Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Occupiers Liability
Definitions: Occupier An occupier is someone who has: Physical possession of a property Control over the activities on a property Access to the property
2
Occupiers Liability
The law of occupiers liability is concerned with the duty of care owed by occupiers of premises or land toward visitors, whether invited or uninvited, who suffer either personal injury or property damage during the course of their visits. An occupier is the person (not necessarily the owner) who has control over the premises (Pg 128)
VISITORS
People lawfully on premises People invited or permitted to be on premises People using premises for certain purposes People with implied licences Not trespassers
6
Occupiers Liability
Historically, special rules determined who the visitor was:
a trespasser one who was there without the occupiers permission; a licensee a person permitted or invited to be there; an invitee the same as a licensee except that there must in addition have been something in the nature of a business relationship between occupier and invitee; an entrant as of right this covered a heterogeneous group of people who had a right to go onto the occupiers land, including visitors to public facilities such as parks and playgrounds, the person who came to read the meter and the fireman who came to extinguish a fire; or a contractual entrant these were people who had paid to use the occupiers premises, such as cinema goers.
Occupiers Liability
Occupiers must take reasonable care and owe a common law duty of care to ensure that anyone (even trespassers) who comes onto those premises is not injured
CASE: Hackshaw v Shaw (1984)
10
Occupiers Liability
Trespasser sues owner for negligence In a drawn-out case (Hackshaw v Shaw (1984) 155 CLR 614), a farmer was troubled by trespassers stealing fuel from his property. He finally took the law into his own hands one night when he saw a man pumping petrol into an unlit car. The farmer had been lying in wait with two guns and, seizing his opportunity, fired shots into the car hoping to put it out of action. Unbeknown to him, a girl was hiding in the car below the level of the dashboard and was hit by one of the bullets. The farmer sued for trespass but while accepting the farmer's evidence that he did not see the girl at any time and his claim that she contributed to her injury by being on the property for an illegal purpose, the court found the farmer was negligent. The farmer appealed to the Supreme Court, which found that the girl was a trespasser and was owed no duty of care because the farmer did not know she was in the car. Finally, however, the girl appealed to the High Court, which found that she was entitled to damages from the farmer who should not have fired at the car because of the risk of injury to a person even if he could not see her. The girl's compensation was reduced by 40 per cent because the Court found that she had contributed to the negligence by being in an unlit car at night on the farmer's property while the driver was stealing fuel.
11
DUTIES TO TRESPASSERS
Prior to Occupiers Liability Act 1984,occupiers duty to trespassers was to act with common sense and humanity. This required all the surrounding circumstances to be considered, e.g. the seriousness of danger, the type of trespasser likely to enter and in some cases the resources of the occupier.
12
DUTIES TO TRESPASSERS
Definition of a trespasser a person whose presence is unknown, or if known is practically objected to It may include the innocent as well as the malicious. Broadly speaking, it is a person who knows he does not intend communication with the occupier or anyone else on the premises.
13
DUTIES TO TRESPASSERS
British Railways v Errington 1972
The facts: The local management of British Rail were aware that children gained entry to an electrified railway line through a broken-down fence which divided the line from land open to the public. British Rail merely reported the matter to the police but did not repair the fence. A child of six was injured on the line. Decision: The occupiers duty must be set by reference to the particular circumstances of the trespassers. A warning may be sufficient for an adult but it falls short of the duty of common humanity owed to a child to safeguard it from accessible and tempting perils (danger / threat) on the occupier's land.
14
The duty is to take such care as is reasonable in all the circumstances to see that the person to whom a duty is owed does not suffer injury on the premises by reasons of the danger.
16
The occupier can only be liable for injury to the person. The Act expressly provides that there can be no liability for loss or damage to property.
17