The State of Georgia (AD 1788) The County of Macon (AD 1837) The United States of America (AD

1789-1791)

} } Subscribed and affirmed }

Affidavit re: Exigent and non-exigent events regarding (child's name redacted) on December 5th and 6th 2012 1. Exigent circumstance is defined as an emergency situation requiring swift action to prevent imminent danger to life or serious damage to property, or to forestall the imminent escape of a suspect, or destruction of evidence. Imminent danger is danger that is certain, immediate, and impending, such as the type an individual might be in as a result of a serious illness or accident. The chance of the individual dying would be highly probable in such situation, as opposed to remote or contingent. Two year old (child's name redacted) received second degree burns to both feet resulting in blisters and pain. The greatest risk to (child's name redacted) from these burns would have been infection resulting from the actual wounds not being immediately treated. (child's name redacted)'s parents, being cognizant of the perils of infection and the fact that they were not immediately equipped to treat this type of wound, did what they could at home before leaving to Coliseum Hospital in Macon, Georgia. Prior to leaving for the Coliseum hospital, (child's name redacted)'s wounds were well washed and honey was applied to both feet. Many hospitals treat burns with honey. Time between (child's name redacted) being burned, treated at home, calmed down and leaving for the Coliseum hospital was around 30 minutes. Once at the Coliseum hospital Flint's wounds were irrigated and dressed. The Coliseum medical staff never once indicated a concern about tetanus infection over the several hours (child's name redacted) was there. There was then a few hour ride to the Doctors Hospital in Augusta, Georgia wherein (child's name redacted) and his father arrived around 10:30 P.M. Ambulance/paramedic staff indicated no concern regarding tetanus. (child's name redacted)'s feet were re-examined and redressed at this time by a female nurse. Said nurse indicated that the doctor and surgeon would be in around 8AM the next day. This first nurse made no mention of concerns regarding tetanus. This nurse nor any other medical staff irrigated or de-brided (child's name redacted)'s wounds prior to the the meeting with the surgeon's assistant and pediatrician Dr. Cartie the next morning around 8AM. Tetanus requires anaerobic conditions in which to colonize. Therefore, the best defense against a tetanus infection is immediate wound irrigation and damaged skin de-bridement.

2.

3. 4. 5.

6. 7. 8.

9.

10. 11.

12.

Page 1 of 4

13.

Obviously, this first nurse nor any other medical staff at the Doctors Hospital between 10:30PM and 8 AM saw tetanus as being of an imminent danger or exigent nature regarding (child's name redacted)'s burned feet. Had this nurse or any other staff been concerned about tetanus then the standard of care requires immediate de-bridement and irrigation of the wound. De-bridement and irrigation did not occur until around 12:30PM the next day after father made multiple demands to medical staff for these procedures to be immediately performed. Delay is evidence of lack of exigency. Rogers v. County of San Joaquin, 487 F.3d 1288, 1296 (9th Cir. 2007),citing Calabretta v. Floyd, 189F.3d 808, 813 (9thCir. 1999). The surgeon's assistant, Brian Shirley, never once indicated a concern about tetanus to the parents pre or post surgery. The surgeon, Dr. Hassan, never once indicated concern about tetanus to the parents pre or post surgery. As of around 8AM and after Dr. Cartie immediately demanded (child's name redacted) be given the tetanus vaccine. Other than Dr. Cartie no nurse, no other doctor, and no other medical staff indicated that tetanus presented an exigency regarding the health of (child's name redacted) until DFCS entered the picture at around 1PM. At around 1PM tetanus was put forth as a concern by two female Richmond County DFCS agents. Agents did not appear to have medical educations appropriate to dispense medical advisement.. Said DFCS agents indicated to parents, "We have been instructed to tell you that if you do not consent to the vaccination then your child could be taken from you. " Parents refused to consent to said vaccination at that time and at all times. If tetanus was presented as an exigent circumstance then why would DFCS agents, medical staff, multiple doctors, a patient advocate, and others delay the vaccination seven additional hours from around 1PM until 8PM when nurse Julie Lewis and Richmond County Police Officer Wren, by way of armed intimidation, had (child's name redacted) forced vaccinated? Delay is evidence of lack of exigency. Other than these two non-medical DFCS agents, Dr. Cartie was the only person to bring up tetanus as an issue. Dr. Cartie never disclosed any concern that (child's name redacted) had actually had tetanus or elevated probability that (child's name redacted) could have tetanus. Dr. Cartie repeatedly indicated that, "one in four people die that get it (tetanus)", but was unable or unwilling to provide prevalence rates or morbidity. This is an unacceptable lack of information on the part of a doctor. as prevalence rates are an important factor in any medical decision. An analogy would be that the mortality rate for a Black Mamba bite is exceedingly high (nearly 100%), but the chance of being bitten by a Black Mamba in the United States is exceedingly low (less than .05%). This would translate into Dr. Cartie indicating that the chance of dying from this snake bite is so great (100%) that immediate precautions should be made, while ignoring the fact that the actually likelihood of being bitten is nearly non-existent. Refusal to provide preventative treatment for such an snake bite would, in Dr. Cartie's mindset, be justification for the kidnapping of a child because the "possibility" of injury exists. The existence of a "possibility" of injury is not an exigent circumstance. Dr. Cartie did not observe (child's name redacted)'s wounds prior to demanding that (child's name redacted) be given the tetanus vaccine thus was not able to determine if the wounds were anaerobic thus conducive to tetanus. Page 2 of 4

14. 15. 16.

