Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COMPLAINT .lOllN IIOS'l'lCK( . "Bostick") P l a i n t i l 'h f ercinf . l l c st h i sC o r n p l a i na t g a i n sC t BOCS. I N C . . D / B / AC I R A C K I - . R I I A I { R t r l O L D C O U N R ' l ' YS ' I O R E& R l l S T n I J R n N - f .( ' C r a c k c r B a n ' e l "D ) c t b n d a nh t e r c i na . n da l l e g c s : PARTIES l. P l a i n t i f l . l o h nB o s t i c k .i s a n d w a s .a t a l l t i r n e sr n a t e r i a a l . c i t i z c na n d r e s i d c no t l-
the lJnitedStates ol America and a rcsident of. Chesterton County,, lndiana.plaintilf is a qav tnalewho at all timeswas an employee w'howorked tbr Defbndant CrackerBarrel.
2'
I
P O I ] I - 0 SL A \ \ ' F I R \ I . -100 Nbrth .\drlcr Dr.. lrite 2600 . falfn. Irkrrida -li(r02 o nl l. po Lrl o slarilantpact nl
JTRISDICTIONALSTATEMENT
i.
t h i sa c t i o r S r .p c c i f i c a l lP l'. l a i n t i lh f as d u e lf i l e dc h a r g eo sf d i s c r i n t i n a t ia on ndr e t a l i a t i o ni t ht h c w E t r O Ca n d t l r e I rl o r i d aC o m r n i s s i oo nn I l u r n a nR e l a t i o n s T.h i s i s a n a c t i o nf b r u n l a w f i r l elnploYmen pt racticcs o n t h e b a s i so f s e x u a lo r i e n t a t i o d n i s c r i r n i n a t i oh na . r a s s m ea nn td reta liation. 'l'his c o u r lh a s . j u r i s d i c t u io n n d c Artic r l c I I I . s c c t i o r2 r o1-thc U n i t c dS t a t c s
4.
u.s.c.n r i.4 3 .
VI'NUE
-5. V c n u ci s e s t a b l i s l r ci d n t h i s . i u d i c i a l d i s t r iL cr tndcr,l? Li.S.C . A . 2 0 0 0 c - 5 .i n t h a tt h c
F A C ' I S I N S U P P O R TO F C I , A I M S 'l'hc
6.
rcstauran t d u s t r l .i n c l u d i n g a a in s n o\\,ncr.
7.
'lraining as a rnanager-in-training in the Associate Compete ncr (AC'f) prograrn with the goalof becoming a c-icncra l anager M o f a h i g h v o l u m es t o r e . Afier corrpletion o [ 8 w e e k so f c l a s s r o o m -[ennessee. trainingat thc colxpanr'sheadqttarters in l-chranon plaintifr was assigned to his tjrst
storeas a lranager in trairringin Anderson. South Carolina.l'hroughoLrt his employrnent with CrackerBarrel,plaintifFconsistently' perforrned above the standards his ernployerhad set for hirn.and received consistentl5r satisfbctory evaluations.
8.
9.
I n 2 0 1 0 . M r . B o s t i c kr c c e i v e d a n a b o v ea v c r a g c s c o r eo f ' f b u r ( 4 ) o n a s c a l eo f
onc (l) to five (5). rnearring he was exceedine companystandards. Witlr a strong perfbrmance evaluation fi'omhis Sotrth Carolirra CcneralManager StcvenHardler, plaintifidecided to translbr to a biggerstorehcre in [rloridafbr his last(6) six months of rnanagcrnent training.
10.
M a n a t eC e otrntyl . " l o r i d al i o r n a s r n a l l c r C r a c k e ra r r e l s t o r e B i n S o L r tC h arolina to theBradenton location to flnish up his trainingas a StoreManagerin a high volumestort:.
ll.
w a l k t l i r o L r -o cl.' h thc Lrniw t ith CeneralManager'l-ir nc e s l c r . K P l a i n t i t fi n f i t r r n e d Mr. Kesslcr that he had more than 80%o percentof the management modules and trainingcornpleted and that he desired to colnpletctnanagement trainingunderhis guidance at his storein Br-adenton.
12.
B e g i n n i n gi n f r e b r u a r y o 1 -2 0 1 1 . P l a i n t i f F b e g a nt o e x p e r i e n c e lrarassmen at nd
3
POL-IL-OS L,\\\' IJI R\l . {00 Nbnh;\JrlerDr..Sritc 2600 . l'alFt. Fbrida.]i602 . uu rr pouloslaulantpamnl
13.
gift shopwhcnAssociate restaurants Manager Matt Donohue approached him andsaid,"buying candy fbr your bo1,'fiiend. How sweet!"Plaintiff told Donohue thal he dd not flnd his comrnentary funny andasked him notto do it again.
