Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
It is generally acknowledged that there are three models for the ordering of
human society:
• Christian Democracy, based on a Biblical Life and World View, and operating
according to a leadership coalition based on the model of unity-in-diversity
with the enactment of charters of individual as well as cultural, religious and
language community rights (Consociational Democracy)
• Liberal democracy, operating according to the Westminster liberal democratic
concept of the winner takes all
• Socialist Democracy, operating as an interventionist state that meddles in the
internal affairs of communities and organs of civil society
At the end of this document it is shown to what extent the Human Rights Charter
of the Constitution of SA, 1996 is in conflict with the dictates of Christian
governance.
Christian governance is the only guarantee for the protection of diverse
communities and the individual from the state’s abuse of public power.
The characteristics of governance according to Christian principles are as listed:
1
3. The organisation of Christian society:
• Is done in accordance to the principle of unity-in-diversity.
• Unity refers to the common Christian religious direction of each of the
diverse social structures.
• Diversity refers to the diversity of organs of state and of organs of civil
society.
• The diversity of organs of civil society are characterised by cultural and
language identities.
• A Christian society rejects the dogma of liberalism that makes man the
centre of his own universe.
• A Christian society rejects the dogma of totalitarianism that designates
overarching power to an institution of human society, such as the state
4. The Church:
• Is a religious institution of organised worship by Christian communities
• Has a special duty to teach the Word of God
• Has a specific duty to proclaim the Kingdom of God as being in heaven as
well as on earth
• Should exercise its prophetic responsibility towards proclaiming, directing,
instructing and reprimanding.
5. The state:
• Is a judicial institution and creation of God to ensure order and exercise
justice
• Is an institution that should create the prerequisites for the protection of
human kind, its institutions and the organs of state
• Should divide power according to the responsibility of each organ of civil
society, as well as of organs of state (the executive, the legislative, the
administrative and the judicial)
• Should govern according to just laws
• Should protect and advance the development of disadvantaged persons or
categories of persons.
• Should protect the right to life, including the life of the unborn child.
• May only in extreme circumstances relating to the public interest disown
owners of their property rights
• In the formulation of just laws to consult with organs of civil society and
organised communities in terms of aspects of its unique existence
2
7. The judiciary:
• Operates independently of the executive
• Appoints its own functionaries according to specific criteria and
procedures
• Structures itself according to the demands of functionality
• Is bound by Charters of Human and Community Rights
• May apply the death penalty in extreme situations of first degree murders
and rape, etc.
• Should exercise law according to the law of the land and in terms of
modern international laws and standards, in as much as those laws could
be reconciled with the four charters (individual rights, language rights,
cultural rights and religious rights) and as long as those laws and practices
respect the right to life (also of the unborn child) and the dignity of the
human personality
8. Jurisprudence:
• Should observe international and customary law, in as much as it is not in
conflict with the Charters of Individual and of Community Rights
• Must recognise indigenous laws and practices as the internal right of
traditional communities structured according to their own religious
direction and cultural orientation
11. Penitentiaries:
• Are institutions where people are separated from society for the protection
of society
• Offenders should be punished in relation to the seriousness of the crime
but then accompanied by religious, educational and psychological
programmes exercised by trained and qualified persons (including clergy),
with the purpose to rehabilitate them in order to reintegrate them into
society
• The link between an offender and the family is important
3
• Penitentiaries should be developed as industries of a special kind, in order
to be as self-sufficient as possible
4
• Should not be misused as instruments of social engineering to further state
ideology
• Strict discipline and even corporeal punishment under controlled
conditions, should be exercised after due process
• Alternative forms of education, such as Home Schooling, should be
allowed
Conclusion
5
The so-called limitation clause (s.36 of the Constitution), makes it possible for
any secular party – be that liberalism, communism or national-socialism – once
elected in the majority position, to govern by enacting laws that qualifies each and
every stipulation of the Individual Human Rights Charter.
The right to life clause (s.11) is used to outlaw capital punishment, but also to
legalise abortion.
The right to property clause (s. 25) is limited within itself to allocate excessive
power to the government to deprive private property for public purposes or in the
general interest.
The rights of a child (s.28) undermine parental rights to the effect that a child
of 12 years may demand an abortion without the consent of the parent.
The education clause limits the right to education in private educational
institutions to education without state financial assistance.
In addition, organised parental institutions or governing bodies, are actually
substructures of the appropriate organs of state. The independence of organs of civil
societies are being systematically eroded.
Although a Christian may belong to a party, which is not structured according
to the model of a Christian democracy, such personal religious orientation does not
make the party itself Christian in its decisions and functioning.
A party that strives to separate religion from politics inevitable redefines God
as an absent God far away from the very people that He created and from the cosmos
that God upholds.