Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2012/SCSC/WKSP/007
Workshop on Developing a Harmonised Electrical Equipment Regulatory Risk Assessment Tool Singapore 15-16 May 2012
IEC Structure
IEC COUNCIL
Full Member National Committees Management Advisory Committees
CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT BOARD (CAB) Management of Conformity Assessment operations and systems
IECEE
IECEx IECQ
2/69
IECEx
System for Certification to Standards Relating to Equipment for use in Explosive Atmospheres
IECQ
Quality Assessment System for Electronic Components
CB Scheme
CB-FCS CB FCS Scheme PV Programme
E3 Energy Efficiency Hazardous Substances
3/69
4/69
5/69
Argentina Australia Austria Bahrain Belarus Belgium Brazil Bulgaria Canada Chi China Colombia Croatia Czech Rep. Denmark
Finland France Germany Greece Hungary India Indonesia Ireland Israel I l Italy Japan Kenya Korea Rep. of Libya
53 Participating Economies
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
6/69
IECEE Membership
IECEE is a voluntary C.A. System of National Member Bodies that fully represent electrotechnical l h i l interests i in i their h i economies i
Membership one Member Body per economy MB Unlimited number of Certification Bodies - NCBs Unlimited number of Testing Laboratories CBTLs Unlimited number of Manufacturers Testing Laboratories - MTLs
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
7/69
8/69
The IECEE Schemes are based on the principle of mutual recognition (reciprocal acceptance) by its worldwide members of test results for obtaining certification or approval at national level. The IECEE Schemes in the last decade have naturally evolved and become de facto the most accepted proof of compliance by many Economies Authorities and Regulators as the passport to entry their markets without further testing.
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
10/69
The IECEE Schemes are intended to reduce obstacles to international trade which arise from having to meet different national certification or approval criteria. criteria
11/69
Where national standards are not yet completely based on IEC standards, declared national differences are taken into account. However, successful operation of the Scheme presupposes that national standards are reasonably harmonized with the corresponding IEC standards.
12/69
13/69
Household Appliances
14/69
Safety-Performance-Environmental
Safety
IEC Standards for electrical safety
15/69
Sample request
CB requests sample(s) and sets the testing programme CBTLs Staff performs the measuring and testing programme CBs Staff performs the Factory Inspection CBs Staff evaluates the Test Report CBs officer takes the Certification decision
Testing
CB-FCS
16/69
Assessment Type test Type test Certificate program program Conformity Assessment National National Report differences differences Factory (if applicable) Inspection (if applicable) Factory Audit Report National differences
(if applicable)
Laboratory
Testing
Analyzing
Application documents
APPLICANT
Conformity Assessment Factory Certificate Audit Report Conformity Assessment Report Auditing Factory Audit Report National differences
(if applicable)
Factory
NCB Economy B1
Recognizing
15 working days
Market
Regulators
Retailers/Vendors Buyers
NCB Economy B2
Recognizing
NCB Economy B3
Recognizing
17/69
IECEE Membership
400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Countries Certification Bodies Testing Laboratories
18/69
70'000 60'000 50'000 40'000 30'000 20 000 20'000 10'000 '0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Certificates re-issued over the publication of new editions of standards
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
19/69
20/69
10
The use of the IECEE System Ensures that the product are safe Prevents redundant testing Facilitate trade Support regulatory policies provides a competitive edge!
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
21/69
More Affiliate Plus economies Expand p mentoring g programme p g Cooperation with regional bodies Reach out to Pacific Islands and West Africa Training on regional basis /Virtual training Adoption event with ISO New benefits in conformity assessment
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
22/69
11
In 2001 IEC had stable membership (since 1906!) but membership requirements were 1906!), deterring developing economies World Trade Organization was looking for ways to ensure effective participation of Members, and particularly of developing economy Members M b in i [international [i t ti l standardization organizations] activities. The IEC found a unique approach to ensuring that participation.
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
23/69
24/69
12
Benefits This is of particular interest to industry, which can export to and import from these areas with the assurance that their products and services will operate safely and efficiently.