11.
Kessler. Kesslcr's rcsponsc ll'asthat Donohue was "iustplaying".In response. plaintifl'reqLlcsted thatsuchbehavior bc stoppcd.
15.
O n M a r c h 5 . 2 0 1l . P l a i n t i f fn o t i c e d s o r n er r a n u a l a d - i u s t r nn te s m a d et o e r n p l o v e e
timc records. which w'creidenticalto some rlanualadjustrnents that hc had noticed.just a week or two prior. Plaintiff spokewith Ccneral ManagerKeesleraboutthe changes and his concerns with thc lcgalityol'changcs to the tirnc cards.Mr. Kceslertold hirn that it was cornrnon pract'rce and that it is donc all ol- tlre tirnc arrdthat. "he should worry about his own AOR. "Area of' Responsibility "bor la a t t h i s u n i t i s r n 1c ' oncern ".
l6'
O n M a r c h6 . 2 0 1 l . P l a i n t i t f r'vaspeaking w i t h f b u r ( 4 ) r n a . lc eu s t o r x e ra st a r a b l c .
-l'irn Ilntncdiatclv thcrealtcr.DorrahLre in the presence ol'thc storc rxanager Kessler, contrnentcd t o P l a i n t i f i ." ' l ' c l l v o t t t ' b u d d i e s . ' c a u ste h a t ' sw h a t ) ' o u a l l c a l l e a c h o t h e r . t o v i s i t w i t h y o L r somewhere else." l-his is a farnih opemtion." Donahueobvious ly believedthat these rnab custolnerswerc lrtlt]toscxttal. When Mr. Bostick confionted Donohue about the coml.nent Defbndarrt's StoreMarugerTirn Kessrer tordMr. Bostickto droo it.
17.
u'asnot receiving the cxperience that he needed in orderto complete his managetnent training
u'hich was the sole reasonfbr the transferto the Florida store.Prior to Florida. plaintiff was previotts Crackcr Barrel [:lorida store so he could was to cornpletefris training in order to -['he becorne a GeneralManager. reason he w'asassigrred to Store #73 in Bradenton was to completehis managelnent training fbr an eventualG.M. position. In order to attain a luture GeneralManagerpositionplaintifi necded expcrience runninga largerbusierstoresuclras thc Bradenton storc.
18.
O r r A p r i l 1 8 . 2 0 1 1 . P l a i n t i f fw a s r e l a y i n g a c u s t o r n e rc 's o r n p l a i ntto [ ) o n o h u e
rvherein tlrc saladarrdentrdehad come out together. Mr. Bostick oflbred to replacethe cntrec aftcrthe ctlstorne r flnislred his salad.rvhichthe clientdcclinedbecause he was concerncd that the kitchenr'r'ould dtl sotlrcthirrg to his fbod. In fl'ontof'rnany mcmbers of tSc wait stafl. Donahuc r e s p o n d ctd o p l a i n t i l - f 'rs ecitation o l ' t h e t a c t sb 1 ' s t a t i n g t h a t t h e c u s t o r x ew r as "probably,aliaid h e ' l lc a t c hA I D S f i o r n 1 ' o t t . " Plaintifl'atternptc d question to w h y t h i s w 3 s b c i ' g d o n e .a n d t h e sttpcrvisot'thrcatcr rc .,hLrmiliated to cd a l l t h ep o l i c ei f P l a i n t i t d f id notleavc. P l a i n t i f l ' r v ag sr e a t l y and cltrbarrasscd" by thc supervisor's actions.'l'hesupervisor's actioms were in retaliationtbr Plaintill-srequcstto his supervisor that tlrc supcrvisornot persistin the oflbrsive verbalancl physicalscxual cottduct.PlaintilT immediatelynotilled Delbndant'sA.ssistant Manaser a'd c o m p l a i n ea db o u tt h ea c t i i t n s o f t h e s u D e riv sor.
19.
Mr. llostick itntrediatelrrreet r,l'ith the Store Managerf irn Kesslerand told hirr
of Donohue's statemcl.lt and how Donohue was intentionallvrlaking these sexually charged statenlents in fiont of thc ver) ernployee plaintiffrequested s thev rl'erecharged with rnanagirrg. a meeting as thc lrarasstncnt had not stopped and lr'asincleed escahting.As ri 4g yearold rnanw,ith
5
POL, LOS L,A\\' FI R\1 . .100Mnh .\Jrlcr Dr.. SLrire 26i)0 . TarxFr. Fbrida i-]601 o \\\\\\ poutosla\\tanlp ca 0r11
closeto 30 yearsof experie nce in the restaurant business. plaintiff figuredthat the bestapproach woLrld be to havea mcctingto try and put an end to the harassment befbrecontactins the horne officeernplo1'ee rc lations department.
