Professional Documents
Culture Documents
back
Provided for client's internal
research purposes only. May not
be further copied, distributed, sold
or published in any form without
the prior consent of the copyright
owner.
Borneo Post Sabah, Sabah
10 Aug 2013, by No author available
International News, page 4 - 359.00 cm
Malaysia - English Newspapers - circulation 23,235 (MTWTFS)
ID 208146045 PAGE 2 of 2
UPDATE 1-Murdoch's Australia head departs as election battle heats up
* Murdoch appoints new boss of Australian arm
* PM Rudd steps up claims of election bias
* Business, not politics more likely reason for change
CANBERRA, Aug 9 (Reuters) - Rupert Murdoch's News Corp appointed a
new chief executive to its Australian arm on Friday, a move Prime Minister
Kevin Rudd linked to mounting attacks on his government by Murdoch's
local newspapers during a divisive election campaign.
Murdoch named former newspaper executive Julian Clarke to run News
Corp Australia, the country's dominant newspaper publisher, replacing
former pay TV boss Kim Williams, who announced his retirement after less
than two years in the job.
Rudd told reporters the shakeout came after Murdoch sent key lieutenant
Col Allan from New York to Australia to increase attacks on his government
and its A$38 billion ($35 billion) high speed broadband plan ahead of the
Sept. 7 elections.
"The message delivered very clearly to them was 'go hard on Rudd. Start
from Sunday and don't back off'," Rudd said on Friday.
News Corp did not respond to requests for comment on Rudd's allegations.
Some media analysts said the change of executives was more likely linked
to the split of News Corp into its entertainment and publishing arms earlier
this year, rather than politics and the heated election campaign.
But there is no question that the Murdoch press in Australia wants Rudd
defeated come September's election.
Leading Sydney newspaper the Daily Telegraph on Monday ran a front
page headline saying "Kick this mob out" over a photo of Rudd on the first
day of an election campaign.
Murdoch's main Queensland daily on Friday continued the anti-government
campaign, with a front page headlined "Send in the clown" over a
photograph of Rudd and his surprise candidate for a key seat, a former
popular state premier Peter Beattie.
Melbourne University media analyst Margaret Simons said News Corp had
long been against the Labor government under both Rudd and his
predecessor, prime minister Julia Gillard.
Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.
back
2013 Thomson Reuters.
Reuters Newswires, ANZ
09 Aug 2013, by Reuters
Global Media
General News - 543 words
ID 207646418 PAGE 1 of 2
"Col Allan's arrival was crucial. I'm hearing Col Allan was sent to report back
on how Kim Williams was leading the local operation. When I heard he was
arriving, it was clear it couldn't possibly be good for Kim."
"I think the campaign that News is running is being run by the masthead
editors, and they are also the ones who have done it for Kim. I think it all has
an impact on the campaign."
Crickey.com.au news website said there had been internal unrest in News
Corp Australia over Williams cost cuttings and structural changes and relief
in newsrooms at his departure.
"I want to thank him for his unwavering commitment and the blood, sweat
and tears he has put into News Corp Australia," Murdoch in a statement on
Williams' retirement.
Paul Xiradis, managing director at fund manager Ausbil Dexia, the biggest
investment manager shareholder in News Corp's Australian-listed shares,
said Williams' departure was more likely about business than politics.
"Leading up to it (the News Corp split) there was a fair bit of work involved in
that. But now implementing the ongoing strategy, maybe he (Williams)
wasn't committed there full-time," Xiradis said.
Simons said the move suggested a cultural shift within Murdoch's media
empire, with traditional newspaper executives taking key roles.
"There was a cultural battle going on within the company and obviously this
is one of the outcomes," she told Australian Broadcasting Corp.
Copyright 2013 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.
back
2013 Thomson Reuters.
Reuters Newswires, ANZ
09 Aug 2013, by Reuters
Global Media
General News - 543 words
ID 207646418 PAGE 2 of 2
Rudd attacks Murdoch as News Corp Australia boss quits
SYDNEY, Aug 09, 2013 (AFP) - Prime Minister Kevin Rudd intensified a
bitter war of words with Rupert Murdoch Friday as the head of the media
mogul's Australia arm quit in a shock move during an election campaign.
Rudd, facing an uphill battle to win September 7 polls against the Tony
Abbott-led conservative opposition, has become a target of the Murdoch
media and he accused the powerful tycoon of an orchestrated plan to get rid
of him.
"Fact number one is Mr Murdoch has said in black and white that he wants
Mr Abbott to be prime minister of Australia, (and) no one disputes he
controls 70 percent of newspapers," Rudd told reporters in reaction to the
surprise announcement that News Corp Australia chief Kim Williams had
quit.
"We also know as a fact that Mr Murdoch sent out his right hand man to
Australia, Mr Col Allan, (and) we know as fact a large number of his editors
were called to a meeting in Sydney last week.
"What we know from that meeting, because those editors have spoken to
various people, is the message that was given to them was: Go hard on
Rudd, start from Sunday and don't back off."
The mogul jetted in his trusted Australian lieutenant, New York Post editor-
in-chief Allan, last week to shake up his titles.
Days later Williams, who came from a pay television background, resigned
after overseeing some brutal cost-cutting and staff reductions as the group
transitions to a more digital platform.
Margaret Simons, director of advanced journalism at the University of
Melbourne, said Williams was the victim of internal News Corp politics, with
the old newspaper hands winning their battle to have him removed.
"News Limited has always been dominated by its newspapers, as opposed
to News Corp, and its most powerful people have traditionally been the
editors of the mastheads," she told AFP, referring to the Australian arm by
its old name.
"Right from the early weeks he (Williams) was in conflict with other people.
"Yes, he was brought in to restructure and had experience in paid content
models, but he was strongly opposed by the well-established men in the
Copyright AFP, 2013
back
2013 AFP
AFP Newswires, Global
09 Aug 2013, by AFP
Global Media
General News - 630 words
ID 207648377 PAGE 1 of 2
newsrooms. It is clear now who has won that battle."
Williams has been replaced by Julian Clarke, a long-time company man who
was most recently chairman of Murdoch's Melbourne-based Herald and
Weekly Times group in Australia, whose titles include the Herald Sun.
"Clarke is an old hand on the Murdoch carousel. He will be a popular
appointment," added Simons.
Murdoch said Williams had been "a steady and courageous leader at a time
when our businesses have faced unprecedented pressure and economic
challenges".
Williams took the job 20 months ago, moving from his role as head of
Foxtel, a News Corp joint venture that is Australia's largest pay television
company.
In an internal memo to staff, he said he was leaving with "a heavy heart and
a mixed bag of feelings".
"It is certainly not a decision made lightly," he said.
Murdoch said he was "so pleased" to have Clarke take the helm at News
Corp Australia.
"He is an experienced executive with a unique understanding of our
company's culture, and the immense energy and clarity of vision necessary
to drive our properties forward at this challenging time for all media in all
countries," he said.
Murdoch controls two-thirds of Australia's newspapers and has a stake in
broadcasters Sky News and Fox Sports.
His newspapers are an influential voice and they have made clear whose
side they are on in the national elections. His Sydney tabloid The Daily
Telegraph this week ran a front-page headline, "Kick This Mob Out", under a
picture of Rudd.
Murdoch has been a critic of Labor's plan for a multi-billion-dollar National
Broadband Network and also fiercely opposes proposed media reforms,
which were set to include a new public interest test for major mergers and
stronger self-regulation requirements.
mp/mfc/sm
Copyright AFP, 2013
back
2013 AFP
AFP Newswires, Global
09 Aug 2013, by AFP
Global Media
General News - 630 words
ID 207648377 PAGE 2 of 2
D a t e : 0 9 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 3
P a y s : F R A N C E
E d i t i o n : F i l E c o
P e r i o d i c i t e : Q u o t i d i e n
S u r f a c e : 8 3 %
T X - P A R - K I D R O
1 1 1 1 ' T o u s d r o i t s d e r e p r o d u c t i o n r e s e r v e s
back
International
Press Clip
International Press Clippings - France, France
09 Aug 2013
General News, page 1 - 408.55 cm
International - circulation (Daily)
ID 207778252 PAGE 1 of 1
D a t e : 0 9 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 3
P a y s : F R A N C E
E d i t i o n : F i l G e n
P e r i o d i c i t e : Q u o t i d i e n
S u r f a c e : 8 3 %
T X - P A R - K I E 4 7
1 1 1 1 ' T o u s d r o i t s d e r e p r o d u c t i o n r e s e r v e s
back
International
Press Clip
International Press Clippings - France, France
09 Aug 2013
General News, page 2 - 398.48 cm
International - circulation (Daily)
ID 207778253 PAGE 1 of 1
D a t e : 0 9 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 3
P a y s : F R A N C E
E d i t i o n : F i l E c o
P e r i o d i c i t e : Q u o t i d i e n
S u r f a c e : 8 3 %
T X - P A R - K I D R O
1 1 1 1 ' T o u s d r o i t s d e r e p r o d u c t i o n r e s e r v e s
back
International
Press Clip
International Press Clippings - France, France
09 Aug 2013
General News, page 3 - 407.25 cm
International - circulation (Daily)
ID 207778254 PAGE 1 of 1
D a t e : 0 9 / 0 8 / 2 0 1 3
P a y s : F R A N C E
E d i t i o n : F i l G e n
P e r i o d i c i t e : Q u o t i d i e n
S u r f a c e : 8 3 %
m e n e n t c e t t e
T X - P A R - K I E 4 7
1 1 1 1 ' T o u s d r o i t s d e r e p r o d u c t i o n r e s e r v e s
back
International
Press Clip
International Press Clippings - France, France
09 Aug 2013
General News, page 4 - 398.57 cm
International - circulation (Daily)
ID 207778255 PAGE 1 of 1
Why political parties simply cant see the big picture
N
owthat the electiondate
has beenset, the optim-
ists among us might
hope that attentionwill
turnto policies.
There does seemmore aware-
ness this time aroundthat policies
andpolicy analysis are big gaps in
howAustralianelections are con-
ducted, reportedanddebated.
For a start, we dont have the
policy manifestos that Britishpar-
ties put out in the rst or second
week of their campaigns. Those
long, detaileddocuments tendto
include some grand(andnot
uncontroversial) plans suchas
DavidCamerons 2010idea for a
Big Society.
InAustralia, the closest we get
to these are the parties campaign
launchpolicy speeches, tradition-
ally heldat the start of the cam-
paign. But, in the 1990s, the parties
recognisedthat holding these
events early workedagainst them.
Their opponents andthe media
thenhadplenty of time to ndeven
small errors in the detail or cost-
ings of policies. Andreleasing all of
their major policies inone go
meant that it was difcult to sus-
tainmedia attention across the ve
or six weeks of the campaign.
By 2010, the campaignlaunch
was a misnomer. The Coalition
heldits launch only 13 days from
polling day while the Labor Party
gave voters even less time to
reect, just ve days.
Before we get to those events at
this election, we will see hundreds
of small, individual policies trickle
out over the next month. Policies
are deliveredinpiecemeal fashion
are deliveredinpiecemeal fashion
because it ts withthe daily,
media-focusedcampaigncycle.
But its also because the parties
like small policies.
Electionpolicies are designedto
winelections. They are carefully
craftedto target (or appease)
specic sections of the electorate.
They are not designedto solve
complex or long-termpolicy
problems.
So, if recent elections are any
guide, during this campaignwe
shouldexpect announcements
about pensionincreases for senior
Australians, promises to create
more childcare places or extra
childcare funding, funding for new
roads especially inmarginal seats
andpromises to reduce redtape
for small businesses.
There will also be small but
heavily promotedpolicies about
education. Labor has a consistent
theme here. Bob Hawke promised
in1983 to equipsecondary schools
withcomputers. So didPaul Keat-
ing in1996 and KevinRuddin2007.
The Coalitiontends to take a differ-
ent angle. Both JohnHowardin
2007 andTony Abbott in2010
promisedparents helpwithschool
fees.
We will see many small policies
that tinker at the edges rather than
boldattempts to address big, sys-
temic problems or outline major
policy visions. The usual viewof
this lack of policy ambitionis that it
is a strategic choice by the parties
because big visions are big tar-
gets andno one wants to get
caught out on the ner detail of
grandpolicies. Ever since John
grandpolicies. Ever since John
Hewsons Fightback! manifesto
went awry, the parties have
steeredaway frombig plans during
elections andtend to set only
modest policy goals.