17. 18.

19.

20. 21. 22

23.

24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32.

Dr. Cartie demanded a tetanus vaccine be administered. Dr. Cartie demanded that a tetanus shot be administered. Dr. Cartie did not demand that a TIG shot be given at any time nor did he make a single mention of the diphtheria vaccine which (child's name redacted) was also given without parental consent. At no time did Dr. Cartie inform the parents about the tetanus vaccine, the TIG, the diphtheria vaccine. Dr Cartie never once demanded that (child's name redacted)'s feet be immediately irrigated and debrided as would be appropriate in the event tetanus was a truly a legitimate concern in his mind. According to nurse Ecks the best possible way to defeat tetanus (irrigation and surgical debridement) was delayed due to the "vaccine issue". The shot known as the TIG has no safety or efficacy data associated within the pediatric population. A tetanus vaccine is not an emergency medical procedure. Attorney Lisa Coogle Rambo did practice medicine without a medical license or medical knowledge by proxy via her fraudulent "Order for Shelter Care.

Given the above facts one can understand how the parents identified an exigent circumstance and responded with immediacy. However, Dr. Richard Cartie and several medical staff actually impeded and temporarily denied the very best treatment to (child's name redacted) - irrigation and de-bridement. Exigency can not be utilized as the argument (or better yet, the excuse) for the unlawful seizure of (child's name redacted). Please note that the refusal of the tetanus vaccine was asserted to have put the child's life - possibly- in danger. As per the tetanus vaccine's manufacturer the tetanus vaccine SHOULD not be administered to people with tetanus and the TIG shot has no safety or efficacy data within the pediatric population. therefore, it is not reasonable to assert that the child's life was ever in danger as a result of not being vaccinated against tetanus. On the contrary, the tetanus vaccine could have adversely affected the child had (child's name redacted) had tetanus. Additionally, the TIG, having no safety studies, could have adversely impacted (child's name redacted)'s health. An analogy would be a doctor telling a patient they "might" have cancer, that the particular cancer they "might" have has a 25% mortality rate, and that treatment should begin immediately, but that said treatment could have some side effects and is not recommended for your particular age group. If you don't start this treatment, you will be forced to do so against your will, and the judge will support this unlawful act. The rights to due process specifically the fourth amendment was expressed to specifically prohibit what the government has done to this family and child. Had attorney Lisa Coogle Rambo chosen to support the Constitution then this family would not have been allowed to become victims of Dr. Cartie, his medical staff, DFCS, and others.

Page 3 of 4

Personal Affirmation: Thus Be it known to all men of sound moral fiber by these presents on this____day of the____month, in the Year of our Lord Jesus Christ two thousand thirteen (as men measure such things), and pursuant to scriptural mandate (Matthew 5: 33-37), that this document is hereby subscribed and solemnly Affirmed on my own name with all honorable intent and without swearing by me, (parent's name redacted), the undersigned. I Affirm that all of the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, remembrance and understanding. I Affirm that I am of lawful adult age and am competent to execute this Instrument. I hereby affix my own signature to all of the Affirmations in this entire document with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights as granted to me by God alone. This Instrument is hereby respectfully subscribed by me, (parent's name redacted) as a free and voluntary act and deed. All Rights and Remedies reserved under the watchful eye and aegis of God Almighty alone (and no other), without prejudice, waiver or surrender: non-assumpsit per idem sonans persona ficta: X.................................................. (parent's name redacted) (in esse) sui juris

Personal Affirmation: Thus Be it known to all men of sound moral fiber by these presents on this____day of the____month, in the Year of our Lord Jesus Christ two thousand thirteen (as men measure such things), and pursuant to scriptural mandate (Matthew 5: 33-37), that this document is hereby subscribed and solemnly Affirmed on my own name with all honorable intent and without swearing by me, (parent's name redacted), the undersigned. I Affirm that all of the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, remembrance and understanding. I Affirm that I am of lawful adult age and am competent to execute this Instrument. I hereby affix my own signature to all of the Affirmations in this entire document with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights as granted to me by God alone. This Instrument is hereby respectfully subscribed by me, (parent's name redacted) as a free and voluntary act and deed. All Rights and Remedies reserved under the watchful eye and aegis of God Almighty alone (and no other), without prejudice, waiver or surrender: non-assumpsit per idem sonans persona ficta: X.................................................. (parent's name redacted) (in esse) sui juris I, the undersigned Notary Public, do hereby affirm that (parent's names redacted) personally appeared before me on the ___ day of July 2013 and signed the above affidavit of their own volition. _________________________________ Notary Public
Page 4 of 4