20.
speak to [)onohuercgarding his irrappropriate conduct. but then endedthe rneeting by telling Mr. Bosticktlrat hc bclicr,cc'l plaintiff was bcing overl"rsensitivearrd that plaintifl was an overly scnsitirg cu\ an\\\l\
21.
O n A p r i l 2 5 . 2 0| l . u , h i l e o f f f i o r nw o r k . M r . B o s t i c k r c c e i , y ea dp h o n cc a l l f i o r n
M r . K e s s l ca r s k i n gl r i t r t c tc o r n ei n f b r a r r e e t i n g o n A p r i l 2 7 . 2 0 l 3 u n d e rt h e g u i s e o l ' g o i n go v e r his perfbrrnallcc cvaltration. [{orvcver. insread ol'rcceivinghis perlbflnance evaluation. plaintiflreccivea d f l n a l w r i t t c nw a r n i n gl b r s c r i o L ru sn d e r p e r f b n n a n c c h i s A O F i o f s u p p l i e sT in . heflnal rvarning stated lhat "on thc fbllowingdates the unit was fbrccdto transfbr productliorn othcr u n i t sb c c z t t t s oc f - r u no u t s : 2 / 2 6 . 2 1 2 7 4 .3 . 31 . 3 1 6 . 3 1 2 3 . 3 1 2 6 . 3 1 3 0 . 4 t 2 , 4 1 3 . 4 1 9 . 4 1 t 0 , 4 1 t 8 . 4 1 2 3 , 4 1 2 4 . conversch solllc cxalllplcs o l ' o v e ro r d c r i n g a r eh a v i n g 5 casc of'souflld c u p l i d s w h e no n c c a s e u ' i l l l a s tu s t h r e ct n o t r l h s a n d8 . 5b u c k c t s ofsanitizeu r ,hen w e n c e d1 . 5p c nw c c k . "
22.
O n A p r i l 2 8 . 2 0 1I P l a i n t i l l - i n c o r n p l i a n cw e i t h I ) e f ' e n d a n tE 's E O p o l i c yc a l l e d
23.
enrployce rclations dcpartrncnt. She stated that she was no\\ irra d iflbrentdepaftmentbLrtthat 'lvrone shell'ould leavca r.ncssagc lbr ernpror,ee relations specialist Srnithto call Mr. Bostick
pronlptl)'.
24'
25'
Ernployee Rclatiorrs.
26.
c o n l p l a i n to st ' d i s c r i l r i t r a l i oa nn d h a r a s s m c n b tl l i r s tr c p o r t i n g t h e h a r a s s n r ea nn t dd i s c r i r n i n a t i o n (icncralManager'l'irn to the storc's Kesslcr. who also hadpersonalknowlcdge of manyof the derogatorv and dc'caning staternents rradc b1,Mat1 Donohue.
27'
28.
A t a l l t i n l e sr el c v a n tt o t h i s c o r n p l a i n t l '.i r n K c s s l e rw a s t h e G e n e r a M l anager of
29.
I)lainti11'reportc d I i r n p l o y c eR e l a t i o n s to p e r s o n n c li n c i d e n t s of'sexuallv
annoying o r s u g g c s t i vc co r n l n e n trsx a d c t o h i r nb l , M a t t D o n o h u e .
30'
reponed t h a th e \ \ a s t h c v i c t i t no f s e x u a l h a r a s s r n e n r .
3I'
Associate
7
POI,I-'JS I-,\\\ FIR\I 'l o l()0 \rnh ..\Jrlo Dr. Suirc 26(X) . iulfx,tl .j h r i d a1 i 6 0 2 o r\ $ pouloSIa$tamparttnl
Managcr Matt Donohitc abng ',rith othcr assistant Inanagers cngagedin retaliatory conduct d e s i g n etd o i t l t i t t t i d a ta cn d u p s e t Plaintiff J o h nB o s t i c k a n dt o g e n e r a t s eu f f r c i e n t a nb de l i e v a b l e pretexl to firc him arrd/orcause him to resignincluding. but not limitedto: a.) b.) c') l:ngauin{r in d isparate d isc ip linarypractices: I : a l s c hr c c L r s i n l g l o s t i c ko f v i o l a t i n g workrules: l)rcvcntcd and or restricted Bostick fiorn cornpleting his n]anagelnent trainingby
assigning l r i r n t h e d i r t i e so f ' s u p p l 1 , ' a n d i n v e n t o r yw . h i c h a r e ao f e x p e r t i s e he had cornpleted w h i l eu o r k i n g i n D c t c \ n d a n t 's S o u t hC a r o l i n a Store: d.) j c c t i r g( ' o r d c r ot o l n c a n Sub a n do f f e n s i v e cor.ll'ents.
