SAWE Paper No. 3483 Category No.

17

REPORT FORMAT FOR WEIGHT CONTROL OF OFFSHORE STRUCTURES by Stein Bjrhovde BAS Engineering AS / ShipWeight

For Presentation at the 71st Annual Conference of Society of Allied Weight Engineers, Inc. Bad Ggging and Manching Bavaria, Germany 05-10, May, 2012

Permission to publish this paper, in full or in part, with credit to the author and the Society may be obtained, by request, to: Society of Allied Weight Engineers, Inc. P.O. Box 60024, Terminal Annex Los Angeles, CA 90060

The Society is not responsible for statements or opinions in papers or discussions at the meeting. This paper meets all regulations for public information disclosure under ITAR and EAR

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Table of Contents
Table of Contents.......................................................................................................................................................... ii Table of Figures ........................................................................................................................................................... iii Abstract..........................................................................................................................................................................1 Background....................................................................................................................................................................2 The goal of this Paper ....................................................................................................................................................2 ISO 19901-5: Weight control during engineering and construction ..............................................................................2 Statoil requirement TR2352: Weight control requirements for topsides and substructures ..........................................2 Identification (key) and description fields .................................................................................................................3 Unique identification of items ............................................................................................................................... 3 Topics for further discussion and consideration ....................................................................................................3 Quantity, weight and co-ordinate fields .....................................................................................................................3 Net weight vs. gross weight ...................................................................................................................................4 Content and co-ordinates .......................................................................................................................................4 Local coordinates ...................................................................................................................................................4 Topics for further discussion and consideration ....................................................................................................4 Information fields ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 Additional fields needed to comply to ISO standard ............................................................................................. 5 Topics for further discussion and consideration ....................................................................................................5 Weight report content ....................................................................................................................................................6 Layout of printouts and tables ...................................................................................................................................7 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Major assemblies..........................................................................................................................................7 1.2 Cut-off date ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Weight information provided by others ...........................................................................................................7 1.4 List of reported loading conditions ..................................................................................................................8 2.1 Main summary .................................................................................................................................................9 2.2 Weight and load budget (WLB) ..................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Global CoG plot................................................................................................................................................. 10 2.4 Main variations from the previous report .......................................................................................................... 11 2.5 Weight forecast .................................................................................................................................................. 12 2.5.1 General............................................................................................................................................................ 12 2.5.2 Main trend graphs ........................................................................................................................................... 13 2.6 Main weight printout summaries by area and discipline ................................................................................... 14 2.7 As built / weighing data ..................................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Variation from last report by area and discipline ............................................................................................... 16 3.2 Trend graphs by area ......................................................................................................................................... 17 3.3 CoG plots ........................................................................................................................................................... 18

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

3.4 Area weight printouts ........................................................................................................................................ 19 5.1 Assumptions ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 5.1.1 General assumptions ....................................................................................................................................... 20 5.1.2 Discipline assumptions ................................................................................................................................... 20 5.2.1 Global origin ................................................................................................................................................... 21 5.2.2 Area designations............................................................................................................................................ 22 5.3 Weight allowance and contingency ................................................................................................................... 23 5.4 Report codes ...................................................................................................................................................... 23 5.4.1 Weight installation codes ................................................................................................................................ 23 5.4.2 Weight phase codes ........................................................................................................................................ 24 5.4.3 Weight status codes ........................................................................................................................................ 24 5.4.4 Area codes ...................................................................................................................................................... 24 Automatic generated weight reports ............................................................................................................................ 25 Background .............................................................................................................................................................. 25 Requirements ........................................................................................................................................................... 25 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................... 25 Terms and definitions .................................................................................................................................................. 26 Appendix 1: Examples of Main Summary tables from various Weight Reports. ........................................................ 27 Example 1: Jacket topside ....................................................................................................................................... 27 Example 2: FPSO topside ........................................................................................................................................ 28 Example 3: Jacket topside ....................................................................................................................................... 28 Example 4: Semi-submersible total platform .......................................................................................................... 29 Example 5: FPSO topside and vessel ...................................................................................................................... 30 Appendix 2: Example of chapter mapping between ISO standard chapters and weight reports from past projects .... 31

Table of Figures
Figure 1: Major Assemblies printout ............................................................................................................................. 7 Figure 2: Loading Conditions printout .......................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 3: Main Summary printout .................................................................................................................................9 Figure 4: Weight and Load Budget printout ................................................................................................................ 10 Figure 5: Global CoG printout ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Figure 6: Main Variations printout .............................................................................................................................. 11 Figure 7: Weight Forecast printout .............................................................................................................................. 12 Figure 8: Main Trend Graphs printout ......................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 9: Area & Discipline Summary printout .......................................................................................................... 14 Figure 10: As-built / Weighing Data printout .............................................................................................................. 15

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Figure 11: Variation from Last Report by Area & Discipline printout ........................................................................ 16 Figure 12: Trend Graphs by Area printout .................................................................................................................. 17 Figure 13: CoG Plots printout...................................................................................................................................... 18 Figure 14: Area Weight printout .................................................................................................................................. 19 Figure 15: Discipline Assumptions printout ................................................................................................................ 20 Figure 16: Global Origin printout ................................................................................................................................ 21 Figure 17: Area Designations printout......................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 18: Weight Allowance and Contingency printout ............................................................................................ 23 Figure 19: Weight Installation Codes printout............................................................................................................. 23 Figure 20: Weight Phase Codes printout ..................................................................................................................... 24 Figure 21: Weight Status Codes printout ..................................................................................................................... 24 Figure 22: Area Codes printout ................................................................................................................................... 24

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to suggest standard layouts for printouts to be included in the weight report for engineering and construction of offshore structures. The proposals are based on a systematic review of weight reports for existing oil platforms built for the North Sea and Gulf of Mexico during the last 10 year. The content of these weight reports are systemized according to the ISO standard for weight control, as well as the Statoil requirement for weight control. Requirements for weight control of offshore structures are described in the ISO standard 19901-5 Petroleum and natural gas industries Specific requirements for offshore structures Part 5: Weight control during engineering and construction. This document includes definitions, weight control classes, weight- and load budgets, weight reporting, requirements for suppliers, requirements for weighing in addition to various appendixes. In this paper we will focus on chapter 6.3 Requirements to the weight report. The content of existing weight reports are systemized and mapped to the defined chapters (printouts/tables) that are required according to the ISO standard. The Norwegian energy company Statoil has a technical requirement for weight control titled TR2352 Weight control requirements for topside and substructures. This document specifies among others which data fields the weight database should include as a minimum. One of the results of this paper is an overview of which data fields are included in the various weight report chapters required by the ISO standard. This paper can serve as a specification of the data fields and printouts that should be included in a weight control system for offshore structures to fulfill the requirements of the ISO-19901-5. The layouts of the printouts are in focus. In this paper it is also discussed whether its realistic to desig n a weight control system that automatically or semi-automatically produces the weight reports. Stein Bjrhovde is one of the founders and head of development of BAS Engineering. Mr. Bjrhovde has a Master of Science Degree in Ship Design, and has been developing the weight engineering software ShipWeight since 1993. He has also been involved in development of other weight control software, in addition to being a consultant doing weight estimation and monitoring in the offshore industry. He has more than 15 years experience in weight estimation of new ship designs for several Norwegian and international ship designers and yards.

