Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Yesterday, I addressed the political nature of Sandy Weills argument and why his conclusions are wrong. In addition to his political argument, Weill also tried to make a systemic safety and soundness argument. Lost in Weills political and public relations justification for a return to Glass-Steagall is the fact that the system is far safer than the one he seems to be concerned about. Im no fan of the Dodd-Frank act I would have preferred a far less confusing and prescriptive reform of our financial system. The law makes it more difficult for U.S. firms to serve customers and compete globally. However, theres no question that Dodd-Frank, however flawed, is contributing to a more safe and sound banking system. Weill cited the need for more capital and less leverage. Generally, everyone agrees, and in fact, since the end of the crisis the entire financial sector has increased capital and liquidity levels. As highlighted in the Hamilton Financial Index, the Tier 1 Common Capital Risk-Based Ratio for commercial banks is at an all-time high and has risen 38 percent since the crisis (Exhibit 1). Exhibit!1 !
TIER 1 COMMON CAPITAL LEVELS HIT ANOTHER ALL-TIME HIGH IN THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2012!
Tier 1 Common Capital and Tier 1 Common Risk-Based Ratio for U.S. Banks! 14! Tier 1 Common Capital ($T)! Tier 1 Common Risk-Based Ratio (%)! Tier 1 Common Capital Ratio has risen 38% since 2007 to an alltime high.! 1.4! 1.2!
12!
6!
1991!
1992!
1993!
1994!
1995!
1996!
1997!
1998!
1999!
2000!
2001!
2002!
2003!
2004!
2005!
2006!
2007!
2008!
2009!
2010!
2011!
Q112!
HPSInsight
HPSinsight.com
The
four
largest
banks
have
increased
this
ratio
by
the
same
amount.
At
the
same
time,
theyve
increased
the
quality
of
their
capital,
as
their
common
equity
to
assets
ratios
are
at
new
all-time
highs.
So
as
more
people
in
Washington
clamor
for
higher
capital
levels,
remember,
banks
not
only
have
more
capital
already,
but
better
quality
capital
than
ever
before.
Similarly,
for
all
the
press
the
Volcker
Rule
receives,
banks
have
already
dismantled
and
sold
virtually
all
but
the
barest
ability
to
make
markets
for
clients.
Proprietary
trading
at
banks
has
largely
gone
away,
reducing
so-called
speculation.
Personally,
I
would
prefer
to
repeal
the
Volcker
Rule
it
remains
a
solution
in
search
of
a
problem,
but
the
reform
is
working
in
ways
Sandy
Weill
would
seemingly
approve.
Finally,
Weills
call
for
a
return
to
Glass-Steagall
was
spiced
with
the
common
concern
that
we
should
never
again
bail
out
banks.
Weill
is
either
unfamiliar
with
Dodd-Franks
actual
provisions
or
has
simply
chosen
to
join
the
collection
of
eternal
disbelievers.
If
by
bailouts
Weill
is
referring
to
the
governments
response
to
the
financial
crisis
in
2008-2009,
then
he
should
be
pleased.
I
supported
that
government
response.
I
continue
to
support
it
and
would
support
it
again.
But
thats
not
the
response
youll
find
in
Dodd-Frank.
Instead,
the
laws
Resolution
Authority
only
allows
the
government
to
wind
down
not
preserve
failed
financial
institutions.
In
the
event
of
failure,
it
guarantees
that
bondholders
will
take
losses
and
shareholders
will
be
wiped
out.
The
past
three
years
have
seen
significant
changes
that
Weill
and
others
continue
to
ignore.
Rather,
they
flack
an
old
rule
that
would
not
have
prevented
the
financial
crisis.
The
financial
crisis
actually
showed
that
diversified
banks
were
safer
than
the
simpler
commercial
and
investment
banks.
And
as
a
result
of
Dodd-Frank,
banks
have
made
real
and
significant
reforms.
Going
back
to
an
anachronistic
law
will
only
hobble
both
our
banks
abilities
to
compete
in
the
global
market
and
the
ability
of
our
regulators
to
regulate
the
global
financial
sector.
When
Glass-Steagall
was
being
repealed
in
the
late
1990s,
economist
Michael
K.
Evans,
then
of
the
Kellog
School
of
Management
at
Northwestern
University,
wrote
how
the
Asian
financial
crisis
presented
the
U.S.
financial
sector
with
a
unique
opportunity
to
participate
fully
in
these
[global]
markets
and
that
the
financial
services
firms
that
took
advantage
of
the
situation
then
would
have
an
insurmountable
lead
for
many
years.
Repealing
Glass-Steagall
helped
enable
our
banks
to
expand
their
services
and
geographies
to
best
serve
U.S.
clients
global
needs.
Now,
in
the
wake
of
our
own
financial
crisis,
a
globalizing
economy
with
large
banks
throughout
Europe,
Asia
and
805
15th
St.
NW,
Suite
700 Washington,
DC
20005
HPSInsight
HPSinsight.com
the rest of the world, do we want to hinder the competitive advantage of U.S. firms and reduce the reach of our regulators? Tony Fratto is a Managing Partner at Hamilton Place Strategies, former Assistant Secretary at the U.S. Treasury Department, and a former White House official. He is also an on-air contributor for CNBC.