32'
a ff c c t e d a t c r n . lc . o n di 1 i o no . r p r i ' i l c g eo l - p l a i n t i l s f ernplovrnent.
'll'
harasslrrcnt alld Storc Marlagcr Kccslcr anci I)istrict Manager Paul ,/lncona's retaliationto Cracker Barre I's [:rnp loyecRelations I)epartment.
'l'+' continLrcd.
Not$ itlrslatrd ing his ob.iections and cornplaints. the harassme nt and rctaliation
35'
retaliatorr' treattrrct.tt to rrhich he vr'as sub.iccted bv StoreManagerKecslerand by other Cracker Ban'elInallagcl's at thc Kcssler's direction. CrackerBarreltook no corective 3(r' action.
C O U N TI SEXUAL HARASSMENT 31. Phintiffrealleges and incorporates bl, reference paragraphs I through 36.
38.
I'he c o n d u c to f t h e G e n e r a l M a n a g eT r i m K e s s l e rD . i s t r i c tM a n a g e r P a u lA n c o n a
supervisor. and AssociateN{anagcr Matt Donohueaffecteda terrn. condition or privilege of Plaintiffs cntnlovmerrt. 'l'he
39.
s e x u a l h a r a s s n r c no t 1'Mr.
B o s t i c k a l l b c t c d t a n g i b l e a s p e c t so f h i s
e m p l o y t r t c n lt:.o r c x a r r p l e .P l a i n t i l l ' v r a s d e n i c d g i v e n t h c n e c e s s a rty r a i n i n gP l a i n t i l lb - 1' his sttpervisor vs r a su n w c l c o t n c& - .l t d P l a i n t i t F a t a l l t i m c s a d v i s c dh i s i r r m e d i a t e supervisor s.t o r e .l'irn managef Kesslcr arrd Dcfbndant'sother cnployees who committcd such harassnrcnt and Plaintil-f.s sttpcrvisors and othcr Inalrascrrent of Defbndant that this conductwas unwelcome. 'l'hc
40.
41.
I'lrc verbal lmrasstnent of' PIaintill' by' Associate Manager Donohue and
acquiescctlcc bv Ceneral N'lanascrKecsler and District Manager Ancona was sufficiently, pervasive attcl scvere to creatcalt abusivcand hostile work cnvironment firr the plaintiff. '['he
42.
ManagcrKccslerand District ManaqerAncona w'ereacting as agentsof the Defendant in the scope o t ' a n dd u r i n gt h ec o u r s e o l - t l r e ie r r l p l o rm e n t .
43.
and circumstances relevantto the conductof supervisor and its otherem;rloyees and did nothing to preventfirrtlrer acts of misconduct. and acqLriesced in. approvedand ratified the actionsof supcrvisor and its otlier ernployees and is therefbreliable lbr the actiorrs of supervisor and its othcremployecs.
44.
45.
ManagcrKccsler arrd I)istrict MarragcrAncona were intentional and dcmonstrated a willfirl. wantonand/or recklessindil rcrrccto the rights ol- thc PIaintilf such that punitive clarnages should beassessc d a g a i r r st th e I ) c l d n d a n t .
47.
in this Clornplaint by reportingit to his supervisor. Mr. Bostick lodgeda written cornplaint with the Defbrrdant I:niployerregardins u'hat he reasonably believed to be sex.ual harassment and sex discrimina tn . io
48.
'l'he
49.
regarding the scxualharasstnent. hostileu,orke nvironlnent. and the retaliation to which plaintifT was subjected. '['he a c t s a l l e g e di n t h i s C o r r p l a i n tc o n s t i t u t e a v i o l a t i o no f S e c t i o n 7 6 0 . 1 0 : . \ .
50.
I--brida S t a t u t e s".i t i s a r r t r n l a w l i r l c r n P l o v r n c pn rt actice f b r a n e r n p l o y et ro d i s c r i r n i n a ta cg a i n s t a l l \ p e r s o nb c c a u s c t h a t p c r s o n h a so p p o s e d a n l , p r a c t i c ew h i c h i s a n u n l a w f u le r n p l o y r n e n t practice under this section.or becausc thal pcrsonhas rnadea chargc,testitied, assiste6 in anv I n a n n eirn a n i n v e s t i g a t i op rr r.o c c e d i n go r h c a r i n g unde r t h i ss e c t i o n ".