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Background
A weight report for offshore structures is typically released every second month during the engineering and construction period. A large offshore project can take years to complete and the numbers of revision of the weight report can be significant. The amount of work put in to preparing these weight reports is therefore also quit significant, and it might be that more standardization can reduce time consumption and increase quality both when it comes to reliability of the figures, but also in terms of readability. In the Norwegian offshore industry the content of a weight report has been quite standardized due to Norwegian Standards (NS 2128 NS2131 from 1994) that have been around for a long time, and oil companies having similar requirements. But even though the overall content has been standardized, the order and format of the figures, tables and text can differ quit a lot. And when the industry has become more internationalized over the years, the demand of standardization is even higher. A key document when it comes to standardization is the ISO standard for weight control for offshore structures during engineering and construction from 2003. In addition to this standard the oil companies will have separate requirements when it comes to weight control and reporting. A standardized format for a weight control report must be based on these two requirement sources.

The goal of this Paper

The main goal of this paper is to present suggestions to formats of printouts included in the weight reports according to the report content specified in the ISO standard. A second goal is evaluate whether weight reports can be generated automatically from the weight control system, as a replacement of todays practice of putting together a document from a word processing system.

ISO 19901-5: Weight control during engineering and construction

Requirements for weight control of offshore structures are described in the ISO standard 19901-5 Petroleum and natural gas industries Specific requirements for offshore structures Part 5: Weight control during engineering and construction. This document includes definitions, weight cont rol classes, weight- and load budgets, weight reporting, requirements for suppliers, requirements for weighing in addition to various appendixes. In this paper we will focus on chapter 6.3 Requirements to the weight report. The ISO standard defines three different weight control classes. In this paper we will only look into class A which involves projects with high sensitivity when it comes to weight and center of gravity. Chapter 6.3 in the ISO standard document describes requirements for weight reporting. The content of a weight report is divided into 5 main chapters with several subchapters: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Main summary Summary and conclusions to the report Area/module reports Special reports Annexes to the report

Statoil requirement TR2352: Weight control requirements for topsides and substructures
The Norwegian energy company Statoil has a technical requirement for weight control titled TR2352 Weight control requirements for topside and substructures. This requirement document cover new building projects in the engineering and construction phase. The technical requirement TR1244 Technical requirements for cost estimate classes offshore projects with appendixes A1-4 covers Pre-Feed and modification projects. The TR1244 document refers to the ISO standard 19901-5 both in general and when it comes to more specific topics. TR1244 requires that weight control is performed according to class A.

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

The TR2352 document specifies among others which data fields the weight database should include as a minimum for each weight record. These fields are described and discussed in the following chapters.

Identification (key) and description fields

Drawing number (key): The drawing number from which the weight has been identified or calculated. Piece number (key): The unique piece within a drawing number, e.g. plate girder M10-2356 shown on a structural deck drawing. The data field is a text field with maximum 20 characters. Weight phase code (key): A coding to identify during which phase a piece number will be installed and present. Piece designation: The designation of the piece number, e.g. HE200A, Pl 20 mm. Date: The date when a piece number was entered or revised in the weight control database.

Unique identification of items

The combination of the three fields Drawing number, Piece number and Weight phase code shall uniquely identify a record. The logic behind this is that a piece of material (item) has a unique position number on a drawing. For a unique item e.g. weight and CoG can vary in different phases of the project because of temporary location due to transport, infill areas, partially installation etc. For these reasons the same item can occur as several records in the database; with identical Drawing and Piece number, but varying Phase codes.

Equipment
For equipment items both drawing and piece numbers must be identical to the tag number for the weight carrying item (skid). But the use of both drawing number and piece number it not logical to identify equipment items because the tag number is unique by itself and the res not necessarily one specific drawing describing an equipment skid.

Data from 3D systems

More and more weight information are these days exported from 3D data models. Identification and traceability on item level can be challenging. Each item in the 3D model is uniquely identified for the model, but the ID is often a complex strings giving no other meaning than identifying the 3D object in the data model. Globally unique identifiers (GUID) can be used for this purpose and this ID is a 32-character hexadecimal string, often randomly generated. The Statoil requirement specifies maximum 20 characters for the piece number and this is a potential conflict.

Topics for further discussion and consideration

It might be more practical to use one large field for unique identification of records instead of both drawing number and piece number, due to handling of 3D model data and equipment data. It might also be practical to have a field for identifying the person entered the record in the database.

Quantity, weight and co-ordinate fields

Number off: Number of identical pieces. Only integer numbers shall be used. Size: The size of each piece, e.g. 2,350 m for the length of an HE200A-beam. Unit weight: Unit weight for the piece, e.g. 42, 3 kg for unit length (1m) of an HE200A-beam. Dry weight: The dry weight of each piece in kg, that is the product of Number off x Size x Unit weight, e.g. 1 x 2,350 x 42,3 = 99 kg for one HE200A with a length of 2,350 m. Content: The weight of the content in kg in a piping line, vessel, tank etc.

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Co-ordinates: The co-ordinates in the platform north direction, the platform east direction and Elevation.

Net weight vs. gross weight

Net weight for an item is weight without any contingencies or allowances. According to the ISO standard gross weight is net weight including allowances while contingency is the difference between the gross weight and the budget weight. But its not unusual that the terms contingency and allowance are mixed when applying percentage factors to the net weight to obtain the reported weight. Anyway, it is the reported weights that are used in all calculation of totals and subtotals throughout the weight report. The percentage factors used to calculate gross weight are dependent on weight status and usually also on discipline. When gross weight is not stored in a separate field for each record, there is no direct relation between the weights in the database and the results in the report without doing a calculation. In the ISO standard gross weight is referred to as reported weight.

Content and co-ordinates

Content weight is applied to equipment items to calculate operating weight. Operating weight is defined as gross weight including content. But the center of gravity for the equipment item itself (dry weight) and the content are seldom identical. If not two sets of co-ordinate fields are applied to each record, dry weight and content has to be defined as two different records. And if this is the case, the need for a separate field for content can be discussed because content could be identified by other existing fields like ItemType which is used to identify bulk, equipment and structure.

Local coordinates
Local co-ordinates for equipment skids are specified by the supplier on a weight datasheet. The global coordinate for the skid will refer to the origin of the item, often located in the southwest corner of the support structure. If there are only one set of co-ordinates in the item database, these will refer to total co-ordinates which are global- plus local co-ordinates. But if the equipment arrangement is relocated, orientation is changed or local coordinates are updated on new revisions of weight datasheet (e.g. du to weighing), it will be difficult to enter new total co-ordinates without referring backup information. It should therefore be considered whether the weight record should contain fields for both local and global co-ordinates and whether total co-ordinates also should be stored.

Topics for further discussion and consideration

It should be considered to implement a separate field for weight records for gross weight. In cases where several factors / percentage are added to the net weight to calculate gross weight (both allowance and contingency) there might be a need for separate fields for these calculated add-ons. It should also be considered whether it is necessary to have a separate field for content weight, and if so how different coordinate for dry weight and content weight shall be handled. Fields for local and global co-ordinates in addition to total are also an issue.

Information fields
Originator code: The originator code according to the Engineering Numbering System (ENS) of the organization or contractor who have calculated or revised the weight data for a piece number. Discipline code: The discipline code according to the ENS. System code: The system code according to the ENS. Area code: The area code according to the ENS. Drawing revision: The revision of the drawing from which the weight has been identified or calculated.

