Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A CenterWatch Publication
0
)
&
NTE
R
#¬
NA
T
0
I
H
ONA
L
A
¬
R
2E
SE
M
A
RC
A
H¬
¬
/R
&O
GA
NI
C
Z
A
U
TI
S
ON
¬
From Volume 13, Issue 17. April 27, 2009. Copyright © 2009 by CenterWatch. All rights reserved.
CWWeekly, April 27, 2009 2 of 2
PFC Pharma Focus (continued from page 1)
ber of sites and patients; however, an IIT is not principals at small biotech companies are hired What are your plans for growth?
meant for registration purposes. The largest IIT we from Big Pharma and naturally implement Big
are managing is a 450-patient study in Israel and Pharma processes in the new entrepreneurial envi- We have recently finished a five-year plan. It
South Africa—the biggest ever done in the indica- ronment. This can add unnecessary cost. This sur- encompasses further development and strengthen-
tion of post-traumatic stress disorder. These are prised us, because the small biotechs thrive on ing of our international project management and
the most challenging studies. We work hand-in- their innovation. our QA/QC groups with a moderate expansion.
hand with the investigator, who is a great clini- Today, even at Big Pharma, especially because Our primary expansion is where our core offices
cian, to help him learn what implication his spon- of the worldwide financial crisis, we see budgets are. We have evaluated what the margin is in each
sorship has on his responsibilities. for clinical research getting cut and requirements of the offices to grow and to what level. We are
Many CROs don’t want to enter into the IIT increasing. The processes in Big Pharma are less currently a company of 50 employees. Our expan-
services area. It’s not an attractive area for CROs flexible and they often look on CROs more as a sion plan goes to 120 employees within the next
because these studies are usually modest and commodity, concentrating on hourly costs. We’ve four years. We have identified three additional
require a very high level of efficiency as well as encountered some companies that try to impose locations in Europe where we would like to
professionalism to manage. You need a very expe- freelance hourly costs, ignoring the fact that our expand into. We have just recently opened a new
rienced person who can deal with and mediate emphasis on continuous quality and training of office in New Delhi, India, because this market is
between the investigators and pharmaceutical each employee is an added value for the customer. becoming increasingly attractive to find the num-
companies. Or, that payments based on ‘unit pricing,’ such as ber of patients, which is increasingly difficult in
We are proud of our unique strength in concept number of visits and fixed time on site only Europe, and we have excellent ties to local clinical
development and drug development consultancy. encourages inefficient monitoring if it is clear that research facilities through Excel Life Sciences [a
There are not many companies with continuous some sites need more time. Inefficient monitoring pharmaceutical research organization]. This collab-
exposure. That allows us to always be at the front demotivates our staff as well as the site staff, oration makes a startup very efficient and effec-
and to come up with innovative solutions. This we making it more difficult to run the study. We see tive. We would also like to better penetrate the
can do through many years of experience in lead- that sponsors’ thinking is evolving, based on their U.S. market. We don’t think the way is to open our
ing positions of globally active pharmaceutical previous experience as well as the practice in the own office in the U.S. but to liaise with a local U.S.
companies and CROs. We feel that, for us, clinical industry. We suffer when other CROs take advan- CRO that shares the same values. We are not
research is not just a profession, it is a mission. tage of the system, but we can show our clients looking for a huge CRO but a CRO of comparable
that they need to revise their preconceived size that would like to penetrate the European
What challenges do you face? notions. market. PFC always builds a project team tailored
With regard to pricing, we have to tailor a to the needs of the project and allies with national
Although our clientele includes some of the largest unique pricing model that will fit the company and and regional CROs to extend its geographical
pharma companies, we are also attracting busi- its financial status or stability. Thus, we work close- reach. The project teams are carefully managed
ness from smaller pharma companies and biotech ly with venture capitalists and other investment and supervised by our project management and
now because they need a true partner. They pro- groups, filling the gap between regulatory and quality assurance groups.
vide projects that are challenging for us not only clinical requirements and the company budget
scientifically but also financially, because they usu- through fair market value pricing. This is a chal-
ally have lower budgets. We have to convince lenging activity in itself and positions PFC in differ-
them of intelligent ways to save without endan- ent segments than other CROs.
gering the quality of their program. Often, the