25/69
Benefits This is also of particular interest to Affiliate Economies, which can set the basis in their own economies to build the necessary Conformity Assessment structures to ensure that importing p g electrical goods g are compliant with IEC International Standards in terms of safety and efficiency.
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
26/69
13
27/69
www.iecee.org
14
15
Contents
Aim Guides Types of Standards Fire Hazard Risk Reduction Accessible Surface Temperature Risk Reduction Conclusions
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
31/69
Contents
Aim Guides Types of Standards Fire Hazard Risk Reduction Accessible Surface Temperature Risk Reduction Conclusions
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
32/69
16
Balance between absolute safety and demanded performance of the appliance Suitability of purpose Benefit to the user Cost effective Conventions of society concerned
33/69
Methodology
Electric shock Mechanical Explosion Ionising and Non-ionising radiation Fire Temperature Biological and Chemical Unattended operation Electricity supply system faults Other
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
34/69
17
Risk analysis Using risk analysis a lack of incident history does not equate to low risk
35/69
Solutions
Slight (reversible short term) High (reversible long term) Serious (irreversible possibly death)
Inherently safe design measures Safeguarding Information for use to cover residual risk Training Clear instructions Use of protective equipment
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
36/69
18
Contents
Aim Guides Types of Standards Fire Hazard Risk Reduction Accessible Surface Temperature Risk Reduction Conclusions
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
37/69
Guides
IEC Guide 116 - Guidelines for safety related risk assessment and risk reduction for low voltage equipment ISO/IEC Guide 50 - Safety aspects Guidelines for child safety ISO/IEC Guide 51 - Safety aspects Guidelines for their inclusion in standards ISO/IEC Guide 71 - Guidelines for standards developers to address the needs of older persons and persons with disabilities IEC Guide 117 - Electrotechnical equipment Temperatures of touchable hot surfaces
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
38/69
19
Contents
Aim Guides Types of Standards Fire Hazard Risk Reduction Accessible Surface Temperature Risk Reduction Conclusions
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
39/69
Types of Standards
Basic safety publications - publication on a specific safetyrelated matter, , applicable pp to many y electrotechnical p products
Group safety publications - publication covering all safety aspects of a specific group of products within the scope of two or more product TCs
concepts, terminology or technical characteristics, relevant to a number of technical committees and of crucial importance to ensure the coherence of the corpus of standardization documents
40/69
20
Types of standards
IEC 60204 series (machines) IEC 60335 series (appliances) IEC 60598 series (luminaires) ( ) IEC 60601 series (medical electrical equipment) IEC 60745 series (hand-held tools) IEC 60950 series (IT equipment)
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
41/69
Contents
Aim Guides Types of Standards Fire Hazard Risk Reduction Accessible Surface Temperature Risk Reduction Conclusions
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
42/69
21
43/69
Fan heater
44/69
22
Selected parts of the IEC 60695 series of basic safety standards are used This allows for
These options are alternatives to reduce the fire hazard risk posed by appliances they are not equivalents
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
45/69
Test standard used is: IEC 60695-2-11 Fire Hazard Testing Part 2-11: Glowing/hot wire based test methods Glow-wire flammability test method for end products
46/69
23
Risk Assessment
For appliances, the glow-wire test severity is selected according to the risk presented by a given type of appliance. The fire hazard risk is assessed based on three criteria
Whether the appliance is attended or unattended during normal use; The rms value of current passing through an electrical connection during normal use; The proximity of non-metallic material to such connections.
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
47/69
For all appliances and regardless of current a minimum severity of 550 C is specified as being applicable to nonmetallic material. material For attended appliances the break point current is 0,5 A for testing non-metallic material in proximity to a connection
Severity is 750 C if the current > 0,5 A Severity is 650 C if the current 0,5 A
For unattended appliances the break point current is 0,2 A for testing non-metallic material in proximity to a connection
Severity is 850 C and 750 C if the current > 0,2 A Severity is 650 C if the current 0,2 A
48/69
24
Consequential Testing
application of the glow-wire, the consequential fire hazard created may necessitate further tests using other ignition sources such as a needle-flame applied to those parts which are reached by the emitted flames.