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Weight status code: A coding to identify the level of accuracy of the weight data of each piece number. See sub-section 2.4.2 of this document. Weight installation code: A coding to identify whether a piece is installed or not on a module/installation. The Physical Breakdown Structure (PBS): A hierarchical structure which defines the physical/functional component of a project. For all projects at the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) the PBS shall be used at level four in accordance with NORSOK Z-014. For other projects the NORSOK Z-014 is a recommended guideline. Code of Resources (COR): A hierarchical structure which defines project resources. For all projects at the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS) the COR shall be used at level three in accordance with NORSOK Z-014. For other projects the NORSOK Z-014 is a recommended guideline. Package number: The procurement package number. Compensation code: Contract Appendix B compensation cost item code at lowest level (for modification projects).

Additional fields needed to comply to ISO standard

The information fields listed in the Statoil requirement document are considered a minimum. These fields are those necessary to generate content for the compulsory chapters in the weight report according to the ISO standard.

Lift code
One of the chapters that are considered optional according to the ISO standard is lifting reports. A field for Lifting code is not listed in TR2352 and should therefore be considered. Especially because Statoil in chapter 5.1 of TR 2352 list lift report as one of the minimum required topics included in weight reports. Lift code is neither included in specifications for Master Equipment list or Material Take-off list in Statoil requirement TR1244 covering weight reporting for modification and early phase projects.

Displacement code
For floaters it is required to report lightship weight (ref. ISO 19901-5, ch. 6.3.2.1). Lightship is normally complete dry weight included content from some systems. It will therefore be necessary to identify all items included in the lightship weight (LW) with a specific code. All other items should be either deadweight or temporary. This is also an argument for keeping content in separate records, ref. previous discussion.

Topics for further discussion and consideration

As mentioned, fields for Lift code and Displacement should be considered added to the minimum field requirement. Appendix 4 for the Statoil TR1244 requirement covering modification project specifies several more fields for Master Equipment List (MEL) and Material Take-off lists. And this is fields not only related to modification phases and packages. It should therefore be considered to update the list of required record fields in TR2352 according to those record fields required in TR 1244.

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Weight report content

According to the ISO standard the following topics / chapters should be included (as a minimum) in a weight report: 1. Introduction 1.1. Major assemblies 1.2. Cut-off date 1.3. Weight information provided by others 1.4. List of reported loading conditions 1.5. Discrepancies Summary and conclusion to the report 2.1. Main summary 2.2. Weight and load budget (WLB) 2.3. Global CoG plot 2.4. Main variations from the previous report 2.5. Weight forecast 2.5.1. General 2.5.1.1. Approved design changes not included 2.5.1.2. Proposed design changes 2.5.1.3. Possible weight changes 2.5.2. Main-trend graphs 2.6. Main weight printout summaries by area and discipline 2.7. As built / weighing data Area / module report 3.1. Variation from last report by area and discipline 3.2. Trend graphs by area 3.3. CoG plots 3.4. Area weight printouts Special reports (optional) 4.1. System reports 4.2. Sub-area report or sub-assemblies report 4.3. Secondary lift report Annexes to the report 5.1. Assumptions 5.1.1. General assumptions 5.1.2. Discipline assumptions 5.2. Area designations and global origin 5.3. Weight allowance and contingency 5.4. Report codes 5.4.1. Weight installation codes 5.4.2. Weight phase codes 5.4.3. Weight status codes 5.4.4. Area codes 5.5. References 5.6. Other descriptions

2.

3.

4.

5.

A systematic review of a number of weight report from North Sea and Gulf of Mexico for the last 10-15 years has given us a good overview of how the content of these report comply with the topics specified in

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

the ISO standard. An overview of mapping between ISO standard chapters and chapter numbering in weight reports from some past offshore projects can be seen in Appendix 2. In general terms it can be said that the content of the weight reports corresponds good with what the ISO standard describes as necessary content for a weight report, but the order of how this content appears in the reports and the actual layouts and formats varies a lot. The ISO standard forms a template of how the chapters of a weight report can be organized.

Layout of printouts and tables

When it comes to layout of printouts and tables, we have tried to pick out the best cases from these weight reports we have reviewed as a basis for this paper. A key content of a weight report is the main summary and as the examples from various weight reports in appendix 1 shows, the layout and content of the summary tables varies a lot. In the following subchapters layout suggestions for printouts relevant for the ISO specified weight report chapters are presented. These are marked as hyperlinks in the above list.

1. Introduction
All weight reports shall have an introduction giving information necessary to understand the content of and background to the report. ISO 19901-5: 2003

1.1 Major assemblies

a) Which major assemblies are included ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: Code C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00 OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report MAJOIR ASSEMBLIES Title Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside Description Living quarter L00 includes helideck Contractor: Page: Rev.date: Revision: RIG CONSTRUCTOR x of 50 01.05.2012 06F

Includes subareas D10, D20, D30 og D40 (tower)

Figure 1: Major Assemblies printout

1.2 Cut-off date

b) The cut-off date ISO 19901-5: 2003

1.3 Weight information provided by others

c) Weight information provided by others ISO 19901-5: 2003

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

1.4 List of reported loading conditions

d) List of reported loading conditions ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: Code LC50 LC60 LC70 LC90 OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report LOADING CONDITIONS Contractor: Page: Rev.date: Revision: RIG CONSTRUCTOR x of 50 01.05.2012 06F

Title Description Transport to offshore field Weight of lifting slings and spreader bars etc. are included Lift at offshore field Weight of lifting slings and spreader bars etc. are NOT included. Offshore dry installed Future operating installed (max load)

Figure 2: Loading Conditions printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

2.1 Main summary

The main summary shall contain all current main-weight data, including CoG, and comparisons between those data and the WLB. The reported weights shall reflect all relevant loading conditions and all main assemblies. Any major problems that need to be highlighted shall also be included here. For floating structures, a block diagram showing all major elements of the displacement, lightship and deadweight may be included. An example of such a block diagram is given in Annex D. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report MAIN SUMMARY Contractor: Page: Rev.date: Revision: RIG CONSTRUCTOR x of 50 01.05.2012 06F