But the newer, andscarier,
theory is that the parties just cant
do long-term, detailedpolicy plan-
ning any more because of a range
of factors. These include the par-
ties owninternal processes, their
hollowing out, lack of connection
withcitizens andcommunities,
andlack of attentionto policy
researchanddevelopment.
Creaky 19th-century political
structures are trying to functionin
a globalising worldwhere national
leadershipmeans less thanit used
to, andwhere there is a highdegree
of interconnectivity, complexity
andrapidspeeds ininformation,
technology andcommunications.
Former lobbyist andministerial
adviser Mark Triftt, who spent
two decades observing policy pro-
cesses, is concluding inhis PhD
researchthat politicians canno
longer deliver sound, forward-
looking policy in any consistent or
coherent way because of deep,
systemic problems withour liberal
democratic systemitself.
So what are the big policies that
needto be tackledbut probably
wont be during this campaign?
Some of the biggest include plan-
ning for an ageing Australia, the
mismatchbetweengovernment
revenues andspending, andthe
barbecue stopper issue of work/
N
SALLYYOUNG
Politicians prefer small
policies that tinker at the
edges than bold policy visions.
Why political parties simply cant see the big picture
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Age, Melbourne
07 Aug 2013
General News, page 20 - 471.47 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 144,277 (MTWTF--)
ID 207130259 PAGE 1 of 2
life balance that Howardagged
more thana decade ago.
There is also planning to meet
the opportunities andchallenges
that have come withunpreceden-
tedgrowthin China andIndia
(whichKeating identied17 years
ago).
There are changes to the polit-
ical systemthat arent inthe major
parties self-interest but somehow
still needto be made. Inequality
andpoverty are perennial big
issues that were mentionedin
some of the rst policy speeches
made inthe early 1900s. Amore
recent issue thats rmly of our
recent issue thats rmly of our
time is howto ensure the future of
journalismina country that ranks
poorly oninternational rankings of
press freedom. Australia is ranked
26thinthe Reporters Without Bor-
ders WorldPress FreedomIndex
behindNewZealand(8th), Sweden
(10th), Ireland(15th) andCanada
(20th).
But if policy development is
suffering, there are at least signs
of growthinpolicy analysis. For
example, for the rst time, there is
nowa single repository keeping all
of the major parties policies inone
place for comparison at the Elec-
place for comparison at the Elec-
tionWatchwebsite at the Uni-
versity of Melbourne. This is one
initiative among several others
throughnewspapers, public broad-
casting andindependent outlets
seeking to ll the gapinanalysis.
Nowits upto the parties to come
upwiththe content andthe big
ideas, if they can.
Sally Youngis anAge columnist,
associate professor inpolitical science,
andresearchdirector of Election
Watch, basedat the University of
Melbournes school of government.
life balance that Howardagged more thana decade ago. There is also planning to meet the opportunities andchallenges that have come withunpreceden- tedgrowthin China andIndia (whichKeating identied17 years ago). There are changes to the polit- ical systemthat arent inthe major parties self-interest but somehow still needto be made. Inequality andpoverty are perennial big issues that were mentionedin some of the rst policy speeches made inthe early 1900s. Amore recent issue thats rmly of our time is howto ensure the future of journalismina country that ranks poorly oninternational rankings of press freedom. Australia is ranked 26thinthe Reporters Without Bor- ders WorldPress FreedomIndex behindNewZealand(8th), Sweden (10th), Ireland(15th) andCanada (20th). But if policy development is suffering, there are at least signs of growthinpolicy analysis. For example, for the rst time, there is nowa single repository keeping all of the major parties policies inone place for comparison at the Elec- tionWatchwebsite at the Uni- versity of Melbourne. This is one initiative among several others throughnewspapers, public broad- casting andindependent outlets seeking to ll the gapinanalysis. Nowits upto the parties to come upwiththe content andthe big ideas, if they can. Sally Youngis anAge columnist, associate professor inpolitical science, andresearchdirector of Election Watch, basedat the University of Melbournes school of government.
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Age, Melbourne
07 Aug 2013
General News, page 20 - 471.47 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 144,277 (MTWTF--)
ID 207130259 PAGE 2 of 2
M i c h e l l e
R o w l a n d
K e v i n R u d d ,
S t e p h e n M i l l s .
S a l l y Y o u n g ,
J u l i a G i l l a r d ' s
M c T e r n a n ,
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Australian Financial Review, Australia
27 Jul 2013, by Fleur Anderson
Perspective, page 17 - 803.15 cm
National - circulation 64,861 (MTWTFS)
ID 205494791 PAGE 1 of 4
T o n y A b b o t t
N i e l s e n J o h n S t i r t o n
C l i v e
P a l m e r B o b K a t t e r .
M a r k T e x t o r ,
J o h n S c a l e s , J W S R e s e a r c h ,
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Australian Financial Review, Australia
27 Jul 2013, by Fleur Anderson
Perspective, page 17 - 803.15 cm
National - circulation 64,861 (MTWTFS)
ID 205494791 PAGE 2 of 4
C l i v e P a l m e r : f o r m i n i n g a n d m a n u f a c t u r i n g
B o b K a t t e r : p i t c h i n g t o t h e d i s a f f e c t e d
o f v o t e r s a r e
s w i n g i n g ,
a c c o r d i n g t o s o m e
e s t i m a t e s
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Australian Financial Review, Australia
27 Jul 2013, by Fleur Anderson
Perspective, page 17 - 803.15 cm
National - circulation 64,861 (MTWTFS)
ID 205494791 PAGE 3 of 4
M i c h e l l e R o w l a n d s p e a k s t o L a l o r P a r k r e s i d e n t F r e d e r i c k K e e t c h , 8 6 . P H O T O : K A T E G E R A G H T Y
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Australian Financial Review, Australia
27 Jul 2013, by Fleur Anderson
Perspective, page 17 - 803.15 cm
National - circulation 64,861 (MTWTFS)
ID 205494791 PAGE 4 of 4
JOURNALISM AND ETHICS
image caption
description
M
a
r
g
a
r
e
t
S
i
m
o
n
s
K
a
t
h
V
i
n
e
r
G
r
e
g
J
e
r
i
c
h
o
New News
The New News Conference takes the debate about what journalists do and why
it matters to the public. Over two days (Friday 30 and Saturday 31) the festival
will buzz with digital experts, professional journalists, and media enthusiasts of
all kinds, coming together to tackle the present and the future of news.
THE NEWS ABOUT NEWS
Is journalism in rotten shape, or
better than ever? Is information
still reliable? Will big media
continue to dominate, or will
citizens and startups step up?
Eric Beecher (Private Media),
Katharine Viner (Guardian
Australia), Mark Forbes (The
Age) and author Pamela
Williams (Australian Financial
Review) take the medias
temperature with Margaret
Simons (CAJ).
WHEN: FRI 30 AUG 10AM
WHERE: ACMI CINEMA 1
A PICTURE TELLS A
THOUSAND WORDS
What impact has the
digital revolution had on
photojournalism? What are
the ethical challenges for
media as every mobile phone
becomes a camera, and every
citizen a publisher? Fairfax
Media photographers, Justin
McManus, Jason South, Kate
Geraghty, and Fay Anderson
(Monash University) discuss
the history and future of
Australian photojournalism
Australian photojournalism
with Michael Gawenda (CAJ).
WHEN: FRI 30 AUG 11.30AM
WHERE: ACMI CINEMA 1
CHINA OPENING UP
OR CLOSING DOWN?
Chinese people are some
of the worlds biggest users
of social media. Although
private enterprise news outlets
expect more freedom, state
control of news remains, and
journalists get sacked and
censored. Rowan Callick (The
Australian), May Hu (SBS
Radio) and Peter Cai (Fairfax
Media) discuss media in China
with chair Margaret Simons
(CAJ).
WHEN: FRI 30 AUG 1PM
WHERE: ACMI CINEMA 1
GETTING IT RIGHT
Shorter news cycles put media
outlets under pressure to be
rst, rather than best, but
when errors get published,
people get damaged. From
the Whitehaven Hoax to the
Boston bombings to election
Boston bombings to election
reporting, John Barron (ABC),
Damon Johnston (Herald
Sun) and Jonathan Moylan
(activist) dissect what accuracy
requires with Denis Muller
(CAJ).
WHEN: FRI 30 AUG 2.30PM
WHERE: ACMI CINEMA 1
IS NEW MEDIA MAKING
US STUPID?
We Tweet and Facebook our
lives away. Attention spans
are supposedly shortening,
and ink on paper is so 1900s.
Gael Jennings (CAJ), leads
the discussion with Greg
Jericho (Guardian Australia),
Gideon Haigh (journalist and
author) and Geoffrey Donnan
(Florey Institute), and questions
whether we are entering a new
enlightenment, or a dark age.
WHEN: FRI 30 AUG 10AM
WHERE: ACMI THE CUBE
TICKETS: FREE
THE CITIZENS AGENDA
This election campaign,
University of Melbourne
University of Melbourne
researchers and the team
at OurSay have intervened
in ten key electorates, using
social media to give citizens
the chance to ask, and vote
for, questions they want the
candidates to address. Get a
progress report on this world
rst project with David Nolan
(Melbourne University), Denis
Muller (CAJ), Eyal Halamish
(OurSay) and Margaret Simons
(CAJ).
WHEN: FRI 30 AUG 4PM
WHERE: ACMI STUDIO 1
Proudly supported by
JOURNALISMANDETHICS
image caption description
Margaret Simons
Kath Viner
Greg Jericho
NewNews
The NewNews Conference takes the debate about what journalists do and why
it matters to the public. Over two days (Friday 30 and Saturday 31) the festival
will buzz with digital experts, professional journalists, and media enthusiasts of
all kinds, coming together to tackle the present and the future of news.
THE NEWS ABOUT NEWS
Is journalismin rotten shape, or better than ever? Is information still reliable? Will big media continue to dominate, or will citizens and startups step up? Eric Beecher (Private Media), Katharine Viner (Guardian Australia), Mark Forbes (The Age) and author Pamela Williams (Australian Financial Review) take the medias temperature with Margaret Simons (CAJ).
WHEN: FRI 30 AUG 10AM WHERE: ACMI CINEMA 1
A PICTURE TELLS A THOUSAND WORDS
What impact has the digital revolution had on photojournalism? What are the ethical challenges for media as every mobile phone becomes a camera, and every citizen a publisher? Fairfax Media photographers, Justin McManus, Jason South, Kate Geraghty, and Fay Anderson (Monash University) discuss the history and future of Australian photojournalism with Michael Gawenda (CAJ).
WHEN: FRI 30 AUG 11.30AM WHERE: ACMI CINEMA 1
CHINA OPENING UP OR CLOSING DOWN?
Chinese people are some of the worlds biggest users
of social media. Although private enterprise news outlets expect more freedom, state control of news remains, and journalists get sacked and censored. Rowan Callick (The Australian), May Hu (SBS Radio) and Peter Cai (Fairfax Media) discuss media in China with chair Margaret Simons (CAJ).
WHEN: FRI 30 AUG 1PM WHERE: ACMI CINEMA 1
GETTING IT RIGHT
Shorter news cycles put media outlets under pressure to be rst, rather than best, but when errors get published, people get damaged. From the Whitehaven Hoax to the Boston bombings to election reporting, John Barron (ABC), Damon Johnston (Herald Sun) and Jonathan Moylan (activist) dissect what accuracy requires with Denis Muller (CAJ).
WHEN: FRI 30 AUG 2.30PM WHERE: ACMI CINEMA 1
IS NEWMEDIA MAKING US STUPID?
We Tweet and Facebook our lives away. Attention spans are supposedly shortening, and ink on paper is so 1900s. Gael Jennings (CAJ), leads the discussion with Greg Jericho (Guardian Australia),
Gideon Haigh (journalist and author) and Geoffrey Donnan (Florey Institute), and questions whether we are entering a new enlightenment, or a dark age.
WHEN: FRI 30 AUG 10AM WHERE: ACMI THE CUBE TICKETS: FREE
THE CITIZENS AGENDA
This election campaign, University of Melbourne researchers and the team at OurSay have intervened in ten key electorates, using social media to give citizens the chance to ask, and vote for, questions they want the candidates to address. Get a progress report on this world rst project with David Nolan (Melbourne University), Denis Muller (CAJ), Eyal Halamish (OurSay) and Margaret Simons (CAJ).
