You are on page 1of 21

FENDERSYSTEMS FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS

by: Dominique Polte Sales Manager FenderTeam GmbH

FENDERTEAM GMBH
Germany based company specialised in the design, and supply of customised Fender Solutions. well experienced employees and partners, working in the Fender Business for more than 20 years. FullService provider, starting from design stage up to supervision of Fender installation. Our exclusive partner for engineering and design; Civil engineering consultant, specialised in design of FenderSystems and waterfront structures.

TABLE OF CONTENT
1.
a. b. c. d. e.

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES


THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY

2. 3.
a. b. c. d. e. f. g.

DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS
APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

4.

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES Timber Bushes / Truck Tyres Cylindrical Rubber Fender

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

THE 60s
First onpurpose built Container Vessel FAIRLAND 440TEU

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES Cylindrical Rubber Fender CSSFender (Cell Fender)

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

THE 70s
Container Vessel HAMBURG EXPRESS 3010TEU

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES CSSFender (Cell Fender) SXFender (Arch Fender) FEFender (Fender Elements)

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

THE 80s
Container Vessel MARCHEN MAERSK ~4300TEU

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES CSSFender (Cell Fender) FEFender (Fender Elements) SPCFender (Conical Fender)

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

THE 90s
Container Vessel SOVEREIGN MAERSK ~8300TEU

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES CSSFender (Cell Fender) Ocean Guard Foam Fender SPCFender (Conical Fender)

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

2000today
Container Vessel EMMA MAERSK ~14000TEU

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY THE 60s FAIRLAND TODAY LATEST DESIGN VESSELS

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

Summary

EA = 259 kNm

EA = 3685 kNm
+ 1400 %

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

CASE STUDY

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

Design of a FenderSystem for the latest generation of Container Vessels

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PIANC2002: Guidelines for the Design of FenderSystems British Standard 6349: Maritime Structures EAU 2004: Recommendations of the Committee for Waterfront Structures DIN 18800: Design and Construction of Structural Steelwork EUROCODE 3: Design and Construction of Structural Steelwork

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS Sheet Pile Wall Combi Wall (Sheet Pile Section with Piles, or Beams) Open / SemiOpen Pile Structure Concrete deepwall (Euromax) Gravity Structures (Caissons, Concrete Blocks)

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT Design criteria: Energy Reaction Hull Pressure = 2765 kNm = <4000 kN = < 300 kN/m

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

Berthing Angle = 6 Standoff = <2000 mm

Selected Fender: 2nos. SPC1400H G2.2 E = 1416 kNm * 2 = 2832 kNm (>2765) R = 3862 kN (<4000)

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL Net Size: 12.88 m (R/HP = Net Size) Closed Box Steel Panel Type with 100mm side and 300mm top Chamfer FOS 1.4 onnon permanent loads, further capacity check acc. to DIN 18800 Line Loads vs. Flat Contact Lower or Upper Contact, Panel/Vessel Flare Angle of Vessel Steel grade S355J2, thickness acc. to PIANC2002 Coating acc. to ISO 12944C5M

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL DETAILED PROCESS (SIMPLE SYSTEM)

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL DETAILED PROCESS (ADVANCED SYSTEM)

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

Summary

RSTAB: Software for 3Dframework analysis

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Release of production only after technical approval Quality control process and Third Party Verification Final documentation (manuals, mill certificates etc.) Supervision of Fender installation at site Availability of spare parts and local support

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS TO BE CONSIDERED


Fully compliant with Standards (worst case) Submittal of complete set of Drawings Submittal of Structural Calculation (FOS!) Consideration of Line Loads, Beltings etc. Clarification of Steel Grades S355J2 Submittal of Third Party Testing Certificates Approved Coating System for Marine Application (incl. DFT Protocol) Submittal of Installation and Maintenance Manuals

QUOTE A
NO YES (YES) NO NO NO (YES) NO

QUOTE B
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

Summary

DEVELOPMENT OF FENDERSYSTEMS VS. VESSEL SIZES THE 60s THE 70s THE 80s THE 90s 2000 TODAY DEVELOPMENT OF REQUIRED BERTHING ENERGY

SUMMARY The increase in vessel sizes and new developments e.g. special coatings, leads to new requirements on Fender Solutions. Designs have to incorporate all conditions at site and available Norms. Vital data (e.g. velocity) and requirements (e.g. standoff) have to be collected and evaluated thoroughly. The demand for Customised Fender Solutions is increasing and challenges especially the final client when comparing fender designs.

CASE STUDY: DESIGN OF A FENDERSYSTEM FOR THE LATEST GENERATION OF CONTAINER VESSELS APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TYPICAL DESIGNS OF CONTAINER QUAY WALLS SELECTION OF RUBBER FENDER UNIT DESIGN OF THE STEEL PANEL FINAL DESIGN OF THE FENDERSYSTEM ORDER EXECUTION & AFTERSALES SERVICE CHECKLIST FOR COMPARING FENDER DESIGNS

Summary

TREND: STANDARDIZATION => CUSTOMIZATION

Thanks for your kind attention!

You might also like