Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 2 3 4
Audience..................................................................................................................................... 2 HP-UX Virtual Partitions Overview................................................................................................... 2 Virtual Partition Monitor and Database Relationship ......................................................................... 2 Operating System to vPar relationship ............................................................................................ 3 4.1 vPars A.01.xx, A.02.xx, and A.03.xx on HP-UX 11iV1 ............................................................. 3 4.2 vPars A.04.xx on HP-UX 11iV2............................................................................................... 3 Virtual Partition Architecture and Firmware ...................................................................................... 3 Upgrading vPars and/or the HP-UX OS .......................................................................................... 4 6.1 Initial Virtual Partition Deployment ........................................................................................... 4 6.2 Upgrading Operating System and/or Virtual Partition Versions .................................................. 5 6.2.1 Upgrading vPars Only ..................................................................................................... 5 6.2.2 Upgrading the OS only .................................................................................................... 5 6.2.3 Upgrading both vPars and OS .......................................................................................... 5 Customer Impact .......................................................................................................................... 5 7.1 Solution Design (potential) Issues............................................................................................. 5 7.1.1 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 6 7.2 Proposed Solution Design....................................................................................................... 7 7.2.1 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 7 For More Information .................................................................................................................... 9
5 6
Figure 1 Monitor to Database Relationship ..................................................................................3 Figure 2 vPar PA Architecture ....................................................................................................4 Figure 3 vPar IA Architecture .....................................................................................................4 Figure 4 Typical Customer Design ..............................................................................................6 Figure 5 Proposed Customer Design ...........................................................................................7
1 Audience
This white paper is intended for individuals who are interested in using HP-UX virtual partitions (vPars) to consolidate multiple systems onto a single system or hard partition. This document explains the issues around the mixing of different vPar versions and HP-UX Operating System versions in a vPars environment. This paper assumes that the reader has a good knowledge of the HP-UX operating system and is familiar with the concepts of vPars.
For each system in the case of supported legacy non-cell based systems and each hard partition in the case of supported cell based systems, there is only one copy of the vPar monitor running and one copy of the vPar database loaded into memory. Further, each vPar boot disk contains a copy of the monitor and database such that at initial load time, the monitor may be loaded from any of the vPar boot disks (usually the primary partition boot disk). The database which also resides on every vPar boot disk is then read by the monitor and loaded into memory. Once one or more vPars are running, the vpard daemon synchronizes every live disk copy of the database with the one residing in memory. Figure 1 shows the relationship of the Monitor and Database.
2 of 9
3 of 9
Figure 3 vPar IA Architecture The supported firmware versions are listed in the vPar Ordering and Configuring guide.
4 of 9
firmware, and OS will be in a supported configuration and vPars is then installed. In this case, the version of vPars must be supported with the existing configuration.
7 Customer Impact
Now that we have established the rules for mixing vPar versions and OS versions, how this affects customer solutions will now be discussed.
5 of 9
Figure 4 Typical Customer Design Looking back at Section 6 above, lets see how upgrading either vPars or the OS impacts this design. From Section 6.2.1 just the version of vPars in each nPar can be upgraded as long as the version stays at the A.03.xx release stream (i.e. A.03.01, A.03.02, A.03.03, etc). And each nPars vPar version can be upgraded independently of the other nPars. From Section 6.2.2 just the release of the OS in each vPar can be upgraded as long as the release stays at the 11iV1 release stream (i.e. Fusion Releases). Section 6.2.3 proves to be the difficult upgrade. In this example, all of the vPars are running production and/or critical applications. If either a major release upgrade of the OS version (i.e. from 11iV1 to 11iV2) or a major release upgrade of the vPar software (i.e. from A.03 to A.04) is required, then BOTH the OS and vPars must be upgraded at the same time. Remember, vPars A.03 cant run on 11iV2 and vPars A.04 cant run on 11iV1. The problem with the design in Figure 4 is that the customer has not left any Test and Development space to try out the new OS and vPars upgraded versions within the complex.
7.1.1 Summary
The customer has fully standardized on vPars A.03.xx and HP-UX 11iV1 and utilized the entire system for business applications. This leads to the following issues: The full capacity of the system is dedicated to Business needs and is virtualized The customer doesnt have the capacity now, or a parallel System for QA / Dev The customer incorrectly assumed vPars A.03.xx could support HP-UX 11iV1 and HP-UX 11iV2 or vPars A.04.xx could run HP-UX 11iV1 The customer didnt understand that only one major version of vPars can run in a nPar In this environment there is no place to test upgrades before Business implementation: Customers are now submitting escalations to HP to get vPars A.03.xx to support HP-UX 11iV2 or A.04.xx to support HP-UX 11iV1 Upgrades must be tested on a separate system
6 of 9
Figure 5 Proposed Customer Design Looking back at Section 6 above, lets see how upgrading either vPars or the OS impacts this design. From Section 6.2.1 just the version of vPars in nPar1 and nPar3 can be upgraded as long as the version stays at the A.03.xx release stream (i.e. A.03.01, A.03.02, A.03.03, etc) in nPar1 and the version stays at the A.04.xx release stream (i.e. A.04.01, A.04.02, etc) in nPar3. In addition, each nPars vPar version can be upgraded independently of the other nPars. From Section 6.2.2 just the release of the OS in each vPar can be upgraded as long as the release stays at the 11iV1 release stream (i.e. Fusion Releases) in nPar1 and the release stays at the 11iV2 release stream (i.e. Fusion Releases) in nPar3. In this example, all of the vPars are not running production and/or critical applications; specifically nPar3 is QA/DEV. Again, if either a major release upgrade of the OS version (i.e. from 11iV1 to 11iV2) or a major release upgrade of the vPar software (i.e. from A.03 to A.04) is required, then BOTH the OS and vPars must be upgraded at the same time. However, with the design in Figure 4 the customer has left a QA and Development space to try out the new OS and vPars upgraded versions. This allows the customer to try out the new versions on the same system without impacting the other hard partitions or having to utilize another system.
7.2.1 Summary
The customer has not fully standardized on vPars A.03.xx and HP-UX 11iV1 and has not utilized the entire system for business and/or critical applications. This leads to the following benefits: The customer deployment is based on Pre-Sales and vPars EAP data vPars is not present in all nPars Main Business Critical Application in one large nPar Customer is mixing vPars and non-vPars environments on large systems An nPar is reserved for Quality and Development of new OS, Patches and vPar versions
7 of 9
This configuration provides customers with QA/Dev nPar they can use to test vPar A.03.xx before upgrade to A.04.xx: Customers have the flexibility to switch to a newly created nPar/vPar when setup and testing are complete
8 of 9
2005 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. The only warranties for HP products and services are set forth in the express warranty statements accompanying such products and services. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting an additional warranty. HP shall not be liable for technical or editorial errors or omissions contained herein. Itanium is a trademark or registered trademark of Intel Corporation in the U.S. and other countries and is used under license. XXXX-XXXXEN, 10/2005
9 of 9