W I I F I I I E I ' - O I t F lI .' } l a i n t i f l - d c r r n n d as. i u 1 1 't r i a l o f t h i s a c t i o n . a n d f i r r l h e rd . emands judglnentagairrst Def.:ndant lbr {re nelal danrases. back pay, compcnsatory darnages lbr lossof dignity' and tnental anguish. rcasonablc atturnel'sfbes.thc costso1-this action.and a r r dl i r n h c rr c l i c f .i n l a r vo r i n e c 1 L r i t 1 o .u ' h i c hI ) l a i n t i l l ' r n ab 1e , ,- u f s t l yc n t i t l e d . fbr sr-rch other
Plaintifl'dernan si a l o f t h i sa c t i o n ad tr bv iurv.
I
o -100 \nh I'0L L-OS I-A\\' I]IRNl . \ : l rl e r I ) r . S u i r e 2 6 0 0 r I a l p l . F b n d a - l - 1 6 0r 2 \\\\ \\ p0 ulr) sla\\tantpa c! nl
/s/AntoniosPo ulos
Antonios Poulos A t t o r n e rl b r P l a i n r i l l Floridallar N umber:0039669 ,100 N Ashlel,Drive t i u i t e2 6 0 0 l'anrpa.F lorida 33602 -felephone : ( 8| 3) I 1 2 - 8 7 42 Iiax: (8l3) 902-1042 e-ttra i I:tonvlDpoLr loslilwtalnpa. co m 2nd e- rnail :shena@po u loslawtampa. cot.ll
I]
Qn behalf of percort(s) aggrieved whose identity ts coNFtDENTtAL (29 CFR 91601.7(a)) -EEOC Rspresentaflve
EEOC Charge'No.-
Telephone N* . -
846-2012-31372
NoncE Io rHe Pen$oH AGcRrevEo:
{813) 202-7927
(See a/so the additio.qal infomtation enc/os.ed with misform.)
Titlevl of the civil RightsAct of 'l964,the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),or the Gerretic Informailon Nondiscrimrnation Act (GIYA); Thisis yourNotice of Right to sue, issued under TitleVll theADAor GINAbasedon the above-numbered charge.lt has beenis:;ued your at request Yourlawsuit under TitleVll,the ADA or ctt'tn ru*t be filed in a federalor state court wlrHlN g0 DAys of your recaiptof this notice;or your rightto sue basedon this chargewiil be tost. ffhe trmeririiio|. fiilngsuit baseo-on a;i;iEGEE slatela\vmaybe dlfferent,) LiJ Morethan190dayshavepassed sjncethefrting of thischarge, Lessthan180dayshave,passed sincethefiling of thischarge, but I havedetermined thatit is unlikely thatthe EEoc vrill be ableto cornplete its adminislrative processini withinlg0iays tromfnefilirrg of thischarge. The EEOCis terminating its processing of thi.tcharge. The EEOClyillcorrtinue to process thischaree. vou we haveconipreteo aci;;.-il;il;ge. rn tnis r*suro,$re piiagriph marked bertw appriesto
fl
E]
n
;3,X8$.' l*
Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA): you may sue under the ADEA at any time fronr 60 days after the chargewas filed until receive noticethat
TheEEOCis closing yourcase. fherefore, yourlawsuit under lhe ADEAmust be flled in federalor statecourt WITHIN 90 DAYSof your receipt of thls Notlce' clii yl* *nt to si.re basedon tne a-nove-nurnbered chargo wiil b; ro;",*Lu,
[]
davs passed have since the ririns or the charge, ;ff 5:lfrJ',:filii:[xj1'"?".?j]I:"i'J:ilf,[f;a',X ffil:iilJ:60
EqualPrry Act (EPA):You. already havetheright to sue under the EPA(filing an EEoc clrarge is notrequired.) EpA suits in rederaor statecourtwithin2 v,:ars(3 mustbe brought il. *irrrrrr;oruirnufoii;;:H"d vears Een unoeffin,,ln,l'ir,i, meansrhatbackpay any vicit;itions that occurr.a -"." tr,"n z vear:s due for rj vn".Ji ;;;;;; ,olitir"l =ri, may not be collectibte. lf yorrfilesu( based on thischarge, prease senda copyof yourcourtcompr'int to thisoffice. On behalf of lhe Cornmission
Enclosu'es(s) . Marchbanks, DonnaRobarts Associato General Counsel CRACKER BARREL O L DC O U N T R Y STORE P,O.Bor 7ET Lebanon, TN 3709E
FEB i 4 ..r,r3
(Date Maited)