violence. We chose three student populations as target groups as research suggests that being brought up in violent families is a significant risk factor for future violence. We aimed to develop an effective strategy by use of our workshops to contest domestic violence in a susceptible age group aiming to tackle their pre- and misconceptions of domestic violence, by questioning their myths of the subject and further educating them on the causes and consequences of domestic violence, with aspirations of empowering the youth and heightening their awareness.

Analyses revealed that training nurses were now aware that physical abuse was not the only form by which domestic violence may occur. As emphasized, exemplified and described in full throughout the workshop other forms of domestic violence such as psychological, emotional, sexual and social also exist. More importantly, training nurses now indirectly reported being aware of such forms. In addition, training nurses now stated being aware of the role the media had to play. A significant portion of the workshop described the role of media and its portrayal of women and gender roles. This was reflected in the new attitudes stated by the students. The workshop was the first in a series of workshops we aim to continue in order to enhance awareness on this serious health issue of domestic violence. Our first target group was nurses and although not a large amount of attitudinal change occurred a significant enough difference was obtained as a foundation to further build upon. We intend to continue with this intervention strategy by visiting police stations, schools and other universities in to strive to build awareness and consciousness to eliminate the grave threat that domestic violence poses.

PART II: EVALUATION REPORT As EMU-PDRAM we organized workshops aimed at four different groups on domestic violence: Department of Nursing at Near East University (N = 55), Akova Womens Association (N =17), Gazimagusa State Hospital (N =20) and EMUPsychology Department (N =14). A total of 106 participants (90 females and 16 males) age ranged between 18 and 58 (M = 25.28, SD =9.56) attended the workshops. However only 80 of these participants provided feedback. At the end of the workshop, participants were given an evaluation form (see Appendix) and asked to rate the presenters on a 5 point Likert Scale (1= Strongly Disagree, 5= Strongly Agree) on the following items: accommodating environment created; supportive and friendly attitude toward participants; clarity and speed of language; preparedness and efficiency of presentation; and encouragement of participant involvement. The ratings, as can be seen in Table 1, were analyzed using SPSS 14 and findings yielded that, students on average rated the presentations as highly successful with a mean of 3.39 (SD =1.35), ratings were equally high for both presenters (Biran Mertan, M =3.45; Ugur Maner, M =3.47). Table 1. Mean and Standard Deviations for presenters Accommodation M SD 3.45 1.80 Attitude Language Preparedness Encouragement Total 3.43 1.80 3.49 1.77 3.47 1.76 3.47 1.76 3.39 1.35

In terms of the content and preparation of material presented, participants were asked to rate the presentations in general on a 5 point Likert Scale (1= Strongly Disagree, 5= Strongly Agree) based on the following items: structure and preparation;

appropriateness of material; mentally stimulating; emotionally stimulating; enjoyable; stimulating and interesting; length of presentations; and appropriateness of number of participants. Analyses revealed (see Table 2) that participants in general rated the presentation as efficient in the areas stated above (M =3.39, SD =1.35). Table 2. Mean and Standard Deviations for presentations Structured Material Mentally Emotionally Enjoyable Interesting Length Number Total Stimulation Stimulation M SD 3.49 1.75 3.43 1.70 3.39 1.66 3.17 1.57 3.50 1.74 3.29 1.57 2.67 1.31 3.82 1.38 4.2756 .31698

These results suggest that participant evaluations regarding both the presenters and presentations of domestic violence were found to be successful in content, preparation, and efficiency. To give us more information regarding the organization of future workshops, participants were also asked whether they wanted to receive further information concerning domestic violence in addition to what hour of the day and what season of the year they would prefer such workshops. Seventy nine percent of the participants stated wanting further information on domestic violence, 57% suggested we conduct such workshops in Spring and 49% stated morning hours would be the ideal time to hold such workshops. All this information will be taken into consideration when planning future workshops to be organized by EMU-PDRAM.