WHEN: FRI 30 AUG 4PM WHERE: ACMI STUDIO1
Proudly supported by
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Age, Melbourne
19 Jul 2013
Supplements, page 12 - 544.21 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 144,277 (MTWTF--)
ID 204135383 PAGE 1 of 2
image caption
description
P
e
t
e
r
C
l
a
r
k
e
W
e
n
d
y
H
a
r
m
e
r
S
o
p
h
i
e
B
l
a
c
k
The New Newsroom
Have you ever wondered how editors and journalists make decisions? How things work in a
real newsroom, under pressure and with deadlines approaching? Now you can watch leading
reporters and executives make the difcult decisions before your eyes, as Peter Clarke (Media
Active) takes leading reporters and newsroom executives Katharine Viner (Guardian Australia),
Gay Alcorn (Age columnist and freelance journalist), Charles Firth (The Chaser), Sophie Black
(Private Media), Wendy Harmer (The Hoopla), Jonathan Green (ABC) and Denis Muller (CAJ)
through an evening in a simulated newsroom as they package the daily mess of events into the
news you consume.
Proudly presented by the Centre for Advancing Journalism (CAJ) at the University of Melbourne
and supported by ConnectWeb.
WHEN: SAT 31 AUG 6.30PM
WHERE: THE WHEELER CENTRE PERFORMANCE SPACE
TICKETS: $25/22.50
Freeloading
Does our insatiable hunger for free content starve creativity? Critic and writer Chris Ruen
discusses his rst-hand experiences in the New York music scene with Triple RRRs Byte Into It
host Vanessa Toholka, seeking solutions as he explores the consequences of digitisation and
the impact of free le sharing on todays musicians, record labels and fans.
WHEN: SAT 31 AUG 5.30PM
WHERE: ACMI CINEMA 1
TICKETS: $21.50/19.50
The Fourth Annual Philanthropy and
Ethics Forum: Mind the Gap
Does philanthropy distort government policy and misdirect resources? Or does it enhance
participation and opportunity? Mary Crooks (Victorian Womens Trust), Satyajit Das (nance
analyst and writer), Miriam Lyons (Centre for Policy Development) and Terry Moran AC
(Institute of Public Administration Australia), examine philanthropys risks and rewards.
Proudly supported by Australian Communities Foundation
WHEN: SUN 1 SEP 11.30AM
WHERE: DEAKIN EDGE
TICKETS: $21.50/19.50
NEW NEWS TICKETS: $21.50/19.50
NEW NEWS PASS: $85/75
The New News Pass gives you access to all New News events, including
The New Newsroom.
image caption description
Peter Clarke
Wendy Harmer
Sophie Black
The NewNewsroom
Have you ever wondered how editors and journalists make decisions? How things work in a real newsroom, under pressure and with deadlines approaching? Now you can watch leading reporters and executives make the difcult decisions before your eyes, as Peter Clarke (Media Active) takes leading reporters and newsroomexecutives Katharine Viner (Guardian Australia), Gay Alcorn (Age columnist and freelance journalist), Charles Firth (The Chaser), Sophie Black (Private Media), Wendy Harmer (The Hoopla), Jonathan Green (ABC) and Denis Muller (CAJ) through an evening in a simulated newsroomas they package the daily mess of events into the news you consume.
Proudly presented by the Centre for Advancing Journalism(CAJ) at the University of Melbourne and supported by ConnectWeb.
WHEN: SAT 31 AUG 6.30PM WHERE: THE WHEELER CENTRE PERFORMANCE SPACE TICKETS: $25/22.50
Freeloading
Does our insatiable hunger for free content starve creativity? Critic and writer Chris Ruen discusses his rst-hand experiences in the New York music scene with Triple RRRs Byte Into It host Vanessa Toholka, seeking solutions as he explores the consequences of digitisation and the impact of free le sharing on todays musicians, record labels and fans.
WHEN: SAT 31 AUG 5.30PM WHERE: ACMI CINEMA 1 TICKETS: $21.50/19.50
The Fourth Annual Philanthropy and
Ethics Forum: Mind the Gap
Does philanthropy distort government policy and misdirect resources? Or does it enhance participation and opportunity? Mary Crooks (Victorian Womens Trust), Satyajit Das (nance analyst and writer), Miriam Lyons (Centre for Policy Development) and Terry Moran AC (Institute of Public Administration Australia), examine philanthropys risks and rewards.
Proudly supported by Australian Communities Foundation
WHEN: SUN 1 SEP 11.30AM WHERE: DEAKIN EDGE TICKETS: $21.50/19.50
NEW NEWS TICKETS: $21.50/19.50
NEW NEWS PASS: $85/75
The New News Pass gives you access to all New News events, including
The New Newsroom.
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Age, Melbourne
19 Jul 2013
Supplements, page 12 - 544.21 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 144,277 (MTWTF--)
ID 204135383 PAGE 2 of 2
FRIDAY 30 AUG
10am
Cost of War
VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1901
Margaret Evisons son was killed ghting in
Afghanistan. Retired senior Army ofcer John
Cantwell served in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
They join ABC 774s Raf Epstein to share their
very personal insights into the human cost of
war, from loss and death to the hidden legacy
of post-traumatic stress.
Proudly supported by Deakin University
New News: The News About News
VENUE: ACMI Cinema 1 CODE: 3901
Is journalism in rotten shape, or better than ever?
Is information still reliable? Will Big Media continue
to dominate, or will citizens and startups step up?
Eric Beecher (Private Media), Katharine Viner
(Guardian Australia), Mark Forbes (Fairfax)
and Pam Williams (author), take the medias
temperature with Margaret Simons (CAJ).
Proudly presented by the Centre for
Advancing Journalism at the University of
Melbourne, supported by ConnectWeb
Bookwallah: Good Girls, Bad Girls
and Terrible Truths
VENUE: ACMI Studio 1 CODE: 4901
The plight of women in India has drawn
international attention in recent times.
Bookwallah participant Annie Zaidi and
Norwegian author and womens rights advocate
Anne stby join Kirsty Murray to share the
powerful stories of women in modern India.
Proudly presented by BHP Billiton. Brought
to you by Asialink.
New News: Is New Media Making
Us Stupid?
VENUE: ACMI The Cube FREE
We Tweet and Facebook our lives away.
Attention spans are supposedly shortening,
and ink on paper is so 1900s. Gael Jennings
(CAJ) leads the discussion with Greg Jericho
(Guardian Australia), journalist and author
Gideon Haigh and Geoffrey Donnan (Florey
Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health)
and questions whether we are entering a new
enlightenment, or a dark age.
The Morning Read
VENUE: Beer DeLuxe FREE
Start your day with Festival early bird and
Big Issue books editor, Thuy On, as she hosts
readings with Nihad Sirees, Fiona Capp, Jane
Rawson and Tao Lin.
Walk: Melbourne as the Muse
VENUE: MWF Box Ofce CODE: 9493 $40 PAGE: 10
See Melbourne as writers do and join Lorelei
Vashti and Soja Stefanovic on this walk
through the citys inspiring spaces. Melbourne
is the muse, and you will write along the way.
Masterclass: The Essay
VENUE: The Wheeler Centre - Workshop Space
CODE: 7901TICKETS: $140/120 PAGE: 24
11:30am
Why I Read
VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1902
Chandrahas Choudhury, Jay Grifths and
Maureen McCarthy discuss the books that
have inspired their love for reading, in an event
about the power of stories and the ways they
entwine with our lives. Chaired by Antoni Jach.
New News: A Picture Tells a
Thousand Words
VENUE: ACMI Cinema 1 CODE: 3902
What impact has the digital revolution had
on photojournalism? What are the ethical
challenges for media as every mobile phone
becomes a camera, and every citizen a
publisher? Fairfax Media photographers Justin
McManus, Jason South, Kate Geraghty
and Fay Anderson (Monash University)
discuss the history and future of Australian
photojournalism with Michael Gawenda (CAJ).
Vivienne Eliot, The Poets Wife
VENUE: ACMI Studio 1 CODE: 4902
Mary-Kay Wilmers, London Review of Books
editor, is drawn to the life of Vivienne Eliot
(TS Eliots rst wife) and the predicament of the
muse. Novelist Steven Carroll is fascinated by
TS Eliots legacy and explores the period with
Wilmers. Chaired by poet Chris
Wallace-Crabbe.
New News: Will We, or Wont
We Pay for News?
VENUE: ACMI The Cube FREE
In the past 12 months, major news outlets have
introduced subscription fees for online users.
Will it work? Everyone from Rupert Murdoch to
the lowliest reporter wants to know.
Hal Crawford (Ninemsn), Pamela Williams
(Australian Financial Review), Jon Burton
(Herald Sun) and Andrew Dodd (Swinburne
University) report from the centre of the
struggle.
12pm
Illustrator in Residence
VENUE: The Atrium, Fed Square FREE
Daily three-hour sessions where some of the
worlds leading illustrators work live in the
Atrium. Todays illustrator in residence is
Melbourne illustrator Marc Martin.
1pm
The Politics of Sex
VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1903
Young Australian writer Anna Krien and
Canadian-born, Welsh-Egyptian Shereen El
Feki have both used sex as the exploration
point for a discussion about culture, gender and
power. Together they join Sophie Cunningham
power. Together they join Sophie Cunningham
to discuss how the politics of sex provides a
literary lens from which to view society.
New News: China - Opening Up
or Closing Down?
VENUE: ACMI Cinema 1 CODE: 3903
Chinese people are some of the worlds
biggest users of social media. Although private
enterprise news outlets expect more freedom,
state control of news remains, and journalists
get sacked or censored. Rowan Callick (The
Australian), May Hu (SBS Radio) and Peter Cai
(Fairfax Media) discuss media in China with
Margaret Simons (CAJ).
The End of the Homosexual?
VENUE: ACMI Studio 1 CODE: 4903
Emerging in the late 1960s and early 1970s gay
liberation challenged and redened western
societies. But what fundamentally has changed?
And what hurdles remain to a full acceptance of
sexual and gender diversity? Pioneering activist
Dennis Altman chronicles the journey and
looks to the future in conversation with Anne
Summers.
New News: The Pitch
VENUE: ACMI The Cube FREE
Cant break into the guild that is media? Trying
to freelance but getting nowhere?
Take ve minutes to pitch your idea to editors
Jill Baker (Herald Sun), Cathy Alexander
(Crikey), John van Tiggelen (The Monthly),
or Duska Sulicich (The Sunday Age) with MC
Simon Mann (The Citizen).
Word on the Square
VENUE: Fed Square FREE
Wordsmith or wordsloth, which one are you?
Do you have something to say, or just feel like
a spot of wordplay? Castlemaine based duo
Words on the Run bring Word on the Square,
an installation of 100 giant-sized wooden
letters, to Melbourne Writers Festival 2013. Find
them on the spelling eld and connect with
fellow alphabologists for giant crosswords,
Boggle, 9-letter word games and general free-
styling letter frivolity. Until 6PM.
2pm
Masterclass: Writing Fiction
VENUE: The Wheeler Centre - Workshop Space
CODE: 7903, TICKETS: $140/120 PAGE: 24
Masterclass: Writing about Music
VENUE: The Wheeler Centre - Boardroom CODE:
7902, TICKETS: $140/120 PAGE: 24
2:30pm
Natural Connections
VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1904
Robyn Davidson and Jay Grifths have both
travelled extensively in places where modern
FRIDAY 30AUG
10am
Cost of War VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1901
Margaret Evisons son was killed ghting in Afghanistan. Retired senior Army ofcer John Cantwell served in both Iraq and Afghanistan. They join ABC 774s Raf Epstein to share their very personal insights into the human cost of war, from loss and death to the hidden legacy of post-traumatic stress.
Proudly supported by Deakin University
New News: The News About News VENUE: ACMI Cinema 1 CODE: 3901 Is journalism in rotten shape, or better than ever? Is information still reliable? Will Big Media continue to dominate, or will citizens and startups step up? Eric Beecher (Private Media), Katharine Viner (Guardian Australia), Mark Forbes (Fairfax) and Pam Williams (author), take the medias temperature with Margaret Simons (CAJ).