LC50 - Transport to offshore field WEIGHT Last month Variation This month Budget Margin CoG East Last month Variation This month C00 - Deckbox 10 250 30 10 280 10400 120 C00 - Deckbox 331,600 0,400 332,000 L00 - Living quarter 1 315 5 1 320 1400 80 L00 - Living quarter 277,200 -0,200 277,000 U00 - Utility modules 4 270 -20 4 250 4400 150 U00 - Utility modules 303,800 0,200 304,000 P00 - Process modules 1 720 30 1 750 1900 150 P00 - Process modules 328,100 -0,100 328,000 D00 - Drilling modules 6 450 0 6 450 6250 -200 D00 - Drilling modules 372,200 -0,200 372,000 F00 - Flare 235 5 240 250 10 F00 - Flare 390,700 0,300 391,000 T00 - Topside 24 240 50 24 290 24600 310 T00 - Topside 334,880 0,149 335,028 COMMENTS: CoG North Last month Variation This month This report shows an increase in the reported dry weight of 50 tonnes since last C00 - Deckbox 119,600 -0,100 119,500 report. The margins are 310 tonnes. L00 - Living quarter 120,300 0,100 120,400 U00 - Utility modules 121,100 0,100 121,200 The margins for CoG East are negative by 2,417 meters. P00 - Process modules 119,000 -0,500 118,500 D00 - Drilling modules 121,400 -0,200 121,200 The margins for CoG North are negative by 0,233 meters. F00 - Flare 120,500 -0,300 120,200 T00 - Topside 120,347 -0,115 120,233 CoG Elev. Last month Variation This month C00 - Deckbox 508,300 0,200 508,500 L00 - Living quarter 535,600 -0,100 535,500 U00 - Utility modules 528,200 0,800 529,000 P00 - Process modules 530,200 1,300 531,500 D00 - Drilling modules 527,000 1,200 528,200 F00 - Flare 528,800 -0,300 528,500 T00 - Topside 520,015 0,625 520,640 LC60 - Lift at offshore field WEIGHT Last month Variation This month Budget Margin CoG East Last month Variation This month C00 - Deckbox 10 100 30 10 130 10250 120 C00 - Deckbox 331,600 0,400 332,000 L00 - Living quarter 965 5 970 1050 80 L00 - Living quarter 277,200 -0,200 277,000 U00 - Utility modules 4 170 -20 4 150 4300 150 U00 - Utility modules 303,800 0,200 304,000 P00 - Process modules 1 670 30 1 700 1850 150 P00 - Process modules 328,100 -0,100 328,000 D00 - Drilling modules 6 300 0 6 300 6100 -200 D00 - Drilling modules 372,200 -0,200 372,000 F00 - Flare 185 5 190 200 10 F00 - Flare 390,700 0,300 391,000 T00 - Topside 23 390 50 23 440 23750 310 T00 - Topside 335,552 0,153 335,706 COMMENTS: CoG North Last month Variation This month This report shows an increase in the reported dry weight of 50 tonnes since last C00 - Deckbox 119,600 -0,100 119,500 report. The margins are 310 tonnes. L00 - Living quarter 120,300 0,100 120,400 U00 - Utility modules 121,100 0,100 121,200 The margins for CoG East are negative by 2,527 meters. P00 - Process modules 119,000 -0,500 118,500 D00 - Drilling modules 121,400 -0,200 121,200 The margins for CoG North are negative by 0,228 meters. F00 - Flare 120,500 -0,300 120,200 T00 - Topside 120,345 -0,117 120,228 CoG Elev. Last month Variation This month C00 - Deckbox 508,300 0,200 508,500 L00 - Living quarter 535,600 -0,100 535,500 U00 - Utility modules 528,200 0,800 529,000 P00 - Process modules 530,200 1,300 531,500 D00 - Drilling modules 527,000 1,200 528,200 F00 - Flare 528,800 -0,300 528,500 T00 - Topside 519,737 0,635 520,372

Budget 330,000 280,000 300,000 330,000 370,000 395,000 332,612 Budget 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Budget 510,000 540,000 527,000 530,000 527,000 530,000 520,815

Margin -2,000 3,000 -4,000 2,000 -2,000 4,000 -2,417 Margin 0,500 -0,400 -1,200 1,500 -1,200 -0,200 -0,233 Margin 1,500 4,500 -2,000 -1,500 -1,200 1,500 0,175

Budget 330,000 280,000 300,000 330,000 370,000 395,000 333,179 Budget 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 Budget 510,000 540,000 527,000 530,000 527,000 530,000 520,497

Margin -2,000 3,000 -4,000 2,000 -2,000 4,000 -2,527 Margin 0,500 -0,400 -1,200 1,500 -1,200 -0,200 -0,228 Margin 1,500 4,500 -2,000 -1,500 -1,200 1,500 0,125

Figure 3: Main Summary printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

2.2 Weight and load budget (WLB)

Known changes to the WLB, if relevant (including reasons for them), shall be documented. Expected changes to the WLB and their potential consequences shall also be included. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report WEIGHT & LOAD BUDGET Contractor: Page: Rev.date: Revision: RIG CONSTRUCTOR x of 50 01.05.2012 06F

LC70 - Offshore dry installed Area C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00 Description Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside Rep.dry wgt. 9 880 920 3 850 1 650 6 200 190 22 690 Budget Margin 10 000 120 1 000 80 4 000 150 1 800 150 6 000 -200 200 10 23 000 310 Change Order 65 5 35 5 75 0 185 Inital Company Budget Reserves 9 935 199 995 20 3 965 79 1 795 36 5 925 119 200 4 22 815 456 Future 2 866 -15 956 969 1 957 -4 6 729 Not to Exceed 13 000 1 000 5 000 2 800 8 000 200 30 000

Figure 4: Weight and Load Budget printout

2.3 Global CoG plot

Global CoG plots shall be included if applicable to the project. The global location shall be presented relative to the various CoG envelopes. Weight and CoG shall also be pres ented in relation to each other.
ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report GLOBAL COG PLOT Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

LC70 - Offshore dry installed

Horizontal envelope
North
120,5 521,0 Budget

Vertical envelope
Envelope
Budget

01F East
120,0 333,0 02F

520,0

01F
02F

334,0

335,0

336,0

337,0

03F 04F
05F

519,0

East

03F 04F
05F

06F 119,5

518,0 333,0

334,0

335,0

336,0

337,0

06F

Rev. Budget 01F 02F 03F 04F 05F 06F

CoG East CoG North CoG Elev. 333,609 120,000 520,435 333,500 119,800 518,200 333,800 120,100 518,900 334,500 120,200 519,200 335,600 120,300 519,450 336,000 120,342 519,661 336,152 120,223 520,296

Figure 5: Global CoG printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

2.4 Main variations from the previous report

Only the major changes in weight and CoG shall be included. A short explanation of why the changes occurred shall be given. If the changes relate to more than one phase in the project, the explanation shall give details of this. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report MAIN VARIATIONS Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

LC70 - Offshore dry installed Area Type Discipline C00 Equipment Bulk Electrical Safety Instrument Architect Piping Surface protection Structural Outfitting structure Total D00 Equipment See drilling wgt.rep. Bulk See drilling wgt.rep. Structural See drilling wgt.rep.

Change Temp containers and equipment Cables updated Passive fireprotection components and cables Coating and insulation Pipe support updated New takeoff on paint Outfitting updated from As built drawings, temp located hookup material

Rep.wgt. 5 6 2 1 2 6 1 7 30 0 0 0 0

Total F00 Equipment Bulk Structural No changes Minor adjustements Minor adjustements

Total L00 Equipment Bulk Telecom Structural No changes Temporares for hookup phase Reinforcement due to transport

0 2 3 5 0 -2 7 5 5 -40 5 10 -20 5 10 5 10 30 50

Total U00 Equipment Bulk Piping Surface protection Structural Temp. containers and equipment Temporaires for hookup phase New take-off Temp. located hookup material

Total P00 Equipment Bulk Piping Surface protection Structural New weight certificate Pipe support updated New take-off Temp. located hookup material

Total Grand total

Figure 6: Main Variations printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

2.5 Weight forecast 2.5.1 General

The weight forecast shall be included in the report as an aid to weight management, and to give an early warning of weight trends. As a minimum, the following shall be included, where applicable: a) approved design changes not yet included in the reported weights; b) proposed design changes not yet approved; c) possible weight changes relating to any design change under review or any alternative to the design which has a potential weight impact. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report WEIGTH FORECAST Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

LC70 - Offshore dry installed VOR status APP PEN Company reserve Wgt. impact impact 15 15 45 27 1 3 91 54 14 68 45

Area C00

Type Discipline Equipment Bulk Electrical Safety Instrument Architect Piping Surface protection Structural Outfitting structure

Description Frequency control HVAC motors Upgraded MOB boat system New walls New walls MOB boat system

PEN

Total D00 Equipment Bulk Structural Replacement of crane arrangement Replacement of crane arrangement

3 63

Total L00 Equipment Bulk Safety Structural

0 0 2 2 15 3 1 2 21 86

Helideck surface

PEN

4 4

Total P00 Equipment Bulk Piping Instrument Structural Outfitting structure Increased size of test separator Test separator Test separator Test separator PEN PEN PEN PEN

Total Gran total

15 3 1 2 21 184

Figure 7: Weight Forecast printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

2.5.2 Main trend graphs

Main-trend graphs shall be produced and presented for all relevant loading conditions. Trend graphs shall, as a minimum, contain reported weight and WLB data. Dry weight and operating weight shall be shown where applicable. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report MAIN TREND GRAPHS Contractor: Page: Rev.date: Revision: RIG CONSTRUCTOR x of 50 01.05.2012 06F

LC70 - Offshore dry installed

32 000

30 000

28 000

Not to exceed

Rep. wgt.