Concluding Remarks

As a result of this preliminary analysis of the attitudes and opinions of Turkish Cypriots and later with our workshops, we realized that the issue of domestic violence is an important and sensitive topic that has been neglected in North Cyprus up until now. Throughout the work we conducted, we came upon voices that had never been heard before, willing and eager to give across their own stories and observations, thankful to us for finally being listened. As a centre we therefore choose to dedicate our future research interests to this subject matter and aim to further heighten public awareness, increase sensitivity toward this global societal issue and give a voice to those suffering in silence. To conclude we would like to express our gratitude to the UNDP Action for Cooperation and Trust in Cyprus for funding our work and to the Frederick Research Centre for their collaboration that helped us visualize, plan and implement this groundbreaking research together.

*Eastern Mediterranean University Psychological Counseling Guidance and Research Center was approved by the University Board on November 4th 1997 as a unit working in direct association with the Rectors office. EMU-PDRAM deals with the psychosocial developmental issues of university students on a regular basis, aiding students in their search for understanding and awareness of their social, academic, and cognitive potential. In addition EMU-PDRAM takes pride in being an institution that concerns itself on societal issues and accordingly conducts psychological research in topics of importance, one of the most recent being the prevention and awareness of domestic violence.

References

American Bar Association, Commission on Domestic Violence website. http://www.abanet.org retrieved on September 2008. akc, Dnmez and akc (2007). Kuzey Kibrista Kadina Yonelik Siddet. Kibris Turk Ruh Sagiligi Yayinlari. World Health Organization (1997). WHO Multi-country Study on Women's Health and Domestic Violence against Women. World Health Organization Publications.

Appendix 1 The aim of the present research is to explore the psychosocial issues of women living in North Cyprus. The knowledge and attitudes of the youth in higher education regarding women will be investigated. This is not an examination. There are no correct or false answers. The data obtained will be collectively evaluated. You will not be asked to give information regarding your identity. In order to obtain accurate results it is important that you answer the questions sincerely. It will take about 15 minutes to fill out the questionnaire. Thank you for participating in this study. EMU-PDRAM Please answer the following: Department: _________ What year are you in this department?__________

Gender: ______ Age: _____ Place of Birth: _____/________ (Country) (county/ province) Nationality: TRNC _____ TRNC and TR (Both)______Other (Please indicate): _______ Current Residency: ________/________ (City) (Village) (Flirt /Engaged...) No___ Marital Status: Married___ Divorced____ Widowed____ Single (Please indicate): ________ Are you currently employed? Yes___ -If Yes, where? __________________ Since when? __________________ Have you ever received eduction or training on domestic violence? Yes ___ No ____ Have you ever met an individual who has experienced domestic violence?Yes ___ No __ - If Yes, did you openly ask this individual whether she or he had been subject to domestic violence? Yes ___ No ____ Is there a bylaw regarding doemstic violence in North Cyprus? Yes ___ No ___I dont know __

A group of statements are given below. Please read each statement and rate the extent to which you agree with the following statements using a tick ( ).
1= Stronlgly agree 2= Agree 3= Neutral 4= Disagree 5= Stronlgly Disagree 1 Domestic violence is an important health issue. Domestic violence is a crime. Domestic violence only exists in families of low socioeconomic status. Domestic violence is not a duty of those in the health profession. A woman experiencing domestic violence has behaved in a manner that has upset her partner. Those working in the health profession do not have time for matters of domestic violence. Domestic violence is a private, family matter. Health institutions should register domestic violence cases as simple injuries. In North Cyprus, a database should be created on domestic violence cases. Being insulting and derogatory are the most common forms of domestic violence. Battery (phyiscal violence) alone should be considered as domestic violence. Domestic violence exists in every society. It is unimportant if children witness domestic violence. Only women are subject to domestic violence. As education level increases the occurence of violent behavior decreases. Domestic violence only occurs in homes where alcohol, drugs and gambling problems exist. Romantic relationships that have violence in them should be ended. Preventing ones partner to see friends or family members is domestic violence. Child development is negatively influenced by domestic violence. Threatening ones partner by using ones children is a form of domestic violence. Threatening to kill ones partner is a form of domestic violence. Unemployment is an important cause of domestic violence. Mothers who experience domestic violence from their partners are likely to be violent with their children as well. The reason for desensitization toward domestic violence is the media. For some individuals using violence is a means of communication. Watching programs of violent content can calm a person. 2 3 4 5

