Professional Documents
Culture Documents
According to PED an assembly has to be assessed following the global conformity assessment procedure (GC). The GC is not explained in detail in the PED. This guidance document aims to give some more insight in how to assess the conformity of assemblies by notified bodies. The scope of this document is limited to the direct inspection route modules (such as A1, B, C1, F, G), not the QA modules (D, E and H).
2 Objective
The objective of this document is to establish consistency in application of the global conformity assessment procedure by CABs as mentioned in article 10.2 of the PED. This is achieved by giving guidance in the main steps to the conformity assessment of assemblies. Furthermore guidance and explanations is given to a number of guidelines that need clarification. This document is intended to be a public document and available to all parties involved.
3 Definitions
Article 1 paragraph 2.1.5 defines assemblies as an integrated, functional whole. This paragraph gives some notes on this definition. As there are no upper or lower limits for an assembly, it could vary from a fire extinguisher to an oil refinery. As there are no such limits a global conformity assessment can vary form small to very large. It is therefore advisable that the manufacturer (in many cases in close communication with the user) determines the limits as early as possible. This is important to clarify the scope of work for de CAB and can be of influence on the inservice inspections under national law. It is the manufacturer who is responsible for determining the limits of the assembly. It is advisable to keep the functional unit as small as practical. For example a large and complex assembly could be divided in smaller sub-assemblies which assessed one by one and joined together later.
4 Documentation
The manufacturer must provide (depending on the conformity assessment procedure) the following technical documentation for the assessment, this list is not exhaustive.
At the design assessment stage: General description of the assembly (including intended use and foreseen misuse). List of equipment with all relevant information (PS, TS, content, fluid, category, etc). for examples see appendix 1 and 2 Instructions for use of each item of pressure equipment (specifically the safety related information such as; pressure, temperature, fluids, safeguarding etc) Hazard analyses of the assembly (cases such as fire, coolant system, power failure, etc) Information relating to safeguarding (eg flow sheets, safety valve capacity, maximum flow of fluid, ) Process flow diagram, Piping & Instrumentation diagram Standards by which the integration and safeguarding is designed and constructed. Examples of possible standards used:
o o o o o o o o o ANSI/API Standard 521 (of ISO 23251) API Standard 520 EN ISO 4126-1/3/4/5 EN 764-7 ISO/IEC 61511-1/2/3 EN 12952-10 EN 12953-8 EN 378 A harmonised standard for intergration and safeguarding of other assemblies should be developed.
At the stage of manufacturing or final assessment: DOC of all pressure equipment making up the assembly (and which have been subjected to a conformity assessment procedure). DOC of all other equipment that is essential for the safety of the assembly, and which is covered by a directive. (ie CSPRS, SRMCR) As built documentation (must be available at the inspection stage) DOC of the assembly (draft) Instructions for use of the assembly (draft)
art 10.2 a
There is no need (it is even prohibited) to re-assess equipment that has already been CE-marked. The proper documentation (instructions for use, Declaration of conformity) need to be available. The CAB should check the DOCs and identify the equipment that has not been assessed yet. Art 15.3 states that the physical CE-marking is not necessary for every item in the assembly, but the applicable conformity assessment procedure must be performed for every item of pressure equipment in the assembly.
5.2.1 design
Items to be assessed during the design appraisal of integration (this list is not exhaustive) (assessment depending on the chosen module): General info, equipment and line list, hazards analysis, process description (from a safety point of view, for understanding the use of the assembly), user manuals etc. for examples of lists see appendix 1 and 2 Verification according to the P&ID. On the P&ID all fluid flows will be considered. Where does the fluid come from (pump, vessel, etc.) and what is the set pressure of safety devices or maximum pressure from the pump. Of all equipment it must be assessed if they are suitable for the intended use (PS, TS, fluid, vacuum, cold or hot flashing, forces on nozzles, vibration, fatigue, etc etc) Possibility of different fluids getting mixed, possible reactions (ESR 2.2.3) lines connected to a pump, pressure, vibrations, fatigue (ESR 6 d) flexibility of piping (ESR 6 a) cat II and higher (the flexibility of the piping has been considered during the conformity assessment of the piping. The forces on connecting equipment (nozzle loads) shall be considered during the assessment of the assembly) nozzle loads (ESR 2.2.1 +6 d) Static head of liquid.