26 000

Company budget
Contractor budget Rep.dry.wgt

24 000

22 000

20 000

Revision Date Not to exceed Future Company budget Company reserves Change Order Contractor budget Margin Rep.dry.wgt

01F 02F 03F 04F 05F 06F 01.07.2011 01.09.2011 01.11.2011 01.01.2012 01.03.2012 01.05.2012 30 000 30 000 30 000 30 000 30 000 30 000 6 729 6 729 6 729 6 729 6 729 6 729 23 271 23 271 23 271 23 271 23 271 23 271 271 221 191 126 86 86 0 50 80 145 185 185 23 000 23 050 23 080 23 145 23 185 23 185 1 500 1 315 1 035 930 725 495 21 500 21 735 22 045 22 215 22 460 22 690

Figure 8: Main Trend Graphs printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

2.6 Main weight printout summaries by area and discipline

The printout summaries shall, as a minimum show the total assembly weight for all relevant loading conditions. CoGs shall also be included. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report AREA & DISCIPLINE SUMMARY Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

LC50 - Transport to offshore field Area Description EQUIP.

Total Electrical Safety HVAC Inst.

BULK
Architect. Piping Surf.prot. Telecom Total Primary struct.

STRUCTURAL
Second. struct. Outf. struc. Total

TOTAL
Rep. wgt.

C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00 CoG East CoG North CoG Elev.

Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside 335,028 120,233 520,640

2 000 40 1 000 300 1 500 5 4 845 19,9 % Eq./Tot.

207 25 150 80 160 0 622 10,0 %

165 0 10 2 30 3 210 3,4 %

33 15 60 30 55 0 193 3,1 %

365 1 25 40 55 0 486

220 340 445 150 370 0 1 525

2 200 5 190 130 420 15 2 960 47,4 %

80 5 35 15 60 1 196 3,1 %

10 20 15 5 0 0 50 0,8 %

3 280 411 930 452 1 150 19 6 242 25,7 % Bulk/Tot.

2 200 600 1 100 448 3 000 170 7 518

1 100 0 500 300 450 40 2 390

1 700 269 720 250 350 6 3 295

5 000 869 2 320 998 3 800 216 13 203

10 280 1 320 4 250 1 750 6 450 240 24 290

7,8 % 24,4 % Bulk/Tot.bulk.

56,9 % 18,1 % 25,0 % 54,4 % Struc./Tot.struc. Tot.st./Tot.

LC60 - Lift at offshore field Area Description

EQUIP.
Total Electrical Safety HVAC Inst.

BULK
Architect. Piping Surf.prot. Telecom Total Primary struct.

STRUCTURAL
Second. struct. Outf. struc. Total

TOTAL
Rep. wgt.

C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00 CoG East CoG North CoG Elev.

Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside 335,028 120,233 520,640

1 980 30 990 280 1 480 3 4 763 20,3 % Eq./Tot.

205 20 140 80 155 0 600 9,9 %

165 0 10 0 30 0 205 3,4 %

30 10 55 30 50 0 175 2,9 %

350 1 25 40 50 0 466

220 300 440 150 365 0 1 475

2 180 4 185 120 410 12 2 911 48,0 %

80 4 30 15 60 1 190 3,1 %

10 15 15 5 0 0 45 0,7 %

3 240 354 900 440 1 120 13 6 067 25,9 % Bulk/Tot.

2 130 450 1 050 440 2 940 139 7 149

1 100 0 500 300 440 30 2 370

1 680 136 710 240 320 5 3 091

4 910 586 2 260 980 3 700 174 12 610

10 130 970 4 150 1 700 6 300 190 23 440

7,7 % 24,3 % Bulk/Tot.bulk.

56,7 % 18,8 % 24,5 % 53,8 % Struc./Tot.struc. Tot.st./Tot.

LC70 - Offshore dry installed Area Description

EQUIP.
Total Electrical Safety HVAC Inst.

BULK
Architect. Piping Surf.prot. Telecom Total Primary struct.

STRUCTURAL
Second. struct. Outf. struc. Total

TOTAL
Rep. wgt.

C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00 CoG East CoG North CoG Elev.

Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside 335,028 120,233 520,640

1 950 28 900 270 1 400 3 4 551 20,1 % Eq./Tot.

200 20 130 80 150 0 580 10,1 %

160 0 10 0 30 0 200 3,5 %

30 10 50 30 50 0 170 2,9 %

340 1 20 40 50 0 451

115 280 400 140 360 0 1 295

2 150 4 170 110 400 12 2 846 49,3 %

80 4 30 15 60 1 190 3,3 %

10 14 10 5 0 0 39 0,7 %

3 085 333 820 420 1 100 13 5 771 25,4 % Bulk/Tot.

2 115 430 1 000 440 2 940 139 7 064

1 080 0 480 300 440 30 2 330

1 650 129 650 220 320 5 2 974

4 845 559 2 130 960 3 700 174 12 368

9 880 920 3 850 1 650 6 200 190 22 690

7,8 % 22,4 % Bulk/Tot.bulk.

57,1 % 18,8 % 24,0 % 54,5 % Struc./Tot.struc. Tot.st./Tot.

LC90 - Future operation installed (max load) Area Description EQUIP.

Total Electrical Safety HVAC Inst.

BULK
Architect. Piping Surf.prot. Telecom Total Primary struct.

STRUCTURAL
Second. struct. Outf. struc. Total

TOTAL
Rep. wgt.

C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00 CoG East CoG North CoG Elev.

Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside 335,028 120,233 520,640

4 100 28 1 600 1 230 3 380 3 10 341 34,8 % Eq./Tot.

250 20 150 80 155 0 655 9,9 %

180 0 10 0 30 0 220 3,3 %

30 10 60 30 50 0 180 2,7 %

430 1 25 40 50 0 546

220 280 450 150 365 0 1 465

2 600 4 200 120 410 12 3 346 50,3 %

80 4 30 15 60 1 190 2,9 %

10 14 15 5 0 0 44 0,7 %

3 800 333 940 440 1 120 13 6 646 22,4 % Bulk/Tot.

2 200 430 1 050 440 2 940 139 7 199

1 100 0 500 300 440 30 2 370

1 680 129 760 240 320 5 3 134

4 980 559 2 310 980 3 700 174 12 703

12 880 920 4 850 2 650 8 200 190 29 690

8,2 % 22,0 % Bulk/Tot.bulk.

56,7 % 18,7 % 24,7 % 42,8 % Struc./Tot.struc. Tot.st./Tot.