Proudly presented by the Centre for Advancing Journalism at the University of Melbourne, supported by ConnectWeb
Bookwallah: Good Girls, Bad Girls and Terrible Truths VENUE: ACMI Studio 1 CODE: 4901
The plight of women in India has drawn international attention in recent times. Bookwallah participant Annie Zaidi and Norwegian author and womens rights advocate Anne stby join Kirsty Murray to share the powerful stories of women in modern India.
Proudly presented by BHP Billiton. Brought to you by Asialink.
New News: Is New Media Making Us Stupid? VENUE: ACMI The Cube FREE
We Tweet and Facebook our lives away. Attention spans are supposedly shortening, and ink on paper is so 1900s. Gael Jennings (CAJ) leads the discussion with Greg Jericho (Guardian Australia), journalist and author Gideon Haigh and Geoffrey Donnan (Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health) and questions whether we are entering a new enlightenment, or a dark age.
The Morning Read VENUE: Beer DeLuxe FREE
Start your day with Festival early bird and Big Issue books editor, Thuy On, as she hosts readings with Nihad Sirees, Fiona Capp, Jane Rawson and Tao Lin.
Walk: Melbourne as the Muse VENUE: MWF Box Ofce CODE: 9493 $40 PAGE: 10
See Melbourne as writers do and join Lorelei Vashti and Soja Stefanovic on this walk through the citys inspiring spaces. Melbourne is the muse, and you will write along the way.
Masterclass: The Essay VENUE: The Wheeler Centre - Workshop Space CODE: 7901TICKETS: $140/120 PAGE: 24
11:30am
Why I Read VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1902
Chandrahas Choudhury, Jay Grifths and Maureen McCarthy discuss the books that have inspired their love for reading, in an event about the power of stories and the ways they entwine with our lives. Chaired by Antoni Jach.
New News: A Picture Tells a Thousand Words VENUE: ACMI Cinema 1 CODE: 3902
What impact has the digital revolution had on photojournalism? What are the ethical challenges for media as every mobile phone becomes a camera, and every citizen a publisher? Fairfax Media photographers Justin McManus, Jason South, Kate Geraghty and Fay Anderson (Monash University) discuss the history and future of Australian photojournalism with Michael Gawenda (CAJ).
Vivienne Eliot, The Poets Wife VENUE: ACMI Studio 1 CODE: 4902
Mary-Kay Wilmers, London Review of Books editor, is drawn to the life of Vivienne Eliot (TS Eliots rst wife) and the predicament of the muse. Novelist Steven Carroll is fascinated by TS Eliots legacy and explores the period with Wilmers. Chaired by poet Chris Wallace-Crabbe.
New News: Will We, or Wont We Pay for News? VENUE: ACMI The Cube FREE
In the past 12 months, major news outlets have introduced subscription fees for online users. Will it work? Everyone from Rupert Murdoch to the lowliest reporter wants to know. Hal Crawford (Ninemsn), Pamela Williams (Australian Financial Review), Jon Burton (Herald Sun) and Andrew Dodd (Swinburne University) report from the centre of the struggle.
12pm
Illustrator in Residence VENUE: The Atrium, Fed Square FREE
Daily three-hour sessions where some of the worlds leading illustrators work live in the Atrium. Todays illustrator in residence is Melbourne illustrator Marc Martin.
1pm
The Politics of Sex VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1903
Young Australian writer Anna Krien and Canadian-born, Welsh-Egyptian Shereen El Feki have both used sex as the exploration
point for a discussion about culture, gender and power. Together they join Sophie Cunningham to discuss how the politics of sex provides a literary lens from which to view society.
New News: China - Opening Up or Closing Down? VENUE: ACMI Cinema 1 CODE: 3903 Chinese people are some of the worlds biggest users of social media. Although private enterprise news outlets expect more freedom, state control of news remains, and journalists get sacked or censored. Rowan Callick (The Australian), May Hu (SBS Radio) and Peter Cai (Fairfax Media) discuss media in China with Margaret Simons (CAJ).
The End of the Homosexual? VENUE: ACMI Studio 1 CODE: 4903 Emerging in the late 1960s and early 1970s gay liberation challenged and redened western societies. But what fundamentally has changed? And what hurdles remain to a full acceptance of sexual and gender diversity? Pioneering activist Dennis Altman chronicles the journey and looks to the future in conversation with Anne Summers.
New News: The Pitch VENUE: ACMI The Cube FREE Cant break into the guild that is media? Trying to freelance but getting nowhere? Take ve minutes to pitch your idea to editors Jill Baker (Herald Sun), Cathy Alexander (Crikey), John van Tiggelen (The Monthly), or Duska Sulicich (The Sunday Age) with MC Simon Mann (The Citizen).
Word on the Square VENUE: Fed Square FREE
Wordsmith or wordsloth, which one are you? Do you have something to say, or just feel like a spot of wordplay? Castlemaine based duo Words on the Run bring Word on the Square, an installation of 100 giant-sized wooden letters, to Melbourne Writers Festival 2013. Find them on the spelling eld and connect with fellow alphabologists for giant crosswords, Boggle, 9-letter word games and general free- styling letter frivolity. Until 6PM.
2pm
Masterclass: Writing Fiction VENUE: The Wheeler Centre - Workshop Space CODE: 7903, TICKETS: $140/120 PAGE: 24
Masterclass: Writing about Music VENUE: The Wheeler Centre - Boardroom CODE: 7902, TICKETS: $140/120 PAGE: 24
2:30pm
Natural Connections VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1904
Robyn Davidson and Jay Grifths have both travelled extensively in places where modern
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Age, Melbourne
19 Jul 2013
Supplements, page 19 - 547.77 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 144,277 (MTWTF--)
ID 204135775 PAGE 1 of 2
tourists do not go, spending time with nomadic
and Indigenous peoples on all continents. They
discuss their relationships with the natural
world, and explore what happens when we lose
touch with nature and wildness.
New News: Getting it Right
VENUE: ACMI Cinema 1 CODE: 3904 PAGE: 12
Mossad: The Great Operations
VENUE: ACMI Studio 1 CODE: 4904
Israels foremost expert on espionage, Michael
Bar-Zohar is also author of more than 35 books
including the biography of Mossad Director
Isser Harel. Michael joins Leah Garrett to
reveal the secrets behind some of the most
dangerous missions in the 60-year history
of the worlds most respected and enigmatic
secret service organisation.
Proudly supported by the Pratt Foundation
Walk: The Yarra
VENUE: MWF Box Ofce CODE: 9912 TICKETS: $40
PAGE: 10
4pm
What Difference Does It Make?
VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1905
New York music writer Chris Ruen, London-
based rock critic Andrew Mueller and Victorian
writer and broadcaster Elmo Keep discuss
contemporary music criticism; its form, its
impact and the challenges it faces from the
online environment. Chaired by Penny Modra.
Politics, Power and the PM
VENUE: ACMI Cinema 2 CODE: 2901
Anne Summers continues her exploration of
power and misogyny with former Victorian
Premier Joan Kirner. They join Tanja Kovac to
discuss how gendered motifs in literature and
history shape our political understanding of
women leaders; and the challenges that future
women leaders face in light of the barrage of
gendered attacks on Australias rst female PM.
Proudly supported by EMILYs List
New News: Citizens Agenda
VENUE: ACMI Studio 1 CODE: 4905
This election campaign, University of Melbourne
researchers and the team at OurSay have
intervened in ten key electorates, using social
media to give citizens the chance to ask, and
vote for, questions they want the candidates
to address. Get a progress report on this world
rst project with David Nolan (University of
Melbourne), Denis Muller (CAJ), Eyal Halamish
(OurSay) and Margaret Simons (CAJ).
Proudly presented by the Centre for
Advancing Journalism at the University of
Melbourne, supported by ConnectWeb
New News: Indigenous Media
VENUE: ACMI The Cube FREE
A world where anyone can publish is a place
in which neglected voices can be heard.
Indigenous Australians are some of the
most innovative users of new media tools
and platforms. Luke Pearson (IndigenousX),
Jeremy Geia (NITV) and Brett Leavy (AICA)
discuss what their communities are doing with
new media.
6pm
Inside the London Review of Books
VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1906 TICKETS: $30/27
Enjoy an exclusive insight into the literary world
through the personal and professional stories
of those who write, edit and publish the biggest
names in contemporary literature, ideas,
society, and the arts. Editor Mary-Kay Wilmers,
publisher Nicholas Spice, contributing editor
Jeremy Harding and writer Jacqueline Rose
take us inside the London Review of Books,
Europes leading literary magazine. Chaired by
Sally Heath.
Proudly presented by the Hart Line subfund
of the Australian Communities Foundation
Launch: Warwick Prize Shortlist
VENUE: ACMI The Cube FREE
The Warwick Prize for Writing judges Marina
Warner and Professor Ed Byrne, the
Vice-Chancellor and President of Monash
University, reveal the shortlisted works for
2013. This coveted 25,000 prize is run by the
University of Warwick, England, in association
with Monash University.
Proudly supported by Monash University
Bookwallah: Meet the Bookwallahs
VENUE: Experimedia, State Library of Victoria FREE,
BOOKINGS REQUIRED
Welcome roving writers Annie Zaidi and
Chandrahas Choudhury from India and
Australians Benjamin Law and Kirsty Murray
as Bookwallah arrives down under. Join us for a
glass of chai and some amazing tales from this
travelling celebration of Indias contemporary
literary culture.
Proudly presented by BHP Billiton. Brought
to you by Asialink
9pm
Friday Night Live
VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1907 TICKETS: $25
Start your second Festival weekend with Friday
Night Live! Grab a wine from the Yering Station
pop-up bar and join comic icon Wendy Harmer,
for the our Letterman meets Jon Stewart late-
night talk show, with guests Andrew OHagan,
Shereen El Feki, Michelle Dicinoski and Bike
Snob NYC, plus comedian Sammy J, and live
music from The Blackeyed Susans.
tourists do not go, spending time with nomadic and Indigenous peoples on all continents. They discuss their relationships with the natural world, and explore what happens when we lose touch with nature and wildness.
New News: Getting it Right VENUE: ACMI Cinema 1 CODE: 3904 PAGE: 12
Mossad: The Great Operations VENUE: ACMI Studio 1 CODE: 4904
Israels foremost expert on espionage, Michael Bar-Zohar is also author of more than 35 books including the biography of Mossad Director Isser Harel. Michael joins Leah Garrett to reveal the secrets behind some of the most dangerous missions in the 60-year history of the worlds most respected and enigmatic secret service organisation.
Proudly supported by the Pratt Foundation
Walk: The Yarra VENUE: MWF Box Ofce CODE: 9912 TICKETS: $40 PAGE: 10
4pm
What Difference Does It Make? VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1905
New York music writer Chris Ruen, London- based rock critic Andrew Mueller and Victorian writer and broadcaster Elmo Keep discuss contemporary music criticism; its form, its impact and the challenges it faces from the online environment. Chaired by Penny Modra.
Politics, Power and the PM VENUE: ACMI Cinema 2 CODE: 2901
Anne Summers continues her exploration of power and misogyny with former Victorian Premier Joan Kirner. They join Tanja Kovac to discuss how gendered motifs in literature and history shape our political understanding of women leaders; and the challenges that future women leaders face in light of the barrage of gendered attacks on Australias rst female PM.
Proudly supported by EMILYs List
New News: Citizens Agenda VENUE: ACMI Studio 1 CODE: 4905
This election campaign, University of Melbourne researchers and the team at OurSay have intervened in ten key electorates, using social media to give citizens the chance to ask, and vote for, questions they want the candidates to address. Get a progress report on this world rst project with David Nolan (University of Melbourne), Denis Muller (CAJ), Eyal Halamish (OurSay) and Margaret Simons (CAJ).
Proudly presented by the Centre for Advancing Journalism at the University of Melbourne, supported by ConnectWeb
New News: Indigenous Media VENUE: ACMI The Cube FREE
A world where anyone can publish is a place
in which neglected voices can be heard. Indigenous Australians are some of the most innovative users of new media tools and platforms. Luke Pearson (IndigenousX), Jeremy Geia (NITV) and Brett Leavy (AICA) discuss what their communities are doing with new media.