One by one the possible malfunctions (related to pressure) shall be considered. One single malfunction should not lead to exceeding of the design limits of any equipment. Examples are: o Malfunction of cooling system o Rupture of one pipe in a heat exchanger o Closing or opening of one or more valves o Thermal expansion of liquid o Power failure / utilities / cooling. o Exothermal reaction o Fire o Foreseeable misuse o A pressure just under the set pressure of a safety device is considered as normal operations condition. o etc
5.2.2 inspection
Items to be inspected at the integration stage (this list is not exhaustive): welds / WQ / WPQR/ NDT (wpg 3/15) nozzle loads, vibrations and fatique (ESR 6 d) provisions to ensure safe handling and operation (ESR 2.3) means of examination (ESR 2.4) means of draining and venting (ESR 2.5 + 6 b) Provisions for filling and discharge (ESR 2.9) connections and supports (ESR 6 a) verification according the P&ID (ie position of valves, verification according the as build isometrics pressure testing of the assembly (guideline 3-6) see 8.2
art 10.2c
If, as a result of the assessment of the integration and / or the hazard analysis, an assembly is to be equipped with protective devices, the assessment of the safe guarding must contain at least the following (this list is not exhaustive):
5.3.1 Design
Items to be assessed in the design stage of safe guarding: Acoustic alarm systems. safety accessories, type (ie bellow / foil), category, capacity, activation value (ie pressure, temperature) input signals for ESD valve Blow-off capacity calculation / liquid /gas? Blow-off lines of safety accessories. o Capacity / size,
o Back pressure (ie from resistance in the line, from general flare system) o Supports of the line, o Safe blow-off location SRMCR, CSPRS, design, SIL class,
5.3.2 Inspection
Items to be considered in the inspection stage: activation values, pressure, temperature, etc o test certificate of opening pressure of safety valve (not older than 12 months) o simulation test o actual in-situ test o certificates of other devices (such as rupture disks) type of safety device (ie material of RDs, bellow in PSVs) combination of safety devices such as RDs with PSV (pressure build-up between RD and PSV), Blow-off lines of safety accessories. o Size, o Supports of the line, o Safe-blow off location Verification if built according to design (P&ID) Location of other equipment verification of locked open / locked closed valves, testing of interlock systems (or comparable system) reference for level of safety EN 764 part 7 paragraph 8.5 data plate and CE-marking for the assembly.
7 Certificate of conformity
When the conformity assessment has been completed the CAB shall issue a document to the manufacturer. For modules B, B1, F and G this document shall be a certificate (see annex III), for modules A1 and C1 this document can be or any other report about the result of the visit (see CABF-R-013). It should be clearly stated that it concerns an assembly (as opposed to equipment) or a reference to article 10.2 a, b and c. Manufacturer. The CAB shall check the (draft of the) DOC from the manufacturer. It should be clear that it concerns an assembly (preferably stated as assembly, list of equipment, reference to art 10.2).
8.2 Guidelines
Guideline 3-1 assembled by user.
No clarification needed Guideline 3-2 joining operations on site No clarification needed Guideline 3-3 SEP in manually fed boiler No clarification needed Guideline 3-4 minimum extend of boiler No clarification needed Guideline 3-5 CE-marking for assembly 3.2.3 No clarification needed
No clarification needed
* B: 50 125 - 06 HH D: 39 309 - 08 HH -
111222
10 bar
50C
air
IV
0098
GL 39 000 - 08 HH
TAG nr
2
Name
2a 2b 3
Ref NBCAB
5
User reference
6
Chamber
7
ltr
7a 8 9
Mm
State of aggregation
C Kg/m3 bar bar C bar bar C C Y/N C bar bar C C
Appendix 2 Draft table for integration and safeguarding (classification and line list)
Mass Vapour pressure at TS Operating pressure Operating temperature Min operating pressure Max operating pressure Min operating temperature Max operating temperature tracing Max temperature tracing Min allowable pressure in assembly Max allowable pressure in assembly Min allowable temperature in assembly Max allowable temperature in assembly Applied design code