Figure 9: Area & Discipline Summary printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

2.7 As built / weighing data

Summaries of final weighing results shall be included where relevant. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report WEIGHING DATA Contractor: Page: Rev.date: Revision: RIG CONSTRUCTOR x of 50 01.05.2012 06F

Unit L10 - Living quarter structure Predicted Weighed Difference

Date 13.11.2011 15.11.2011

Comment

Weight 620 586 -34 -5,5 %

CoG East 275,567 275,220 -0,347

CoG North. 120,476 120,550 0,074

CoG Elev. 535,756

Implemented in database

D10 - Drilling module Predicted Weighed Difference

12.12.2011 14.12.2011 Negleced

2 122 2 150 28 1,3 %

352,765 353,110 0,345

122,987 122,550 -0,437

515,345

D40 - Derrick Predicted Weighed Difference

27.01.2012 28.01.2012 Neglected

1 256 1 274 18 1,4 %

355,423 354,990 -0,433

125,300 123,900 -1,400

540,812

F00 - Flare tower Predicted Weighed Difference

14.02.2012 17.02.2012 Neglected

201 205 4 2,0 %

390,700 390,320 -0,380

120,200 120,000 -0,200

528,800

C00 - Deckbox Predicted Weighed Difference

03.03.2012 06.03.2012 Implemented in database

8 587 8 345 -242 -2,8 %

331,400 330,400 -1,000

119,600 120,600 1,000

508.3

Figure 10: As-built / Weighing Data printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

3.1 Variation from last report by area and discipline

The variations from the previous report shall describe the weight changes (and reasons for them) per discipline by area. Comparisons to the WLB may be included and various project loading conditions shall be reflected where relevant. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report AREA & DISCIPLINE VARIATION Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

LC50 - Transport to offshore field Area Description EQUIP.

Total Electrical Safety HVAC Inst.

BULK
Architect. Piping Surf.prot. Telecom Total Primary struct.

STRUCTURAL
Second. struct. Outf. struc. Total

TOTAL
Rep. wgt.

C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00 CoG East CoG North CoG Elev.

Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside 0,149 -0,115 0,625

5 5 5

6 -40 10 2 -22 183,3 %

1 -2

15 50,0 % Eq./Tot.

6 -50,0 %

2 -16,7 %

0 0,0 %

1 -8,3 %

-2 16,7 %

18 -2 -40 10 0 2 -12 -40,0 % Bulk/Tot.

7 7 10 3

17

7 7 10 3 0 0 27

30 5 -25 18 0 2 30

-8,3 % -16,7 % Bulk/Tot.bulk.

11,1 % 63,0 % 25,9 % 90,0 % Struc./Tot.struc. Tot.st./Tot.

LC60 - Lift at offshore field Area Description

EQUIP.
Total Electrical Safety HVAC Inst.

BULK
Architect. Piping Surf.prot. Telecom Total Primary struct.

STRUCTURAL
Second. struct. Outf. struc. Total

TOTAL
Rep. wgt.

C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00 CoG East CoG North CoG Elev.

Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside 0,153 -0,117 0,635

5 5 5

6 -40 10 2 -22 183,3 %

1 -2

15 50,0 % Eq./Tot.

6 -50,0 %

2 -16,7 %

0 0,0 %

1 -8,3 %

-2 16,7 %

18 -2 -40 10 0 2 -12 -40,0 % Bulk/Tot.

7 7 10 3

17

7 7 10 3 0 0 27

30 5 -25 18 0 2 30

-8,3 % -16,7 % Bulk/Tot.bulk.

11,1 % 63,0 % 25,9 % 90,0 % Struc./Tot.struc. Tot.st./Tot.

LC70 - Offshore dry installed Area Description

EQUIP.
Total Electrical Safety HVAC Inst.

BULK
Architect. Piping Surf.prot. Telecom Total Primary struct.

STRUCTURAL
Second. struct. Outf. struc. Total

TOTAL
Rep. wgt.

C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00 CoG East CoG North CoG Elev.

Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside -2,543 -0,119 -0,636

5 5 5

6 -40 10 2 -22 183,3 %

1 -2

15 50,0 % Eq./Tot.

6 -50,0 %

2 -16,7 %

0 0,0 %

1 -8,3 %

-2 16,7 %

18 -2 -40 10 0 2 -12 -40,0 % Bulk/Tot.

7 7 10 3

17

7 7 10 3 0 0 27

30 5 -25 18 0 2 30

-8,3 % -16,7 % Bulk/Tot.bulk.

11,1 % 63,0 % 25,9 % 90,0 % Struc./Tot.struc. Tot.st./Tot.

LC90 - Future operation installed (max load) Area Description EQUIP.

Total Electrical Safety HVAC Inst.

BULK
Architect. Piping Surf.prot. Telecom Total Primary struct.

STRUCTURAL
Second. struct. Outf. struc. Total

TOTAL
Rep. wgt.

C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00 CoG East CoG North CoG Elev.

Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside 0,145 -0,128 0,658

5 5 5

6 -40 10 2 -22 183,3 %

1 -2

15 50,0 % Eq./Tot.

6 -50,0 %

2 -16,7 %

0 0,0 %

1 -8,3 %

-2 16,7 %

18 -2 -40 10 0 2 -12 -40,0 % Bulk/Tot.

7 7 10 3

17

7 7 10 3 0 0 27

30 5 -25 18 0 2 30

-8,3 % -16,7 % Bulk/Tot.bulk.

11,1 % 63,0 % 25,9 % 90,0 % Struc./Tot.struc. Tot.st./Tot.

Figure 11: Variation from Last Report by Area & Discipline printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

3.2 Trend graphs by area

Trend graphs by area shall be included where relevant. These trend graphs shall contain reported weights, and the WLB shall be included if established. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report TREND GRAPHS BY AREA Contractor: Page: Rev.date: Revision: RIG CONSTRUCTOR x of 50 01.05.2012 06F

LC70 - Offshore dry installed

C00 - Deckbox
13 500
13 000 12 500 12 000

Rep. wgt.

Not to exceed

11 500
11 000 10 500 10 000

Company budget

Contractor budget Rep.dry.wgt

9 500
9 000

Revision Date Not to exceed Future Company budget Company reserves Change Order Contractor budget Margin Rep.dry.wgt

01F 02F 03F 04F 05F 06F 01.07.2011 01.09.2011 01.11.2011 01.01.2012 01.03.2012 01.05.2012 13 000 13 000 13 000 13 000 13 000 13 000 2 734 2 734 2 734 2 734 2 734 2 734 10 266 10 266 10 266 10 266 10 266 10 266 331 319 308 285 266 201 0 12 23 46 65 65 9 935 9 947 9 958 9 981 10 000 10 000 435 317 148 196 150 120 9 500 9 630 9 810 9 785 9 850 9 880

Figure 12: Trend Graphs by Area printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

3.3 CoG plots

CoG plots by area may be included where relevant. The CoG location for a fixed structure shall be presented relative to the lifting control envelope, the lifting points, the support point or the axis, as appropriate. Weight and CoG coordinates shall also be presented. The inclusion of CoG plots for a floating structure is optional. Where included, they shall be presented relative to the requirements of the project. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report AREA CoG PLOTS Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

C00 - Deckbox
LC70 - Offshore dry installed

120,5

511,0 Budget
510,0

Envelope

Horizontal envelope
North

Vertical envelope
Budget
01F

120,0

01F

02F
119,5 East 03F 04F

509,0
508,0 East

02F 03F
04F

05F
06F

05F
06F

119,0 329,0

330,0

331,0

332,0

333,0

507,0 329,0

330,0

331,0

332,0

333,0

Rev. Budget 01F 02F 03F 04F 05F 06F

CoG East CoG North CoG Elev. 330,000 120,000 510,000 329,600 119,500 508,050 329,600 119,900 508,140 330,450 120,320 508,420 330,830 119,830 508,380 331,600 119,600 508,300 332,000 119,500 508,500

Figure 13: CoG Plots printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

3.4 Area weight printouts

Area printouts shall be included for the relevant loading conditions. These printouts should as a minimum, contain the WLB, reported weight and CoG by discipline, together with any variations from the previous report. Temporaries shall either be included on these printouts, or printed separately. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report AREA WEIGHT Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

LC50 - Transport to offshore field Area Description

Net.dry. wgt.

