Professional Documents
Culture Documents
73
Figure 5.2 Flow around a symmetric aerofoil at a small angle of incidence to the ow.
is lost. Lift occurs because the ow is deected downwards by the aerofoil; this leads to the ow over the upper surface being faster than that on the lower surface. Note that this difference in speeds is not because the upper surface ow has further to travel but rather due to the aerofoil shape. Point S is the stagnation point where the ow is brought to rest. Making use of Newtons laws of motion (see Chapter 6) and neglecting gravitational effects, Bernoullis equation (Anderson, 2001) for constant (incompressible ow) can be derived to relate the pressure, density and velocity such that P+1 V 2 = constant. 2 (5.10)
For compressible ow it can be shown that Bernoullis equation, again neglecting gravitational effects, becomes 1 P 1 + V 2 = constant. 2 (5.11)
Consider the ow along a typical streamline starting in the free stream at pressure P and velocity V and then changing to pressure P and velocity V at some point close to the aerofoil. Applying Bernoullis equation gives
2 V =P+1 V 2 P + 1 2 2
2 P = P + 1 V V2 . 2
(5.12)
Hence for a velocity V > V , pressure P < P , so an increase in velocity leads to suction (pressure reduction); for velocity V = V , pressure P = P, ; and for velocity V < V , pressure P > P , so a decrease in velocity leads to compression (pressure increase). The maximum pressure occurs at the stagnation point S where the ow comes to rest on the aerofoil (V = 0), so
2 Ps = P + 1 V . 2
(5.13)
It is usual to describe the pressure distribution in terms of the nondimensional pressure coefcient C p , which is dened for a point in the ow (or on the aerofoil) as Cp = P P =1 1 2 V 2 V V
2
(5.14)
which is a measure of the ratio of the local static pressure on the aerofoil (relative to the free stream pressure P ) to the free stream dynamic pressure. In terms of C p , the pressure distribution of a typical symmetric aerofoil at an angle of incidence below stall (see later) is plotted in Figure 5.3.
Module1/Lesson1
Module 1: Elasticity
1.1.1 INTRODUCTION
If the external forces producing deformation do not exceed a certain limit, the deformation disappears with the removal of the forces. Thus the elastic behavior implies the absence of any permanent deformation. Elasticity has been developed following the great achievement of Newton in stating the laws of motion, although it has earlier roots. The need to understand and control the fracture of solids seems to have been a first motivation. Leonardo da Vinci sketched in his notebooks a possible test of the tensile strength of a wire. Galileo had investigated the breaking loads of rods under tension and concluded that the load was independent of length and proportional to the cross section area, this being the first step toward a concept of stress. Every engineering material possesses a certain extent of elasticity. The common materials of construction would remain elastic only for very small strains before exhibiting either plastic straining or brittle failure. However, natural polymeric materials show elasticity over a wider range (usually with time or rate effects thus they would more accurately be characterized as viscoelastic), and the widespread use of natural rubber and similar materials motivated the development of finite elasticity. While many roots of the subject were laid in the classical theory, especially in the work of Green, Gabrio Piola, and Kirchhoff in the mid-1800's, the development of a viable theory with forms of stress-strain relations for specific rubbery elastic materials, as well as an understanding of the physical effects of the nonlinearity in simple problems such as torsion and bending, was mainly the achievement of the British-born engineer and applied mathematician Ronald S. Rivlin in the1940's and 1950's.