6pm
Inside the London Review of Books VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1906 TICKETS: $30/27
Enjoy an exclusive insight into the literary world through the personal and professional stories of those who write, edit and publish the biggest names in contemporary literature, ideas, society, and the arts. Editor Mary-Kay Wilmers, publisher Nicholas Spice, contributing editor Jeremy Harding and writer Jacqueline Rose take us inside the London Review of Books, Europes leading literary magazine. Chaired by Sally Heath.
Proudly presented by the Hart Line subfund of the Australian Communities Foundation
Launch: Warwick Prize Shortlist VENUE: ACMI The Cube FREE
The Warwick Prize for Writing judges Marina Warner and Professor Ed Byrne, the Vice-Chancellor and President of Monash University, reveal the shortlisted works for 2013. This coveted 25,000 prize is run by the University of Warwick, England, in association with Monash University.
Proudly supported by Monash University
Bookwallah: Meet the Bookwallahs VENUE: Experimedia, State Library of Victoria FREE, BOOKINGS REQUIRED
Welcome roving writers Annie Zaidi and Chandrahas Choudhury from India and Australians Benjamin Law and Kirsty Murray as Bookwallah arrives down under. Join us for a glass of chai and some amazing tales from this travelling celebration of Indias contemporary literary culture.
Proudly presented by BHP Billiton. Brought to you by Asialink
9pm
Friday Night Live VENUE: Deakin Edge CODE: 1907 TICKETS: $25
Start your second Festival weekend with Friday Night Live! Grab a wine from the Yering Station pop-up bar and join comic icon Wendy Harmer, for the our Letterman meets Jon Stewart late- night talk show, with guests Andrew OHagan, Shereen El Feki, Michelle Dicinoski and Bike Snob NYC, plus comedian Sammy J, and live music from The Blackeyed Susans.
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Age, Melbourne
19 Jul 2013
Supplements, page 19 - 547.77 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 144,277 (MTWTF--)
ID 204135775 PAGE 2 of 2
R e a l s t o r y h i d e s
b e t w e e n t h e l i n e s
S o m e t i m e s t h i n g s p o l i t i c a l
a r e n ' t a l w a y s w h a t t h e y
s e e m w r i t e s S A L L Y Y O U N G
D e s p i t e a l l t h e
m y t h o l o g y ,
j o u r n a l i s t s
h a v e n e v e r
b e e n
d e t a c h e d ,
n e u t r a l
o b s e r v e r s o f
p o l i t i c s
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Sunday Examiner, Launceston TAS
30 Jun 2013, by Sally Young
General News, page 26 - 425.03 cm
Regional - circulation 34,357 (------S)
ID 201223988 PAGE 1 of 2
S a l l y Y o u n g i s a c o l u m n i s t w i t h T h e
A g e , a s s o c i a t e p r o f e s s o r i n p o l i t i c a l
s c i e n c e , a n d r e s e a r c h d i r e c t o r o f
E l e c t i o n W a t c h , b a s e d a t t h e
U n i v e r s i t y o f M e l b o u r n e ' s S c h o o l o f
G o v e r n m e n t .
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Sunday Examiner, Launceston TAS
30 Jun 2013, by Sally Young
General News, page 26 - 425.03 cm
Regional - circulation 34,357 (------S)
ID 201223988 PAGE 2 of 2
Political reporters fail
to tell the whole story
Journalists must
provide more context
to news coverage
because thats what
the public deserves.
R
egardless of what
happenedlast night,
political reporting
shouldalways come
witha warning of
buyer beware.
Readers of newspa-
pers or TVnews viewers usedto be
calledmedia consumers but that
doesnt accurately describe what audi-
ences do today. Audiences have
become more educated, media literate
andmore aware of howpolitics andthe
media intersect. They do more than
just passively consume news media.
As audiences have become more
critical andinquiring, they are increas-
ingly capable of reading betweenthe
lines of news stories. Andthis is vital
because so much of what is important
innews media is never said, or else is
saidso indirectly that the reader has to
NATAGE A024
saidso indirectly that the reader has to
decode it for themselves.
Agoodexample of this happened
last monthwhen there were reports
that two Labor MPs hadpackedup
their ofces as a signof their despair at
Labors chances at the forthcoming
election. That story was prominently
reportedinnewspapers, radio andon
televisionas well as online. But it made
no sense a public confessionof
imminent defeat was so fatalistic and
contrary to normal campaigning
practice.
One of the MPs, Daryl Melham,
holds his seat with a slimmarginof
1.5 per cent so his fears are reasonable,
albeit still unusual in the way they were
sharedwiththe media andpublic. But
the other MP, AlanGrifn, holds his
seat witha margin of more than7 per
cent. That gives hima ghting chance
evenonthe worst reading of current
opinionpolls.
The box-packing revelationwas
reportedinmany media outlets as a
straightforwardaccount of two Labor
MPs despair. But the story didnt
make sense because vital information
was left out of the reporting.
First, the story came about after the
MPs toldat least two different news
organisations they were packing
boxes; it was a deliberate andplanned
media event.
Second, the two MPs involvedwere
supporters of Kevin Rudd, whichsug-
gestedthe third, andbigger, context to
the story: that it was part of the cam-
the story: that it was part of the cam-
paignto promote Ruddby conveying
despair about Julia Gillards leader-
ship. Its telling that it took former
Labor leader Mark Lathamto note this
context publicly and connect the dots
for news audiences, rather thanthe
many journalists who reportedthe
story straight.
The box-packing saga is just one
example of what goes onall the time in
political reporting. Many of the events
only make sense whenyouunderstand
the context, but that part of the puzzle
is sometimes left for audiences to ll in
for themselves.
One of the strong expectations of
journalists inthe past was that they
shouldbe objective andreport the
news straight without any comment-
ary or interpretation. But rigidadher-
ence to those oldmodes of reporting
oftenhidmore thanthey revealed. For
example, if a journalist gave two can-
didates equal space in a story for the
sake of balance eventhoughthe journ-
alist knewone of the candidates was
lying.
These days, audiences expect journ-
alists to tell us what they knowand,
increasingly, to tell us what they think.
Journalists are caught betweenthese
changing views about political report-
ing but they are also caught by the fact
that they are a part of the political
connections they write about.
For everyleadershiptusslethat ever
Political reporters fail
to tell the whole story
Journalists must provide more context to news coverage because thats what the public deserves.
NATAGE A024
R
egardless of what happenedlast night, political reporting shouldalways come witha warning of buyer beware. Readers of newspa- pers or TVnews viewers usedto be calledmedia consumers but that doesnt accurately describe what audi- ences do today. Audiences have become more educated, media literate andmore aware of howpolitics andthe media intersect. They do more than just passively consume news media. As audiences have become more critical andinquiring, they are increas- ingly capable of reading betweenthe lines of news stories. Andthis is vital because so much of what is important innews media is never said, or else is saidso indirectly that the reader has to decode it for themselves. Agoodexample of this happened last monthwhen there were reports that two Labor MPs hadpackedup their ofces as a signof their despair at Labors chances at the forthcoming election. That story was prominently reportedinnewspapers, radio andon televisionas well as online. But it made no sense a public confessionof imminent defeat was so fatalistic and contrary to normal campaigning practice. One of the MPs, Daryl Melham, holds his seat with a slimmarginof 1.5 per cent so his fears are reasonable, albeit still unusual in the way they were sharedwiththe media andpublic. But the other MP, AlanGrifn, holds his seat witha margin of more than7 per cent. That gives hima ghting chance evenonthe worst reading of current opinionpolls. The box-packing revelationwas reportedinmany media outlets as a straightforwardaccount of two Labor MPs despair. But the story didnt make sense because vital information was left out of the reporting. First, the story came about after the MPs toldat least two different news organisations they were packing boxes; it was a deliberate andplanned media event. Second, the two MPs involvedwere
supporters of Kevin Rudd, whichsug- gestedthe third, andbigger, context to the story: that it was part of the cam- paignto promote Ruddby conveying despair about Julia Gillards leader- ship. Its telling that it took former Labor leader Mark Lathamto note this context publicly and connect the dots for news audiences, rather thanthe many journalists who reportedthe story straight. The box-packing saga is just one example of what goes onall the time in political reporting. Many of the events only make sense whenyouunderstand the context, but that part of the puzzle is sometimes left for audiences to ll in for themselves. One of the strong expectations of journalists inthe past was that they shouldbe objective andreport the news straight without any comment- ary or interpretation. But rigidadher- ence to those oldmodes of reporting oftenhidmore thanthey revealed. For example, if a journalist gave two can- didates equal space in a story for the sake of balance eventhoughthe journ- alist knewone of the candidates was lying. These days, audiences expect journ- alists to tell us what they knowand, increasingly, to tell us what they think. Journalists are caught betweenthese changing views about political report- ing but they are also caught by the fact that they are a part of the political connections they write about. For everyleadershiptusslethat ever
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Age, Melbourne
27 Jun 2013
General News, page 24 - 787.38 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 144,277 (MTWTF--)
ID 200743973 PAGE 1 of 2
eventuated(or stalled), thereweresome
journalists tobefoundoneither sideof
thecontest. This maybebecauseof
friendship. It maybebecausethe
reporter has adeeplyheld, and
informed, viewabout whowouldbea
better primeminister. Or it maybethat
oneof the contenders is avaluable
sourcefor the journalists ownreporting.
That connectionseems especially
important incontemporaryjournalism.
Despiteall themythology, journalists
havenever beendetached, neutral
observers of politics. Theydont report
fromthesidelines, theyactivelyshape
events. For example, just byringingup
anMPandaskingif aleadershipcoupis
beingdiscussed, theycanset it in
motion. Or bytheir outlet runninga
campaignonsome particular policyor
advocatingfor one or other leaders, they
caninuencehowpoliticians speakand
act.
This isnt new. AlanReidwas an
inuential Australianpolitical journalist
fromthe1930s tothe1980s. Hewas also
adeeplyinvolvedpolitical player inu-
encingtheoutcomes of leadershiptake-
overs andpolicychanges. But this was
never revealedovertlyinhis articles.
Readers hadtoreadbetweenthelines.
That was prettydifcult inanera
without onlinecommentary, blogs and
alternativenews. Its still difcult nowin
aworldof insiders, secrets and
unrevealedconnections.
Readingbetweenthe lines over the
past fewmonths, andevenyears, I think
I canspot particular reporters whohave
Journalists
have never
been
detached
observers of
politics.
They dont
report from
the
sidelines,
they shape
events.
advocatedfor achangeof Labor leader-
shipor at least for aleadershipcontest.
Their stories usuallybeginandendthe
sameway, withopinionpoll results, and
includeanonymous quotes.
Therewerealsoreporters who
agitatedfor previous contenders
(includingfor Peter CostellowhenJohn
Howardwas Liberal primeminister) but
theRudd-Gillardleadershipcontest has
beenthemost sustained, media-fuelled
leadershipcontest inAustralianpolitical
history. Likemanypolitical stories, from
theoutside, it feels likealot of the
context is missingandhas yet tobetold.
Journalists areconstantlyweighing
upthedemands of their jobtoget the
news (andhavingaccess tosources who
areclosetothe centreof power helps
themachievethat) withtheneeds and
expectations of their audiences. But
their rst allegiancehas tobetotheir
audience, especiallyinanerawhennews
audiences havebeenswitchingoff and
becomingincreasinglyreluctant topay
for news.
Reporters needtobemoreupfront
about thefactors that shapetheir news
coverageandtogive us thecontext that
sheds light onevents. Intodays world,
reporters cannolonger useImjust
tellingastory as acover becausethe
publicsees anddemands somuchmore.