THIS PERIOD
Allowance/ Contingency

LAST PERIOD
Rep.dry wgt. Rep.dry wgt. Rep. dev.

BUDGET
Rep.dry wgt. Rep.dev. CoG East

COORDINATES
CoG North CoG Elev.

C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00

Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside

10 108 1 299 4 150 1 691 6 190 240 23 678

172 21 100 59 260 0 612

10 280 1 320 4 250 1 750 6 450 240 24 290

10 250 1 315 4 270 1 720 6 450 235 24 240

30 5 -20 30 0 5 50

10 400 1 400 4 400 1 900 6 250 250 24 600

-120 -80 -150 -150 200 -10 -310

332,000 277,000 304,000 328,000 372,000 391,000 335,028

119,500 120,400 121,200 118,500 121,200 120,200 120,233

508,500 535,500 529,000 531,500 528,200 528,500 520,640

LC60 - Lift at offshore field Area Description

Net.dry. wgt.

THIS PERIOD
Allowance/ Contingency

LAST PERIOD
Rep.dry wgt. Rep.dry wgt. Rep. dev.

BUDGET
Rep.dry wgt. Rep.dev. CoG East

COORDINATES
CoG North CoG Elev.

C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00

Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside

9 961 955 4 053 1 643 6 046 190 22 846

169 15 97 57 254 0 594

10 130 970 4 150 1 700 6 300 190 23 440

10 100 965 4 170 1 670 6 300 185 23 390

30 5 -20 30 0 5 50

10 250 1 050 4 300 1 850 6 100 200 23 750

-120 -80 -150 -150 200 -10 -310

332,000 277,000 304,000 328,000 372,000 391,000 335,706

119,500 120,400 121,200 118,500 121,200 120,200 120,228

508,500 535,500 529,000 531,500 528,200 528,500 520,372

LC70 - Offshore dry installed Area Description

Net.dry. wgt.

THIS PERIOD
Allowance/ Contingency

LAST PERIOD
Rep.dry wgt. Rep.dry wgt. Rep. dev.

BUDGET
Rep.dry wgt. Rep.dev. CoG East

COORDINATES
CoG North CoG Elev.

C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00

Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside

9 715 906 3 760 1 594 5 950 190 22 114

165 14 90 56 250 0 576

9 880 920 3 850 1 650 6 200 190 22 690

9 850 915 3 870 1 620 6 200 185 22 640

30 5 -20 30 0 5 50

10 000 1 000 4 000 1 800 6 000 200 23 000

-120 -80 -150 -150 200 -10 -310

332,000 277,000 304,000 328,000 372,000 391,000 335,706

119,500 120,400 121,200 118,500 121,200 120,200 120,228

508,500 535,500 529,000 531,500 528,200 528,500 520,372

LC90 - Future operation installed (max load) Area Description THIS PERIOD
Net.dry. wgt.
Allowance/ Contingency

LAST PERIOD
Rep.dry wgt. Rep.dry wgt. Rep. dev.

BUDGET
Rep.dry wgt. Rep.dev. CoG East

COORDINATES
CoG North CoG Elev.

C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00

Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside

12 665 906 4 736 2 560 7 869 190 28 926

215 14 114 90 331 0 764

12 880 920 4 850 2 650 8 200 190 29 690

12 850 915 4 870 2 620 8 200 185 29 640

30 5 -20 30 0 5 50

13 000 1 000 5 000 2 800 8 000 200 30 000

-120 -80 -150 -150 200 -10 -310

332,000 277,000 304,000 328,000 372,000 391,000 336,790

119,500 120,400 121,200 118,500 121,200 120,200 120,190

508,500 535,500 529,000 531,500 528,200 528,500 520,307

Figure 14: Area Weight printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

5.1 Assumptions
The assumptions for the report shall be split into two main sections, one for general assumptions and one for discipline asssumptions. ISO 19901-5: 2003

5.1.1 General assumptions

The general assumptions shall include information concerning layout, construction philosophy, inclusions at various project loading conditions, temporaries for various phases, residual fluid content, any bridges to adjacent facilities etc. ISO 19901-5: 2003

5.1.2 Discipline assumptions

The discipline assumptions shall include information about the basis for discipline work, any discrepancies according to general reporting instructions, any interdiscipline assumptions, any special hook-up assumptions etc. ISO 19901-5: 2003
Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: Code E F H I L M O P R SA SB SC T OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report DISCIPLINE ASSUMPTIONS Description Electrical Safety HVAC Instrument Architect Mechanical Marine Piping Surf.prot. Primary str. Sec. struct. Outf. struc. Telecom Assumption Cable ladders, Lighting, Transits and Cables imported from Engineering Database Discipline MTO data based on drawing information imported from Engineering Database MTO import from Engineering Database MTO import from Engineering Database Co-ordinates are transferred from the 3D model or entered manually by the disciplines if not modelled yet. Piping lines MTO import from Engineering Database, Pipe support MTO from PDMS, MTO for insulation based on calculations MTO based on input from structural and piping drawings. Co-ordinates for MTO quantities are transferred from the 3D model. Co-ordinates for estimated by the Structural discipline by utilising info from the 3D model. Telecom imported from Engineering Database Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

Figure 15: Discipline Assumptions printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

5.2.1 Global origin

The annex shall also show the location of global origin relative to axis and levels of the main structure.
ISO 19901-5: 2003

Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout:

OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report GLOBAL ORIGIN & MAIN AREA CODES

Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

Figure 16: Global Origin printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

5.2.2 Area designations

This report annex shall describe all project main areas/modules and sub -areas, including their location, size, code and name. ISO 19901-5: 2003

Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout:

OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report AREA DESIGNATIONS

Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

Figure 17: Area Designations printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

5.3 Weight allowance and contingency

If weight allowances and contingencies are applied to the net weights, these shall be reported
2003 ISO 19901-5:

Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout:

OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report WEIGHT ALLOWANCES AND CONTINGENCIES

Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

Disc. Code Disc. Name

B0 B1

BULK (B)
B2 B3 B4 B5 E0 E1

EQUIPMENT (E)
E2 E3 E4 E5

E F H I L M O P R SA SB SC T X

Electrical Safety HVAC Instrument Architect Mechanical Marine Piping Surf. prot. Piping Struct.primary Struct.second. Struct.outfitting Multi disc.