For unattended appliances, the reported results of f the 750 C and 650 C glow-wire tests related to the test specimen are used to decide whether further fire hazard tests are necessary
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
49/69
IEC 60695-2-12, 60695 2 12 Glow-wire Glow wire flammability index (severities selected from 550 C, 650 C, 750 C or 850 C depending on the glow-wire test severity specified in IEC 60335-1) IEC 60695-2-13, Glow-wire ignition temperature (severities selected from 675 C or 775 C ( depending on the glow-wire test severity specified in IEC 60335-1 for the consequential test decision for unattended appliances
50/69
25
selection option for the 550 C glow-wire test pre-selection option for the needle flame test
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
The choice of option (end product test or material pre-selection) is not specified in IEC 60335-1 The choice is strictly a commercial decision to be made by the appliance manufacturer
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
52/69
26
Use the g glow-wire ignition g temperature p prep selection option; Use the 50 W flame test pre-selection option; Use of V-1 rated flame barriers; Appropriate placement of parts with respect to current carrying connections.
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
53/69
Contents
Aim Guides Types of Standards Fire Hazard Risk Reduction Accessible Surface Temperature Risk Reduction Conclusions
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
54/69
27
55/69
Hair straightener
56/69
28
Selection of surface temperature rise limits for non-functionally heated surfaces Non-functionally heated surfaces are:
57/69
ISO 13732-1: Ergonomics of the thermal environment Methods for the assessment of human responses to contact with surfaces Part 1: Hot surfaces
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
58/69
29
Risk Assessment
Persons expected to touch the surface Expected Touch time Texture of surface (smooth or not smooth). For rough surfaces 2 C is added to the smooth surface threshold upper limit Thermal inertia of surface material, (product of density, thermal conductivity and specific thermal capacity) Acceptable burn threshold
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
59/69
Persons expected to touch the surface are selected from healthy adults, people with physical disabilities and children Expected Touch times are generally selected from 0,5 s to 15 s depending on the persons expected to touch the surface Burn thresholds for short contact periods (up to 10 s) are given as spreads because knowledge of the boundary between a non-burn and onset of a burn is incomplete 60/69 APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
30
Surface t temperature C
90
1 2
80
70
60
50
40 0.1
0.5
10
15
60
100
1000
10000
100000
600
28800
61/69
1 Plastics and wood 2 Ceramics, glass and stone material 3 Uncoated metal
The burn threshold for water is derived from the lower limit of the burn threshold spread established for uncoated metal
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
62/69
31
For healthy adults, elderly people and people with physical disabilities, a figure in the middle of the spread can be chosen For children, F hild a figure fi more towards t d the th lower end of the spread should be chosen. For products specifically made for children, the value on the lower end of the spread is used.
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
63/69
The higher the probability of touching a hot surface, the more should a figure towards the lower end of the spread be chosen The lower the probability of touching a hot surface, the more can a figure towards the upper end of the spread be chosen The more severe the consequences of touching a h t surface, hot f the th more essential ti l that th t a figure fi towards t d the lower end of the spread shall be chosen The less severe the consequences of touching a hot surface, the more a figure towards the upper end of the spread can be chosen
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
64/69
32
Contents
Aim Guides Types of Standards Fire Hazard Risk Reduction Accessible Surface Temperature Risk Reduction Conclusions
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
65/69
Conclusions
The micro micro-risk risk assessment applied to specify safety requirements in international standards
is robust leads to prudent solutions to address identified hazards compliments the macro-risk assessment for product selection requiring enhanced regulatory intervention
APEC EE JRAC Workshop May 15 - 16 2012, Singapore
66/69
33
T-Factor Conclusions
The two examples given show how some of the T-Factor: Product is likely to be used by
unsupervised children working surfaces
T-Factor: Product that has hot accessible nonT Factor: Product is commonly used locally in T-Factor: an unattended mode but classified internationally as used attended
67/69
P-Factor Conclusion
68/69
34
35