SallyYoungis anAgecolumnist, associate
professor inpolitical science, andresearch
director of ElectionWatch, basedat the
Universityof Melbournes School of
Government.
eventuated(or stalled), thereweresome journalists tobefoundoneither sideof thecontest. This maybebecauseof friendship. It maybebecausethe reporter has adeeplyheld, and informed, viewabout whowouldbea better primeminister. Or it maybethat oneof the contenders is avaluable sourcefor the journalists ownreporting. That connectionseems especially important incontemporaryjournalism. Despiteall themythology, journalists havenever beendetached, neutral observers of politics. Theydont report fromthesidelines, theyactivelyshape events. For example, just byringingup anMPandaskingif aleadershipcoupis beingdiscussed, theycanset it in motion. Or bytheir outlet runninga campaignonsome particular policyor advocatingfor one or other leaders, they caninuencehowpoliticians speakand act. This isnt new. AlanReidwas an inuential Australianpolitical journalist fromthe1930s tothe1980s. Hewas also adeeplyinvolvedpolitical player inu- encingtheoutcomes of leadershiptake- overs andpolicychanges. But this was never revealedovertlyinhis articles. Readers hadtoreadbetweenthelines. That was prettydifcult inanera without onlinecommentary, blogs and alternativenews. Its still difcult nowin aworldof insiders, secrets and unrevealedconnections. Readingbetweenthe lines over the past fewmonths, andevenyears, I think I canspot particular reporters whohave
Journalists have never been detached observers of politics. They dont report from the sidelines, they shape events.
advocatedfor achangeof Labor leader- shipor at least for aleadershipcontest. Their stories usuallybeginandendthe sameway, withopinionpoll results, and includeanonymous quotes. Therewerealsoreporters who agitatedfor previous contenders (includingfor Peter CostellowhenJohn Howardwas Liberal primeminister) but theRudd-Gillardleadershipcontest has beenthemost sustained, media-fuelled leadershipcontest inAustralianpolitical history. Likemanypolitical stories, from theoutside, it feels likealot of the context is missingandhas yet tobetold. Journalists areconstantlyweighing upthedemands of their jobtoget the news (andhavingaccess tosources who areclosetothe centreof power helps themachievethat) withtheneeds and expectations of their audiences. But their rst allegiancehas tobetotheir audience, especiallyinanerawhennews audiences havebeenswitchingoff and becomingincreasinglyreluctant topay for news. Reporters needtobemoreupfront about thefactors that shapetheir news coverageandtogive us thecontext that sheds light onevents. Intodays world, reporters cannolonger useImjust tellingastory as acover becausethe publicsees anddemands somuchmore. SallyYoungis anAgecolumnist, associate professor inpolitical science, andresearch director of ElectionWatch, basedat the Universityof Melbournes School of Government.
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Age, Melbourne
27 Jun 2013
General News, page 24 - 787.38 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 144,277 (MTWTF--)
ID 200743973 PAGE 2 of 2
Whos protecting
the whistleblowers?
Ruth Williams reports, page 8
ILLUSTRATION: SIMON BOSCH
Whos protecting
the whistleblowers?
Ruth Williams reports, page 8
ILLUSTRATION: SIMON BOSCH
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
The Saturday Age, Melbourne
15 Jun 2013, by Ruth Williams
Business News, page 1 - 2,116.91 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 241,029 (-----S-)
ID 198884617 PAGE 1 of 7
W
hen US nurse Laura
Davis first triggered
concerns her
employer, Dialysis
Corporation of
America (DCA), was
overbilling taxpay-
ers for medicines, she was greeted
with puzzlement by her colleagues.
Laura Davis raised concerns . . .
internally, but no one listened to
her, her lawyer, Stephen Haseg-
awa, said last month. They
thought she was a little strange to
care that the government was being
overcharged.
So Davis took matters into her
own hands. After engaging a no-
win, no-fee lawfirm, she pursued
the company on behalf of the state
the right of every would-be
whistleblower in the US.
After hearing her story, the US
Department of Justice stepped in
and joined the lawsuit. Last month,
it announced DCA had agreed to
pay $US7.3 million ($7.7 million) to
settle the action.
And Davis? She collected more
than $US1.3 million for her trouble.
In 2008, the same year Davis
began her legal action, a group of
whistleblowers in Australia contac-
ted the corporate regulator here
about a case of alleged misconduct.
As detailed in a BusinessDay
investigation this month, they tip-
ped off the Australian Securities
and Investments Commission
about the activities of former Com-
monwealth Bank financial planner
Don Nguyen, who was eventually
banned from working in financial
services.
But after sending a detailed,
anonymous fax to ASIC in 2008,
nothing happened. They then
tried sending letters and emails.
The regulator sat on the informa-
tion for 16 months, as the losses
tion for 16 months, as the losses
suffered by the planners clients
mounted. Eventually, the whistle-
blowers went to ASIC in person a
move that finally sparked action.
Their actions helped ensure
CBA clients received more than
$36 million in compensation. But
it left the whistleblowers stressed
and disillusioned.
ASIC has defended its perform-
ance in a large and complex mat-
ter, saying its action against CBAs
planning division was a land-
mark achievement.
But a member of the group, Jeff
Morris, remains unimpressed.
When you choose to tread the
path of the whistleblower, you
knowingly take arms against a sea
of troubles. What you dont expect
though is for the odds against you
to be lengthened by a Monty
Pythonesque regulator.
Morris frustrations are echoed
by other Australian corporate
whistleblowers and their support-
ers, who say the system includ-
ing the whistleblower protections
in place under the Corporations
Act actually discourages action
and inflicts considerable stress on
those who do come forward.
The list of corporate blow-ups
in Australia sparked by or
involving whistleblowers is long
and spectacular Coles Myer-
Yannon, AWB and oil-for-food,
NABs rogue traders, and Multi-
plexs Wembley Stadium debacle
to name a few.
Several of these scandals
sparked significant corporate law
and regulatory reforms.
Yet Morris and his fellow CBA
whistleblowers who dubbed
themselves the ferrets were
just the latest to be left bruised by
their experience.
Often their careers are des-
troyed, no question about it, says
troyed, no question about it, says
Kim Sawyer, from the department
of historical and philosophical
studies at the University of
Melbourne. It means theres such
a disincentive for people to blow
the whistle.
Morris says: It would take an
impossibly good man to be a
whistleblower under the current
system unless they are acting in
ignorance.
A recent example was Brian
Hood, who exposed corruption at
the Reserve Banks currency print-
ing subsidiaries. He was ignored
and victimised after sparking con-
cerns internally, and then forced
out of his job.
He told Melbourne Magistrates
Court last year of the relentless
pressure and stress he was under,
and the friction in his dealings
within the company. I was
becoming increasingly isolated,
he said.
Whistleblowers Australia
national president Cynthia Kardell
says, I dont think people gener-
ally understand that whistleblow-
ing is a harrowing business. It
changes your life forever.
Jeff Simpson, an accountant
who tried to warn the prudential
regulator of the goings-on at HIH
before its spectacular implosion,
says, The people who stand up
just get belted up for it through the
legal process.
Ben Phi, a lawyer with Slater &
Gordon who has worked with
whistleblowers, says, You are
essentially asking private
individuals to step up and be a
hero. It is not conducive to an
environment that encourages
people to come forward and
report wrongdoing.
Protection for public servant
Warning: blowing
the whistle could
mess up your life
In the US, the law is geared to protect and reward informants, but in
Australia, they end up jobless and traumatised, writes Ruth Williams.
W
Warning: blowing
the whistle could
mess up your life
In the US, the law is geared to protect and reward informants, but in
Australia, they end up jobless and traumatised, writes Ruth Williams.
W
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
The Saturday Age, Melbourne
15 Jun 2013, by Ruth Williams
Business News, page 1 - 2,116.91 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 241,029 (-----S-)
ID 198884617 PAGE 2 of 7
whistleblowers has come under
scrutiny in recent years, as the
federal government has edged
forward on promised new laws
that are now before Parliament.
But the protections offered to
private sector whistleblowers
under the Corporations Act were
last updated in 2004, despite the
Rudd government talking up
potential reforms in 2009.
The laws protect whistle-
blowers who come to ASIC from
being sacked, and from criminal
and civil liability including
potential breach of confidentiality
suits.
But in 2009, the Rudd govern-
ment revealed that just four
whistleblowers in five years had
claimed protection and given
evidence to ASIC.
Then corporate law minister
Chris Bowen described the
protection laws as poorly
regarded and rarely used, saying
they contained fundamental
shortcomings.
The laws prevent former
employees, for example, from
claiming protection, along with
business partners and anyone
wishing to act anonymously.
A consultation process was
launched, along with a Treasury
paper that itself criticised the
protections in place especially a
requirement that whistleblowers
must be acting in good faith to
receive protection.
Originally intended to prevent
maliciously fabricated
accusations, this rule exaggerates
the importance of motive,
Treasury argued, and left victim-
ised and aggrieved employees
vulnerable to having their motives
questioned.
Yet it went nowhere. The
consultations did not reach
consensus on the need for or form
of further reforms, a spokesman
for Bernie Ripoll, parliamentary
secretary to the Treasurer, said this
week, adding that there was also
little evidence to suggest that the
existing [framework] was not
operating as intended.
Ben Phi says those who do
come forward are often kept in the
dark about what is happening with
their evidence.
It is, he says, a common com-
plaint, and one voiced by Morris
and the ferrets at CBA.
A further issue is that whistle-
blowers who provide evidence for
class action suits are not protected
at all, leaving them vulnerable to
at all, leaving them vulnerable to
injunctions and being sued for
breach of confidence.
The government and the
opposition are being urged not
only to better protect corporate
whistleblowers, but also to con-
sider paying them. The Australian
Federal Police Association, the Tax
Justice Network, whistleblower
supporters and academic experts
are among those calling for new
laws modelled on the False Claims
Act the US law used by Davis,
and hundreds of other whistle-
blowers, to help recoup billions of
dollars for the US government.
The idea is being looked at by
the Attorney-Generals Depart-
ment.
The [department] is currently
considering the merits of an
Australian scheme modelled on
the US False Claims Act and how
the scheme could best be adapted
for the Australian legal context, a
spokesman said. The department
has undertaken consultation with
key stakeholders regarding this
issue.
The opposition declined to say
whether it would consider new
laws, or whether it believed
reforms were needed to better
serve corporate whistleblowers.
We have made no such
announcement, a spokesman for
shadow attorney-general George
Brandis said. The Coalitions
policies will be announced
between now and the election.
The police association has
been urging both parties to
examine False Claims Act-style
laws since 2010, believing they
could be a valuable new tool to
combat corruption and fraud in
government contracts.
If [fraud] has been carefully
orchestrated in the first place, its
very hard to detect its only
through someone coming forward
that wed even know about it,
national president Jon Hunt-
Sharman says.
People are reluctant to come
forward about private companies
because they risk losing their jobs.
This counteracts that by saying
you might lose your job but you
will be compensated for being
honest.
The Tax Justice Network, a not-
for-profit group that campaigns for
tax reforms, believes similar laws
could crack open significant cases of
tax evasion through the use of
havens and shell companies.
Advocacy and support group
Whistleblowers Australia hopes it
Whistleblowers Australia hopes it
can change the way informers are
perceived and treated. It would
give the whistleblower a far better
image, and it would encourage
people to come forward if they
could be seen not as a grubby
dobber but as someone assisting
an inquiry, Kardell says.
The False Claims Act, created by
AbrahamLincoln during the Civil
War to combat burgeoning fraud
against the government, then bol-
stered in recent decades by presi-
dents Ronald Reagan and Barack
Obama, allows private citizens to
launch legal action alleging fraud
against the state known as a qui
tam suit and to share between
15 per cent and 30 per cent of any
settlement or penalties recouped
as a result.
Crucially, once a whistle-
blowers claim is lodged with the
court, the file is sealed meaning
not even the company or business
accused of wrongdoing knows
about it. The Department of Justice
then examines the case and
decides whether to join the action.
Even if it does not, the whistle-
blower can still proceed alone,
although the chances of success
are much lower.
Most cases settle before they go
to trial.
The laws, supporters say, com-
pensate whistleblowers for their
actions, and recognise that those
actions often come at a significant
financial and personal cost.
It has been lucrative for all
involved, including no-win, no-fee
lawfirms all except the compan-
ies targeted, of course.
A record-breaking $US4.9 bil-
lion was recovered under the act
last year, and 647 qui tam suits
were lodged. Whistleblowers
shared in $US439 million worth of
rewards last year; since the 1986
reforms to the act, they have been
awarded nearly $US4 billion.
According to oft-cited figures, the
False Claims Act recovers $US15
for every $US1 spent on investi-
gations.
The act has been particularly
effective in exposing fraud in
healthcare. Last year, GlaxoSmith-
Kline paid $US1.5 billion to settle
multiple allegations, including that
it promoted drugs for uses not
approved by authorities. Merck
paid $US441 million over claims it
made inaccurate, unsupported or
misleading statements about the
safety of painkiller Vioxx.