A partner experiencing domestic violence should hide this from everyone. Individuals experiencing domestic violence frequently visit emergency services with physical complaints. It is natural for a man to be violent toward his wife. A person used to being physically abused is no longer afraid of it. As the frequency and intensity of domestic violence increases, the individual experiencing it will increasingly accept it to be natural. A woman experiencing domestic violence should apply to shelters. Women experiencing violence should give their partners a chance to change. A husband can both love and beat his wife. A man is the boss of the house. If a parent does not take control of his/her daughter through use of violence he/she will suffer the consequences later Sexual abuse cannot occur between husband and wife. Women with children should not leave their homes even if they are experiencing domestic violence. Individuals subject to domestic violence have done something to deserve it. Love does not exist between partners who are violent. A woman who is subject to domestic violence has the strength to leave. The individual being violent cannot control him or herself. Police are unbiased in cases of domestic violence. Social Services are indifferent to cases of domestic violence. Police do not count cases of domestic violence as a crime. Physicians are uneducated in matters of domestic violence. A group of statements are given below. Please read each statement and choose the correct answer in your opinion with a tick ( ). 1= Frequently 2= Sometimes 3= Once in awhile 4= Never 1 As a child I was subject to physical abuse from my mother. As a child I was subject to physical abuse from my father. I have witnessed physical abuse between my parents. I have been subjected to physical abuse from my sibling(s). I have witnessed my parents physically abusing my sibling(s). During primary school I was physically abused by my teachers. During primary school I would physically abuse my friends. During highschool years I was teased by my friends. I watch films of violent content. As a child I preferred toys of violence. Children born of unwanted pregnancies are abused. 2 3 4

Children who are of a sex unwanted by parents are abused. Children born at a time of trouble within the family are abused. Children born to a mother who gives birth consecutively are abused. Women experiencing domestic violence frequently visit emergency services with physical complaints. Please answer the following open-ended questions: 1. In your opinion, what are the main factors that cause domestic violence?

2. In your opinion where or to whom should individuals subject to domestic violence apply to?

3. What do you know about the research conducted in North Cyprus regarding women?

Appendix 2 Pretraining Statistics dv1 170 0 1.31 .70 1.00 5.00 dv15 170 0 3.10 1.59 1.00 9.00 dv31 170 0 3.36 1.49 1.00 9.00 p1 170 0 3.32 .85 1.00 4.00 dv2 170 0 1.32 .85 1.00 9.00 dv16 170 0 3.9 1.07 1.00 9.00 dv32 170 0 2.22 1.16 1.00 5.00 p2 170 0 3.54 .72 1.00 4.00 dv3 169 1 3.85 1.29 1.00 9.00 dv17 170 0 2.28 1.36 1.00 9.00 dv33 170 0 3.00 1.13 1.00 5.00 p3 170 0 3.50 .81 1.00 4.00 dv4 167 3 3.98 1.08 1.00 9.00 dv18 170 0 2.74 1.20 1.00 5.00 dv34 170 0 4.63 .83 1.00 5.00 p4 168 2 3.67 .91 1.00 9.00 dv5 167 3 3.91 1.16 1.00 9.00 dv19 170 0 1.38 1.03 1.00 5.00 dv35 170 0 3.84 1.42 1.00 5.00 p5 169 1 3.46 .91 1.00 9.00 dv6 168 2 4.15 1.28 1.00 9.00 dv20 170 0 1.74 .97 1.00 5.00 dv36 169 1 4.13 1.27 1.00 9.00 p6 170 0 3.39 .88 1.00 4.00 dv7 169 1 3.63 1.42 1.00 9.00 dv8 170 0 4.10 1.42 1.00 9.00 dv9 170 0 1.72 .98 1.00 5.00 dv10 170 0 1.95 1.00 1.00 5.00 dv11 170 0 3.84 1.30 1.00 5.00 dv12 170 0 2.06 1.29 1.00 9.00 dv13 170 0 4.84 .95 1.00 9.00 dv14 168 2 4.05 1.26 1.00 9.00 dv28 170 0 2.59 1.01 1.00 5.00 dv44 169 1 2.89 1.49 1.00 9.00 p15 170 0 2.49 1.13 1.00 9.00 dv29 170 0 4.76 .89 1.00 9.00 dv45 166 4 3.09 1.23 1.00 5.00 dv30 169 1 4.13 1.51 1.00 9.00 dv46 170 0 3.08 1.12 1.00 5.00