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

10,0 10,0 10,0 10,0 10,0 10,0 10,0 10,0 10,0 10,0 7,0 10,0 10,0 10,0

5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 4,0 5,0 5,0 5,0

3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,0 2,0 3,0 3,0 3,0

2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 1,0 2,0 2,0 2,0

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 -

10,0 10,0 10,0 10,0 10,0 -10,0 10,0 -

7,0 7,0 7,0 7,0 7,0 7,0 7,0 -

4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,0 -

2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 2,0 -

0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

0,0

Figure 18: Weight Allowance and Contingency printout

5.4 Report codes

All definitions, abbreviations and codes used in the report shall be fully explained. The codes used may include, but not be limited to: weight installation codes weight phase codes weight status codes area codes ISO 19901-5: 2003

5.4.1 Weight installation codes

Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: Code I N OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report INSTALLATION CODES Description Installed Not installed Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

Figure 19: Weight Installation Codes printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

5.4.2 Weight phase codes

Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: Code LC50 LC60 LC70 LC90 OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report STATUS CODES Description Transport to offshore field Lift at offshore field Offshore dry installed Future operating installed (max load) Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

Figure 20: Weight Phase Codes printout

5.4.3 Weight status codes

Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: Code B0 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 E0 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report STATUS CODES Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

Description Estimate based upon historical data from other projects. Weight take-off from drawings and 3D-models issued in Front end engineering design (FEED). Weight take-off from drawings and 3D-models issued in the Project execution Weight take-off from drawings and 3D-models issued in the Project execution period after inter discipline check (IDC). Weight take-off from drawings approved for construction and as-built. Weighed weights. Estimate based upon historical data from other projects. Estimate based upon concept specific preliminary process data. Estimate based upon information from equipment data sheets. Weight data as supplied by vendor. Confirmed weight data from vendor based on fabrication drawings and catalogue data for standard equipment. Weighed weights.

Figure 21: Weight Status Codes printout

5.4.4 Area codes

Client: Doc.no.: Doc.title: Printout: Code C00 L00 U00 P00 D00 F00 T00 OIL COMPANY XX-XX-XX-XXX-XXXXX Weight Control Report STATUS CODES Description Deckbox Living quarter Utility modules Process modules Drilling modules Flare Topside Contractor: RIG CONSTRUCTOR Page: x of 50 Rev.date: 01.05.2012 Revision: 06F

Figure 22: Area Codes printout

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Automatic generated weight reports

Background
A lot of the time consume during production of weight reports are related to copying and pasting data from the weight control system into a spreadsheet to format tables and printout and further into the final word processor document. A better workflow would be to if the final report document could be produced directly from the weight control system. This would make it possible to increase the time spent on investigating the status and reasons for changes, instead of manual editing of spreadsheets and word processing documents. I would also significantly reduce the chances of getting errors prone to missing updates between the various sources and formula errors in the spreadsheets.

Requirements
Automatic generated weight reports can only be possible if all necessary information is present in the weight database. One of the goals of this paper was to get an overview of how much of the information of weight reports that can be presented as printouts / tables from the system and how much must be produced manually. Until now we have not found any information that cannot be systemized and stored in the weight database. On the contrary, systemizing all information of a weight report would be of great benefit because that makes it possible to quickly search up all related information from previous projects. But there is no doubt that it would be significant amount of work to define all the queries and formats thats necessary to produce weight reports with proper layout. It is therefore of vital importance that the content and layout of the weight report are standardized.

Conclusion
There is good correlation between the ISO standard for weight control, ISO 19901-5, and the Statoil weight control requirement, TR2352, when it comes to weight reporting. The Statoil requirement document focus on which data fields should be included in the database, while the ISO standard is specific when it comes to what information should be included in the various sessions of a weight report. While most reviewed past weight reports includes all the information required by the ISO standard, the order of this information is presented in the reports, and the formatting of printouts and tables are varying a lot. It should be considered to extend the ISO standard 19901-5 with an appendix specifying contents and formats for printouts and tables due to the requirements specified in chapter 6.3 of the standard. A report format specification would also make it possible to automatic generate weight reports from the weight control system. But without this standard specification, it will probably be too much work implementing different format templates customized to the oil companies different requirements and practice.

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Terms and definitions

CoG: Center of gravity ENS: Engineering Numbering System GUID: Globally Unique Identifier Net weight: Weight without any allowance or contingency factor applied Gross weight: Net weight including allowance/contingency factor NS: Norwegian Standard

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Appendix 1: Examples of Main Summary tables from various Weight Reports.

Example 1: Jacket topside

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Example 2: FPSO topside

Example 3: Jacket topside

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Example 4: Semi-submersible total platform

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Example 5: FPSO topside and vessel

Report Format for Weight Control of Offshore Structures

PAPER No : 3483

Appendix 2: Example of chapter mapping between ISO standard chapters and weight reports from past projects
ISO ch. 6.3.1 6.3.1a 6.3.1b 6.3.1c 6.3.1d 6.3.1e 6.3.2 6.3.2.1 6.3.2.2 6.3.2.3 6.3.2.4 6.3.2.5 6.3.2.5.1 6.3.2.5.1a 6.3.2.5.1b 6.3.2.5.1c 6.3.2.5.2 6.3.2.6 6.3.2.7 6.3.3 6.3.3.1 6.3.3.2 6.3.3.3 6.3.3.4 6.3.4 6.3.4.1 6.3.4.2 6.3.4.3 6.3.5 6.3.5.1 6.3.5.1a 6.3.5.1b 6.3.5.2 6.3.5.3 6.3.5.4 6.3.5.4a 6.3.5.4b 6.3.5.4c 6.3.5.4d 6.3.5.5 6.3.5.6 Chapter 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 2 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.5.1 2.5.1.1 2.5.1.2 2.5.1.3 2.5.2 2.6 2.7 3 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4 4.1 4.2 4.3 5 5.1 5.1.1 5.1.2 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.4.1 5.4.2 5.4.3 5.4.4 5.5 5.6 Description Introduction Major assemblies Cut-off date Weight information provided by others List of reported loading conditions Discrepancies Summary and conclusions to the report Main summary Weight and load budget (WLB) Global CoG plot Main variations from the previous report Weight forecast General Approved design changes not included Proposed design changes Possible weight changes Main-trend graphs Main weight printout summaries by area and discipline As built / weighing data Area / module reports Variation from last report by area and discipline Trend graphs by area CoG plots Area weight printouts Special reports (optinal) System reports Sub-area report or sub-assemblies report Secondary lift report Annexes to the report Assumptions General assumptions Discipline assumptions Area designations and global origin Weight allowance and contingency Report codes Weight installation codes Weight phase codes Weight status codes Area codes References Other descriptions (incl. VO) SemiModule/ Jacket Topside Jacket Topside Jacket Topside submersible modification 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 9 10 7 NA NA NA 8 2.1 7.1 Missing 8 9.2+9.3 5 Missing A.1 A.2-A.8 1 1 1 1 1 2.2.3 2.2 7.8-7.9 2.3 8.6 NA NA NA 8.7 9.2 Missing 8.2 7.7 7.8-7.9 6.1 Missing 6.1 7 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 2.3.1-4+2.4 2.3.1-4+2.4 Missing 2.3.1-4+2.4 3.1 NA NA NA 6.6 4.2 4.1.1 6.5 6.6 Missing 7.3+8.3 Missing Missing 5.4 1 1 Missing 1 1 2.1 3 6.5 3 4 5.2 5.2 5.2 5.2 8.18.2 7.2 7.1.1+10.2 7.3 Missing Missing 9.1-9.6 Missing 1 1 1 5.6 1 3.1 Missing 4.2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 4.1.1 3.1 Missing Missing 4.1.1 4.2.1-3 NA Missing NA NA

4.1 4.1 A.10 4.1 Missing Missing 11 A.10 4.1 6.2

1.2 3.1 A-C A-A Missing 1.1 A-A A-C 1.3 10

3.1 3.2 Missing 6.4Missing 1.1 Missing Missing 1.3 Missing

10.4

5.3

10.1

5.7-8 5.6 5.5 5.4 2.1 3.3