Little wonder then that the fed-
whistleblowers has come under scrutiny in recent years, as the federal government has edged forward on promised new laws that are now before Parliament. But the protections offered to private sector whistleblowers under the Corporations Act were last updated in 2004, despite the Rudd government talking up potential reforms in 2009. The laws protect whistle- blowers who come to ASIC from being sacked, and from criminal and civil liability including potential breach of confidentiality suits. But in 2009, the Rudd govern- ment revealed that just four whistleblowers in five years had claimed protection and given evidence to ASIC. Then corporate law minister Chris Bowen described the protection laws as poorly regarded and rarely used, saying they contained fundamental shortcomings. The laws prevent former employees, for example, from claiming protection, along with business partners and anyone wishing to act anonymously. A consultation process was launched, along with a Treasury paper that itself criticised the protections in place especially a requirement that whistleblowers must be acting in good faith to receive protection. Originally intended to prevent maliciously fabricated accusations, this rule exaggerates the importance of motive, Treasury argued, and left victim- ised and aggrieved employees
vulnerable to having their motives questioned. Yet it went nowhere. The consultations did not reach consensus on the need for or form of further reforms, a spokesman for Bernie Ripoll, parliamentary secretary to the Treasurer, said this week, adding that there was also little evidence to suggest that the existing [framework] was not operating as intended. Ben Phi says those who do come forward are often kept in the dark about what is happening with their evidence. It is, he says, a common com- plaint, and one voiced by Morris and the ferrets at CBA. A further issue is that whistle- blowers who provide evidence for class action suits are not protected at all, leaving them vulnerable to injunctions and being sued for breach of confidence. The government and the opposition are being urged not only to better protect corporate whistleblowers, but also to con- sider paying them. The Australian Federal Police Association, the Tax Justice Network, whistleblower supporters and academic experts are among those calling for new laws modelled on the False Claims Act the US law used by Davis, and hundreds of other whistle- blowers, to help recoup billions of dollars for the US government. The idea is being looked at by the Attorney-Generals Depart- ment. The [department] is currently considering the merits of an Australian scheme modelled on the US False Claims Act and how
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
The Saturday Age, Melbourne
15 Jun 2013, by Ruth Williams
Business News, page 1 - 2,116.91 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 241,029 (-----S-)
ID 198884617 PAGE 3 of 7
Little wonder then that the fed-
eral police association and others
want similar laws introduced in
Australia. Hunt-Sharman says
fraud and corruption involving
government contracts is an area
of criminality that we just dont
knowhow big it is. From the exper-
ience in the US, we know they have
recovered billions of dollars.
While the False Claims Act cov-
ers government contracts, the
Dodd-Frank laws passed in 2011
allowfor the Securities and
Exchange Commission to grant
rewards to whistleblowers report-
ing market-related crimes. And the
Internal Revenue Service has a
similar whistleblower scheme for
tax fraud; it led to a notorious
$US104 million payout to former
UBS banker Bradley Birkenfeld
who exposed the Swiss banks tax-
evasion schemes conducted on
behalf of thousands of US clients.
Birkenfeld was himself con-
victed of the conduct he exposed,
and sentenced to 40 months in
prison, sparking debate about
whether he deserved his hefty pay-
out. Yet his actions helped the IRS
recover more than $US5 billion in
back taxes, fines and penalties for
the US government.
It has to be only a question of
time until we have a systemlike
this here, says Thomas Faunce, a
lawand medicine professor at the
Australian National University and
a long-time advocate of a False
Claims Act-type lawin Australia.
But while the US has embraced
it with gusto, the concept of finan-
cially rewarding whistleblowers
remains controversial in Australia,
with the idea having been con-
sidered and dismissed by success-
ive parliamentary inquiries.
More than two decades ago, a
federal inquiry on insider trading
firmly rejected the idea of
firmly rejected the idea of
bounties, finding it was
incompatible with Australian
society and would cast doubt on
the credibility of evidence given by
whistleblowers.
This decision was cited in 2009
by a federal inquiry examining
public sector whistleblower laws,
which heard evidence that rewards
could lead to false or frivolous
claims and send the wrong signals.
This inquiry did not
recommend for or against financial
rewards, instead calling for a focus
on the removal of disincentives
to blow the whistle, and for
whistleblowers contributions to
be recognised in Australias
honours system.
The threat of malicious former
workers selling false information is
one of the most-cited arguments
against offering rewards. But, as Dr
Mark Zirnsak, fromthe Tax Justice
Network, argues, If somebody
makes a baseless claim, they are
not going to get any reward.
The so-called bounties for
whistleblowers have the obvious
downside that it is premised on
whistleblowing being motivated by
monetary reward, rather than the
best interests of the organisation
that they are in, Melbourne
University corporate lawexpert Ian
Ramsay says. But he adds that
those two arent necessarily
inconsistent.
You can have someone
motivated to act in the best
interests of the company when
they are thinking about
whistleblowing, but the financial
incentive can provide additional
incentive.
With the elections looming, it
remains to be seen whether the
work by the Attorney-Generals
Department on the False Claims
Act is taken further by either of the
Act is taken further by either of the
political parties.
NATAGED1 C009
Whats in place is
not good enough.
Simpson believes financial rewards are not the answer. You have got to come back to why people raise the issue its a good thing to do, its a right thing to do, he says. He believes cultural change within companies and society is the best way to make life easier for whistleblowers a term he dislikes. If you can build up a culture where its OK to raise these issues and have themaddressed, then you are going to overcome that problemfor the people who do raise issues. Simpson says while whistleblowing is not a career- enhancing move, it can be rewarding. But if the concept of financially rewarding whistleblowers remains contentious, the idea that a private citizen could effectively act as a quasi-regulator and bring an action themselves as under the Fair Claims Act is another step altogether. The concept is a little bit alien to Australia, Ben Phi acknowledges. But thats not to say that debate should be shut down, he says. Its important to have that debate about what form encouragement for whistleblowers should take, whether its the provision of positive incentives or the removal of disincentives. Whats in place is not good enough.
Whats in place is
not good enough.
BEN PHI, Slater & Gordon
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
The Saturday Age, Melbourne
15 Jun 2013, by Ruth Williams
Business News, page 1 - 2,116.91 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 241,029 (-----S-)
ID 198884617 PAGE 4 of 7
RAISING THE ALARM
The Yannon aair,
Coles Myer, 1995
Philip Bowman was a inancial
director at Coles Myer when he
claimed the companys then chairman
Solomon Lew had used a shelf
company called Yannon to buy shares
in his own investment company,
Premier Investments. Aer ive years
of investigations, the Federal Director
of Public Prosecutions said in 2000
it would not press charges
against Mr Lew.
The Westpac letters scandal, 1991
John McLennan, a former internal auditor with Westpac,
exposed letters from Westpacs lawyers, Allan Allan and
Hemsley, to the bank containing a damning assessment of
ofshore banking malpractices within Westpac subsidiary
Partnership Paciic overhandling of foreign-exchange loans
between 1984 and 1987. The bank retaliated by suing
him wfor breach of copyright and conidentiality.
Westpac settled with him 18 months later.
RAISINGTHEALARM
TheYannonaair,
ColesMyer, 1995
Philip Bowman was a inancial director at Coles Myer whenhe claimedthe companys thenchairman SolomonLewhaduseda shelf companycalledYannontobuyshares inhis owninvestment company, Premier Investments. Aer ive years of investigations, the Federal Director of Public Prosecutions saidin2000 it wouldnot press charges against Mr Lew.
TheWestpaclettersscandal, 1991
JohnMcLennan, a former internal auditor withWestpac, exposedletters fromWestpacs lawyers, AllanAllanand Hemsley, tothe bankcontaining a damning assessment of ofshore banking malpractices withinWestpac subsidiary PartnershipPaciic overhandling of foreign-exchange loans between1984 and1987. The bankretaliatedbysuing himwfor breachof copyright andconidentiality. Westpac settledwithhim18months later.
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
The Saturday Age, Melbourne
15 Jun 2013, by Ruth Williams
Business News, page 1 - 2,116.91 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 241,029 (-----S-)
ID 198884617 PAGE 5 of 7
HIH Insurance collapse, 2000
Jef Simpson was a manager in HIHs inancial services division.
He outlined grievous problems at the insurance company to the
banking regulator nine months before it collapsed owing $5.3 billion.
The accountant said in a 21-page document to the regulator that
the company was breaching minimum solvency provisions.
He claimed in court the regulator, APRA, did not respond.
NABs rogue trader scandal, 2003
Dennis Gentilin and Vanessa McCallum were junior traders who
exposed a $360 million foreign exchange scandal involving rogue
traders led by David Bullen and Luke Dufy. The trading team had
placed shonky deals that falsiied the proit they had made trading
in currency options. The trades made it appear as if NABs foreign
exchange desk had met its proit targets for the 2003 inancial year.
AWB oil-for-food scandal, 2006
Mark Emons, the regional manager of AWBs Middle-East section,
exposed the wheat boards $300 million Iraqi kickbacks scam
during the 2006 Cole Inquiry. He said knowledge of bribes and
kickbacks to Saddam Hussein went to the very top of the Austral-
ian wheat exporter. Mr Emons had helped devise a system for AWB
to pay trucking fees to Iraq, in breach of United Nations sanctions.
AWB claimed the fees back from the UNs oil-for-food fund but, as the
2006 Cole Inquiry found, the fees were bogus and were corrupt
side-payments.
Reserve Bank Securency scandal, 2012
Brian Hood helped level foreign bribery allegations against
senior oi cials of two Reserve Bank subsidiaries. He claimed
long-held concerns about kickbacks were steadfastly ignored
and that the Reserve Bank was aware of them as far
back as 2007.
HIH Insurance collapse, 2000
Jef Simpsonwas a manager inHIHs inancial services division. He outlinedgrievous problems at the insurance companytothe banking regulator nine months before it collapsedowing $5.3 billion. The accountant saidina 21-page document tothe regulator that the companywas breaching minimumsolvencyprovisions. He claimedincourt the regulator, APRA, didnot respond.
NABsroguetrader scandal, 2003
Dennis GentilinandVanessa McCallumwere junior traders who exposeda $360millionforeignexchange scandal involving rogue traders ledby DavidBullenandLuke Dufy. The trading teamhad placedshonkydeals that falsiiedthe proit they hadmade trading incurrencyoptions. The trades made it appear as if NABs foreign exchange deskhadmet its proit targets for the 2003 inancial year.
AWBoil-for-foodscandal, 2006
MarkEmons, the regional manager of AWBs Middle-East section, exposedthe wheat boards $300millionIraqi kickbacks scam during the 2006Cole Inquiry. He saidknowledge of bribes and kickbacks toSaddamHusseinwent tothe verytopof the Austral- ianwheat exporter. Mr Emons hadhelpeddevise a systemfor AWB topaytrucking fees toIraq, inbreach of UnitedNations sanctions. AWBclaimedthe fees back fromthe UNs oil-for-foodfundbut, as the 2006Cole Inquiryfound, the fees were bogus andwere corrupt side-payments.
ReserveBank Securencyscandal, 2012
BrianHoodhelpedlevel foreignbriberyallegations against senior oi cials of twoReserve Banksubsidiaries. He claimed long-heldconcerns about kickbacks were steadfastly ignored andthat the Reserve Bankwas aware of themas far back as 2007.
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
The Saturday Age, Melbourne
15 Jun 2013, by Ruth Williams
Business News, page 1 - 2,116.91 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 241,029 (-----S-)
ID 198884617 PAGE 6 of 7
Let down: Jeff
Morris, a CBA
ferret, was left
frustrated.
Photo: James Brickwood
NATAGED1 C008
Scandal: Multiplexs disastrous Wembley Stadium project was exposed by a whistleblower. Photo: Reuters
Rewarded: Bradley Birkenfeld, received $104 million. Photo: Bloomberg
Let down: Jeff Morris, a CBA ferret, was left frustrated. Photo: James Brickwood
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
The Saturday Age, Melbourne
15 Jun 2013, by Ruth Williams
Business News, page 1 - 2,116.91 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 241,029 (-----S-)
ID 198884617 PAGE 7 of 7
F r a s e r s p i n w o n ' t s t o p A b b o t t
G E R A R D H E N D E R S O N
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Ballarat Courier, Ballarat VIC
12 Jun 2013, by Gerard Henderson
General News, page 19 - 667.96 cm
Regional - circulation 14,955 (MTWTFS-)
ID 198344402 PAGE 1 of 2
G e r a r d H e n d e r s o n i s e x e c u t i v e d i r e c t o r o f
T h e S y d n e y I n s t i t u t e .
n a t i o n a l t i m e s . c o m . a u
C o u R S E i t g B o o K K E E
/ 1 4 A Y B E A P A R T T I M E
n r ) l ' T r T 1 7 ) M i
E i - D D R A 4 A A
A N D Y o U ?
s .