Valid Missing

Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum N Valid Missing Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum N Valid Missing Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum N Valid Missing Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum

dv21 170 0 1.68 1.36 1.00 9.00 dv37 170 0 3.65 1.65 1.00 9.00

dv22 170 0 1.91 1.01 1.00 9.00 dv38 170 0 4.11 1.08 1.00 5.00

dv23 170 0 2.86 1.16 1.00 9.00 dv39 169 1 4.15 1.09 1.00 9.00 p10 170 0 3.60 .80 1.00 5.00

dv24 170 0 2.97 1.25 1.00 9.00 dv40 168 2 3.07 1.33 1.00 9.00 p11 169 1 2.60 1.30 1.00 9.00

dv25 170 0 2.98 1.53 1.00 9.00 dv41 170 0 2.83 1.29 1.00 5.00 p12 170 0 2.74 1.17 1.00 9.00

dv26 170 0 4.46 1.03 1.00 8.00 dv42 169 1 2.98 1.30 1.00 5.00 p13 170 0 2.65 1.20 1.00 9.00

dv27 170 0 4.45 1.27 1.00 9.00 dv43 170 0 3.14 1.38 1.00 9.00 p14 170 0 2.88 1.16 1.00 9.00

p7 170 0 3.67 .72 1.00 4.00

p8 170 0 3.75 .62 1.00 4.00

p9 170 0 2.95 1.09 1.00 9.00

Appendix 3 Posttraining Statistics dv1 N Valid Missing Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum 23 0 1.30 .55 1.00 3.00 dv11 N Valid Missing Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum 23 0 4.56 1.37 1.00 9.00 dv21 N Valid Missing Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum dv31 23 0 3.30 1.29 1.00 5.00 23 0 1.43 .58 1.00 3.00 dv32 23 0 2.04 1.74 1.00 9.00 p1 23 0 3.21 .85 2.00 4.00 dv2 23 0 1.39 .58 1.00 3.00 dv12 23 0 2.08 1.27 1.00 5.00 dv22 23 0 2.17 1.69 1.00 9.00 dv33 23 0 2.69 1.14 1.00 5.00 p2 23 0 3.65 .57 2.00 4.00 dv34 23 0 4.43 .89 1.00 5.00 p3 23 0 3.47 .94 1.00 4.00 dv3 23 0 4.21 .99 1.00 5.00 dv13 23 0 5.26 1.21 4.00 9.00 dv23 23 0 3.04 1.18 1.00 5.00 dv35 23 0 3.95 1.26 1.00 5.00 p4 23 0 3.56 .84 1.00 4.00 dv4 23 0 4.08 1.34 2.00 9.00 dv14 23 0 4.30 .87 2.00 5.00 dv24 23 0 2.65 1.07 1.00 4.00 dv36 23 0 4.08 1.12 1.00 5.00 p5 23 0 3.52 .66 2.00 4.00 dv37 23 0 3.08 2.15 1.00 9.00 p6 23 0 3.73 .75 1.00 4.00 dv5 23 0 3.82 1.15 1.00 5.00 dv15 23 0 3.39 1.40 1.00 5.00 dv25 23 0 3.17 1.11 1.00 5.00 dv38 23 0 4.21 .59 3.00 5.00 p7 23 0 3.65 .77 1.00 4.00 dv6 23 0 4.34 1.30 2.00 9.00 dv16 23 0 4.39 .78 2.00 5.00 dv26 23 0 4.43 .72 3.00 5.00 dv39 23 0 4.43 .78 2.00 5.00 p8 23 0 3.69 .70 2.00 4.00 dv7 23 0 3.43 1.92 1.00 9.00 dv17 23 0 2.65 1.40 1.00 5.00 dv27 23 0 4.00 1.12 1.00 5.00 dv40 23 0 3.08 1.27 1.00 5.00 p9 23 0 3.08 .99 1.00 4.00 dv41 23 0 3.00 1.16 1.00 5.00 dv8 23 0 4.17 .83 2.00 5.00 dv18 23 0 2.43 1.23 1.00 5.00 dv28 23 0 2.34 1.07 1.00 4.00 dv42 23 0 2.95 1.33 1.00 5.00 dv9 23 0 1.52 .79 1.00 3.00 dv19 23 0 1.13 .34 1.00 2.00 dv29 23 0 4.73 1.28 1.00 9.00 dv43 23 0 2.67 .98 1.00 4.00 dv44 23 0 3.47 .84 2.00 5.00 p13 23 0 2.65 1.02 1.00 4.00 dv10 23 0 1.43 .66 1.00 3.00 dv20 23 0 2.21 2.27 1.00 9.00 dv30 23 0 3.82 1.80 1.00 9.00 dv45 dv46 23 23 0 0 3.26 3.30 1.68 .82 1.00 1.00 9.00 5.00 p14 23 0 3.04 1.66 1.00 9.00 p15 23 0 2.17 .93 1.00 4.00

N Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum

N Mean Std. Deviation Minimum Maximum

Valid Missing

p10 23 0 3.73 .68 1.00 4.00

p11 23 0 2.69 1.76 1.00 9.00

p12 23 0 2.86 1.74 1.00 9.00

Appendix 4 DOU AKDENZ NVERSTES PSKOLOJK DANIMANLIK REHBERLK VE ARATIRMA MERKEZ ALE DDET ETM SEMNER DEERLENDRME FORMU MART 2008 Seminer salonundan ayrlmadan nce, ltfen aadaki formu doldurunuz. Vereceiniz iten yantlar, gerekletirdiimiz bu eitim semineri dizisinin deerlendirilmesi iin ok nemlidir. Her soruyu yantlamaya alnz. Teekkr ederiz. Cinsiyetiniz: K ..... E ..... Yanz: ........ A= Tamamen katlyorum B= Katlyorum C= Kararszm D= Katlmyorum E= Kesinlikle katlmyorum Sunan kiinin deerlendirilmesi: (Sunum yapan her kiiyi ayr ayr deerlendiriniz) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Sunumu yapan kii sunum esnasnda rahat bir ortam yaratt. Sunumu yapan kii katlmclara kar yardmsever ve arkadaayd. Sunumu yapan kiinin anlatm anlalabilir ve normal hzdayd. Sunumu yapan kii sunumuna iyi hazrlanmt ve sunuu etkindi. Sunumu yapan kii sklkla sizin almaya katlmnz salamaya alt. Biran Mertan A B C D A B C D A B C D A B C D A B C D Uur Maner A B C D A B C D A B C D A B C D A B C D

1 2 3 4 5

E E E E E

E E E E E

6. Eer varsa, sunumu yapan kii ile ilgili ek yorumlar: .... ....................................................................................................................................................

Sunumla ilgili deerlendirme 7. Sunumlar iyi planlanm ve yaplandrlmt. 8. Sunumlarda kullanlan materyaller ok uygundu. 9. Sunumlar benim iin zihinsel olarak uyarcyd. 10. Sunumlar benim iin duygusal ynden uyarcyd. 11. Sunumlardan keyif aldm. 12. Sunumlar son derece uyarc ve ilgin buldum. 13. Gruptaki kii says uygundu. 14. Sunum sresi uzundu. 15. En ok hangi sunumdan keyif aldnz? ----------------------------------------------16. En az hangi sunumdan keyif aldnz? ----------------------------------------------17. Bu sunum sonucu yaantnzda ne/nelerin deieceini dnyorsunuz? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------18. Gelecekte bu konularda daha ok bilgilendirilmek ister misiniz? Evet Hayr A A A A A A A A B B B B B B B B C C C C C C C C D D D D D D D D E E E E E E E E

19. Bu konulara ek olarak ilgi duyduunuz ve bilgilendirilmek istediiniz dier konular nelerdir? 20. Bu tr almalar sizce akademik yln hangi dneminde yaplmaldr? Bahar 21. Bu eit almalar sizce gnn hangi saatinde yaplmaldr? Sabah le Akam Gz

Ek yorumlarnz iin:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Teekkr ederiz.

You might also like