H i l l 1 / 3 7 1 - T
t w i t t e r g m a i r _ a l a n
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Ballarat Courier, Ballarat VIC
12 Jun 2013, by Gerard Henderson
General News, page 19 - 667.96 cm
Regional - circulation 14,955 (MTWTFS-)
ID 198344402 PAGE 2 of 2
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Sydney Morning Herald, Sydney
11 Jun 2013
General News, page 24 - 322.82 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 157,931 (MTWTFS-)
ID 198132042 PAGE 1 of 2
e x e c u t i v e
d i r e c t o r o f T h e S y d n e y I n s t i t u t e .
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Sydney Morning Herald, Sydney
11 Jun 2013
General News, page 24 - 322.82 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 157,931 (MTWTFS-)
ID 198132042 PAGE 2 of 2
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Sunday Herald Sun, Melbourne
09 Jun 2013, by Wendy Tuohy
General News, page 104 - 589.61 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 501,642 (------S)
ID 197921591 PAGE 1 of 2
i f
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Sunday Herald Sun, Melbourne
09 Jun 2013, by Wendy Tuohy
General News, page 104 - 589.61 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 501,642 (------S)
ID 197921591 PAGE 2 of 2
P a r t i e s a g r e e w h e n p r i c e i s r i g h t
C o l l u s i o n b y t h e m a j o r
p a r t i e s o n p o l i t i c a l f u n d i n g
h a s b e e n a l i v e a n d w e l l f o r
t w o d e c a d e s , w r i t e s S A L L Y
Y O U N G .
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Sunday Examiner, Launceston TAS
09 Jun 2013
General News, page 23 - 299.31 cm
Regional - circulation 34,357 (------S)
ID 197931786 PAGE 1 of 2
S a l l y Y o u n g i s a r e g u l a r c o l u m n i s t f o r
T h e A g e a n d a s s o c i a t e p r o f e s s o r o f
p o l i t i c a l s c i e n c e a t t h e U n i v e r s i t y o f
M e l b o u r n e .
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Sunday Examiner, Launceston TAS
09 Jun 2013
General News, page 23 - 299.31 cm
Regional - circulation 34,357 (------S)
ID 197931786 PAGE 2 of 2
Australianpolitics 101:
take the moneyand run
SALLY
YOUNG
Collusion by the
major parties on
political funding has
been alive and well
for two decades.
L
ast week, during the
public funding debacle,
independent MPRob
Oakeshott described
the major parties as
indulging incartel
behaviour. This was a
more apt descriptionthanperhaps
evenhe knew.
The cartel is the basis of an
important theory inpolitical science
about the way parties have beenbehav-
ing since the 1990s. Eighteenyears ago,
two of the top researchers inthe eld
RichardKatz and Peter Mair wrote
anarticle in the journal Party Politics
whichdeclaredThe Emergence of the
Cartel Party.
They arguedthat althoughmajor
NATAGE A044
They arguedthat althoughmajor
parties usually appeared to be staunch
opponents, they actually colludedon
many matters of commoninterest.
Katz andMair noticedespecially how
parties indifferent countries colluded
to use the resources of the state to
ensure their collective survival.
The parties began doing this when
their party memberships dropped
severely at the same time as the costs
of their party activities were increas-
ing especially their media costs.
Last weeks events were part of this
long andinternational pattern. The
ALPandCoalition made a deal to
introduce newadministrative fund-
ing for parties of anextra $1 for every
rst preference vote. This was to be in
additionto the present $2.48 they
receive per vote (the newrate from
July). Thenthey pushedit further with
a cheeky provision to backdate pay-
ments.
Thedeal stretchedthelimits of public
acceptanceof state subsidies becauseit
was sotransparentlybornof self-
interest; thetimingwas awful coming
just beforeanelectionbut after budget
cuts andamoreausterenancial envir-
onment but it alsohappenedinapar-
liamentaryenvironment characterised
byoutspokenindependents andminor
parties whopublicisedtheir distasteand
madetheissue newsworthy. Theresult-
ingpublicbacklashstoppedthis pro-
posal dead, at least for now.
But many deals have beendone suc-
cessfully incrementally, andfar more
quietly inthe past. State subsidies
have beenincreasingly owingto par-
ties andMPs over the past 20years.
One important signof this is the
growthinMPentitlements suchas mail
andcommunications allowances. Being
able to sendpromotional mail to con-
stituents is a major advantage of being
anincumbent. Those postcards, letters,
calendars andfridge-magnets that
arrive inletterboxes (especially inmar-
ginal seats) are animportant part of the
groundwar of political campaigning.
Inthe early 1990s, $5200was the aver-
age amount MPs spent onprintingand
stationery per year, but accordingto the
latest reports fromthe Department of
Finance andDeregulation, MPs spent
anaverage of $107,000eachonofce
administrative costs (whichincludes
printingandcommunications) inthe
2011-12 nancial year. This means upto
a 20-foldincrease.
Other markers of the way Australian
politicians have pushedthe costs of
their permanent campaigningonto
taxpayers are bigger electoral allow-
ances, more staffers for MPs, more
media advisers andlarger media units
wheningovernment, andthe biggest
public perkof all for incumbent political
parties, government advertising.
But fundingfor elections was the
state subsidy highlightedlast week.
Whenit was introducedat the federal
level inAustralia in1984, public funding
was paidat 60 per House of Repre-
Australianpolitics 101:
take the moneyand run
SALLY
YOUNG
NATAGE A044
Collusion by the
major parties on
political funding has
been alive and well
for two decades.
L
ast week, during the public funding debacle, independent MPRob Oakeshott described the major parties as indulging incartel behaviour. This was a more apt descriptionthanperhaps evenhe knew. The cartel is the basis of an important theory inpolitical science about the way parties have beenbehav- ing since the 1990s. Eighteenyears ago, two of the top researchers inthe eld RichardKatz and Peter Mair wrote anarticle in the journal Party Politics whichdeclaredThe Emergence of the Cartel Party. They arguedthat althoughmajor parties usually appeared to be staunch opponents, they actually colludedon many matters of commoninterest. Katz andMair noticedespecially how parties indifferent countries colluded to use the resources of the state to ensure their collective survival. The parties began doing this when their party memberships dropped severely at the same time as the costs of their party activities were increas- ing especially their media costs. Last weeks events were part of this long andinternational pattern. The ALPandCoalition made a deal to introduce newadministrative fund- ing for parties of anextra $1 for every rst preference vote. This was to be in additionto the present $2.48 they receive per vote (the newrate from July). Thenthey pushedit further with a cheeky provision to backdate pay- ments. Thedeal stretchedthelimits of public acceptanceof state subsidies becauseit was sotransparentlybornof self- interest; thetimingwas awful coming just beforeanelectionbut after budget cuts andamoreausterenancial envir- onment but it alsohappenedinapar- liamentaryenvironment characterised byoutspokenindependents andminor parties whopublicisedtheir distasteand madetheissue newsworthy. Theresult- ingpublicbacklashstoppedthis pro- posal dead, at least for now. But many deals have beendone suc-
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Age, Melbourne
05 Jun 2013, by Sally Young
General News, page 44 - 813.17 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 144,277 (MTWTF--)
ID 197223574 PAGE 1 of 2
sentatives vote and30 per Senate vote.
That amount was basedonthe cost of a
standard30 postage stampper elector
per year.
The rate per vote is now$2.48for
bothHouse of Representatives and
Senate votes (whichbuys about four
stamps intodays money). The amount
of public fundingpaidout in2010was
nearly seventimes that paidout in1984.
The public fundinglegislationhad
goodintentions to breakthe nexus
betweenmoney andpolitics andstop
private money owing into the system,
but it didnt achieve those goals because
the legislationdidnt combine public
fundingwitheither caps onspendingor
limits onprivate donations. So private
donations were not curtailedbut
insteadgrewenormously.
At the federal level, Australian
political parties insteadset upa highly
unusual systeminwhichthey receive
public fundingwithno restrictions on
howthey canspendit, they canthen
still raise as muchprivate money as
they like, andspendit all without limit
duringanelection.
We give public fundingbut dont ask
for anythinginreturn. Thats not the
way it is done inother countries. Even
inthe US, the home of free-market
political fund-raising, if a presidential
candidate accepts public fundingfor
their electioncampaign, they have to
agree not to raise private contributions
andnot to spendmore thanthe amount
of public funds they receive.
We give
public
funding
but dont
ask for
anything
in return.
Elsewhere parties have to do
somethingwiththeir funding,
somethingthat will benet the broader
community or improve the conduct of
politics. For example, inthe UKthere
are grants for parties that are givenfor
policy development. Other countries
give fundingfor activities that promote
the political participationof young
people or reinvigorate their party
memberships or to conduct socio-
political research.
InAustralia, we dont demandthe
parties use public money to expand
their memberships, buildlinks withthe
community or researchbetter policies.
We dont evenaskthemto limit the
amount of private money they raise. We
just give themextra money for more
advertisinganddirect mail.
Ina systemlike this, political parties
that rail against biggovernment are
shamelessly hypocritical. They dont
want others to be reliant onwelfare or
public handouts but are heavily so
themselves.
Katz andMair didnt mention
Australia whenthey wrote about cartel
parties inthe mid-1990s. They focused
onwesternEurope. But the thesis has
beenalive andwell inAustralia for two
decades andit was onshowinearnest
last week. The parties hada setbackbut
we havent seenthe endof it.
SallyYoungis a regular columnist for The
Ageandassociateprofessor of political
scienceat theUniversity of Melbourne.
P
h
o
t
o
:
A
F
R
sentatives vote and30 per Senate vote. That amount was basedonthe cost of a standard30 postage stampper elector per year. The rate per vote is now$2.48for bothHouse of Representatives and Senate votes (whichbuys about four stamps intodays money). The amount of public fundingpaidout in2010was nearly seventimes that paidout in1984. The public fundinglegislationhad goodintentions to breakthe nexus betweenmoney andpolitics andstop private money owing into the system, but it didnt achieve those goals because the legislationdidnt combine public fundingwitheither caps onspendingor limits onprivate donations. So private donations were not curtailedbut insteadgrewenormously. At the federal level, Australian political parties insteadset upa highly unusual systeminwhichthey receive public fundingwithnorestrictions on howthey canspendit, they canthen still raise as muchprivate money as they like, andspendit all without limit duringanelection. We give public fundingbut dont ask for anythinginreturn. Thats not the way it is done inother countries. Even inthe US, the home of free-market political fund-raising, if a presidential candidate accepts public fundingfor their electioncampaign, they have to agree not to raise private contributions andnot to spendmore thanthe amount of public funds they receive.
We give
public
funding
but dont
ask for
anything
in return.
Elsewhere parties have to do somethingwiththeir funding, somethingthat will benet the broader community or improve the conduct of politics. For example, inthe UKthere are grants for parties that are givenfor policy development. Other countries give fundingfor activities that promote the political participationof young people or reinvigorate their party memberships or to conduct socio- political research. InAustralia, we dont demandthe parties use public money to expand their memberships, buildlinks withthe community or researchbetter policies. We dont evenaskthemto limit the amount of private money they raise. We just give themextra money for more advertisinganddirect mail. Ina systemlike this, political parties that rail against biggovernment are shamelessly hypocritical. They dont want others to be reliant onwelfare or public handouts but are heavily so themselves. Katz andMair didnt mention Australia whenthey wrote about cartel parties inthe mid-1990s. They focused onwesternEurope. But the thesis has beenalive andwell inAustralia for two decades andit was onshowinearnest last week. The parties hada setbackbut we havent seenthe endof it.
SallyYoungis a regular columnist for The Ageandassociateprofessor of political scienceat theUniversity of Melbourne.
back
Copyright Agency Ltd (CAL)
licensed copy
Age, Melbourne
05 Jun 2013, by Sally Young
General News, page 44 - 813.17 cm
Capital City Daily - circulation 144,277 (MTWTF--)
ID 197223574 PAGE 2 of 2